Sign in

Scholarly Futures

@scholarlyfutures.bsky.social
35 followers 86 following 30 posts

An exploratory project to explore the uncertain future of scholarly communication, research practices and academic publishing amid accelerating change. By @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social @jontreadway.bsky.social and the wonder that was @roobina.bsky.social

PostsRepliesMedia
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 28/04/2026
This week on Scholarly Futures, @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social ponders on the future for foundational research and whether we're at the risk of losing the fundamentals as grants and funding shift to 'fashionable' areas. #openresearch #funding #openscience scholarlyfutures.substack.com/p/what-gets-...
What Gets Funded, What Gets Lost: Will funding irretrievably shift the foundational research that science relies on?
Science funding is determining what academics can and will research - with foundational, core areas of science missing out. Will this science be lost forever or will life, as always, find a way?
001
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Katharine Sanderson @kms163.bsky.social · 23/04/2026
Voyaging from Cornwall to the funeral of a darling friend, but a crash has closed the m5. I won’t get there to carry her coffin as planned. Is Ruth having a giggle about that time she made me drive around narbonne at 2am to pick her up from a broken down train? www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle...
theguardian.com
Before Ruth died, we agreed on her ‘ghost’ sign. Experts say it’s a powerful tool for working through grief
I don’t believe in ghosts. But for the bereaved, receiving ‘messages’ from beyond the grave can help us feel connected to the departed
251
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 22/04/2026
Another plug for our latest article by @jontreadway.bsky.social about the different emerging versions of metascience, and whether any of them care about academic publishing any longer
001
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 21/04/2026
@jontreadway.bsky.social ponders on the rise of metascience in todays post and if big data even cares about publishers any more scholarlyfutures.substack.com/p/the-changi...
scholarlyfutures.substack.com
The changing locus of scientific reform
Do metascientists dream of academic publishers, or have they moved on?
011
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 09/04/2026
This week we have a guest post from @loupeck.bsky.social on the 'click' legacy the industry has been focussed on for quite a long time. Let us know what you think! open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
open.substack.com
The Great Decoupling: Why the "Click" is a Legacy Metric in 2026
Our next guest post, from Lou Peck, CEO The International Bunch, who debates why we should no longer be obsessed with clicks. An audio version is provided and can be accessed below.
000
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 02/04/2026
This week we look at the economies of Open Science - and how it might not be about the economy after all #openscience #openresearch
000
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 17/03/2026
A message about @roobina.bsky.social from the whole Scholarly Futures team open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
open.substack.com
A message about Ruth Francis
An update from the Scholarly Futures team about one of our founders
011
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 12/03/2026
This week's Substack from @jontreadway.bsky.social looks at the paradox facing mission-driven remote organisations within the research and scholarly communications ecosystem scholarlyfutures.substack.com/p/mission-dr... It's a complicated one #STM #scholarlycommunications
scholarlyfutures.substack.com
Mission-driven remote organisations: a paradox for scholarly infrastructure
Remote organisations expand global participation and representation, but distributed teams and governance also complicate coordination and trust-building.
000
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 03/03/2026
International Women's Day is nearly here - come and see what we think about gender equality in scholarly communications open.substack.com/pub/scholarl... #IWD #ScholarlyCommunications #ScholarlyPublishing
000
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 17/02/2026
Scholarly communication has been a high-trust industry, but faces significant challenges if it is to remain so. Is there a way we can get ahead of research integrity issues while maintaining a system based on trust? Latest from @roobina.bsky.social on our Substack 👇 open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
A magnifying glass seen lying on a laptop keyboard. Bold green text asks: COULD WE GET AHEAD OF RESEARCH INTEGRITY ISSUES?
010
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 03/02/2026
Is something truly ever free? We dig into the issues and impact of Diamond OA and ask 'who is going to pay?' open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
open.substack.com
The Diamond Dilemma: Who Pays for 'Free' Publishing?
The future of Diamond Open Access (OA) publishing hangs in a delicate balance. When do we stop and think is each new model simply pushing financial constraints and equity issues somewhere else?
000
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 27/01/2026
Debates about paying peer reviewers go back and forth, but @grnr25.bsky.social presents experience of doing just that at a small, gold OA journal. The economics make sense. Find out why 👇 open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
Text, white on dark blue, reads: if the economics make sense, should we pay peer reviewers? Scholarlyfutures.substack.com Scholarly Futures 
Below this a pale blue background with red white blue and black paper confetti exploding.
010
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 20/01/2026
Our first guest post! Emma Green @majordoma.bsky.social attended last week's APE conference and pondered whether we are truly doing enough to transform the industry in the face of current challenges. What do you think? 🤔 open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
000
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 13/01/2026
The latest post on our Scholarly Futures Substack is live and digs into how AI is used in peer review. It aids in technical checks & helps reviewers with their reports. But is there any governance or best practice out there? By @roobina.bsky.social 👇 open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
open.substack.com
Peer review needs a revolution. AI is already driving it
Challenges to peer review affect the quality and efficiency of academic publishing. AI tools already help reviewers and publishers but are we prepared for the future?
010
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 06/01/2026
Lots of predictions out there about the year ahead, so we asked AIs what they thought would happen in scholarly communications in 2026. AI predicts more AI! Do you agree? open.substack.com/pub/scholarl... @roobina.bsky.social @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social @jontreadway.bsky.social @grnr25.bsky.social
A brutalist building with an unlit neon sign saying 'the future' with blue sky behind it. A white caption reads: What to expect in scholarly communications in 2026
Or what AI believes could occur...
Scholarly Futures 
Scholarlyfutures.substack.com
011
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 23/12/2025
Instead of scholarly communication or academic publishing, this week we share on and off topic content we have enjoyed this year. Plus @grnr25.bsky.social shares some lessons learned @jontreadway.bsky.social @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social @roobina.bsky.social open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
A gnome figurine in front of a red background. White text reads: Christmas Gifts. Some on and off topic recommendations from the SchFuCrew.
Scholarly Futures 
ScholarlyFutures.substack.com
020
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Retraction Watch @retractionwatch.com · 18/12/2025
The U.S. Office of Research Integrity has been relatively quiet in 2025, releasing just two misconduct findings with only two weeks remaining in the year — the fewest the office has released since at least 2006. ORI typically releases an average of about 10 findings a year.
retractionwatch.com
ORI has released just two misconduct findings this year
The U.S. Office of Research Integrity has been relatively quiet in 2025, releasing just two misconduct findings with only two weeks remaining in the year — the fewest the office has released since …
086
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Phill Jones, PhD @phillbjones.bsky.social · 17/12/2025
Last week I attended the #STMInnovation and #STMIntegrity days in London. I believe the scholarly research ecosystem needs to change in a pretty substantial way if we're to face in to the societal threats that have emerged. scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/12/17/w...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Why We Must Work Together to Harden the Scholarly Supply Chain - The Scholarly Kitchen
At the STM innovation and Integrity days in London last week, it's clear that research integrity has become an increasingly pressing issue. Many publishers are reporting significant increases in submi...
013
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Ludo Waltman @ludowaltman.bsky.social · 12/12/2025
Very much enjoyed last week's meeting in Cambridge about the Publish-Review-Curate (PRC) model for scholarly publishing. There were lots of highly inspiring discussions, including an important discussion about strengthening coordination between initiatives in this area. asapbio.org/reimagining-...
asapbio.org
Reimagining Scholarly Publishing: Outcomes From A Public Forum To Discuss The Publish, Review, Curate (PRC) Publishing Model – ASAPbio
At a meeting held on the 3rd December 2025 at Kings College, Cambridge over 50 delegates, comprising researchers, publishers, librarians, research funders and
12216
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 17/12/2025
Latest post by @jontreadway.bsky.social explores what the shortlist and winners of the Vesalius Innovation Award say about changes in the research workflow system. open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
White text on a red background on the top half of the image. The bottom half is a light bulb. Text reads: Innovation with receipts. What can we infer from the winners of The Vesalius Innovation Award about developments in the research workflow and ecosystem over the six years since the annual award was first given?
021
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Digital Science @digital-science.com · 09/12/2025
📣 On demand: Watch our webinar with Research Information and see how publishers can scale #ResearchIntegrity checks with the Dimensions Author Check API. Presented by Dr Leslie McIntosh & Tyler Ruse. 🔗 See the webinar now: ow.ly/Rfzf50XGcff #scholcomm
031
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
Will AI help or hinder the Publish, Read, Curare model? New post from @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social for our Substack 👇 open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
White text on a blue background reads: AI calls time on curation. 
Will AI stop new curation lead publishing models thriving before they've even had a chance to grow? Scholarly Futures looks into the publish, read, curate model and the potential impact of AI. ScholarlyFutures.substack.com
020
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information @barcelonadori.bsky.social · 05/12/2025
🚀 Big news for open research information! From 2026, @cnrs.fr will no longer have institutional access to Web of Science. This move aligns with the vision of the Barcelona Declaration and shows how institutions can operationalise the transition to open systems. 🔗 www.cnrs.fr/en/update/cn...
cnrs.fr
Le CNRS s’émancipe du Web of Science
À partir du 1er janvier 2026, le CNRS coupera l’accès à l’une des plus importantes bases bibliométriques commerciales : le
026
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Elisabeth Bik @elisabethbik.bsky.social · 05/12/2025
This afternoon, I will give a public lecture about #ResearchIntegrity and #ImageForensics, at the University of Bern, CH, where I will receive an honorary doctorate from the Faculty of Science tomorrow. Thank you for your support ❤️
Screenshot from a flyer that reads: 
Public Lecture on Scientific Integrity
Dr. Elisabeth Bik
Errors and Misconduct in
Biomedical Research
Images
Science builds upon science. Even after peer-review and publication, science papers could still contain
images or other data of concern. If not addressed, papers containing incorrect or even falsified data
could lead to wasted time and money spent by other researchers trying to reproduce those results.
Several high-profile cases of science misconduct have been reported, but many more remain
undetected. Elisabeth Bik is an image forensics detective who left her paid job in industry to search for
and report biomedical articles that contain errors or data of concern. She has conducted a systematic
review of 20,000 papers across 40 journals and found that approximately 4% of these contained
inappropriately duplicated images. In her talk, she will present her work and show several types of
inappropriately duplicated images and other examples of research misconduct. In addition, she will
discuss how Artificial Intelligence can both help identify cases of misconduct and also create them, as
well as the growing threat of scientific paper mills.
On the occasion of the Dies academicus of the University of Bern on 6th December 2025,
Elisabeth Bik will receive an honorary doctorate from the Faculty of Science for her
groundbreaking work and untiring commitment to scientific integrity.
Friday 5th December 2025, 4pm
Aula, 2nd floor, Main Building, Hochschulstrasse 4.

Also see this link: https://www.vetsuisse.unibe.ch/e58/e1479157/e1624857/e1753357/Elisabeth_Bik_flyer_2025_A3_20251104_ger.pdf
2118221
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Digital Science @digital-science.com · 24/11/2025
🚨 Webinar Alert 👉 Dec 4 @ 10am ET What does #GenAI do well and where does it fail without supporting tech? We’ll explore how knowledge graphs, symbolic reasoning & more can help GenAI! 🔗 Register: ow.ly/QGVI50Xx7y3
011
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 25/11/2025
How much further can consolidation go in scholarly publishing, and could winds of change blow in from elsewhere to reshape the market, perhaps even ‘disrupt’ the way things are done? Latest by @roobina.bsky.social 👇 open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
open.substack.com
The last large acquisition before big tech brings big change?
The recent announcement that OUP is acquiring Karger heralds yet more consolidation in an industry where there have been growing concerns about market concentration, monetisation and monopolies.
011
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Kora @qornik.bsky.social · 18/11/2025
Excellent start to #Munin2025 with the panel on open #metadata with perspectives from @barcelonadori.bsky.social, @doaj.bsky.social, @oa2020.org, @pkp.sfu.ca and SCOAP3 @cern.bsky.social. Followed by the beautiful sight of the final sunset of the year from UiT Campus
Sunset over snowy hills seen from UiT campus
0206
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 19/11/2025
Fascinating post by @jontreadway.bsky.social this week about the 'Chuna Cycle' and how well it could map onto academic publishing. Find out more 👇
000
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 13/11/2025
Scholastica & Maverick Release New Survey Report: Tech Needs of Small and Medium Publishers
sspnet.org
Scholastica & Maverick Release New Survey Report: Tech Needs of Small and Medium Publishers
Member News Release submitted by Scholastica on 11/05/2025.
001
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Retraction Watch @retractionwatch.com · 14/11/2025
The @ama-assn.org will cease publication of its ethics journal at the end of this year.
retractionwatch.com
AMA ethics journal shutters after 26 years
The American Medical Association will cease publication of its ethics journal at the end of this year.  The AMA Journal of Ethics, an open access, peer-reviewed journal was founded in 1999 und…
45527
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 11/11/2025
Is there a major health crisis coming for STM publishing? @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social shares her thoughts on the @stmassoc.bsky.social day that runs adjacent to the Frankfurt Book Fair: 👇 open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
open.substack.com
Does Publishing need a Pulse Check or Resuscitation?
Sharing my thoughts and fears on whether a major health crisis for STM publishing is coming or not.....
000
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 05/11/2025
Amid growing financial pressure, exacerbated by the increasing dominance of open access, learned societies face a defining moment. Leveraging their community could be the answer. By @grnr25.bsky.social 👇 open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
open.substack.com
The untapped potential of community
Amid growing financial pressure, exacerbated by the increasing dominance of open access, learned societies face a defining moment.
000
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 31/10/2025
To round off the week, we bring this quick update on research security, since our post on Tuesday. Written by @roobina.bsky.social about an announcement from the @ec.europa.eu and a report by @scienceeurope.org open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
A neon sign on a modern street. White text over the top of the image reads: Quick updates on research security. News from the European Commission and Science Europe.
032
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Andy Tattersall @andytattersall.bsky.social · 30/10/2025
This is something I have thought about a lot over the last couple of years, especially since 2022. The Great Pullback: Why Academic Social Media’s Fragmentation Matters @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/10/29/g... 1/12
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post — The Great Pullback: Why Academic Social Media’s Fragmentation Matters - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's guest bloggers share insights into the fragmented, tiring, and uncertain digital landscape for academics, and evidence that a shift is underway — with implications for scholarly communication ...
244
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
European Commission @ec.europa.eu · 29/10/2025
✅ More transparency online. As of today, researchers can access data from the biggest online platforms. Why? To study their societal impact and address risks like illegal content and scams – making the online world safer, especially for minors. → link.europa.eu/RMdwCV
A graphic illustrating the Digital Services Act. A smartphone is surrounded by yellow EU stars and icons such as a lock, shield, bell, and document with a magnifying glass, symbolising transparency and safety. Text reads: “DIGITAL SERVICES ACT – Unprecedented access for researchers to online platforms.” The European Commission logo appears in the bottom right corner.
56022
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 28/10/2025
This week, @roobina.bsky.social takes a look at research security and how it could create tensions with open science and open data: 👇 open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
A padlock on a keyboard with red and green neon light trains. White text over the image reads: Could research security measures reshape open science?
022
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information @barcelonadori.bsky.social · 24/10/2025
1/2 Moving funding metadata forward: highlights from our round table (co-organized with @crossref.bsky.social) New blog by @hldejonge.bsky.social , based on Working Group 3 (Funding Metadata) • ~25% Crossref records have funding info ⬇️
167
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information @barcelonadori.bsky.social · 24/10/2025
2/2 • 45 funders using Grant IDs (250k+ links) • Standardisation + coordination = faster progress🔗 Read: barcelona-declaration.org/news/2025102... #FundingMetadata #OpenScience #OpenResearchInformation
barcelona-declaration.org
Moving funding metadata forward: key takeaways from a Barcelona Declaration round table
On October 2, 2025, funders, publishers, submission system providers and infrastructure organisations came together for a focused discussion on improving the collection and sharing of open funding met...
075
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
What might it mean to publish research with no human in the loop? @jontreadway.bsky.social post investigates four possible avenues and explores which seem more likely: open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
White text over an image of a large building at night with a neon 1st sign. Text reads: AI-first publishing - what would it look like and when might we see it? What might it mean to publish research with no human in the loop? Digital-first publishing offers some parallels, but the AI transition will likely be different and deeper.
033
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 20/10/2025
Printing and cake! We can get behind that!! 🍰
020
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Ludo Waltman @ludowaltman.bsky.social · 17/10/2025
There is considerable discussion about the (lack of) openness of metadata of journal articles, but how do preprint servers perform in terms of openly available metadata? @neesjanvaneck.bsky.social and I report our findings in a new @leidenmadtrics.bsky.social blog post doi.org/10.59350/te7....
doi.org
Crossref as a source of open bibliographic metadata for preprints
Crossref is a crucial source of open bibliographic metadata for articles published in scientific journals. Importantly, however, Crossref can also serve as a source of bibliographic metadata for prepr...
12814
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 15/10/2025
Quick drop by @jontreadway.bsky.social on a news article about how a more transactional world could affect scholarly communications. 👇 open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
open.substack.com
US / China relations threaten Open Research?
Dispatches on how a more transactional world might affect scholarly communications
000
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 15/10/2025
Interesting post from @altmetric.com about the rise of podcasts and the citations they contain.
051
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 14/10/2025
The arrival of AI and the speed it is changing our working lives is astonishing. @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social investigates the adoption of AI tools into academic publisher workflows, attitudes towards them & lessons from book publishing. open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
Viewed over the shoulder of a lady looking at a phone with LLM and a logo on the screen
011
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Altmetric @altmetric.com · 13/10/2025
5 million of them are about research
graph showing Timelapse of 4,949,864 posts linking to research items
201956149
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 13/10/2025
An interesting summary of AI tools in scholarly publishing. Well worth a read! Thanks @phillbjones.bsky.social
020
Scholarly Futures @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social · 13/10/2025
Our first post is live! In our daily lives it can be hard to find time to stop and discuss the vast changes occurring in scholarly communication, research practices and academic publishing. We wanted to make time and engage our community to gain insights. Join us! 👇 open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
A hand holding a crystal ball reflecting inverted trees with blossoms
002