I will be discussing this Bill at the Battle of Ideas on Sunday 18 October so publish here a recent briefing note I drafted, to put my concerns in context.

This offer was rejected and is now withdrawn.

Those who crusade on behalf of individuals, to promote an ideology or increase fund raising, must owe some duty of care to their psychological well being.

If the police are going to argue in the High Court that they have a 'duty' to visibly support the LGBTQIA++++ community which overrides their statutory duty of impartiality - where are they?

Recent controversy over US male basketball players brings the 'test' for 'what is a woman' into stark relief.

Is this capable of bringing down both the criminal AND family justice systems? Much more work needs to be done to analyse the impact of this bill on the already tottering family justice system.

On 13 June 2026 I went to Chippenham Pride. It was dedicated to gender identity. Where does this leave women's rights, children's safety and the rule of law?

11 months after victory against Northumbria, we are here again against Wiltshire Police. Of all the organisations we have lost to gender identity, the police are among the most serious casualties.

What are the dangers of academia corrupted by ideological delusion? Whose version of 'truth' should prevail in court? To what degree can it ever be in the 'public interest' to assert what is untrue?

You are seeing this page because our security systems have detected some unusual activity on this connection. To regain access to The Telegraph website please try the following:

What the Good Law Project are attempting is to diminish the protection of article 10 ECHR for every regulated professional. This must be resisted.

It's yet another fight between the liberal and the illiberal. But if you think dishonest disparagement is a substitute for argument, you will not have me as either your victim or your audience

Will the Good Law Project's determination to fight 'transphobia' on every front mean the embrace of some very dubious allies?

Another stunning technical victory for the Good Law Project shows that sanity is being restored to the public debate about gender identity, slowly but ever so surely.

For years now I have been noticing an interesting insistence from many that 'shame' is the way out of gender identity ideology. I disagree.

The continuing saga of Christian social worker Felix Ngole has yet another chapter, this time at the EAT. What can this tell us about belief versus manifestation of belief?

And now I am livid. Gender identity ideology corrupts everything it touches. And that is dangerous.

The High Court has dismissed a judicial review brought by the Good Law Project and three individuals challenging the lawfulness and accuracy of the Interim Update issued by the Equality and Human Righ...

Campaigners claimed the guidance for employers, such as hospitals, shops and restaurants, was

Media update and overview February 1-8

When the world is burning, why court a fight with a determined and unreachable ideologue, who has deep pockets filled with other people's money?

The Supreme Court judgment on the meaning of sex in the Equality Act brought legal clarity to sex-based rights last year, and most people agree with it.

Darlington NHS nurses win harassment claim in trans ruling

I worry about words used as 'spell casting' rather than to promote discussion, which infects all controversial debate, not merely around gender identity. I also worry about the impact of this on me.

The new thought terminating cliché has arrived and it is 'living as a woman'. If this means 'successfully passing' then what are the implications for the (majority) of trans identifying men who don't?

I publish here my letter to Jolyon Maugham. There is no freedom of speech to tell harmful lies about others.