iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 30/04/2024

why don't replicators replicate themselves or each other or areas they have experience and expertise in? wouldn't it lead to better outcomes?

021

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 21/08/2026

bluesky is that place where you see the worst ideas get the most attention, somehow crayz

000

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 30/03/2024

Many Labs 4 preregistered both 60 and 80 as minimum participant cut offs. when it came time to report the results, 60p cut off had better results for replicators, so that is the one that got reported.. what does that mean?

021

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 08/02/2026

Imagine having argued against AI like a year ago :D

000

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Richard D. Morey @richarddmorey.bsky.social · 08/08/2025

Notice that *small* p values --- those with high evidential weight --- are mapped to 0, and values near the significance criterion are mapped to arbitrarily large values. This means that positive evidence is destroyed, and negative evidence is given very heavy weight! Example: suppose you... 5/?

2132

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Stuart Watt @morungos.bsky.social · 01/01/2026

I guessed you’d bring this up. You should read more about replication. Scientists really don’t do it, you know. They never did, in the real world. journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1...

journals.sagepub.com

Replication and Mere Replication - Michael Mulkay, G. Nigel Gilbert, 1986

1122

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 25/12/2025

@elisabethbik.bsky.social when asked cant provide any ethical approval for her most famous 2016 study, or any information on her false positive rate no open analysis scripts, no open data, no science @nature.com @science.org @einsteinberlin.bsky.social @plos.org @plosbiology.org @error.reviews

000

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 24/12/2025

I am sure @science.org @cos.io @nature.com @currentbiology.bsky.social @plosbiology.org also have an interest in your setting an example in this regard and making clear that you did not actually get ethical approval for the study, and you did not take any precautions about false positives?

111

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 24/12/2025

can you link to the ethical approval for your 2016, most famous study? Id also like information on your false + rate, and what steps you take to safeguard people who might be falsely accused. I assume you have this material prepared, since it would be needed for any real ethics approval .. ?

311

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 17/11/2025

these are hilarious but also the BIG RED SIGN to buy your farm in the hills because its over

010

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Paolo Crosetto @paolocrosetto.bsky.social · 12/11/2025

What is the most profitable industry in the world, this side of the law? Not oil, not IT, not pharma. It's *scientific publishing*. We call this the Drain of Scientific Publishing. Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820 Background: doi.org/10.1162/qss_... Thread @markhanson.fediscience.org.ap.brid.gy 👇

8334238

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Ted Underwood @tedunderwood.com · 04/11/2025

Wrote a short piece arguing that higher ed must help steer AI. TLDR: If we outsource this to tech, we outsource our whole business. But rejectionism is basically stalling. If we want to survive, schools themselves must proactively shape AI for education & research. [1/6, unpaywalled at 5/6] +

chronicle.com

Opinion | AI Is the Future. Higher Ed Should Shape It.

If we want to stay at the forefront of knowledge production, we must fit technology to our needs.

1326473

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 04/11/2025

in 20 years the field is going to see the replicability movement for the mistake it was, and those who spent their time will just be forgotten.

100

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 04/11/2025

@minzlicht.bsky.social the longer you delay the QReP paper from coming out the worse off you and yours are going to look when it does come out - and the more years you and yours will have wasted. we have an empirical paper coming that handles all your 'criticisms' e.g., no expertise, no piloting

000

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 03/11/2025

what you dummies look like claiming ai is bad and etc

000

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 28/10/2025

Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb

000

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Molly White @molly.wiki · 28/10/2025

fixed that for you

CNBC headline: "Elon Musk’s AI-powered Wikipedia competitor goes live after a rocky launch". I've struck through "AI-powered" in red, and replaced it with "Wikipedia-powered"

Grokipedia attribution text: "The content is adapted from Wikipedia, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License."

6643831053

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 28/10/2025

when real money is on the line the truth comes out

000

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 26/10/2025

dont forget retweeting your own tweets 10 - 15 times and then retweeting everyone who makes a comment on your tweet

031

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 24/10/2025

you mean concentration camps?

262

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Nathan Kalman-Lamb @nkalamb.bsky.social · 13/10/2025

Front page of Scottish newspaper The National today.

4590313534

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 11/10/2025

by all means, it is better for me if you do not use ai :D

010

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Mar Hicks @histoftech.bsky.social · 11/10/2025

When the notoriously leftwing institution of the <checks notes> papacy is telling your country it’s gone too far right

113825

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Mike Buckbee @buckbee.bsky.social · 11/10/2025

article's conclusion is both inspiring and unsettling: if you're making strategic plans based on linear projections of AI capabilities, you're probably wrong. The only certainty is that things will change faster than you think. My takeaway: Instead of trying to predict exactly where AI search is-

julian.ac

Failing to Understand the Exponential, Again

Posts and writings by Julian Schrittwieser

111

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Mike Buckbee @buckbee.bsky.social · 11/10/2025

Julian Schrittwieser wrote a piece that perfectly captures something I've been wrestling with: people (including me) keep underestimating exponential AI progress. His key point: our brains are wired for linear thinking. When something improves 10% year over year, we can mentally project that-

231

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Ron Filipkowski @ronfilipkowski.bsky.social · 11/10/2025

Trump got a Covid vaccine today.

86148511678

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

The Tennessee Holler @thetnholler.bsky.social · 10/10/2025

“The explosion was felt 15 miles away”

1291928700

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 10/10/2025

nobody has any real objections, just name calling

200

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 09/10/2025

How to people feel about Sigma Xi? research honor society

000

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Jo Wolff @jowolff.bsky.social · 05/10/2025

I wouldn’t normally endorse AI prompts but these are indeed essential for all academics.

610336

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Hannah Lönneker @hloenneker.bsky.social · 03/09/2025

As part of the Pilot Reporting Task Force, founded at @improvingpsych.org conference 2023, I would like to share a preprint with you: osf.io/preprints/ps.... We are looking for feedback on our perspective piece, promoting more transparency in the reporting of piloting in psychological science. 1/4

osf.io

OSF

1119

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 27/07/2025

is it just me or did the open science thing really slow down?

100

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Kalwant Bhopal @kalwantbhopal.bsky.social · 23/07/2025

Free Palestine.

273

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Joe Bak-Coleman @jbakcoleman.bsky.social · 12/06/2025

A ten year investigation to prove this is indeed the gold standard was retracted for many things, including overstating the causal support. *The science supporting the EOs gold standard was retracted!* www.nature.com/articles/s41...

nature.com

RETRACTED ARTICLE: High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable - Nature Human Behaviour

Four labs discovered and replicated 16 novel findings with practices such as preregistration, large sample sizes and replication fidelity. Their findings suggest that with best practices, high replica...

281

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 12/06/2025

snap - whole replicability movement falling down soon #aspredicted

020

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 11/06/2025

“So you’re saying we can’t work on science reform at all” No. I have being working on this for a decade and continue to do so. I’m saying don’t make a name for yourself by lying about the scope of the problem using ridiculous models that require absurd assumptions to get off the ground.

Why Most Published Research Findings
Are False
John P A loannidis

713915

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

David Slack @slack2thefuture.bsky.social · 26/05/2025

If your business model doesn’t work without breaking the law, then you’re not in business. You’re in organized crime.

10084802681

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences @pnas.org · 26/05/2025

By playing rhythmic audio to comatose patients, then skipping a beat, researchers could elicit changes in heart rate—but only in patients who went on to have favorable outcomes. The phenomenon could be used to predict patient outcomes. In PNAS: www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

Overview of the experimental design and exemplar results.

27417

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 17/05/2025

I found these in the same paper i guess

011

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 16/04/2025

Claims about scientific rigour require rigour @jbakcoleman.bsky.social can you please make an open access version of this available? preprint etc www.nature.com/articles/s41...

nature.com

Claims about scientific rigour require rigour - Nature Human Behaviour

Nature Human Behaviour - Claims about scientific rigour require rigour

010

Reposted by Brett Buttliere

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 16/04/2025

I am pretty obviously not a Zalophus californianus. she cant handle real questions so she blocks or ad hominems, if it was a climate denier w private funding not at a uni you would say of course this is an unserious person - why not apply the same here?

121

Brett Buttliere @brettbuttliere.bsky.social · 25/03/2025

i live inside wales but im not Pinocchio, got fans from belgium to tokeyo www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jqdd...

youtube.com

MR TRAUMATIK - WAR DUBS

YouTube video by MR TRAUMATIK

030