Reposted by Sammy
For more than 160 uninterrupted years, federal law has prohibited troops wherever an election is held.
The Insurrection Act’s grant of authority to the president does not supersede Section 592’s prohibition on armed people at the polls, writes @lorenvoss.bsky.social and @nkorpett.bsky.social.
lawfaremedia.org
The Insurrection Act Is No Exception to the Troops-at-Polls Ban
Congress restricted military deployments to election sites, even when a broader deployment authority might otherwise apply.
![‘Whites are the ones who brought blacks out of Africa and created the conditions where they
failed to develop a culture of homework, respect for the law, and strong nuclear families. So
we’ll need to take increasingly extreme measures to fix the ‘culture’ that produces bad outcomes
in certain groups. Again, we’re back to wokeism.’
‘While race realism [a term used as an alternative to hereditarianism] may be less dangerous
than we think, the DEI devil may be more dangerous. Brainwashing generations of children to
believe that intractable group differences are the fault of a particular race (whites) that will
soon be a shrinking minority can end in a dark place. … White children are brainwashed to
despise themselves because of their skin color. Anecdotally, white children are sometimes
driven to transgenderism in an attempt to escape the shameful status of oppressor.’](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:refbwihhzcqqfulwhcou44sr/bafkreigsnafwlpzyxmjxi5xlati6uw76chda7kma7asd547v57p7gyhneq)
