Sign in

Amber Hall

@amberhall.bsky.social
227 followers 686 following 16 posts

She/Her 🧬 Scientist || 🎨 Artist || 🪲 Bug, frog and mushroom-enthusiast NRPDTP PhD at UEA Interested in Gene-Editing, Protein Engineering, Insect Development and Plant-Insect Interactions!

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Amber Hall
Sarah McAnulty, Ph.D. @sarahmackattack.bsky.social · 27/06/2026
My cat. Is so cute. I cannot believe I get to hang out with an adorable little freak whenever I want. What a world. No it's not the toxoplasmosis talking why would you even suggest that.
1155334
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 27/06/2026
Cat being very chatty 💬🐈
120
Reposted by Amber Hall
Şuayb Üstün @suaybuestuen.bsky.social · 24/04/2026
🚨 Paper out now in #ScienceAdvances @science.org 🌱🦠 Pathogens don’t just target protein degradation—they also hijack host translation. "Bacteria use P-body condensates to attenuate host translation during infection" ⚖️♻️ led by @manuelgonzalezfuen.bsky.social www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
911148
Reposted by Amber Hall
Tom Astle @tjalamont.bsky.social · 21/04/2026
A cool behavior I've seen with at least two different mirid plant bugs and several blister beetle sp. - the mirid (Aoplonema sp.) is not preying on the beetle (Lytta sp.), but trying to "steal" some of the beetle's toxic bug blood, possibly to sequester the defensive chemical for itself. #Bugsky 🌿🐙
A macro photo of an elongate, metallic green beetle on a pale purple flower with green fuzzy stem/leaves. Partially visible underneath the green beetle, there is a red and black bug which is poking the underside of the beetle with its needle-like mouthparts.
716438
Reposted by Amber Hall
Philip Leftwich @philipleftwich.bsky.social · 22/04/2026
Exciting work from our lab! @amberhall.bsky.social and Matthew Shackleton-Chavez validated the first 7SK Pol III promoter in a Tephritid fly, Ceratitis capitata. A new tool for gRNA expression in #CRISPR editing of this major agricultural pest. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6... #SynBio #Entomology
CRISPR-mediated editing of the white locus and resulting adult phenotypes. (A) Alignment of
135 the engineered sgRNA to the white reference sequence (GeneID: 101458180); the grey bar indicates the
136 sgRNA target region. Values denote the percentage of sequencing reads assigned to each sequence
137 variant for 7SK-driven and U6-driven sgRNA constructs, respectively. The upper rows show confirmed
138 wildtype and white mutant allele sequences; the lower rows show indel sequences identified by
139 CRISPResso2 analysis. Source data are deposited under ENA project PRJEB111759. (B) Representative
140 images of post-microinjection adult flies: wildtype (left) and mosaic mutant (right).
1104
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 22/04/2026
Very pleased to announce @mattgenetics.bsky.social and I have a 1st version preprint out today on identification and validation of the 7SK Pol III promoter in medfly. Special thanks to @philipleftwich.bsky.social and Tracey Chapman! www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
061
Reposted by Amber Hall
Edoardo Gianni @edogia.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
How could a simple self-replicating system emerge at the origins of life? RNA polymerase ribozymes can replicate RNA, but existing ones are so large that their self-replication seems impossible. Could they be smaller? Excited to share our latest work in @science.org on a new small polymerase. 1/n
science.org
A small polymerase ribozyme that can synthesize itself and its complementary strand
The emergence of a chemical system capable of self-replication and evolution is a critical event in the origin of life. RNA polymerase ribozymes can replicate RNA, but their large size and structural ...
10509215
Reposted by Amber Hall
weird medieval guys @weirdmedieval.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
It was believed in medieval times that hedgehogs had spikes so they could roll over fruit to carry home to their children, which is not true but is a really cute idea
A medieval illustration of a hedgehog with grapes skewered on its spines
7173411722
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 24/12/2025
so much jellyear in the woods today 🍄‍🟫
020
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 23/12/2025
Very excited to share that the art I made is up on the high street of Rickmansworth! Feels like a small accomplishment, but this is the first time I’ve properly had my art on public display :) (if you’re ever nearby pls take a look!) 🐸✨
Picture of a small shop front window covered in a print of the artwork with the Bluesky user standing next to it
021
Reposted by Amber Hall
Nick Desnoyer @nickdesnoyer.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
After 10 Fridays, 10 flowers, and 100+ drawings, the Florédex is complete! ✨ Come take a tour of the design and science behind 10 iconic flowers 🌺🧵
37021
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
Thanks Nick for this amazing opportunity!! 🌸🌺🌼🌷
020
Reposted by Amber Hall
Mark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · 11/11/2025
We wrote the Strain on scientific publishing to highlight the problems of time & trust. With a fantastic group of co-authors, we present The Drain of Scientific Publishing: a 🧵 1/n Drain: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820 Strain: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/... Oligopoly: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
A table showing profit margins of major publishers. A snippet of text related to this table is below.

1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.A figure detailing the drain on researcher time.

1. The four-fold drain

1.2 Time
The number of papers published each year is growing faster than the scientific workforce,
with the number of papers per researcher almost doubling between 1996 and 2022 (Figure
1A). This reflects the fact that publishers’ commercial desire to publish (sell) more material
has aligned well with the competitive prestige culture in which publications help secure jobs,
grants, promotions, and awards. To the extent that this growth is driven by a pressure for
profit, rather than scholarly imperatives, it distorts the way researchers spend their time.
The publishing system depends on unpaid reviewer labour, estimated to be over 130 million
unpaid hours annually in 2020 alone (9). Researchers have complained about the demands of
peer-review for decades, but the scale of the problem is now worse, with editors reporting
widespread difficulties recruiting reviewers. The growth in publications involves not only the
authors’ time, but that of academic editors and reviewers who are dealing with so many
review demands.
Even more seriously, the imperative to produce ever more articles reshapes the nature of
scientific inquiry. Evidence across multiple fields shows that more papers result in
‘ossification’, not new ideas (10). It may seem paradoxical that more papers can slow
progress until one considers how it affects researchers’ time. While rewards remain tied to
volume, prestige, and impact of publications, researchers will be nudged away from riskier,
local, interdisciplinary, and long-term work. The result is a treadmill of constant activity with
limited progress whereas core scholarly practices – such as reading, reflecting and engaging
with others’ contributions – is de-prioritized. What looks like productivity often masks
intellectual exhaustion built on a demoralizing, narrowing scientific vision.A table of profit margins across industries. The section of text related to this table is below:

1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.The costs of inaction are plain: wasted public funds, lost researcher time, compromised
scientific integrity and eroded public trust. Today, the system rewards commercial publishers
first, and science second. Without bold action from the funders we risk continuing to pour
resources into a system that prioritizes profit over the advancement of scientific knowledge.
8644453
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 05/11/2025
We love these signs at UEA #nosit
020
Reposted by Amber Hall
Sarah McAnulty, Ph.D. @sarahmackattack.bsky.social · 31/10/2025
The amount of AI generated art in slides at this conference, primarily used by older scientists, is killing me. Scientists please. Don’t use these ai platforms to make your figures or slides. They look bad and I have yet to see them meaningfully improve the message of talks.
381755354
Reposted by Amber Hall
Nick Desnoyer @nickdesnoyer.bsky.social · 24/10/2025
Friday Flower 008: Tulip 🌷 Tulip’s pastel colors and waxy cuticle that scatters light give them a soft watercolor look. The “broken” petals of Semper Augustus, created by a virus, became some of the most famous and valuable flowers in history... and their genome is 34Gb 🤯
1276
Reposted by Amber Hall
Alex McClelland @alexjmcclelland.bsky.social · 10/10/2025
1/13 Thankfully, both you and your plants have a lot of sophisticated ways to fight off invading pathogens. In our new preprint, we describe a new way in which animals and plants share a common strategy to ward off harmful bacteria. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
biorxiv.org
A secreted citrus protease cleaves an outer membrane protein of the Huanglongbing pathogen
Plants secrete a variety of proteases as a defense response during infection by microbial pathogens. However, the relationship between their catalytic activities and antimicrobial functions remains la...
33524
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 10/10/2025
I didn’t know this was today!! Cuttlefish are one of my favourite animals! To celebrate, here’s a very blurry picture of one (or what I think was one) I saw in the ocean when I was in Symi, Greece earlier this year :) 🦑
020
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 10/10/2025
Petunias are so cool - defo one of the best flowers 😎
010
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 03/10/2025
Thanks Nick! Really enjoying working on this project - can’t wait for the next few flowers!! 🌸🌺🌼
030
Reposted by Amber Hall
Nick Desnoyer @nickdesnoyer.bsky.social · 03/10/2025
Friday Flower 006: Aquilegia 🌸🦋 Columbines vary in stamen number, making them a powerful model for how floral whorls expand. Darwin marveled at their long nectar spurs, which co-evolve with hawkmoth tongues to reward pollinators that brush the stamens ✨
25516
Reposted by Amber Hall
🌻OK MR. SUNSHINE!🌻 @entobiologist.bsky.social · 25/09/2025
I'M LATE FOR BUGS
digital illustration of a person in a white t-shirt and jeans and a green backpack running while checking their watch. they're also holding an insect net
29517
Reposted by Amber Hall
Nick Desnoyer @nickdesnoyer.bsky.social · 29/08/2025
Friday Flower 002: Mirabilis jalapa🌺✨ Four O’Clocks, like other Caryophyllales, produce red (betacyanins) and yellow (betaxanthins) petal sectors through differential regulation of betalain biosynthesis during corolla development.
14814
Reposted by Amber Hall
Nick Desnoyer @nickdesnoyer.bsky.social · 22/08/2025
Friday Flower 001: Mimulus lewisii 🌸✨ Monkeyflowers are masterpieces of design with nectar-guide spots formed by an activator–inhibitor system of MYB transcription factors. These generate reaction–diffusion patterns across the ventral petal.
59942
Reposted by Amber Hall
Nick Desnoyer @nickdesnoyer.bsky.social · 21/08/2025
First of the Friday Flower Concepts series coming tomorrow! 🌹✨ Can you guess the first flower?
3234
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 13/08/2025
1st western blot vs. 128th western blot 🧪 - - #science #westernblot #predoc #labscientist
1143
Reposted by Amber Hall
Maridel 🐜🍄🌱🦠🏳️‍🌈 @delfreddy.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
💡Can we use network structure 🏁 to infer underlying genetics 🧬 of host – parasite coevolution? 🔎Find out in our new paper 🥳, published in the latest issue of @journal-evo.bsky.social 👇 academic.oup.com/evolut/artic... #Parasite #EvolutionaryBiology #MicrobialEvolution 1/2
academic.oup.com
Mixed network structure in a coevolving host–parasite system
Abstract. Genetic interactions between parasites and hosts determine how these antagonists coevolve. Networks depicting infection outcomes between host and
2147
Reposted by Amber Hall
Karen's Nature Art @karensnatureart.bsky.social · 06/08/2025
Finally finished the right page on my August 2021 moth survey from my IL Prairie Nature Journal. Just love the diversity of all these moths from the Midwest! #SciArt #moths #naturejournal #prairie
Two page spread of realistic watercolor paintings of a diversity of moths plus handwritten inked information including the common name, wingspan, and larval foods. The moths have shadows beneath them which makes it look like they're on a white sheet ready to take off.  The moth survey is from August 18, 2021 at the Schulenberg Prairie at the Morton Arboretum in Lisle, IL.
1226667
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 06/08/2025
WHAT DO YOU MEAN THERE’S ONLY EIGHT LEIBNIZ!?!?
010
Reposted by Amber Hall
Matteo Gravino @matteogravino.bsky.social · 01/08/2025
🎉Thrilled to share our latest work, now published in @newphyt.bsky.social! 🧑‍🔬 @matteogravino.bsky.social, @samtmugford.bsky.social, @saskiahogenhout.bsky.social et al., @johninnescentre.bsky.social #️⃣ #PlantScience #PlantImmunity 📄 Read the full paper👇 nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/8QSRJ9...
Model: Activation and suppression of defences in plant–aphid interactions. Upper left panel: aphid stylet penetration of the cell wall releases oligogalacturonides (OGs), which induce PAMP/DAMP-triggered immunity (PTI/DTI) in a process dependent on BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1-ASSOCIATED RECEPTOR KINASE 1 (BAK1), ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY 1 (EDS1), and CPK5/6/11 (data herein). The stabilisation of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and coreceptors at the plasma membrane may rely on the deubiquitination (DUB) activity of ASSOCIATED MOLECULE WITH THE SH3 DOMAIN OF STAM (AMSHs; Gravino et al., 2024). Upper right panel: the Mp10 effector, introduced by aphids into the cell cytoplasm (Mugford et al., 2016), suppresses OG-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) (data herein) and flg22-induced PTI (Bos et al., 2010). Mp10 targeting of plant AMSHs is implicated in these processes (Gravino et al., 2024). EDS1 is essential for Mp10-mediated ROS suppression and PRR destabilisation (data herein), acting through an unidentified mechanism (denoted by the double-sided arrow with an asterisk). Lower left panel: effector-triggered immunity (ETI) is activated through EDS1, either directly or indirectly, upon recognition of Mp10 and/or its activities by a TNL (Gravino et al., 2024; Rao et al., 2024). Salicylic acid glucosyltransferase 1 (SGT1) is also required for TNL/ETI activation (Bos et al., 2010). Lower right panel: aphids secrete additional effectors, such as cathepsin B proteins (e.g. CathB6), which target EDS1 to suppress ETI (Liu et al., 2025). Solid arrows, increased activation; solid blunt-ended arrows, increased suppression; Dashed arrows, reduced activation; Dashed -blunt-ended arrows, reduced suppression.
12714
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 28/06/2025
oh the irony …
Picture depicts a Greek restaurant called “Acropolis” At the bottom of a flight of stairs
010
Reposted by Amber Hall
plasmidsaurus @plasmidsaurus.bsky.social · 13/06/2025
This is exactly what happens inside our sequencing machines. 😌
062
Reposted by Amber Hall
Sam Mugford @samtmugford.bsky.social · 01/03/2025
We are excited to share our latest preprint from the Hogenhout lab (@matteogravino.bsky.social @saskiahogenhout.bsky.social , @johninnescentre.bsky.social ) on plant-aphid interactions, showing that the aphid effector Mp10 balances suppression of DAMP responses and activation of ETI via EDS1.
22017
Reposted by Amber Hall
Tom Heaven @tcheaven.bsky.social · 06/12/2024
Our preprint is now live! We have sequenced the genomes of three psyllid species. These insects pests transmit devastating plant diseases like 'zebra chip' in potatoes and 'carrot yellows' in carrots. 🥕 #MolecularEntomology #MPMI #PlantPathology #psyllids #liberibacter
hubs.ly
22012
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 05/12/2024
Really enjoyed giving my talk today for APH day on the work I’ve done for my predoc project so far! 🧪 #science
Me standing at a lectern on a stage giving a talk on characterising and engineering different phytoplasma effectors
060
Reposted by Amber Hall
Qun Liu @qunliu07.bsky.social · 21/11/2024
We're happy to present a pre-print from the Hogenhout lab (@saskiahogenhout.bsky.social), describing how a family of proteases in aphid oral secretions suppress plant immunity.
22412
Reposted by Amber Hall
Sam Mugford @samtmugford.bsky.social · 18/11/2024
We’re delighted to share our latest preprint from the Hogenhout lab (@saskiahogenhout.bsky.social) on the molecular mechanisms on plant-aphid interactions. Here we show how the aphid Mp10 effector protein acts as a local anaesthetic to suppress the plant perception of aphid attack
16939
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 17/11/2024
Thank you for 100 followers! 🪲
010
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 17/11/2024
Post a picture you took to bring some zen to the skyline 🦋
Swallowtail butterfly on some pink flowers. White flowers surround
021
Reposted by Amber Hall
Oded Rechavi @odedrechavi.bsky.social · 13/11/2024
But can it run a gel?
2323023
Reposted by Amber Hall
Sophien Kamoun @kamounlab.bsky.social · 14/11/2024
Leafhoppers are not phytoplasmas... #NatureRipoffs @Nature "Similarly, SAP05 from the plant parasite Macrosteles quadrilineatus was found to target host transcription factors to the proteasome in a process that is key to the life cycle of the parasite..." doi.org/10.1038/s415...
071
Amber Hall @amberhall.bsky.social · 13/11/2024
Hi everyone! Just wanted introduce myself as a newbie here :) my name’s Amber and I like bugs, frogs, mushrooms and drawing! I’m currently doing a Predoc characterising Phytoplasma effectors and soon applying for PhD projects! 🐛 Here’s a picture of me and a scarlet tiger moth that landed on my arm 🦋
Author + scarlet tiger moth (very pretty moth) landed on left arm.
0102