Sign in

Science Feedback

@sciencefeedback.bsky.social
5.8K followers 448 following 396 posts

Scientists sorting fact from fiction in scientific media coverage. ➡️ science.feedback.org French account: @sciencefeedback-fr.bsky.social

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Science Feedback
CAAD_Coalition @caadcoalition.bsky.social · 09/07/2026
In a new explainer, @sciencefeedback.bsky.social breaks down what El Niño actually is, how it overlaps with human‑caused climate change, and how that confusion is exploited in climate misinformation. science.feedback.org/el-nino-misi...
science.feedback.org
2026’s El Niño may bring storms, heatwaves – and misinformation
El Niño doesn’t cause climate change, so why do people claim it does?
075
Reposted by Science Feedback
ProPublica @propublica.org · 18/02/2026
NEW: The FDA has removed a webpage warning about dangerous therapies claiming to treat autism. It’s part of a series of actions the agency has taken under RFK Jr. to discredit long-established science. By @megomatz.bsky.social
propublica.org
Chlorine Dioxide, Raw Camel Milk: The FDA No Longer Warns Against These and Other Ineffective Autism Treatments
The FDA has taken down a webpage warning about therapies and products making “false claims” of treating autism. It’s part of a series of actions the agency has taken under Secretary Robert F. Kennedy ...
28128661538
Reposted by Science Feedback
Stephan Lewandowsky @lewan.uk · 05/02/2026
2. The DSA mandates that platforms take down illegal content, such as CSAM and scams and offers to buy and sell illegal goods. Meta is earning $7 billion from scam ads each year, suggesting that such consumer protection is essential. www.reuters.com/inve... 5/9
1151
Reposted by Science Feedback
Stephan Lewandowsky @lewan.uk · 05/02/2026
There have been increasingly shrill accusations against the EU over its digital legislation, based on accusations of "censorship" by defenders of "free speech" -- including, so it appears, the right to peddle an AI app that seemingly produces child sexual abuse material (CSAM). 1/9
16533
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 20/01/2026
We’ve seen recurring claims on social media and in TV segments that cattle are good for the climate, or even 'carbon-negative'. These claims often misrepresent the research they cite or rely on narrow case studies. science.feedback.org/review/impac...
science.feedback.org
Viral claims that cows and beef are climate solutions ignore the impacts of cattle farms
Research says that most cattle farms emit more greenhouse gas than they absorb.
121
Reposted by Science Feedback
Michael E. Mann @michaelemann.bsky.social · 19/01/2026
For those who aren't aware, Google's AI summary chatbot Gemini is programmed to refuse to acknowledge that Joe Biden won the 2020 election. Compare the two cases:
811050
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 20/12/2025
TikTok videos promote supplements and vaginal gels claiming to treat #HPV infection But these lack large well-designed trials to show safety and effectiveness Review by @kevinault.bsky.social & Linda Eckert @uwdeptmedicine.bsky.social science.feedback.org/hpv-infectio...
science.feedback.org
Beware of unregulated products claiming to treat HPV infection
From dietary supplements to vaginal gels with probiotics, TikTok is awash with products claiming to treat HPV infection. But evidence for these claims is scarce.
1132
Reposted by Science Feedback
Marc Veldhoen @marcveld.bsky.social · 19/09/2025
With the viral season upon us, the debate over vaccination will flare up again. It remains strange to watch: the advantages are many, well established, and increasingly better supported by evidence, including benefits against non-communicable diseases. 1/10
38735
Reposted by Science Feedback
EU DisinfoLab @disinfo.eu · 09/12/2025
💡𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐬 𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐛𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧? Join us on Thursday, 11 December (14:30 CET) as we present the findings of the SIMODS study, a 𝐬𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜, 𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐬-𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦 𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 on how six VLOPs are performing against disinfo. 🗣️ Emmanuel Vincent, from Science Feedback 🔗 us06web.zoom.us/webinar/regi...
0118
Reposted by Science Feedback
Daniel Swain @weatherwest.bsky.social · 08/12/2025
Additionally, it appears that all of EPA's previously extensive "indicators of climate change" pages have been scrubbed entirely. The pages no longer exist; there are numerous dead links on the current/live EPA site, and no indication they have been moved to a new URL.
Snapshot of EPA's "indicators of climate change" page, which no longer exists.
517656
Reposted by Science Feedback
Daniel Swain @weatherwest.bsky.social · 08/12/2025
This can be confirmed using the Wayback Machine's last snapshot (from Oct 8, 2025). At some point between Oct 8 & Dec 8, major changes were made to this and other EPA climate change content. Information has either been removed completely or "adjusted" to emphasize natural causes.
Snapshot of EPA "causes of climate change" webpage from Oct 8, 2025, showing major changes that systematically de-emphasize or exclude human causes of climate change.
214036
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 04/12/2025
Some posts on social media are claiming a South Korean study shows COVID-19 vaccines “weaken the immune system”. That’s misleading, and the study’s authors say so themselves. science.feedback.org/review/south...
science.feedback.org
South Korea study doesn't show COVID vaccines weaken immunity
Study examining trends in respiratory infections is misrepresented to spread COVID vaccine misinformation.
151
Reposted by Science Feedback
Ruth Mottram @ruthmottram.eurosky.social · 03/12/2025
I'm preparing a briefing on #SeaLevelRise and my hunt for an image led me to the wikipedia page and holy moly it's good... If you want to learn about many different aspects, I'd definitely start there. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_lev...
en.wikipedia.org
Sea level rise - Wikipedia
14118
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
Some TikTok videos claiming that Vitamin D can “shrink fibroids” have millions of views (+ plenty of supplements to sell) A Science Feedback review shows there’s more hype than evidence behind these claims & some videos push dangerously high doses of Vitamin D science.feedback.org/review/vitam...
science.feedback.org
Insufficient evidence for claim that vitamin D shrinks fibroids
Research finds low vitamin D levels are associated with fibroids. But association alone isn't proof of causation.
120
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 29/09/2025
🚨 New report out: the first cross-platform, cross-country baseline on misinformation in Europe Based on large scale data analysis: ~2.6M posts (24B views) collected on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, X & YouTube science.feedback.org/first-measurement-disinformation-major-platforms-europe
science.feedback.org
What our first measurement says about disinformation on major platforms in Europe - Science Feedback
Science Feedback and partners have released a first measurement of Structural Indicators across six Very Large Online Platforms (VLOPs) in four EU member states (France, Spain, Poland, Slovakia). Belo...
12616
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 09/09/2025
Claims that DMSO can treat everything from pain to cancer often rely on anecdotes—not solid clinical evidence. Science Feedback reviewed these claims and found major gaps.
🔗 science.feedback.org/beware-mirac...
141
Reposted by Science Feedback
Jenny Allen @jennyallen.bsky.social · 06/08/2025
New in TiCS w @dgrand.bsky.social @gordpennycook.bsky.social It’s been ~10yrs since misinfo research exploded but our paradigms are stuck in the post-2016 “fake news” model Time for new approaches: o True/False → Content that misleads o Belief → Behavior o Eval interventions in ambiguous settings
39739
Reposted by Science Feedback
Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf @rahmstorf.bsky.social · 13/08/2025
I checked the claim of the DOE report that sea level is rising at a lower rate than predicted by IPCC: it is false. For 2030, the IPCC AR6 predicts a best estimate 9-10 cm relative to 1995-2014 (Table 9.9). The satellite data show a rise of 74 mm until 2025. At this rate that will be 93 mm by 2030.
8309119
Reposted by Science Feedback
Verified Accounts @verifiedusers.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
🛡️ @sciencefeedback.bsky.social has been verified by @bsky.team Track verified accounts and trusted verifiers at bverified.vercel.app!
011
Reposted by Science Feedback
Andrew Dessler @andrewdessler.com · 09/08/2025
Nice article about NASEM review of the endangerment finding by @insideclimatenews.org National Academies Will Review Endangerment Finding Science insideclimatenews.org/news/0708202...
Andrew Dessler, director of the Texas Center for Extreme Weather at Texas A&M University, said the new controversy that the Trump administration had stirred around climate science was a fitting subject for a fast-track effort by the National Academies.

“The National Academies [were] established exactly to do things like this—to answer questions of scientific importance for the government,” he said. “This is what the DOE should have done all along, rather than hire five people who represent a tiny minority of the scientific community and have views that virtually nobody else agrees with.”
03114
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 08/08/2025
A viral claim from a Japanese anti-mRNA vaccine group says: “The more shots you get, the sooner you die.” It’s based on a fundamental error in interpreting data. Here’s why this conclusion doesn’t hold up: 🔗 science.feedback.org/review/inade... 1/7
science.feedback.org
No, Japanese COVID vaccine database doesn't show "the more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die"
A fair comparison of an unvaccinated group with a vaccinated group requires that the two groups are matched in terms of age and medical condition. Multiple published studies have shown that COVID-19 v...
170
Reposted by Science Feedback
Michael E. Mann @michaelemann.bsky.social · 07/08/2025
"Misleading U.S. Department of Energy climate report chooses bias over science, climate scientists say" | Article by the team at @sciencefeedback.bsky.social: science.feedback.org/review/misle...
science.feedback.org
Misleading U.S. Department of Energy climate report chooses bias over science, climate scientists say
DOE report written by climate contrarians shares misleading information on climate change and excludes well-established evidence.
38233
Reposted by Science Feedback
Gavin Schmidt @climateofgavin.bsky.social · 03/08/2025
Is sea level around the US accelerating? If you actually do the analysis, instead of just repeating talking points from decades ago, the answer is yes. tamino.wordpress.com/2025/08/03/s...
tamino.wordpress.com
Sea Level Mis-information from DOE
Here in the USA, the Department of Energy (DOE) has issued a report titled “A Critical Review of the Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate.” It is a product of the &#8…
17530210
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 06/08/2025
In July 2025, the U.S. DOE released a climate report tied to EPA’s proposed rollback of emissions rules. The report claims to challenge decades of climate science… But scientists say it is unscientific and misrepresents key findings 🧵 science.feedback.org/review/misle...
science.feedback.org
Misleading U.S. Department of Energy climate report chooses bias over science, climate scientists say
DOE report written by climate contrarians shares misleading information on climate change and excludes well-established evidence.
2135
Reposted by Science Feedback
Andrew Dessler @andrewdessler.com · 31/07/2025
🚨 If you're interested in working on a coordinated response to the DOE climate report, please enter your info on this google form 🚨 Please RT this so as many people see it as possible. forms.gle/BL9xUAfRxA...
forms.gle
DOE climate report response form
We are collecting names to assemble a writing team to respond to the DOE climate working group report. If you'd like to contribute, enter your info below. At this point, there is no guarantee what we'll do (if anything), but we want to keep our options open by collecting names. If you have any further questions, feel free to email me. We are primarily looking for Ph.D. scientists at universities or government labs in appropriate fields. I realize that this will exclude some qualified people and I apologize, but we felt this was necessary for a variety of reasons.
10200235
Reposted by Science Feedback
Zeke Hausfather @zekehausfather.com · 29/07/2025
The EPA cited my paper in their argument against the endangerment finding today. However, their point is completely backwards: my paper actually supports the EPA's 2009 range of 1.8C to 4C warming by 2100. www.nature.com/artic...
18708281
Reposted by Science Feedback
Andrew Dessler @andrewdessler.com · 30/07/2025
I've been getting a lot of requests for comments on the DOE report "A critical review of the impact of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions on the U.S. climate". Here are some initial thoughts. More will come later.
This DOE report is best understood through the lens of a well-known saying: “process is product.” In other words, the final document reflects the process that created it — including, most importantly, who was selected to write it. The authors of this report are widely recognized contrarians who don’t represent the mainstream scientific consensus. If almost any other group of scientists had been chosen, the report would have been dramatically different. The only way to get this report was to pick these authors.
The report they produced should be thought of as a law brief from attorneys defending their client, carbon dioxide. Their goal is not to weigh the evidence fairly but to build the strongest possible case for CO2’s innocence. This is a fundamental departure from the norms of science. 
A lawyer is expected to represent their client zealously and selectively, presenting only the information that strengthens their case and leaving it to the opposing counsel to present the other side. In fact, a lawyer who stood up in court and gave equal weight to both sides of a case would be considered professionally negligent, possibly even disbarred.
In science, the standard is the opposite. Scientists are obligated to engage with the full range of evidence, especially that which might contradict their hypotheses. Ignoring contrary data is not just bad practice, in some cases it can rise to the level of scientific misconduct. 
Scientific credibility depends on a willingness to base conclusions on all of the evidence. When scientists cherry-pick data or misrepresent the balance of evidence, they are violating a core principle of the discipline.
In this report, the authors are firmly in lawyer mode. They sift through data to find the few examples that support their narrative while systematically ignoring the much larger body of evidence that contradicts it. 
In conclusion, this report does not appear to be a fair assessment of the state of climate science.
914860
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 30/07/2025
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱? A recent study found that Earth’s energy balance – the difference between incoming solar energy and outgoing heat – has more than doubled in recent decades. agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/...
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Earth's Energy Imbalance More Than Doubled in Recent Decades
Earth's energy imbalance more than doubled in recent decades The large trend has taken us by surprise, and as a community we should strive to understand the underlying causes Our capability to o...
131
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 29/07/2025
𝗪𝗵𝗼'𝘀 𝘀𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀? 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗮𝘆 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆'𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝘁𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗰𝘀? Our monthly newsletter (in English and French) helps you track the latest misinformation trends and what scientists are really finding while keeping an eye on policy in this domain.
294
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
1/ 📢 A recent investigation by @Science Feedback and @Alliance4Europe reveals that hundreds of illegal Russian posts remain active on X within the EU, despite numerous user reports under the #DigitalServicesAct (DSA) and clear violations of EU sanctions. science.feedback.org/flagged-and-...
science.feedback.org
Flagged and Ignored: Testing X’s Response to EU Sanction Violations  - Science Feedback
Executive Summary  Researchers identified hundreds of posts violating EU sanctions on the social media platform X. X is categorised as a “Very Large Online Platform” (VLOP) under the Digital Services ...
154
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 17/07/2025
This week at @cgf-uk.bsky.social at European Media&Information Fund Annual Conference, our founder Emmanuel Vincent presented in a panel on what data researchers need to effectively implement European Code of Conduct on Disinformation&advance transparency obligations under the #DigitalServicesAct.
143
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 03/07/2025
𝗪𝗵𝗼’𝘀 𝗮𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰 𝗰𝗮𝗿? A joint report by @sciencefeedback.bsky.social @newtral.es analyzed 9,000+ pieces of content across social media, messaging platforms, TV&radio, in Spain, France, Germany, and the UK, revealing how misleading narratives are slowing down Europe’s green transition. ⤵️
150
Reposted by Science Feedback
Damian Carrington @dpcarrington.bsky.social · 19/06/2025
Climate misinformation turning crisis into catastrophe - major report - IPIE Report comes as a UN human rights official says climate lies should be criminalised and #COP30 Brazil host urges a global crackdown #climatecrisis Story by me www.theguardian.com/environment/...
theguardian.com
Climate misinformation turning crisis into catastrophe – major report
False claims obstructing climate action, say researchers, amid calls for climate lies to be criminalised
57743
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 23/06/2025
First #heatwave of 2025 hit the UK last weekend, with temps 🌡️ above 32°C in southeast England. It's well-established that climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of heatwaves, but last week, World Weather Attribution scientists specifically analyzed this event's climate change ties.
141
Reposted by Science Feedback
David Rand @dgrand.bsky.social · 17/06/2025
🚨In PNAS🚨 The right often accuses fact-checkers of political bias But we analyzed Community Notes on Musk's X and found posts flagged as "misleading" are 2.3x more likely to be written by Reps than Dems! The issue is Reps sharing misinformation, not fact-checker bias... www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
7345130
Reposted by Science Feedback
Ed Hawkins @edhawkins.org · 19/06/2025
Are you a journalist writing about a current heatwave? The images you choose are critical to the story. The @climateoutreach.bsky.social team have shown some ideas here which help stress the risks rather than the typical ice creams: www.climatevisuals.org/how-do-you-p...
climatevisuals.org
How do you photograph heat? - Climate Outreach
6225101
Reposted by Science Feedback
CJC <3 🇺🇦🩷💜💙🇺🇦 @castyman22205.bsky.social · 05/06/2025
@sciencefeedback.bsky.social has a nice debunk on it! climatefeedback.org science.feedback.org/review/antar...
science.feedback.org
Antarctica recently gained some ice; that doesn’t mark the end of ice loss, global warming or sea-level rise, contrary to viral claims - Science Feedback
Antarctica gained ice from 2021-2023, but this doesn't reverse the multi-decade trend of ice loss there. Global warming and sea-level rise still continue.
021
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 02/06/2025
YouTuber John Campbell recently posted a video suggesting a preprint that analyzed Czech data showed COVID-19 vaccines reduce women’s fertility. The #preprint reported finding fewer births among women aged 18 to 39 years old who were vaccinated compared to unvaccinated women in the same age group.
science.feedback.org
Czech data doesn't show COVID-19 vaccines cause infertility
Fertility rates are influenced by many variables, such as age and education. A preprint finding fewer births in vaccinated women didn't account for confounding factors. Published studies didn’t find a...
161
Reposted by Science Feedback
Viki Male @vikilovesfacs.bsky.social · 02/06/2025
I know of 13 studies that have looked at #fertility following mRNA #CovidVaccination, all finding no effect. Yet misinformation that COVID vaccination harms fertility is *still* circulating! I spoke to @sciencefeedback.bsky.social #MedSky #ReproSky #VaccineSky #IDSky
science.feedback.org
Czech data doesn't show COVID-19 vaccines cause infertility
Fertility rates are influenced by many variables, such as age and education. A preprint finding fewer births in vaccinated women didn't account for confounding factors. Published studies didn’t find a...
69038
Reposted by Science Feedback
Dr. Peter Neff @icy-pete.bsky.social · 16/05/2025
Glad to help fact check @sciencefeedback.bsky.social. Recent GRACE-observed Antarctic ice mass gain is making the rounds online as if sea level rise has stopped. More snowfall stemming some Antarctic loss is like new paint on a used car hemorrhaging oil. science.feedback.org/review/antar...
1134
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
A common tactic behind #vaccine #misinformation is to misrepresent published studies, sometimes by making unfounded extrapolations, thereby creating the illusion that claims of vaccine harms are scientifically substantiated.
1102
Reposted by Science Feedback
Ken Caldeira @kencaldeira.com · 03/05/2025
Science Feedback provides valuable context behind the headline. science.feedback.org/review/84-of... We need more contextualizing of clickbait stories. Often, as in this case, there is an important, albeit nuanced, story not easily summarized in a catchy headline. @sciencefeedback.bsky.social
science.feedback.org
84% of the world’s reefs recently experienced bleaching-level heat stress, but not all were ‘completely bleached' - Science Feedback
84% of Earth's reefs experienced bleaching-level heat stress, but not all were completely bleached. Mass bleaching was reported in 82 different countries and territories, but it will be years until sc...
1135
Reposted by Science Feedback
Michael E. Mann @michaelemann.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
"Agriculture emits greenhouse gases, but less than using fossil fuels, despite recent paper’s claim" | The latest from @sciencefeedback.bsky.social: science.feedback.org/agriculture-...
science.feedback.org
Agriculture emits greenhouse gases, but less than using fossil fuels, despite recent paper's claim - Science Feedback
A paper used unusual accounting methods by looking only at gross emissions and omitting CO2 sinks through reforestation; climate scientists explain that this method is misleading. It is like evaluatin...
27928
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 28/04/2025
💰 𝗢𝗻𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗽𝗮𝘆𝘀. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄. New research from @sciencefeedback.bsky.social and @whotargets.me explores how 𝗹𝗼𝘄-𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 continues to be 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗲 across major social media platforms: science.feedback.org/online-misin...
science.feedback.org
Online misinformation pays. Why? Taking stock of a broad range of evidence - Science Feedback
This report examines the financial infrastructure that enables misinformation in Europe through a broad analysis of advertising and monetization practices across major social media platforms and servi...
198
Reposted by Science Feedback
Paloma Moritz @palomamoritz.bsky.social · 22/04/2025
Alors que la recherche est attaquée et que l'extrême droite fait de l'instrumentalisation de l'écologie et des fake news une stratégie de campagne, la désinformation climatique se normalise. En 3 mois, 128 cas ont été détectés sur les 18 principales chaines de TV et radio. youtu.be/k6Z1yqrITCc
youtu.be
LA DÉSINFORMATION CLIMATIQUE SE NORMALISE GRAVEMENT DANS LES MÉDIAS
YouTube video by BLAST, Le souffle de l'info
14722
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 17/04/2025
You’ve probably come across claims by “Frank Bergman” from #SlayNews — a site known for spreading harmful misinformation on climate, health, and politics. It’s gone viral multiple times, but who is behind it? We investigated. 🔗 science.feedback.org/slay-news-fr...
182
Reposted by Science Feedback
Carbon Brief @carbonbrief.org · 17/04/2025
📊 Captured | The share of fossil fuels in Germany's electricity mix has fallen continuously over the past 25 years. Read here ➡️ buff.ly/CkloLYm
Chart: Shares of coal generation in the German electricity mix has fallen as renewables continue to grow.
0165
Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · 10/04/2025
New data from @sciencefeedback-fr.bsky.social , @quotaclimat.org & @dataforgoodfr.bsky.social : France’s first #AI system for detecting #climate #misinformation on TV & radio reveals concerning trends. science.feedback.org/world-first-...
science.feedback.org
World-First AI monitoring uncovers alarming magnitude of climate misinformation on French TV and Radio - Science Feedback
Press Release Paris, April 10, 2025 — In a groundbreaking first, an alliance of NGOs — Data For Good, QuotaClimat, and Science Feedback — has unveiled alarming findings (accessible here) from France’s...
183
Reposted by Science Feedback
InfoxFR @infox.fr · 10/04/2025
La #désinformation sur le #Climat se « normalise » dans une partie des médias 🇫🇷. Selon une étude de @dataforgoodfr.bsky.social, @quotaclimat.org et @sciencefeedback.bsky.social portant sur 128 cas au T1 2025, #SudRadio est le média le plus concerné (31% des cas). www.lemonde.fr/planete/arti...
lemonde.fr
La désinformation climatique prospère dans une partie des médias audiovisuels français
Après avoir passé au crible les programmes d’information des dix-huit principales chaînes de télévision et de radio au premier trimestre, des associations ont recensé 128 cas de désinformation sur le ...
054
Reposted by Science Feedback
CAAD_Coalition @caadcoalition.bsky.social · 10/04/2025
📊 @dataforgoodfr.bsky.social, @quotaclimat.org and @sciencefeedback.bsky.social have released a new report revealing the alarming extent to which mainstream media, often considered more resilient than social media, is spreading climate misinformation. quotaclimat.org/actualites/d...
quotaclimat.org
Détecter la désinformation climatique - quotaclimat
Crédit : illustration de Xavier Lucas pour Le Nouvel Obs C’est une première : les ONGs …
143