Reposted by Visionary_CK
BREAKING: Judge Timothy Kelly grants CNN, MS NOW, and Politico’s TRO against the Trump administration, ordering that the reporters affected “immediately” have their White House hard passes reinstated. The TRO is in effect for 14 days. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
![Discrimination on the Basis of Race
Plaintiffs argue that they are likely to succeed on their race-discrimination claims because
President Trump and others in his administration made countless statements that were "racially
overt[,]... directly targeted at Somali people," [ECF No. 103 at 12], and "explicitly tie[d] racialized notions about Somalis' alleged criminality to demands for their expulsion," [ECF No.
92 at 21-22]. Though Plaintiffs lay out a strong case for why the at-issue statements were racist, see (ECF No. 92 at 23-271, after Mullin, which included a constitutional race-discrimination claim, the Court cannot discern a path to concluding that Plaintiffs will succeed on the merits of this claim.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreighwqmy3n3uqvwxsnyxnjhpmdumwpqt3psopakjlztkvwexvtoz6a)
![Before ELROD, Chief Judge, and JONES, SMITH, STEWART, RICHMAN, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON, WILLETT, HO, DUNCAN, ENGELHARDT, OLDHAM, WILSON, DOUGLAS, and RAMIREZ, Circuit Judges.
JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Chief Judge, joined by JONES, SMITH, STEWART, RICHMAN, SOUTHWICK, GRAVES, HIGGINSON, WAMIER, CIOPUAN, ENGELHARDT, WILSON, DOUGLAS, and
Over a year ago, the President of the United States proclaimed Venezuelan citizens in this country "immediate[ly]" removable "[a]lien [e]nemies" if they were members of a certain gang and "not actually naturalized or lawful permanent residents." That Proclamation has generated litigation around the country in federal courts at all levels. Here, three "Venezuelan national[s]" sued the President and other federal-government defendants, on petitioners' own behalf and that of a putative class, claiming that the Proclamation violates, as relevant here, the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 and due-process guarantees. Petitioners unsuccessfully sought preliminary injunctive relief against summary removal under the AEA in the district court and our court before the Supreme Court returned the case to us.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreifox2ri3g7h7moq423nt25ronn4tsnrpkljnxy64ja755tguuqxhq)
![An example of Representative Edwards’ unprofessional conduct was commenting on the two women’s appearance in the congressional office, telling them when they looked “pretty” or “breathtaking,” and even remarking on one staffer’s weight.7 Representative Edwards acknowledged he made comments such as “that’s a great looking dress, I like that color, I like that texture” and that with the culture on Capitol Hill “it’s almost an insult if you don’t make some comment about [one another’s clothing].”8 He further testified, “I wrote sexual harassment policy [in the corporate world]. I [] investigated sexual harassment many, many times. I lived a very cautious life. I know that commenting on clothing without associating that with any other body part or feature is common acceptable practice in the workplace.”9](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:e7gbntp2tzobn7cfi37viei3/bafkreighcusg3tsnnbai2zance7avbu2clsikggmqcmpdssgm4dka77waa)
![ANALYSIS
Plaintiff alleges damages in an amount up to $10 billion which include damage
to "the value of [Plaintiffs] brand, properties, and businesses..." Compl. 9101 and at
32. As represented by the parties, virtually all of these "properties and businesses" are owned by the Trust. See generally Disc. Mot., ECF No. 52. Despite the Complaint's
damages allegations, the Trust contends that the Subpoena should be quashed because the discovery it seeks is prematures, improper, and burdensome. Id. at 4. For the reasons below, this Court disagrees.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreigx3eex7mikq4j2d7ttuwk4aq4gkcbsr5e4qa6pcxbggdkjgv5owu)
![CONCLUSION
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. Defendant's Motion to Compel [ECF No. 103] is GRANTED in part;
8
Case 1:25-Cv-25894-RKA Document 104 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2026 Page 9 of 9
2. The Subpoena's production requests shall be limited to documents from the
date of January 1, 2023, to the present.
3. The Trust's first substantial production of documentation shall occur within
ten (10) days of the date of this order and continue every week until
complete.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida on this 27th day of
July, 2026.
Enjoligue tZett
ENJOLIQUÉ A. LETT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
cc: All Counsel of Record](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreifsg7kqj34hogaz5pxucigqute5rt7bhkmvl2n2rhwkpjnf2lqrr4)
