special @tropics.bsky.social · 09/09/2026When you hear a guy in a Boston accent say “voir dire” you know you’re in for a bumpy afternoon  000
special @tropics.bsky.social · 26/08/2026Blitzing half a dozen onions with a 1980s plastic bread knife is absolutely god tier skill 000
Reposted by specialjosh (oldfriend99) @oldfriend99.bsky.social · 30/07/2026(looking in this room) Well there's your problem right here 627328
Reposted by specialMr. Gay Man Watch @paragon12321.bsky.social · 09/06/2026"Your Honor, you're breaking up I'm going through a tunnel kssshhshhshhs khshshshh" 2659
Reposted by specialAndy Cortez @andycortez.cool · 04/06/2026Ohhh look at me I'm New York City. I have an awesome basketball team with likeable players and a mayor that cares about making life better for every citizen man fuck you 164105061377
Reposted by specialUncleofJamiroquai @jessefarrar.com · 16/04/2026you cant tax some foreign trust's portfolio of uninhabited $20M investment condos just because you got elected as mayor and "feel like it", ok? that's not how it works. thats not how any of this works. 726214
special @tropics.bsky.social · 27/02/2026Hillary Clinton really was that woman with those emails in that Epstein hearing today. She said what she said and she meant what she meant. She warned us, y'all. We were too asleep to see that we needed to work harder. 000
Reposted by specialwarrior cop @wyattprivilege.bsky.social · 20/03/2025The only fair way to handle this is to appoint a team of teenagers to tear this company limb from limb until we find out what kind of financial damage they are hiding and where 13836025713871
![The Court originally scheduled the show cause hearing in this matter for January 6, 2026. See [110] at p. 1. Williams then filed a Motion [114] seeking to appear at the hearing via videoconference or, alternatively, for the hearing to be continued to a later date. See [114] at p. 1-2. In that Motion [114], Williams represented that she had a conflicting federal court appearance in another case without providing further detail. See id. at p. 1. The Court then issued an Order [115] granting a brief continuance of the hearing and directing Williams to submit documentation verifying her conflicting court appearance on the originally scheduled hearing date. See [115]. Williams complied and promptly submitted a Response [117], which indicated that she was being required to appear at an initial scheduling conference in a case in federal court in New Jersey. See
[117]. Notably, that initial scheduling conference in the New Jersey case was scheduled to occur via video conference three and a half hours before the show cause hearing in this case. Id., Ex. 1 at p. 2. Upon verifying the information provided by Williams, the Court realized that the remote
conference in the New Jersey case had actually been postponed via text order on December 8,
2025—two days before this Court even issued its order scheduling the show cause hearing in this
case, which was entered on December 10, 2025. See Marinesi v. United Airlines, Inc., No. 2:25-
cv-04822, Dkt. [11]. The fact of the matter is Williams never had a scheduling conflict (at least in
the New Jersey case) though she represented as much in her Motion [114] and Response [117].
The Court is troubled by this misrepresentation and finds that Williams was not truthful about her
purported scheduling conflict in violation of her ethical duties as an officer of the court. This
certainly reflects her lack of concern for the seriousness of the underlying misconduct in this case
despite her contentions otherwise.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:y2wx7b4qyjehtrhqml2xpsvo/bafkreiajbsgqu6zusmpgzilmdv7vylezerkuir4qtw3koiicknop6bhyau)
