Sign in

Travis Seaborn

@travisseaborn.bsky.social
390 followers 361 following 48 posts

Assistant prof SNRS at NDSU. Landscape genetics and distribution (and other) ecology modeling endeavors. Conservation, climate change, and land use with disease sprinkles. Views own. He/Him

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Alexa Fredston @afredston.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
good morning. I strongly suspect that we don't really know (or agree) what geographic ranges are, and therefore, our estimates of how species' ranges are shifting in the Anthropocene are uninterpretable. I wrote something about this: doi.org/10.1111/2041... and I'll share the main findings...
doi.org
Measuring the edges of species' geographic ranges
The fundamental unit of spatial ecology is a species range: the geographical area that it occupies. Species ranges are delineated by range edges (also known as boundaries or limits). Why range edg...
36130
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Dan Garisto @dangaristo.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
OMB has not repeatedly proposed a 55%+ cut to NSF because of 'woke' research—even if you eliminated all of the grants flagged in the Cruz report, you wouldn't scratch 10% of the budget. It is because NSF heavily funds universities.
16123
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Dan Garisto @dangaristo.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
OMB's focus on NIH and NSF, which has confused a lot of folks, pretty much boils down to stopping money going to universities.
1224138
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Thomas Cullen @thomascullen.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
With all the news of museums being closed and/or defunded, I feel the message of our paper on the importance of natural history research (and the collections housing those specimens) is just as relevant (or more) today as it was when it was published. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
cover page of the linked paper
3186101
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Maria Akopyan, PhD @akopyan.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
New preprint out today! [1/5] Can higher recombination rates help populations adapt more quickly to environmental change? We used forward-time simulations to find out. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
biorxiv.org
Recombination accelerates adaptation across genetic architectures and demographic histories
According to classic population genetics theory, recombination shapes the efficacy of natural selection. However, whether variation in recombination rate itself translates into meaningful differences ...
12614
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Corey Callaghan @coreytcallaghan.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Do you use #iNaturalist data in research—or advise students who do? We put together a practical guide to using iNaturalist data in scientific research, covering how to access, acquire, analyze, and attribute the data, with examples in R and Python. Paper: doi.org/10.1093/bios... #ecology
410374
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Dan Baldassarre @evornithology.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Interesting social science study here on attitudes toward the proposed renaming of eponymous bird species by @amornith.bsky.social. They surveyed 1,063 birders across 42 states and found 48% felt positively about renaming. 29% were neutral. besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Birds of many feathers? Examining perceptions among US birders following the American Ornithological Society's eponymous renaming decision
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
3279
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Emma Vogel @efvogel.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
I love visuals that bring data to life, so I was very excited when I was asked to create animations for the @uitnorgesarktiske.bsky.social Museum showing the transatlantic scale of humpback whale migrations! This is just a subset of the data I am working with for @bioprotectproject.bsky.social🐋🌍🧪🌊
16125
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Ben Goldfarb @bengoldfarb.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
This is more activisty than I usually get, but these are weird times. In collab w/ Harvard's Env Law & Policy Clinic, I authored a letter objecting to Roadless Rule's rescission, made public so that you can draw upon it in your own comments. Have at it! emmettclinic.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/u...
24113
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Society for Conservation Biology North America (SCBNA) @scbnorthamerica.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
The 2026 Report outlining the impacts of federal and state policies since January 20, 2025, on the fields of ecology, evolution, marine science, and environmental science is NOW LIVE! www.firsthandaccounts.org/impacts/2…
001
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈 @whysharksmatter.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
NSF moves to overhaul funding approach in line with White House priorities idp.nature.com/authorize?re... | The major funder of basic science has not said how its new initiatives will be funded — but staff worry streamlined approach will further squeeze cash for core sciences.
idp.nature.com
NSF moves to overhaul funding approach in line with White House priorities
The major funder of basic science has not said how its new initiatives will be funded — but staff worry streamlined approach will further squeeze cash for core sciences.
1155
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Jacquelyn Gill @jacquelyngill.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
Schools are not a business and a student is not a customer and this is the framing that encapsulates everything wrong with higher education. The “solution” of running universities like businesses rather than a public good was always the problem.
11386112
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Rebecca Sear @rebeccasear.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
“The population of the world’s heaviest parrot, the kākāpō, has surpassed 300 birds for the first time in 75 years, after a record breeding season triggered by the mass fruiting of a native New Zealand tree” www.theguardian.com/world/2026/s...
theguardian.com
Kākāpō rising: 90 chicks swell population of the world’s heaviest parrot
Critically endangered New Zealand bird enjoys record breeding season triggered by mass fruiting of native tree, pushing its numbers to 325
220061
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Mike Keesey @tmkeesey.bsky.social · 30/08/2026
We are getting VERY close 13,000 silhouettes! www.phylopic.org/images
phylopic.org
All Silhouette Images on PhyloPic
Browse all the free silhouette images in PhyloPic.
210835
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Karolina Heyduk @kheyduk.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
New NSF BIO solicitation says expected number of awards is 250-300. Historically, the number of awards is closer to 800-1000 for the Directorate of Bio Sciences: grantwitness.org/nsf/analyses... Unless I'm missing large, non-core programs, this seems really not good?
grantwitness.org
Agency Pulse: Grantmaking at NSF
An independent, up-to-date, grant-level record of federal science funding disruptions in the United States.
88867
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Scientific American @sciam.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
The world’s oceans hit 21.10 degrees Celsius last Saturday, breaking a record set in 2024. And it's only going to get worse.
scientificamerican.com
Earth’s oceans just hit their hottest temperature ever recorded
The world’s oceans hit 21.10 degrees Celsius last Saturday, breaking a record set in 2024
291011643
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Dan Garisto @dangaristo.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
Finally, this has gone a bit under the radar, so I want to highlight it: The social, behavioral and economic sciences directorate (SBE) has simply ceased to deliver grants to many of its subareas. Any topic not specifically OK'd by the Trump administration is receiving zero new awards.
All of the NSF’s directorates are awarding fewer new grants, but the hardest hit is the social, behavioural and economic sciences (SBE) directorate, which the White House proposed eliminating in its 2027 budget request to Congress. SBE has so far awarded 84 new grants this year, about 11% of its average, mainly in areas of artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience and decision-making. Much of its portfolio, such as sociology, archaeology, political science, economics and geography, has received zero new awards. “I don’t think they’ve realized yet that there’s no awards,” one NSF staff member says of researchers in those fields. “That’s going to be clear soon.”
6422226
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Dan Garisto @dangaristo.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
For some perspective on how much FY26 is a historic outlier this is, here is a mockup using the number of grants with an original date for each fiscal year. n.b. slightly overestimates the true number of new grants because it counts transfers, etc. as new awards
Chart showing NSF new grants over time from 1980 on
19230
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Dan Garisto @dangaristo.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
Scoop: For nearly a year, NSF has struggled to make new grants. Now we know that it will not catch up. In fact, NSF will award just 6,100 new grants—a 30% y/o/y decline, itself down from a previous avg. of 11,000+. In fact, the last time NSF awarded so few grants was in the early '80s.
nature.com
Exclusive: NSF set to issue lowest number of new grants in four decades
The US science-funding agency is withholding $1 billion of its budget so that the money can go to a special White House project.
14753471
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Ben Goldfarb @bengoldfarb.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
“I’ve had countless people tell me, ‘It’s amazing all the wildlife we’re seeing — I didn’t think taking out those dams would make a difference.’ Now everything can flow freely and clearly, the way that it was intended.” www.nytimes.com/2026/05/07/c...
nytimes.com
America the Undammed
More miles of the country’s rivers were reconnected last year thanks to dam removals than at any other time in history.
02610
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Jaishri Srinivasan @jaishrijuice.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
nature.com
Freshwater biodiversity impacts of global hydropower dams - Communications Earth & Environment
Hydropower dams fragment rivers and degrade habitats, increasing extinction risk for freshwater species, with over 85% of species showing status changes moving to higher threat categories, based on Gl...
034
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈 @whysharksmatter.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
"How is it possible that scientists are saying that shark populations have declined by a lot, but fishermen are saying they've never seen so many sharks?" Part of the answer is called "shifting baselines," which means how much something changes depends on when you start counting! 🧪🌍🦑🦈🐟
Mockup graph showing dramatic declines in shark populations since the 1980s with a modest recovery over the last few years
315159
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Methods in Ecology and Evolution @methodsinecoevol.bsky.social · 09/08/2026
📖 Published📖 This study develops a method to delineate habitat patches that are biologically relevant for simulating demographic processes of the species of interest🐿️ 🌲 🌏️ buff.ly/AlBfLTR
0137
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences @cjfas.bsky.social · 08/08/2026
Long-term genetic outcomes of a mixed-source introduction of Westslope Cutthroat Trout ow.ly/plKC50Zn3qL 📊: Bell et al. | cjfas-2025-0417
Mean observed heterozygosity over time
064
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈 @whysharksmatter.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
50 years after landmark laws, some U.S. rivers are recovering but threats remain
npr.org
50 years after landmark laws, some U.S. rivers are recovering but threats remain
Half a century ago, a series of landmark federal laws started reining in water pollution. As a result, some rivers across the country are bouncing back to life, but threats to clean rivers remain.
084
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Andrew Rypel @andrewrypel.bsky.social · 30/07/2026
Bigger ≠ Better. Some of the smallest fishes on Earth have some of the most outstanding biology and beauty. I had an absolute blast writing this one... 👇🎏🤯 Five Tiny Fishes That Will Blow Your Mind tnature.substack.com/p/five-tiny-... #Nature #Science #Evolution #Biodiversity #Fishes #Wildlife
tnature.substack.com
Five Tiny Fishes That Will Blow Your Mind
Little species. Enormous wonder.
25419
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Kevin M. Kruse @kevinmkruse.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
If you have an academic in your life, please be gentle with them this weekend because they're probably freaking the fuck out.
351112162
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Nahel Belgherze @wxnb.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
Bordeaux, France, has now recorded more days above 40°C in 2026 alone than during the entire 105-year period from 1920 (when observations began) to 2025. This is deeply shocking.
8236472101
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Stephen Heard @stephenbheard.bsky.social · 28/07/2026
In which I vent about the foolishness we display when we say "Our budgets have been cut? We'll just have to do more with less". That's a losing strategy, every time. Why do we teach toddlers, but not governments, that choices have consequences?
scientistseessquirrel.wordpress.com
The foolishness of “doing more with less”
I got a little bit riled up the other day, and I realized that it might be worth sharing because the thing that riled me is a longstanding pattern in academia (at least in Canada, anyway). It’s a w…
22513
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Evolution Students @ssegrad.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
1/4 In today's funding climate, every grant and fellowship matters. Based on feedback from our GSAC Community Check-In Survey, we're building a growing hub of graduate & postdoctoral funding opportunities and job boards to make them easier to find. 🧵
Funding and job board curated by Dieter Lukas and Pro Manna
13641
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Methods in Ecology and Evolution @methodsinecoevol.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
📖 Published📖 BIMr2: Inference of migration rates and their drivers from multilocus genotypes🌳🧬🧪
buff.ly
BIMr2: Inference of migration rates and their drivers from multilocus genotypes
141
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
John M. Drake @jdrakephd.bsky.social · 23/07/2026
What's the best way to lead a paper discussion so it doesn't die in silence? My answer, after years of getting it wrong: start with a summary, plan the discussion's life cycle, and make disagreement earn its place. New in BioScience. doi.org/10.1093/bios...
doi.org
Three rules for leading a paper discussion
Silence is the sound of a seminar no one is steering, and for my first years as a professor, I was the one who should have been steering it. The course was
0116
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Carl Zimmer @carlzimmer.com · 22/07/2026
Did Thoreau encounter contagious cancer? A new study finds transmissible tumors in catfish--and raises questions about whether they could arise in humans someday. Gift link: nyti.ms/4whfi6v
nyti.ms
Deep in This Lake, a Contagious Cancer Is Spreading (Gift Article)
Transmissible tumors have been reported in a handful of animal species, but never before among fish. Is it possible in humans?
611950
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Vincent J Lynch 🐘🦣🦥 🦇🐋🐢🐍 @devoevomed.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
Can't stop thinking about this; transmissible cancers are so crazy, extremely rare (tassie devils, dogs, some clams), but I wonder why? It seems like it should be very common. It's advantageous for the cancer to escape the dead-end host. And yet... www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Brown bullhead catfish melanoma represents a novel transmissible cancer - Nature
Whole-genome sequencing analysis of tumour and matched non-tumour host tissues of the brown bullhead catfish reveals a type of naturally occurring transmissible cancer.
45221
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Sarah T Roberts, PhD @ubiquity75.xyz · 22/07/2026
A reminder that UC _faculty_ and Faculty Associations — not the universities themselves nor their administrators — are waging this battle in court, demonstrating great bravery and moral clarity.
apnews.com
White House admits it used keywords to kill billions worth of California research grants
Federal agencies that terminated more than a thousand research grants at the University of California last year admitted that they used keywords related to diversity, gender, vaccine hesitancy and COV...
1632951213
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
PEIPolitical 🇨🇦 @peipolitical.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
Eby: "I feel sorry for Americans. If you can't be friends with Canada, then you almost certainly do not have a friend anywhere in the world. And that is a very lonely place to be." #cdnpoli
808206104757
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Karolina Heyduk @kheyduk.bsky.social · 14/07/2026
We're not done friends. See thread. Comment on the NSF proposal, contact your reps!
01912
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Julia Koricheva @juliakoricheva.bsky.social · 14/07/2026
Our new #OA paper on importance of risk of bias assessment for ecology and evolutionary biology is out in @methodsinecoevol.bsky.social. It was great to be part of this project brilliantly led by @anticac.bsky.social besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
097
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Dr. Holly P Jones @dochpjones.bsky.social · 14/07/2026
And the award for best dramatic actor in a field setting goes to….this absolute drama queen 🤣 🧪
21513112
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Inside Higher Ed @insidehighered.com · 13/07/2026
ICYMI | The comment period for the OMB's proposal closes today, July 13th. In late May, the White House proposed a rule that would cement its control over essentially all federal grant making, including research funding and Education Department grants. Read the full article: bit.ly/4fc2aYR
A photo illustration of a gloved hand holding up a glass microscope slide. The slide has a smear of purple with red elephants and blue donkeys suspended in it. In the background sits a microscope.
Below on an orange background the kicker Government, the headline Comments Flood OMB Proposal to Cement Political Control of Grants, and the lede The White House Office of Management and Budget has so far received 90,000 public comments on its plans as scientific and other groups rally against them.
Photo illustration by Justin Morrison/Inside Higher Ed | piranka/E+/Getty Images | Bet_Noire, Vasyl Helevachuk and SAHACHAT/iStock/Getty Images The title: The Proposal:
Four statements read: The Trump administration terminated thousands of grants last year, arguing that they didn’t align with the president’s priorities.

While courts reversed many of those terminations, the planned new regulations would help insulate from lawsuits the administration’s future attempts to control grant funding.

The changes would not only alter what’s historically been called OMB’s “uniform guidance” for grant making, but also elevate that guidance into a binding rule across the federal government.

The proposed rule contains multiple undefined terms and phrases, such as “national interest,” that administration officials could interpret to their liking.The quote, “We have launched a frankly enormous campaign educating the public and scientists on what is included in this rule.” from Colette Delawalla, chief executive officer of Stand Up for Science, a group she founded last year amid the Trump administration’s disruption of science.Four statements read: Defend Public Health has been hosting sessions to answer the public’s questions about how to comment, said Melinda Rostal, a veterinary epidemiologist who’s leading the organization’s response.

The rule would affect federal grants far beyond science, health and education—including transportation funding, she said.

For those who win the awards, Funding wouldn’t be guaranteed. The proposal would give the Trump administration sweeping powers to cancel funding for projects researchers have already started.
The comment period closes
July 13th, 2026.
154
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Colin Carlson @colincarlson.bsky.social · 13/07/2026
Where do diplomats go for scientific advice? We looked at the Pandemic Agreement negotiations, and found that small numbers of scientists, papers, and sometimes industry experts have a huge influence. Our updated book chapter is on SSRN: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
02814
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Jeremy Yoder says no war @jbyoder.org · 13/07/2026
Holy COW. Text analysis of comments on the OMB rule: overwhelming opposition, overwhelmingly not form letters. (But 9 in 10 comments supporting the rule ARE form responses, LOL) Whatever happens next, folks have stepped up.
Screenshot text: Between May 29 and July 9, roughly 51,000 comments were posted to regulations.gov (and over 200,000 more had been received but not yet published). The verdict on public sentiment is clear and lopsided: about 94 percent oppose the proposed rule and only 6 percent support it, with fewer than one percent marked as unclear. The opposition is overwhelmingly grassroots rather than orchestrated. Form letters make up only about 16 percent of all comments (roughly 8,400 comments across 210 distinct campaigns), and only about one in eight opposing comments came from a form-letter campaign. Support for the rule, by contrast, was almost entirely organized: nearly nine in ten supportive comments (about 2,500) came from a single form-letter campaign. Opponents mostly wrote their own comments; supporters mostly signed the same form-letter.
1808303
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Dan Garisto @dangaristo.bsky.social · 10/07/2026
New: The National Science Foundation is preparing to claw back some $500 million in funds from some of its core science programs in physics, math, computer science, and engineering in order to fund a project from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.
nature.com
NSF plans cuts to core science programmes to fund White House initiative
A proposed clawback of already distributed research funds comes as the US agency’s budget is already squeezed and it struggling to clear a backlog of grant applications.
19426326
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Inside Higher Ed @insidehighered.com · 30/06/2026
NEH, Beaten in Court, Asks Grant Recipients if They Still Want Awards A judge ruled that the termination of more than 1,400 National Endowment for the Humanities grants was unconstitutional. Now comes the process of reinstating these projects. bit.ly/4faXVxT #EDUSky #HigherEd #AcademicSky
Seven vintage hardcover books from the early 1900s by various authors and publishers.
054
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
airplane ian - abolish ICE @airplaneian.com · 26/06/2026
fyi, that AltNOAA story about a whale escape that's making the rounds is completely made up/AI generated and the OP is aware and thinks spreading fake stories is fine generally speaking the "altgov" accounts are firehoses of misinfo that are not worth your precious attention
an altNOAA post that says "Two types of people will see this. The first type is the emotionally shallow person who just sees Al and that's it for them. Everyone else will think about the emotions it created for a self-aware being they personally don't know and understand that cetacean captivity is wrong. I love it for this!"
19983338
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Drug Monkey @drugmonkey.bsky.social · 28/06/2026
Oopsies
0165
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Elizabeth (Bit) Meehan, PhD @elizabethbitmeehan.com · 25/06/2026
my siblings in Christ, the OMB proposed rulemaking still has not closed it comments yet the draft GFA put forward by NSF is trying to go through with (1) 15% de minimis indirect rate and (2) disallowing publication costs
Guide 12. Cost Principles and Allowability
• Updates the Prior Approval Matrix to align with NSF's implementation of 2 CFR 200.
• Updates Build America, Buy America and Made in America requirements to align with 2 CFR 184.
• Revises the de minimis indirect cost rate to 15% consistent with 2 CFR 200.
• Disallows publication costs consistent with proposed revisions to 2 CFR 200.
33736
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Gregg Gonsalves @gregggonsalves.bsky.social · 27/06/2026
Let's finish the weekend with 5,000 letters to Congress on Russell Vought's mad power-grab to take over federal grant-making. It will take you two minutes to do this. Click on the link and it does it all for you. Share. Share. Share. actionnetwork.org/letters/oppo...
actionnetwork.org
Oppose OMB Proposal to Put ALL Federal Government Funding Decisions in the Hands of Political Appointees
On May 29, 2026, the Office of Management and Budget issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), OMB-2026-0034, Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance. The scope of this proposed regulation is...
011381
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Max Kozlov @maxkozlov.bsky.social · 27/06/2026
NIH grants have been under political scrutiny since early 2025. But what does the screening process actually look like? What is being flagged? I spent a month digging into leaked docs and emails. We've published the 235-word list that are being flagged by an internal AI tool. And so much more. 🧵
nature.com
Inside the new political screening that’s stalling NIH grants
Mandatory reviews by top health officials and checks for 235 disfavoured terms have left hundreds of vetted grant applications in administrative limbo.
9541384
Reposted by Travis Seaborn
Jenni Momsen @jennimomsen.bsky.social · 25/06/2026
In case you thought everything was fine, it's not fine. NSF is not a big ol' grift. www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Exclusive: NSF slashes research programs to support new tech initiative, insiders say
Unexpected shift in funds has meant sharp drop in grants this fiscal year
001