Reposted by Tom PepinskyTom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 7hGreatest trick the Union ever pulled was sending the world's single greatest grifter into the heart of the neo-Confederacy's reactionary conservative establishment. 27613
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 7hGreatest trick the Union ever pulled was sending the world's single greatest grifter into the heart of the neo-Confederacy's reactionary conservative establishment. 27613
Reposted by Tom PepinskyMina Kimes @minakimes.bsky.social · 23hStraight up: As a woman in football, this sucks to listen to. This week in particular. 2226524676
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 10hAnglicans: "OK let's just get through this, and we go back to all hating each other over minor details later" In all seriousness, because this is a serious matter: the central axis of mainstream white American Christianity runs right through these three faith traditions. Forget Southern Baptists. 0141
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 11hoh yes. But even better --- rather than question their pribumi-ness, I question the premise of pribumi-ness in the first place. What does that even mean? Mahathir ends up being something of an interesting illustration of how situations give categories meaning. 100
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 11hnew epigraph for my book project on Malay as an ethnic category just dropped 171
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 12hAI-generated text about AI’s superpowers always has a through-the-looking-glass quality. “AI can sit inside that loop, and that is genuinely valuable, but it does not collapse the loop to a point.” Oh really now; tell me more, human interlocutor. www.anthropic.com/research/cla...anthropic.comClaude-shaped scienceMatthew Schwartz describes what happened when he stopped fighting Claude and allowed Claude to find “Claude-shaped” problems. This led him to build BootLoops, a toolkit for exact calculations in quant... 132
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 01/10/2026This is why it is actually a little tricky to build a political movement based on labor chauvinism 061
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 01/10/2026Jesus Christ, this is why you should not execute people 1141
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 01/10/2026It took me a minute figure out if this was referring to the guy on the left or the guy on the right 2111
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 01/10/2026I am. I told them how I felt, gave space, and then told them exactly what they should do if they ever receive a text or snap like that 020
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 30/09/2026And I should also clarify, many editors simply are not opposed to referees using AI to generate their reports. (I am not one of those editors, but I am not representative of all editors.) This puts authors in an unfortunate position. Again, it is a lousy time. 040
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 30/09/2026As an editor, I'll put it plainly: - it is almost certainly impossible to *prove* it was AI generated - even if the proof is ironclad, taking action against a referee is high-risk, low reward for the editor These are the structural forces that are shaping peer review right now. It is a lousy time 140
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 30/09/2026Editors behave differently and journal policies do too. I don't think there is any harm in alerting an editor to a suspected AI-generated report, but you should not expect that the editor will consider this to be actionable evidence of anything (to my great dismay, but one must be realistic) 490
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 30/09/2026no bro, the referees are gonna lose their mind about anticipation effects 020
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 30/09/2026Prepare your diff-in-diffs, we got a staggered rollout design here 2347
Reposted by Tom PepinskyCheer Captain @cheercaptain.wang · 30/09/2026Temple of the Dog - “Hunger Strike” 39622
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 30/09/2026This is a truly funny day in politics - Eric Schmitt confused NBA Hawks with NCAA Hawkeyes - In a politically consequential way! - And Amy Klobuchar is ball-knower, just roasting him - And we get to watch Katie Britt make this face Season 6 is the craziest Trump season yet 421004199
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 30/09/2026you're correct also! There are two etymologies, the Malay one is only for the fortress/settlement meaning www.etymonline.com/word/compoundetymonline.comCompound - Etymology, Origin & Meaning"to put together, to mix, to combine; to join, couple together," from Old French… See origin and meaning of compound. 020
Reposted by Tom PepinskyKate Manne @katemanne.bsky.social · 30/09/2026I wrote for @thecut.com about the Cornell case and what it says that, at my institution and many others like it, protesters are often punished more harshly than sexual assailants www.thecut.com/article/what...thecut.comWhat It Feels Like at Cornell Right NowAs a professor at the Ivy League school, Kate Manne has known many, many victims. There’s a palpable feeling on campus, she writes, that this is big. 531865616
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 30/09/2026I am not a Bali expert (sadly), but my basic sketch is: if you have to go south, Sanur; if you can escape and can afford it, Candi Dasa; if you want to laptop people, Ubud; if you're looking for something special, Kintamani 150
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 30/09/2026other good ones include ketchup (kecap), gong (gong), bamboo (bambu), compound (as in settlement, kampung), and cooties (kutu, meaning louse) 350
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 30/09/2026number one memory of my first trip to Bali is a gecko crapping on my face from the ceiling (fun fact, gecko is one of handful of English words that comes from Malay [gekok, after the sound that it makes]) 4321
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 30/09/2026I have never identified more with a politician than I do with the sheer joy on this face, joy that can only come from calmly destroying the argument of stupid rival who walked right into it 1425623
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 29/09/2026bro can't even remember to say Super Intelligence in the third sentence of a three sentence tweet 1202
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 29/09/2026<Tommy Tuberville barging through the door> Stay in your lane, Schmitt! There can be only one dumbest Senator, and as they say in my great home state of Florida, whoooo! 4205
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 29/09/2026I don't know the man, but this does read a little bit like something that an AI firm would support (currently reading Ramseyer and Rosenbluth on delegation, monitoring, the Japanese bureaucracy, and the 'developmental state', so observational equivalence is on the mind) 130
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 29/09/2026amazing: a philosophy professor at a liberal arts college who doesn't know about the, uh, liberal arts 1130
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 29/09/2026I think this is what will happen, and that will be fine! For academic composition, there will be variation across disciplines and countries as well. My prediction is that human-generated writing will be accorded more value on net, because it is more expensive and harder to produce 160
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 29/09/2026As a consequence, no one gets to say "I am allowed to use AI to write this" as a general matter. No you aren't. Your audience has a voice, and while you can try to persuade them that AI writing is fine they are under no obligation to agree with you 1181
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 29/09/2026A good liberal position on using AI for composing text is that individual use for individual purposes is nobody's business. Do what you like. But if you are generating text for an audience, you must anticipate the reactions of others. And writing is normally for other people, so norms will matter. 2265
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 29/09/2026We simply have not yet figured out the social norms of AI use for writing and composition. But they are emerging, and one clear signal is "you better not use AI yourself for academic purposes if you are also telling me I can't use it for my own academic purposes" www.nytimes.com/2026/09/29/u...nytimes.comDartmouth Provost Is the Latest College Professor Examined for A.I. Use (Gift Article)Dartmouth said it would investigate its provost over A.I. accusations. Similar controversies on other campuses have prompted frustration among students. 182
Reposted by Tom PepinskyKen Schultz @kschultz.bsky.social · 29/09/2026I’m sorry. Is the message “invest in us OR we’ll destroy humanity” or “invest in us AND we’ll destroy humanity“? 1827898
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 28/09/2026“I thoughtlessly engaged in Snapchat” This was a Snapchat that said, “come gang rape this woman” abcnews.com/US/district-...abcnews.comDistrict attorney reopens case of alleged Cornell University 'gang rape'Prosecutors in central New York say they are reopening the case of alleged gang rape at a Cornell University fraternity. 1243
Reposted by Tom PepinskyTom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 28/09/2026Now that we know a bit more about the Cornell story, I can say with great confidence: something is very wrong here. There must be justice. 0403
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 28/09/2026Now that we know a bit more about the Cornell story, I can say with great confidence: something is very wrong here. There must be justice. 0403
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 27/09/2026Take a time out and go change these uniforms, good gravy 030
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 27/09/2026The Bills are going to keep turning the ball over until they get rid of those ridiculous gray uniforms and absurd helmets 060
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 26/09/2026In case it's not clear, my argument here is normative rather than legal. I don't know the best way to sanction false citations, and I am not sure I can prove fraud in a court of law. Instead, I want to convince you that false citations are fraud. That is how you should feel when you encounter them. 070
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 26/09/2026If an existential claim is false, then the authorial claim is irrelevant. We don't need to know if the authorial claim would be valid if applied to a true reference to determine if the false citation is fraud. That simply does not matter 140
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 26/09/2026The novel argument, I believe, is that the fraud is located at the citation, not the reference, because the citation makes both an authorial claim ("source X argues that...") and an existential claim ("source X with features that are described in the references section exists") 140
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 26/09/2026tl;dr any mechanism that could generate a false citation implies fraud. Fraud does not simply mean deliberate false statements with the intent to deceive, it also means reckless or negligent disregard for the truth in the generation of statements. This applies to the case of false citations. 1112