Sign in

Sophie Duroy

@sophieduroy.bsky.social
1.6K followers 793 following 112 posts

Lecturer at @universityofessex.bsky.social | Formerly @kfgintlaw.bsky.social & @eui-law.bsky.social Public International Law - Intelligence & Security - Human Rights - Feminism. Book: shorturl.at/itU19

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
The Guardian @theguardian.com · 29/09/2026
Trial of live facial recognition in London stations ends with a false positive and no arrests
theguardian.com
Trial of live facial recognition in London stations ends with a false positive and no arrests
Freedom of information request finds six-month trial cost £320,000, used almost 100 police hours and led to just one – incorrect – alert A six-month trial of live facial recognition (LFR) technology in London’s railway stations that cost more than £320,000 and almost 100 hours of police officers’ time ended in one false match against a watchlist of suspects and no arrests. More than half a million faces were scanned between February and July this year in some of the capital’s busiest transport hubs during the British Transport Police (BTP) trial of the surveillance technology, which aimed to help catch offenders and people breaching court orders. Continue reading...
12139107
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
New blog out on Strasbourg Observers with @martinscheinin.bsky.social: strasbourgobservers.com/2026/09/25/k... We reflect on the Court’s proceduralist approach to mass surveillance, its implications for privacy and human rights, and the concerns raised by the joint dissenting opinion.
strasbourgobservers.com
Kanev v. Bulgaria: How far can the ECtHR sail tied to the mast of proceduralist review of surveillance? - Strasbourg Observers
By Martin Scheinin and Sophie Duroy The latest judgment on surveillance powers in Bulgaria, identified by the Court as a Key Case, is a puzzling read. The Court is undoubtedly right to find that Bulga...
012
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
La traduction française de mon article sur l’affaire Mazan/Pelicot, initialement publié dans @flsjournal.bsky.social, est désormais disponible en libre accès sur HAL. J’y analyse les logiques patriarcales qui continuent de structurer la réponse aux violences sexuelles. hal.science/hal-05748966v1
Page de garde de l'article
032
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Martin Scheinin @martinscheinin.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
Here's a fresh blog post written together with @sophieduroy.bsky.social - critical of the approach by @echr.coe.int concerning surveillance. Full review vs double standards; proceduralism vs essential core & strict proportionality; Ulysses; hammer & nail strasbourgobservers.com/2026/09/25/k...
strasbourgobservers.com
Kanev v. Bulgaria: How far can the ECtHR sail tied to the mast of proceduralist review of surveillance? - Strasbourg Observers
By Martin Scheinin and Sophie Duroy The latest judgment on surveillance powers in Bulgaria, identified by the Court as a Key Case, is a puzzling read. The Court is undoubtedly right to find that Bulga...
062
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
New blog out on Strasbourg Observers with @martinscheinin.bsky.social: strasbourgobservers.com/2026/09/25/k... We reflect on the Court’s proceduralist approach to mass surveillance, its implications for privacy and human rights, and the concerns raised by the joint dissenting opinion.
strasbourgobservers.com
Kanev v. Bulgaria: How far can the ECtHR sail tied to the mast of proceduralist review of surveillance? - Strasbourg Observers
By Martin Scheinin and Sophie Duroy The latest judgment on surveillance powers in Bulgaria, identified by the Court as a Key Case, is a puzzling read. The Court is undoubtedly right to find that Bulga...
012
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
La traduction française de mon article sur l’affaire Mazan/Pelicot, initialement publié dans @flsjournal.bsky.social, est désormais disponible en libre accès sur HAL. J’y analyse les logiques patriarcales qui continuent de structurer la réponse aux violences sexuelles. hal.science/hal-05748966v1
Page de garde de l'article
032
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Mediapart @mediapart.fr · 10/09/2026
L’examen de la loi intégrale contre les violences sexistes et sexuelles a commencé à l’Assemblée nationale. Que prévoit ce texte ? Quels débats fait-il naître ? Les 3 milliards d’euros nécessaires à son application seront-ils débloqués ? On en débat avec nos invitées. Par À l’air libre
l.mediapart.fr
Loi intégrale contre les violences sexistes et sexuelles : l’espoir et les doutes
L’examen de la loi intégrale contre les violences sexistes et sexuelles a commencé à l’Assemblée nationale. Que prévoit ce texte ? Quels débats fait-il naître ? Les 3 milliards d’euros nécessaires à son application seront-ils débloqués ? On en débat avec nos invitées.
02814
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
NEW PUBLICATION Very happy to share that my article on the Mazan/Pelicot case has been published in @flsjournal.bsky.social Read it open access here: doi.org/10.1007/s106... It is a very personal article, and I owe a lot to the colleagues & friends who helped me find my voice on this topic.
Screenshot of the article webpage. Abstract: This article offers a feminist socio-legal analysis of the Mazan case—the 2024 trial of 51 men for the rape of Gisèle Pelicot in France—and the 2025 consent law reform it inspired. Combining feminist legal theory, critical legal analysis, and situated reflection, it examines how patriarchal societies and legal systems convert gendered violence into narratives of protection and progress. Drawing on Iris Marion Young’s analysis of the logic of masculinist protection, the article shows how law, politics, and public discourse surrounding the case reproduced the patriarchal bargain that casts men and the state as protectors while shielding them from accountability. Through analysis of the myth of the “good man”, judicial responses to sexual violence, hierarchies of victims, and the structural affinities between patriarchal and security logics, the article argues that the Mazan case offered only the illusion of remedy, confirming the patriarchal system it appeared to challenge.
037
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Guillaume Meurice @guillaumemeurice.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
🚨 rdv à 18h en live sur Twitch pour débriefer avec vous et Eugénie Mérieau vos propositions pour une nouvelle Constitution (pour ne plus jamais qu'Édouard Philippe et Gabriel Attal n'aient à jouer au prolo devant des caméras) ! 🇫🇷 www.ecrivonsla.com?page=wiki-co...
ecrivonsla.com
Écrivons-la — La plateforme citoyenne participative
Déposez vos doléances, proposez des articles constitutionnels, votez pour les causes qui comptent et, avec WikiConsti, réécrivez collectivement la Constitution. Gratuit, sans inscription obligatoire.
26016
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
NEW PUBLICATION Very happy to share that my article on the Mazan/Pelicot case has been published in @flsjournal.bsky.social Read it open access here: doi.org/10.1007/s106... It is a very personal article, and I owe a lot to the colleagues & friends who helped me find my voice on this topic.
Screenshot of the article webpage. Abstract: This article offers a feminist socio-legal analysis of the Mazan case—the 2024 trial of 51 men for the rape of Gisèle Pelicot in France—and the 2025 consent law reform it inspired. Combining feminist legal theory, critical legal analysis, and situated reflection, it examines how patriarchal societies and legal systems convert gendered violence into narratives of protection and progress. Drawing on Iris Marion Young’s analysis of the logic of masculinist protection, the article shows how law, politics, and public discourse surrounding the case reproduced the patriarchal bargain that casts men and the state as protectors while shielding them from accountability. Through analysis of the myth of the “good man”, judicial responses to sexual violence, hierarchies of victims, and the structural affinities between patriarchal and security logics, the article argues that the Mazan case offered only the illusion of remedy, confirming the patriarchal system it appeared to challenge.
037
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Dr. Oswald Sobrino @oswaldsobrino.bsky.social · 23/08/2026
I found it quite useful: How to Write a Thesis, According to Umberto Eco thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/umberto-eco-... #Education #Writing via @mitpress.bsky.social
thereader.mitpress.mit.edu
Umberto Eco's Guide to Writing a Thesis
A funny and unpretentious guide by the illustrious novelist Umberto Eco, for his favorite audience: teachers and their students.
083
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Lisa Stampnitzky 🤷🏻‍♀️ @lisastampnitzky.bsky.social · 18/06/2026
(Trigger warning: any sociologists among us may wish to avert their eyes to avoid spontaneous combustion resulting from exposure to the worst theory of social action I have seen in decades) For the rest of you, beware if you are “unhappy” or “looking for justice” you may be on the road to terrorism
Image from the UK dept for education.  The “pyramid” theory of terrorism.  Image of a pyramid, with layers in ascending order labeled “unhappy people”,”looking for justice”, “frustration, perceived grievances and anger”, “seeks like
Minded individuals or groups”, “further radicalisation”, “attack”
146916223
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Daniella Lock @daniellalock.bsky.social · 18/06/2026
Here are some thoughts on the new Court of Appeal Palestine Action ruling, written with @alangreene.bsky.social and @colinmurray.bsky.social for @verfassungsblog.de verfassungsblog.de/palestine-ac...
Quote from the blog: 'The Court creates an impression of judicial scrutiny, but one so lacking in substance as to embolden even far more reaching uses of executive powers in the future'
26131
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 10/06/2026
🚨 NEW PUBLICATION 🚨 Delighted to see our paper published open access in the @eui-law.bsky.social Working Papers series: hdl.handle.net/1814/95303 @martinscheinin.bsky.social and I critically examine the ECtHR's approach to mass surveillance and the future of Article 8 privacy protections.
hdl.handle.net
National security as exception : the European Court of Human Rights and the proceduralisation of privacy in the age of mass surveillance
This paper critically analyses European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence on bulk data collection, situating it within the Court’s broader turn to proceduralism. We argue that, in cases concerning m...
024
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Martin Scheinin @martinscheinin.bsky.social · 10/06/2026
Here we go: new @eui-law.bsky.social working paper by @sophieduroy.bsky.social and myself on the European Court of Human Rights and mass/bulk surveillance. We critique the ECtHR for its turn to proceduralism and reasonableness over the essence of HR & proper proportionality hdl.handle.net/1814/95303
hdl.handle.net
National security as exception : the European Court of Human Rights and the proceduralisation of privacy in the age of mass surveillance
This paper critically analyses European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence on bulk data collection, situating it within the Court’s broader turn to proceduralism. We argue that, in cases concerning m...
001
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 10/06/2026
🚨 NEW PUBLICATION 🚨 Delighted to see our paper published open access in the @eui-law.bsky.social Working Papers series: hdl.handle.net/1814/95303 @martinscheinin.bsky.social and I critically examine the ECtHR's approach to mass surveillance and the future of Article 8 privacy protections.
hdl.handle.net
National security as exception : the European Court of Human Rights and the proceduralisation of privacy in the age of mass surveillance
This paper critically analyses European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence on bulk data collection, situating it within the Court’s broader turn to proceduralism. We argue that, in cases concerning m...
024
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 10/06/2026
Excellent piece. Two key points, in my view: "The strike manufactured the war whose laws it now invokes for cover." "Whatever is permissible for Israel and the United States in 2026 is available to any state with the reach to attempt it in 2027."
000
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Simeon Shtebunaev @shtebunaev.bsky.social · 09/06/2026
The state of higher education in the UK, in a photo
512853
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Janina Dill @janinadill.bsky.social · 08/06/2026
The list of countries threatened with U.S. military intervention is growing · Venezuela 🇻🇪 · Iran 🇮🇷 · Cuba 🇨🇺 · Greenland 🇬🇱 · Canada 🇨🇦 …just this year! Do they all want "Liberation"? No, I argue in @foreignaffairs.com
12612
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Benjamin Braun @benbraun.social · 30/05/2026
Any attempt to fight this storm must start from the "recognition that the task facing a mature society is to adapt its methods of financing universities to sustaining the purposes for which such institutions exist – rather than, as at present, the other way round." Stefan Collini in @lrb.co.uk. 3/
lrb.co.uk
Stefan Collini · Squadrons of Pigs: Bonfire of the Universities
The problems with Britain’s universities are systemic and deep-rooted, not just local or contingent. Yet political and...
16720
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
London Review of Books @lrb.co.uk · 26/05/2026
‘The truth is that both ministers and vice-chancellors are locked into a financial model whose premise is misconceived and whose side effects are profoundly damaging for higher education.’ Stefan Collini on the UK’s university problems, online now from the next issue. www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...
lrb.co.uk
Stefan Collini · Squadrons of Pigs
The problems with Britain’s universities are systemic and deep-rooted, not just local or contingent. Yet political and...
02118
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 25/05/2026
Is it ever acceptable to kill a few to spare the many? Is assassination a powerful tool for the future? Great debate at HowTheLightGetsIn Festival with David Whetham and Roy Allison, hosted by Angie Hobbs and the Forum for European Philosophy.
033
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
UCU Westminster @ucuwestminster.bsky.social · 23/05/2026
Always.
"UCU supports trans rights" against blue, pink and white flag
0114
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 25/05/2026
Is it ever acceptable to kill a few to spare the many? Is assassination a powerful tool for the future? Great debate at HowTheLightGetsIn Festival with David Whetham and Roy Allison, hosted by Angie Hobbs and the Forum for European Philosophy.
033
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 25/04/2026
Best thing I've listened to in a while. Great discussion on the current state of the international order, its future, and what we (scholars/states) can and should do.
130
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 20/04/2026
New essay, forthcoming in the inaugural issue of the Armenian Journal of International Law and already available on SSRN: dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn... Comments welcome!
Screenshot of paper's title page.
International law’s purgatory: Strategic uses of international law and the hollowing of the liberal international order
Sophie Duroy, University of Essex
Abstract
This essay challenges accounts that locate the crisis of the liberal international order primarily in growing noncompliance or open defiance of international law. It argues instead that the present moment is the culmination of decades of strategic legal justification. In recent decades, states have increasingly engaged international law to reinterpret, proceduralise, and instrumentalise it in ways that expand the scope of permissible violence while preserving law’s authority as a legitimising discourse. Through practices ranging from expansive readings of self-defence and proportionality to the routinisation of targeted killing, mass surveillance, and selective third-party interventions before international courts, contested interpretations have gradually reshaped the content of legal norms without formal amendment. This process of informal legal change has hollowed out international law’s constraining function while entrenching its discursive centrality. Situating these dynamics within debates on double standards and transitional orders, the essay conceptualises international law as occupying a “purgatory”: normatively authoritative yet increasingly ineffective as a restraint on power.
0114
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 20/04/2026
New essay, forthcoming in the inaugural issue of the Armenian Journal of International Law and already available on SSRN: dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn... Comments welcome!
Screenshot of paper's title page.
International law’s purgatory: Strategic uses of international law and the hollowing of the liberal international order
Sophie Duroy, University of Essex
Abstract
This essay challenges accounts that locate the crisis of the liberal international order primarily in growing noncompliance or open defiance of international law. It argues instead that the present moment is the culmination of decades of strategic legal justification. In recent decades, states have increasingly engaged international law to reinterpret, proceduralise, and instrumentalise it in ways that expand the scope of permissible violence while preserving law’s authority as a legitimising discourse. Through practices ranging from expansive readings of self-defence and proportionality to the routinisation of targeted killing, mass surveillance, and selective third-party interventions before international courts, contested interpretations have gradually reshaped the content of legal norms without formal amendment. This process of informal legal change has hollowed out international law’s constraining function while entrenching its discursive centrality. Situating these dynamics within debates on double standards and transitional orders, the essay conceptualises international law as occupying a “purgatory”: normatively authoritative yet increasingly ineffective as a restraint on power.
0114
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Intelligence and National Security @intnatsecjournal.bsky.social · 16/04/2026
Available online now - a fantastic roundtable on The Polly Corrigan Book Prize Winner 2024, The Regulation of Intelligence Activities under International Law, by Sophie Duroy. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
tandfonline.com
The Polly Corrigan Book Prize Winner 2024, The Regulation of Intelligence Activities under International Law
Published in Intelligence and National Security (Ahead of Print, 2026)
085
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 16/04/2026
A roundtable on my book is now out in @intnatsecjournal.bsky.social Grateful for the thoughtful and generous engagements. A great interdisciplinary exchange on law, intelligence, and security, permitted by @kcsi.uk's Polly Corrigan Book Prize. doi.org/10.1080/0268... @elgarpublishing.bsky.social
098
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 16/04/2026
A roundtable on my book is now out in @intnatsecjournal.bsky.social Grateful for the thoughtful and generous engagements. A great interdisciplinary exchange on law, intelligence, and security, permitted by @kcsi.uk's Polly Corrigan Book Prize. doi.org/10.1080/0268... @elgarpublishing.bsky.social
098
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Brian Finucane @bcfinucane.bsky.social · 13/04/2026
Trump nicely connecting the lawless boat strikes with his illegal war against Iran. The killing spree at sea was an inflection point as it established that the US military would in fact carry out unlawful orders and conduct patently illegal targeting.
5316121
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Ian Dunt @iandunt.bsky.social · 13/04/2026
Good morning and goddamn it's a beautiful day iandunt.substack.com/p/orban-defe...
iandunt.substack.com
Orban defeated: Good morning and goddamn it's a beautiful day
All of a sudden, after months of total darkness, there is hope.
802968497
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 13/04/2026
Important remarks on legal advisers' duty to say no @ejiltalk.bsky.social: www.ejiltalk.org/when-governm... I'd also encourage everyone to read David Luban's article on Lösener and von Moltke: scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2368/ & Lavinia Parsi's excellent article: doi.org/10.1093/jicj...
ejiltalk.org
When Government Lawyers Say No
There are times when government lawyers (including military legal advisors) are faced with a stark choice. Their political masters (or their superiors in the military) are clearly set on pursing a cer...
032
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 10/04/2026
This is an excellent piece. Beyond the Minab school strike and the very human decisions that led to it, it is a reminder that compressing the kill chain (through tech or otherwise) has always led to targeting errors - in violation of IHL. www.theguardian.com/news/2026/ma...
Screenshot reading: It has also occluded something deeper: the human decisions that led to the killing of between 175 and 180 people, most of them girls between the ages of seven and 12. Someone decided to compress the kill chain. Someone decided that deliberation was latency. Someone decided to build a system that produces 1,000 targeting decisions an hour and call them high-quality. Someone decided to start this war. Several hundred people are sitting on Capitol Hill, refusing to stop it. Calling it an “AI problem” gives those decisions, and those people, a place to hide.
010
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Just Security @justsecurity.org · 01/04/2026
The killing of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei signals the end to the US ban on political assassinations, write Luca Trenta and Arturo Jimenez-Bacardi. And, they say, "it opens the door for other States to embrace the use of force to eliminate foreign adversaries."
justsecurity.org
Khamenei’s Killing and the Perilous Death of the Assassination Ban
Khamenei’s killing ends U.S. ban on assassination, deepens U.S.-Israeli lethal ties, and invites States to abandon diplomacy for violence.
24318
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Luca Trenta @lucatrenta.bsky.social · 28/03/2026
Thanks, Martin Sandbu for featuring me in this @financialtimes.com story on decapitation.
062
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Verfassungsblog @verfassungsblog.de · 27/03/2026
International law is increasingly cast as an obstacle to “just wars” against dictators. CHRISTOPHER JANZ shows why this narrative serves as a justification for abandoning the law as a practice to legitimise political actions. verfassungsblog.de/tyrannys-use...
If one does not need to give any reason for a decision, it can be based solely on (impulsive) interests.
0127
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Just Security @justsecurity.org · 26/03/2026
The Minab strike placed squarely before the public a key question: how does the law governing war protect civilians when the intelligence supporting a strike is wrong, and what legal consequences flow from getting it wrong? From Joseph Orenstein: www.justsecurity.org/134350/legal...
justsecurity.org
When Intelligence Fails: A Legal Targeting Analysis of the Minab School Strike
The law of armed conflict demands that we take the Minab school strike seriously to learn, to reform, and to prevent the next failure.
13020
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Luca Trenta @lucatrenta.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
Since we now know that the timing of the strikes and broader attack aimed at killing the senior leadership, maybe we can do away with legal sophistry, and call this an assassination? Just a thought. www.reuters.com/world/middle...
reuters.com
Exclusive: Trump approved Iran operation after Netanyahu argued for joint killing of Khamenei, sources say
Less than 48 hours before the strike on Iran, Netanyahu spoke by phone to President Trump.
055
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
London Review of Books @lrb.co.uk · 24/03/2026
‘The Israeli government wasn’t concerned with settling a political arrangement that would emerge on the “day after” – the lawn had to be burned to its roots.’ Online now from the next issue, Amjad Iraqi on the Israeli military playbook. www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...
lrb.co.uk
Amjad Iraqi · Short Cuts: From Gaza to Iran
It’s no surprise that Operation Roaring Lion (Israel’s name for its campaign) and Operation Epic Fury (as the US...
0106
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Howard Eissenstat @heissenstat.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
I have no idea how this war ends. Nothing I have seen suggests to me that anyone else does either.
4175
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Fionnuala NÍ Aoláin KC (Hons) @niaolainf.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
Had me laughing and crying simultaneously. no01.substack.com/p/march-19-2...
no01.substack.com
March, 19-21: God is a comedian
A stiff drink is recommended
021
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Just Security @justsecurity.org · 20/03/2026
The relationship between regime change and IHL is one of inherent tension, incentivizing battlefields where the law is viewed as an obstacle rather than an essential constraint. Gabor Rona urges the international community to resist this “sliding scale”: #IHL #regimechange #Iran #JusadBellum
justsecurity.org
Fighting an Illegal War and Fighting a War Illegally
The relationship between regime change and IHL is one of inherent tension, casting IHL as an obstacle rather than an essential constraint.
04820
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Luca Trenta @lucatrenta.bsky.social · 20/03/2026
Almost as if assassination is becoming normalised.
053
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 20/03/2026
Not to be that person, but this is what happens when you make assassination a tool of foreign policy. Other states, including and especially those whose officials you targeted, can do the same. @lucatrenta.bsky.social and I wrote about it for @verfassungsblog.de: verfassungsblog.de/is-the-inter...
verfassungsblog.de
Is the International Norm Against Assassination Dead?
066
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Luca Trenta @lucatrenta.bsky.social · 19/03/2026
Nice to appear on @aljazeera.com Inside Story to discuss the war in Iran and the role assassination plays and has played in Israeli and US foreign policy.
142
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Just Security @justsecurity.org · 18/03/2026
An Unserious Justification for an Unnecessary War: Assessing the U.S. “Article 51” Letter to the U.N. on Iran War By @bcfinucane.bsky.social, former State Department attorney #IranWar www.justsecurity.org/134290/us-ar...
justsecurity.org
An Unserious Justification for an Unnecessary War: Assessing the U.S. “Article 51” Letter to U.N. on Iran War
Former State Department attorney writes that the U.S. letter to the UN Security Council fails to identify legal basis for Iran attack.
14734
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Sophie Duroy @sophieduroy.bsky.social · 10/03/2026
🚨 New publication Very happy to share that my article in @globcon.bsky.social has now been published open access. You can read it here: doi.org/10.1017/S204...
Abstract of the paper: This article examines the paradoxical effects of international legal accountability processes on the international law of intelligence. In response to increasing exposure of their intelligence activities, liberal democracies have shifted from a national security culture of secrecy to one of legal rationalisation, offering legal justifications to defend and legitimate contested practices. Rather than improving compliance, accountability processes have enabled states to strategically reshape legal norms to accommodate their preferred policies. Focusing on how legal justifications affect international law’s constraining function, the article analyses the effects of legal justifications on three dimensions of legal norms: obligation, precision and delegation. Intertwining doctrinal legal analysis with International Relations scholarship on rhetorical and justificatory approaches to international law, it identifies four causal mechanisms through which strategic legal justifications decrease law’s constraining power on state behaviour and facilitate norm evasion. The article demonstrates how strategic uses of international law for legitimation purposes can gradually alter legal norms without formal changes to legal texts or institutions, ultimately decreasing international law’s constraining power. Shedding light on the limits and risks of legalisation as a regulatory strategy, these findings raise important questions about the effectiveness and adequacy of legal accountability strategies, particularly strategic litigation, in inducing behavioural change.
087
Reposted by Sophie Duroy
Cambridge University Press Political Science & IR @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org · 10/03/2026
#OpenAccess from @globcon.bsky.social - When intelligence accountability backfires: How states’ strategic legal justifications undermine international law - cup.org/4cEedPg - @sophieduroy.bsky.social #FirstView #IntLaw
043