iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

OSU playing a ton of Odd C1 this year and their front is not full of monsters like they were last year. That plus a bust in assignments w 2 guys chasing a back out fast and they’re down a gap vs unbalanced counter to the boundary. You really can just play C3.

031

Reposted by RossRFulton

Ope and then OSU busts playing C3 or maybe FZ. Needed a Smash call but both the corner and C/F player stayed low.

021

Reposted by RossRFulton

DCs like C1 on early downs bc it’s sound vs run and pass but every week I see teams bust when C1 defenders are put in run/pass conflict. If your front doesn’t protect them from making quick decisions or you don’t know who has what vs motions and formations, you’re gonna end up short a man vs gap.

121

Reposted by RossRFulton

RossRFulton @rossrfulton.bsky.social · 06/09/2026

These IZ RPOs from OSU are exactly what I wanted to see Beck install for our O. Gives you an easy way to line up and run stuff that plays to everybody’s strengths and then play off it.

061

Seemed like a gimmick “throwback” thing to me

020

Reposted by RossRFulton

Manuel Excel @colintj.bsky.social · 06/09/2026

That 3rd and long throw as Blackledge points out was never there. I’m not sure if that was a bracket or C2 weak but either way if you know WMU you know that’s the kind of coverage you’re going to see. Disappointing that Bryce would look that way given the circumstances. Telling in a bad way maybe.

2193

RossRFulton @rossrfulton.bsky.social · 27/01/2026

I also think that D approach played into it—OSU was more of a cover 3, bend but don’t break approach—and opponents went really slow v OSU.

030

RossRFulton @rossrfulton.bsky.social · 27/01/2026

Day discussed in-season how, by playing slow, they were basically taking a game’s worth of plays off their starters. But it’s likewise hard for me to believe that they were that much slower than everyone else.

Brian Fremeau @bcfremeau.bsky.social · 27/01/2026

Reposted by RossRFulton

College football possessions per game totals have been shrinking over the last decade due tempo preferences downshifting, plays per drive increasing with improved offensive efficiency, and game/play clock rule changes. FBS games averaged 23.9 possessions per game in 2025. bcftoys.com/possessions

Chart titled "Possessions Per Game Season Distributions", a bubble chart representing games played between FBS opponents plotted by the number of total game possessions. Columns of bubbles are organized by season, 2007 to 2025. Labels for the median number of possessions per game by season are included, which along with the distributions themselves, drift down from a median of 27 game possessions (in the 2007 and 2012-2015 seasons) to a median of 24 game possessions (in the 2023-2025 seasons).

195

RossRFulton @rossrfulton.bsky.social · 30/11/2025

I agree re relative lack of explosiveness out of the run game, but between the weather and Smith and Tate coming off injuries that’s about as neutered as the pass game will be. Get to play in domes/good weather going forward.

020

Reposted by RossRFulton

Manuel Excel @colintj.bsky.social · 29/11/2025

3x1 bust

011

Reposted by RossRFulton

Space Coyote @spacecoyote.bsky.social · 29/11/2025

Day has run that have roll corner-post (and variations) since he arrived at OSU. Very popular Shanahan influence

062

OSU put Tate and Smith to the same side. UM went C2 to that side, C4 opposite. C2 Safety shaded to Smith.

Space Coyote @spacecoyote.bsky.social · 29/11/2025

Reposted by RossRFulton

OSU really starting to go after the LB level, both in pass and in misdirection. They just do not execute early assignments well or recognize structures of route stems to help DBs behind them in coverage or actually position themselves to at least flash color to the QB

1151

Reposted by RossRFulton

Space Coyote @spacecoyote.bsky.social · 29/11/2025

Zig zag motion into stack from the slot. LB didn’t have good leverage on the point man, can’t let him push vertical there and form that rub. But the motion makes it difficult as they are thinking quick route to the flat with the initial motion and not communicating

1152

OSU went 13P there as a tendency breaker. Got C3

000

Thanks Wink. Appreciate the single coverage.

180

@colintj.bsky.social have to assume that was Zeus on INT? C2 on Smith, C4 to field. Field side was where Sayin needed to go with football.

100

Ironically osu was in a 4 down front

110

I’m similarly expecting UM to get in 12, then spread out, see how OSU responds. Lots of reliefs early.

000

Also if you get UM in a series where they’re playing a bunch of depth like they have all year would again go tempo and not sub.

021

lol great minds. Was gonna say, if UM is in nickel then you run you gap & pin and pull schemes and see if they can fit.

111

Manuel Excel @colintj.bsky.social · 29/11/2025

As we discussed, if I’m OSU I get in 12, then shift/spread out. See a) how UM responds personnel wise; and b) how UM matches personnel. Then if I get UM in base 3-4 I go tempo and don’t substitute.

022

Reposted by RossRFulton

Interesting wrinkle this year is OSU has tended to have a true outside monster and then a guy they lined up in the slot. This year it’s 2 true outside guys. So if we play C2 to Smith to the field, it’ll be Quarters away to Tate. Will Sayin be able to process that and get the ball to the 1v1?

281

Was gonna say, you know who else loved split Q IZ in short yardage!?

Eh. Def maj MoFC but uses C2, C4, C6. Lots of variation w/in those. But hasn’t had/wanted to use much of it. He def likes to use multiple fronts. Likes bringing out the different coverages/disguise on pass downs.

bsky.app

If forced to pick, 3 LBer, but lots of variance.

Yes. It’s not an automatic response, but OSU will play 3 LBers. Will run Penny but have 2 off-ball LBers. Have also seen 6-1, true odd, over, under.

UM likes to run windback, right? Gets you to the same place as Duo.

0, 4i, 5 to the backside, 7 frontside.

020

To me, this is 2 man under. Where do you think Sayin should have gone with the ball?

100

I just don’t know how you get zone doubles against a gapped out, single high penny front. I haven’t seen any offense get doubles against them with zone runs this year.

PSU (and Illinois) had some success with unbalanced. Penny with C3 is such a balanced look on both sides of the center line so unbalanced is a good response. Expect some unbalanced from UM

Manuel Excel @colintj.bsky.social · 24/11/2025

Zero and 4is, but there is no B gap bubble.

110

Reposted by RossRFulton

@rossrfulton.bsky.social has said this elsewhere, but OSU’s become more and more of a Penny front (5-1 Nickel) team and that makes inside zone really tough to execute. Michigan has run more and more IZ to complement their OZ and moved away from their multiple gap stuff as the season has gone on.

1101

When UM is in 12P I’m also expecting Patricia to use some of the 6-1 that the Patriots used against the Rams in the SB.