Sign in

Sam Halpert

@samhalpert.bsky.social
3.6K followers 1.3K following 5.3K posts

Views are solely my own.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Quinn Yeargain @yeargain.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
I've grown quite impatient with the utter refusal of some reporters to speak directly and the overreliance on weak, nondescript words like "odd" and "interesting"
412831
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Benjamín Schultz-Figueroa @benjaminschultzfig.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
I've seen some debate about whether using the language of interiority for AI is just semantics or not. Again, I think Skinner is informative. He argued that one consequence of this language was to posit a subject as a moral actor who should be punished or rewarded for their actions. So he waged...
4407
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Oh The Urbanity! @ohtheurbanity.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
The case of Canadian ICC judge Kimberly Prost being debanked by the United States — having her credit cards and online accounts frozen — shows why Canada, Europe, and others need to develop their own financial systems outside of US control.
cbc.ca
ANALYSIS | As Canada deepens ties with Europe, could it leave U.S. banks and dollars behind? | CBC News
Prime Minister Mark Carney last week pointed to international payments as a system that "can be used as leverage against you" before telling the EU that he sees this as an area for "deep co-operation....
213732
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Professa Murray @kalimurray.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
DOGE was a coup; DOGE was a coup; DOGE was a coup. None of these people were appointed by the Congress to do any of these acts; it was a criminal coup.
327669
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Julian Davis Mortenson @jdmortenson.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
It's hard to imagine a serious effort to fix the federal government that doesn't include court reform. This is not a generic point about bad faith judges. Successful political reform will require the root-and-branch elimination of interlocking con law doctrines that choke off legislative innovation
37122
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Sarah Tuttle @niais.cryptoanarchy.network · 25/09/2026
IN MINNESOTA.
52080650
Sam Halpert @samhalpert.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
The House isn’t even in session now, right? Johnson is still single-handedly holding the doors shut? At some point, MoC need to insist that the Speaker’s decision to prevent them from deliberating during a Constitutional crisis is an unconstitutional violation of his oath of office.
173
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Mrs. Detective Pikajew, Esq. @clapifyoulikeme.favrd.social · 24/09/2026
Court orders aren’t something you “defy,” they’re something you violate
191341265
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Barred and Boujee aka Madiba Dennie @audrelawdamercy.blacksky.app · 23/09/2026
yes more of this please ballsandstrikes.org/law-politics...
screenshot of two paragraphs excerpted from the linked article, with the final sentence of the first paragraph highlighted in green. excerpt reads as follows:

In response to Venegas’s lawsuit, the Trump administration contended that the government had a reasonable suspicion to detain him, and that this argument was supported by Kavanaugh’s concurrence in Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo. Basically, Kavanaugh said that agents detain and question people when they have reasonable suspicion, and since agents detained and questioned Venegas, they must have had reasonable suspicion to do so. In a September 21 order, though, Trump-appointed district judge Jeffrey Beaverstock wrote that the government offered “no factual support whatsoever” as to why its suspicion was reasonable, and that he was “simply not inclined to take the Government’s word for it.”

Beaverstock also wrote that Kavanaugh’s concurrence offered no help to the administration, because the immigration stops they carried out looked nothing like the immigration stops that Kavanaugh imagined. “Venegas was not promptly released,” said Beaverstock. “Instead, the officers disregarded the veracity of his documentation and continued to detain him.” Beaverstock concluded that the administration’s warrantless raid and detention policies are likely unconstitutional, and issued an order temporarily blocking them.
214135
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Chris Edelson @chrisedelson.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
yes-trump has effectively gone to war w/Democratic-led states, which he sees as enemy territory. You can't have a president who sees parts of the country as the enemy--even Lincoln was more charitable toward states that actually went to war against the US: 1/2 www.theunpopulist.net/p/trump-is-d...
theunpopulist.net
Trump Is Destroying the U.S. Constitution and Amassing Unprecedented Powers by Sending Federal Troops to Invade American Cities
Lincoln faced a real insurrection and still did not go as far as this president
1106
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Andy Craig @andycraig.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
It is *vastly* worse to have Hegseth, Blanche, Patel, Mullin, etc. in place than where things stood with those offices Nov-Jan 2020/21.
1232
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Jen Jennings @jenjennings.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Watching the response to the NHJ article, I’m struck by how, when an unequal system becomes a problem for each family to manage, we focus on how they navigated it, scoring the private choice instead of demanding that the public system remedy the inequality.
55914
Reposted by Sam Halpert
David Kaib @davidkaib.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
You should demand they leave.
03411
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick @reichlinmelnick.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
For some context, this kind of local police to ICE pipeline has been a dream for decades. “Secure Communities” under Bush/Obama was an early iteration, but never got anywhere near the funding ICE has now. It generated enough backlash against Obama that ICE was reined in. Very different times now.
144673
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Courtney Milan @courtneymilan.com · 19/09/2026
The whole thing about the "guns don't kill people" narrative is that we have a whole fucking law on the books that prevents us from holding gun manufacturers responsible for the harm caused by their extremely dangerous product. We don't have such a law on the books for AI.
311912
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Courtney Milan @courtneymilan.com · 19/09/2026
The truth was that if United Health had an AI that was accepting a shitload of claims with a 90% error rate, United Health would stop using the AI in about 0.2 seconds.
52130475
Sam Halpert @samhalpert.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
This is why it doesn’t make sense to me to speculate about what to do *if* Trump attacks voting. *This* is the attack, on our confidence in the system. The goal is to lay the groundwork for setting aside the result. He’ll argue we can’t trust the election—& many may agree. Bc he’s ensured we can’t.
121
Sam Halpert @samhalpert.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
If defenses of the US strike on a girl’s school in Iran assume that US commanders didn’t know it was a school, do facts like this shape the strength of that assumption? Is the US entitled to claim ignorance if it also explicitly disavowed its duty to know & dismantled systems intended to inform it?
military.com

At a Pentagon briefing on March 2, 2026, War Secretary Pete Hegseth used blunt language about how the United States would fight, saying there would be "no stupid rules of engagement," "no politically correct wars," and "no nation-building quagmire."

https://www.military.com/feature/2026/03/05/hegseths-stupid-rules-of-engagement-line-and-what-roe-actually-do.html
181
Reposted by Sam Halpert
A.R. Moxon @juliusgoat.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
The only thing they're persuading voters is they'll back down and fold to whatever fascist nonsense Republicans come up with, abandoning the real people affected by it to abuse, terror, deprivation, exclusion, and death.
18598141
Sam Halpert @samhalpert.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
You can’t issue an order they can’t pretend to misunderstand; you have to observe that they’re operating in bad faith and ask for sanctions. The previous order was sufficiently clear to any person not seeking to willfully misinterpret it in order to subvert the court. This is a bad faith Presidency.
161
Sam Halpert @samhalpert.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Investigate this? There haven’t been consequences for his destruction of the East Wing, so the precedent stands: this is a thing he can do, that he will keep doing while he has power. Telling him “no” w/o taking his powers only provokes him. Impeachment isn’t a “fetish”. It’s the only practical path
3209
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Asheesh Kapur Siddique @asheeshks.org · 16/09/2026
AI has exposed the austerity con game in higher ed. For years, we have been told there is no money for students, faculty, staff, capital improvements, libraries. But somehow universities have suddenly come up with the money to pay for AI services??
223561
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Andy Craig @andycraig.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
You can have lots of arguments about if Jeffries should have forced a vote on Massie's impeachment resolution, but that was a choice. He could have done it. Johnson's procedural gambit only worked with Jeffries' passive acquiescence.
629041
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Barred and Boujee aka Madiba Dennie @audrelawdamercy.blacksky.app · 16/09/2026
according to politico, since Jan. 2025, Trump admin has deported 170+ people “in violation of court orders,” “in defiance of legally mandated due process protections,” or “to countries from which they had sought or received protection from torture and persecution” ballsandstrikes.org/ethics-accou...
ballsandstrikes.org
The Trump Justice Department Is Way Too Comfortable Violating Court Orders
Judges have tools for responding to noncompliance. They just have to use them.
34931438
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Andy Craig @andycraig.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
The House can, if it wants, go all Sherlock Holmes on uncovering the hidden smoking gun over many tedious months of investigation. But it's a dumb exercise when the crime was committed in plain daylight, the relevant facts are all publicly known, and everyone's already made up their minds about it.
2266
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Andy Craig @andycraig.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Correct. Anybody else raising a question of privilege like this puts it on a two-day countdown. The minority leader has the perk that he can force the vote immediately, if he wants.
121068244
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Dan Izzo @izzos.net · 16/09/2026
www.cnn.com/2026/09/16/p... Ohhhhhh Mikey did NOT want to have to hold this vote...
cnn.com
House to adjourn early, stave off Hegseth impeachment vote | CNN Politics
Speaker Mike Johnson on Wednesday announced he is sending members home from Washington early for their seven-week campaigning recess ahead of the midterm elections, a move that will stave off a vote o...
3254
Sam Halpert @samhalpert.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Time for another. In the 1830’s, bipartisan majorities banned MoC from bringing petitions re: slavery to the floor. Rep John Q Adams argued the “gag rule” unconstitutionally violated his 1A duty to his constituents & forced the issue of slavery to the floor *against* the rules. He did it every day.
never lost his self-possession." Exhausted by debate, House members tabled the censure. The former president would not be reprimanded. 21
Satisfied, Adams moved on to other busi-ness. After all, he had another hundred petitions to submit. "The circumstances created much merriment in the House, -Mr.
Adams offering his petitions as demurely as if nothing had occurred. "22
And so it continued, petition after petition, year after year. Proslavery members could no more stop them than "stop the flow of the Niagara."23 Finally, on December 3, 1844, the House voted to remove the gag, one more signal that slavery was losing its hold. 24 In retrospect, Sargent noted the irony: "Had Southern members" allowed the petitions, they would have ceased.
Instead, they stirred the anger between South and the North, triggering the Civil War. 25

https://capitolhistory.org/USCHS-Capitol-Stories-files/USCHS-Capitol-Stories-John-Quincy-Adams.pdf
0164
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Kevin M. Kruse @kevinmkruse.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
One of the coolest things about people who don't have a lot of power taking a principled stand is it lays bare the complete cowardice of the ones who actually *do* have power when they fail to do even a fraction as much.
7684771567
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Will Bunch @willbunch.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Cops sign 287(g) deal with ICE to nab immigrants No council vote. No public hearing or input No democracy, a police state
10395149
Sam Halpert @samhalpert.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
@raskin.house.gov it’s wild to claim you haven’t heard this from even “a single person” when Rep. Green is making it the defining point of his 20-year career in Congress. You’re entitled to your judgment, sir. But please be honest about it: you haven’t heard a single person *who you think matters*.
cnn.com

"I've not heard a single person say to me that they think our top priority should be impeachment of Donald Trump," Raskin told CNN. "He hasn't been
1147
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Liz Dye @lizdye.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Trump sued IRS, insists there's no collusive fraud on the court bc parties are totally different. Now his personal attys are getting sanctioned, DOJ is riding to the rescue. Because THESE TWO PARTIES ARE THE SAME. with @andrewtorrez.bsky.social www.lawandchaospod.com/p/trumps-doj...
lawandchaospod.com
Trump’s DOJ Lawyers Leap In To Save Trump’s Personal Lawyers
Because these two things are the same.
511025
Reposted by Sam Halpert
U.S. Representative Al Green @algreen.house.gov · 15/09/2026
Rep. Al Green Votes to Impeach Trump for Covering Up the Deaths of Renee, Alex, Lorenzo, & Johan. You can watch Rep. Al Green’s remarks on the floor of the House by clicking here: youtu.be/BAj8JYJWUm8?...
youtu.be
Rep. Al Green Votes to Impeach Trump for Covering Up the Deaths of Renee, Alex, Lorenzo, & Johan
YouTube video by Rep. Al Green
17397128
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Andy Craig @andycraig.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
So that's two explicit votes for immediately ending democracy plus Kavanaugh signaling not now but maybe after the midterms. I don't feel great about how this is going to go when they keep pushing the USPS ballot ban in time for 2028.
822849
Sam Halpert @samhalpert.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
“People may say, ‘well, I think we need to have an investigation.’ We’ll have a trial in the Senate!…If we impeach, then there will be a trial. Let’s not believe that we have to have a trial in the House before we can impeach & send to the Senate.” @algreen.house.gov www.youtube.com/live/x8_s3fR...
youtube.com
LIVE FROM D.C.: Rep. Al Green addresses NEW articles of impeachment against Trump
YouTube video by Free Speech For People
264
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Athul K. Acharya @athul.acharya.cc · 14/09/2026
Vichy party
21910
Sam Halpert @samhalpert.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Trump has signed a document asserting “Citizenship is a privilege; Citizenship is a gift”—never mind that SCOTUS *just* ruled that citizenship is a right. ICE’s attacks on US citizens are not errors. They are not crimes solely attributable to individual agents. Trump put his name to this idea.
whitehouse.gov
THE WHITE HOUSE
Section 1. Purpose. The privilege of United States citizenship remains a priceless and profound gift.
1113
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick @reichlinmelnick.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
DHS's OIG also confirms people were punished in tiny outdoor cages. We knew they existed but had never seen pictures. The OIG calls these outdoor metal cages "unprecedented" and "highly unconventional," and says they were a "significant risk[] to detainee health and well-being."
Small Metal Enclosures Used as “Calming Areas”
Between July 17, 2025, and January 18, 2026, FSSF confined 79 detainees in small metal
enclosures — each offering about 18 square feet of floor space — for periods ranging from several
minutes to nearly 2 hours, a practice unlike any OIG team has observed in ICE facilities. The use
of such restrictive spaces is highly unconventional and does not align with standards for humane
treatment.15 The use of these small metal enclosures is inconsistent with standards, which state
that facilities maintain detainees in the least restrictive environment necessary for facility safety
and security.16 During our inspection, we observed at least two small metal enclosures in the
outdoor recreation areas (see Figures 11 and 12). According to facility staff, the small metal
enclosures measure approximately 4 feet 3 inches by 4 feet 3 inches and 7 feet 9 inches tall.
Facility staff described the small metal enclosures as “calming areas” for detainees to deescalate and have time alone. Staff further maintained that detainees asked to spend time in the
small metal enclosures. We found at least one instance in which the small metal enclosures may
have been used as a disciplinary tool. Documentation provided by FSSF noted that one detainee
who spent 26 minutes in a small metal enclosure “Failed to comply with a lawful command.” OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL U.S. Department of Homeland Security Staff also reported that time spent in the small metal enclosures is closely monitored, and detainees are not locked in, even though we observed locking mechanisms on the enclosures. Figures 11 and 12. Small Metal Enclosures; Observed January 21, 2026

Underneath are the two pictures at the top of the thread, showing the horrible cages in which people were keptOFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
In March 2026, two U.S. Senators raised concerns and made an inquiry to the Department
regarding the use of these enclosures at FSSF.17 Their letter cited reports from nongovernmental
organizations and the media alleging that detainees were confined in these outdoor structures
as punishment, sometimes subjected to direct sunlight, high temperatures, humidity, insects,
use of restraints for hours, and denial of food or water. When we asked ICE officials about the
enclosures, they reported to us that these enclosures were used for disciplinary issues, crisis
intervention, housing changes, and conflicts among detainees. ICE also reported that all
detainees were placed in hand restraints when they were escorted to the small metal enclosures,
but not while in them.
We were unable to independently confirm or refute ICE officials’ assertions regarding their use of
the enclosures, as well as other allegations, such as deprivation of food or water while in the
enclosures, as none of the detainees we interviewed reported experiencing these conditions
during our unannounced inspection. Use of these small metal enclosures for any reason is
unprecedented among ICE facilities inspected by OIG. Confining individuals in small metal
enclosures for any reason presents significant risks to detainee health and well-being.
22884231
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Greg Pak @gregpak.net · 14/09/2026
So they're gonna kill your kids.
18805298
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Prisonculture @prisonculture.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Public opinion is dynamic. It exists to BE SHAPED. And it is ONLY a resource. It does nothing on its own.
236961
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Sam Halpert @samhalpert.bsky.social · 22/03/2025
Dems imagine that trans rights, immigrant rights, are ballast—weight they can shed to gain altitude. Human rights, community care, ardent attention to the dignity of all people—it’s not ballast. It’s the air in the balloon.
425570
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Jameel Jaffer @jameeljaffer.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
The news here is that (1) the UCLA chancellor lacks a basic understanding of how our legal system works, and of the role that criminal defense attorneys play in it, (2) UCLA's commitment to "institutional neutrality" is a joke. www.latimes.com/california/s...
latimes.com
UCLA chancellor rebukes law school event featuring attorney of alleged 9/11 'mastermind'
After a UCLA law school symposium on 9/11 that featured an attorney who represented alleged 9/11 'mastermind' Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, UCLA Chancellor Julio Frenk issued a rare message distancing the u...
1216851
Sam Halpert @samhalpert.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
“How many more lives must we lose, and how many more loved ones of victims have to plead for help before the self-evident evidence from videos and President Trump’s own words compel us to act?“ @algreen.house.gov will say this alone, if he has to. Because it has to be said.
171
Sam Halpert @samhalpert.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
@raskin.house.gov are you referring to your colleagues in Congress, or do you mean a single person generally? Because if you haven’t heard this from even “a single person”, you haven’t been listening to your constituents or your colleagues on Oversight, apparently.
cnn.com

"I've not heard a single person say to me that they think our top priority should be impeachment of Donald Trump," Raskin told CNN. "He hasn't beenHighlights in **’s 

"Everyone's got an axe to grind with this administration," Democratic Rep. Suhas Subramanyam, who serves on the Oversight Committee, told CNN. "I think **there are definitely people who, the first thing they want to do is start impeaching Trump.** We've already had that happen this Congress. I just want to make sure if we do impeachment, that's it's going to be an ironclad case."
132
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Professa Murray @kalimurray.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
I do think this a key question: who will be the next House Counsel? I might get Marc Elias or Norm Eisen on speed dial; I would trust their opinions. I also might (cough, cough) have an hearing on Administrative Law to explain it to the American People.
3296
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Troy Jackson @troyjackson207.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
Two months ago today, Johan Sebastián Guerrero was murdered by ICE in Biddeford. Susan Collins voted to give ICE $70 billion a month before his killing. ICE needs to be abolished, full stop.
18707198
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Joe Dudek @joedudekjd.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
If the Executive can raise and spend $1.2 trillion, we have abandoned the constitutional order.
0309
Reposted by Sam Halpert
Sharon 🪳🌹 @sharonk.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
we can adjust this to "people in the Western democracies" + "liberal democracy" i feel
215418
Reposted by Sam Halpert
John Terry @johntrterry.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
idgaf about "efficiency" or "productivity" when it comes to spending the time necessary to encourage kids to read, think, and speak well. this is the whole ballgame.
0132