Sign in

Dario Paape

@dariopaape.eurosky.social
175 followers 148 following 146 posts

psycholinguistics @ Potsdam, Germany d-paape.github.io/?ref=bsky

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Dario Paape
Shravan Vasishth @shravanvasishth.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Applications are open for the 2027 summer school on statistical methods for linguistics and psychology: All details are here: smlp.science
smlp.science
The Eleventh Summer School on Statistical Methods for Linguistics and Psychology
01717
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 25/09/2026
Updated preprint with @tallinzen.bsky.social and @shravanvasishth.bsky.social : "LLM surprisal is necessary but not sufficient to capture English garden-path effects: Evidence from joint latent modeling of reading paradigms" arxiv.org/abs/2602.04489
032
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 05/09/2026
010
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 10/08/2026
Ist Frische Gel so was wie Gute Käse?
010
Reposted by Dario Paape
depths of wikipedia @depthsofwikipedia.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
not to be confused with quesadilla
Ķ
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused with Quesadilla.
Ķ (k-cedilla) is the 17th letter of the Latvian alphabet.
5581061803
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 27/07/2026
Deutsche pão de queijo
000
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 26/07/2026
Ah, always a pleasure to hear that universal icebreaker of the International Fraternity of Ostensibly Heterosexual Men: "Germany? Beautiful women! But football?" *makes so-so gesture with hand*
000
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 26/07/2026
Come to Rio for #CogSci2026, stay for the hot dog with peas, corn, quail eggs, raisins and tiny fries on it.
060
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 18/07/2026
Rewatched Ghibli's Tales from Earthsea with the kids yesterday. I hated it when I saw it in the cinema 20 years ago. But turns out it's actually... not that bad?I mean, it's still confusing and the tone is... bleak, but artistically it's still quite enchanting. Kinda Ghibli's The Black Cauldron.
120
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 15/07/2026
Who's attending #CogSci2026 in Rio next week? 🇧🇷 I will be presenting joint work with @shravanvasishth.bsky.social and @tallinzen.bsky.social on LLM surprisal in garden-path sentences on Friday! arxiv.org/abs/2602.04489
0174
Reposted by Dario Paape
Better Things Are Possible @internethippo.bsky.social · 11/06/2026
If I were a coach I would occasionally say to the referees "You're right we did commit a foul there" instead of arguing all the time. This builds my credibility as an objective interlocutor in their minds
16144382
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 08/06/2026
Hmm, the specificity of "eye ointment for use on the eye" makes me wonder what other kinds of eye ointments there are... ? Maybe ointments made *from* eyes for use on one's... ears?
010
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 04/06/2026
Is dit jetze Dialekt oder ham die einfach dit n fajessen
110
Reposted by Dario Paape
Hadas Weiss @hadas.bsky.social · 02/06/2026
academics trying to save the humanities
1126766
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 22/05/2026
Being deeply interested in What The Hell Is Wrong With Germany, the Miscikowski et al. study where we have the highest level of "narcissistic rivalry" in their sample (doi.org/10.1080/1529...) made me wonder how this shaped me, in the sense that I've learned to abhor competition and zero-sum games.
120
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 20/05/2026
Wondering if we can learn something by looking at different cultures' equivalents of the idiom "It's not rocket science". German has "It's not witchcraft" - different because it evokes something arcane/irrational rather than just "very complicated". What does your language use? #linguistics
5134
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 03/05/2026
Schafft es jemand, die Anzahl der möglichen syntaktischen Analysen zu zählen?
100
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 01/05/2026
Small experiment: Which of the following statements makes more sense to you? A) "One dog year is/equals seven human years" or B) "One human year is/equals seven dog years", or C) both are fine. #linguistics
750
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 30/04/2026
One thing I love about the modern world is that it makes garden paths so much more interesting when common sense isn't useful anymore even as a rough guide to wtf happened. (Source: BBC) #linguistics
0166
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 21/04/2026
Currently preparing slides for my science slam that will ask the REAL questions
050
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 17/04/2026
Chat, what do we know about agreement attraction from inside NN compounds? Or maybe something else is happening here. AA on possessives is always interesting to me because it's the kind of error that I subjectively feel I would never conceivably make, because it just feels so... wrong.
010
Reposted by Dario Paape
J. L. Westover @mrlovenstein.bsky.social · 06/04/2026
10103482716
Reposted by Dario Paape
Suyog Chandramouli @suyoghc.bsky.social · 06/04/2026
Excited to share that @shravanvasishth.bsky.social will be visiting @princeton.edu virtually tomorrow (Tuesday, April 7) 🗣️ Talk: "Can Context Eliminate Garden-Pathing? A Bayesian Approach" 12:00 PM ET 🛠️Workshop: "Theory-Informed Model Specification" 11:00 AM ET The zoom is open to all!
252
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 04/04/2026
Das Schild or der Schild? Wrong answers only. #linguistics
010
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 31/03/2026
New preprint: NPI and depth charge illusions in Pythia LLMs of different sizes and at different training checkpoints. NPI illusion goes away but depth charge illusion stays or even gets stronger. Amazingly for me, I come out in favor of... construction grammar? arxiv.org/abs/2603.27855
arxiv.org
What can LLMs tell us about the mechanisms behind polarity illusions in humans? Experiments across model scales and training steps
I use the Pythia scaling suite (Biderman et al. 2023) to investigate if and how two well-known polarity illusions, the NPI illusion and the depth charge illusion, arise in LLMs. The NPI illusion becom...
061
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 17/02/2026
New open-access paper with @shravanvasishth.bsky.social: "Context ameliorates but does not eliminate garden-pathing: Novel insights from latent-process modeling" doi.org/10.1016/j.jm...
doi.org
Redirecting
041
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 05/02/2026
New preprint with @tallinzen.bsky.social and @shravanvasishth.bsky.social: We jointly model reading data from four tasks (SPR, BSPR, eye tracking, Maze) with a latent-process mixture, and find that it outperforms LLM surprisal in terms of predictive fit: arxiv.org/abs/2602.04489
071
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 28/01/2026
What do people think of this construction? I'm not a native speaker of English, but for me "it" can't refer back to "WB-57". #linguistics
390
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 23/01/2026
Shoutout to the person who added this passive-aggressive-ish comment to the CogSci LaTeX template
050
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 21/01/2026
PSA: We're moving the deadline for submissions to the JML special issue on nonveridical language comprehension (www.sciencedirect.com/special-issu...), co-guest-edited by @golfwriterkiel.bsky.social and me, back to end of February! We're looking forward to many interesting contributions!
030
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 23/12/2025
Is it just me or does the chorus of Last Christmas not make sense? X gives their heart to Y, and on the very next day, Y gives "it" away, "it" presumably being X's heart. So... is X now in love with some unspecified person Z or does "it" have a different antecedent here somehow? #linguistics
371
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 22/12/2025
Heute in "Rassismus oder Klammerparadox"?
030
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 19/12/2025
I think "(in)tolerance towards coordination of unlike things" is probably a good indicator of general linguistic pedantry in a person. Here we have "snow and slipperiness removal", which I personally don't feel good about. #linguistics
030
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 13/11/2025
Today's random insight during a lab meeting on visual world experiments was that there's probably a deeper reason why clip art is perfect for psychology experiments. Even found a paper arguing that clip art is "the visual representation of common sense categories": doi.org/10.1177/1470...
doi.org
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
120
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 12/11/2025
Geht es nur mir so oder ist das seltsam, weil es sich anhört, als wäre er schon Manager? (Quelle: FAZ)
010
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 05/11/2025
Gut, dass es Dünger extra für Qualitätsblumen gibt
010
Reposted by Dario Paape
Lara Orphal @laraorphal.bsky.social · 30/10/2025
Actually, we recently spooked away some ghosts with warnings and other scary things (with @semihaktepe.bsky.social)
174
Reposted by Dario Paape
M.J. Crockett @mjcrockett.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
Can AI simulations of human research participants advance cognitive science? In @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social, @lmesseri.bsky.social & I analyze this vision. We show how “AI Surrogates” entrench practices that limit the generalizability of cognitive science while aspiring to do the opposite. 1/
sciencedirect.com
AI Surrogates and illusions of generalizability in cognitive science
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have generated enthusiasm for using AI simulations of human research participants to generate new know…
9288119
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 13/10/2025
Making Apfelstrudel and the recipe says to adjust the amount of breadcrumbs according to "how much the butter can soak up". Am I having a stroke or should it be the other way around? This even appears twice in the recipe. #linguistics
120
Reposted by Dario Paape
Manoel Horta Ribeiro @manoelhortaribeiro.bsky.social · 05/10/2025
Computer Science is no longer just about building systems or proving theorems--it's about observation and experiments. In my latest blog post, I argue it’s time we had our own "Econometrics," a discipline devoted to empirical rigor. doomscrollingbabel.manoel.xyz/p/the-missin...
2319
Reposted by Dario Paape
jenbanim @jenbanim.mastodo.neoliber.al.ap.brid.gy · 20/09/2025
If you mash the audio example buttons on the wikipedia page for the IPA vowel sounds you can create a choir of mildly disgusted men
19938440
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 21/09/2025
So if someone is "X poor" and you promise to make them "X rich", is X the difference between their $$$ and some average, and you're promising to basically flip the sign of that difference? I want to understand precisely what the bear is offering here. #linguistics
330
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 14/09/2025
Can we accurately model reading time patterns by assuming that readers predict upcoming words, but that their memory of the sentence context that the prediction is based on is imperfect? New preprint led by Johan Hennert: osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io
OSF
010
Reposted by Dario Paape
Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 06/09/2025
Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia: doi.org/10.5281/zeno... We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity. 1/n
Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues.Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe.Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles
11341472054
Reposted by Dario Paape
Ed Zitron @edzitron.com · 25/08/2025
Newsletter: My 16,000 word opus - How To Argue With An AI Booster, a comprehensive guide to arguing with AI boosters, addressing both their bad faith debate style and their specific (and flimsy) arguments as to why generative AI is the future. www.wheresyoured.at/how-to-argue...
wheresyoured.at
How To Argue With An AI Booster
Editor's Note: For those of you reading via email, I recommend opening this in a browser so you can use the Table of Contents. This is my longest newsletter - a 16,000-word-long opus - and if you like...
652435721
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 12/08/2025
Inscrutability of reference still going strong. I was totally assuming that the little guy in the picture was the nurdle and immediately went "How dare you!" #linguistics
0101
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 05/08/2025
New preprint with @shravanvasishth.bsky.social: We use a computational model to look at how linguistic context affects first-pass attachment and reanalysis. Assuming a tripartite mixture of reanalyzed, non-reanalyzed and inattentive trials outperforms LLM surprisal. lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/009...
lingbuzz.net
Context ameliorates but does not eliminate garden-pathing: Novel insights from latent-process modeling - lingbuzz/009217
A theoretically important claim in psycholinguistics is that in English, linguistic context largely eliminates garden-path effects in temporary complement clause/relative clause ambiguities (e.g., Alt...
0101
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 04/08/2025
There‘s probably a reason that these guys aren‘t placed right next to Hagebuttentee, Kamillentee and Pfefferminztee #linguistics
010
Dario Paape @dariopaape.eurosky.social · 02/08/2025
I think this is the first time ever that I've seen this bracketing in the wild. [[pet [dog and cat]] poo] #linguistics
150
Reposted by Dario Paape
Melanie Mitchell @melaniemitchell.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
In a stunning moment of self-delusion, the Wall Street Journal headline writers admitted that they don't know how LLM chatbots work.
432936468