Sign in

Rémy Furrer

@remyfurrer.bsky.social
81 followers 137 following 27 posts

Behavioral Scientist PostDoc: Bioethics @MGH @HarvardMed PhD: Psychology @UVA Psychosocial implications of Genomics & Neurotechnologies Attitudes | Decision Making | Causal Reasoning | Moral Cognition

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
ELSIhub | CERA @elsihub.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
📄 New publication featured on ELSIhub: 🔹 "Decision-making criteria in polygenic embryo screening: A survey of reproductive medicine physicians" Explore: elsihub.org/publication/... @remyfurrer.bsky.social
021
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Philip Ball @philipcball.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
I am rather delighted by this paper. So here’s a thread to tell you why, and why it matters. /1 www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
science.org
Noncoding transcription controls the developmental dynamics of long-range gene regulation
The genomic regions regulating gene expression are often themselves transcribed into a variety of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). However, the regulatory roles of this noncoding transcription remain largely unknown. By using live imaging, we reveal that the ...
29035
Rémy Furrer @remyfurrer.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Research Spotlight: Fertility specialists’ perspectives on polygenic embryo screening “Overall, 64% said that PES should only be offered under a research protocol, and 20% said it should not be offered at all.” @mgbresearch.bsky.social news.massgeneralbrigham.org/en/fertility...
news.massgeneralbrigham.org
Research spotlight: Fertility specialists' perspectives on polygenic embryo screening | Mass General Brigham
Researchers surveyed U.S. fertility specialists to understand their views on polygenic embryo screening, a technology that estimates an embryo's future risk of certain diseases. The study found widesp...
010
Rémy Furrer @remyfurrer.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
What are IVF doctors’ views on polygenic embryo screening (PES/PGT-P), and what criteria shape their decisions? New survey results from 152 clinicians. @gimjournal.bsky.social @shaicarmi.bsky.social @toddlencz.bsky.social www.gimjournal.org/article/S109...
gimjournal.org
Decision-making criteria in polygenic embryo screening: A survey of reproductive medicine physicians
Polygenic embryo screening (PES) examines embryos for their genetic likelihood of developing complex conditions and traits. The commercialization of PES places reproductive endocrinologists and infert...
001
Rémy Furrer @remyfurrer.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
My letter responding to The Economist’s “designer babies” editorial is out. The editorial cites our study on public attitudes toward polygenic embryo screening but omits a key finding: attitudes became less favorable when participants first considered potential concerns. Link below.
1117
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Philip Ball @philipcball.bsky.social · 18/05/2026
"a PRS is not an internal predisposition waiting to be realized; it is a risk estimate derived from a model constructed from population-level DNA associations without clearly defined biological mechanisms."
22614
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Eric Turkheimer @ent3c.bsky.social · 18/05/2026
With @remyfurrer.bsky.social, a new piece in Nature Human Behavior. The standard description of a polygenic score as a "genetic predisposition" essentializes a statistical construct. It's not language policing: PGS are a new kind of entity; now is the time to think carefully about what they are.
nature.com
Polygenic risk scores are not genetic predispositions - Nature Human Behaviour
Nature Human Behaviour - Polygenic risk scores are not genetic predispositions
213450
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Pew Research Center @pewresearch.org · 05/03/2026
We asked people around the world to rate the morality and ethics of others in their country. The U.S. is the only place we surveyed where more adults describe the morality and ethics of others living in the country as bad than good. See our full morality report here: www.pewresearch.org/...
Chart showing in many countries, people see their fellow citizens as morally good.
38483248
Rémy Furrer @remyfurrer.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
Polygenic embryo screening is being marketed commercially – but how do IVF clinicians view it? • General approval is low (12%) For specific uses: • 59% approved of health-related embryo selection • 6% approved of trait-based selection 🧵 Survey findings in NPJ Genomic Medicine
165
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Shai Carmi @shaicarmi.bsky.social · 07/11/2025
A meta-analysis of the impact of polygenic risk score disclosures on health outcomes. 27 RCTs, max follow up 12 months. For 22 outcomes tested in >=2 trials, "Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant effects on any measured outcome" www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...
medrxiv.org
Effects of polygenic risk score communication on health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Objective. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize evidence from all RCTs to-date on the efficacy of polygenic risk score (PRS) communication in changing healt...
143
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Jake Quilty-Dunn @quiltydunn.bsky.social · 08/11/2025
there was some discussion on here recently about the scientific legitimacy of cognitive dissonance research. as someone who has spent years investigating this literature, i wanted to make a thread to explain why pessimism is not justified by careful inspection of the evidence 1/
14118
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Eric Turkheimer @ent3c.bsky.social · 17/10/2025
Here is another way to put the paradox. If you ask, "If I had different genes, would my personality be different?" Then the answer is, "Probably, yes." If you ask, "If I had THESE genes, what would my personality be like?", the answer is, "We don't have any idea."
65711
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 06/09/2025
Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia: doi.org/10.5281/zeno... We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity. 1/n
Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues.Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe.Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles
11341512055
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 31/07/2025
The reaction to this being essentially completely positive has me pleasantly surprised. I sometimes get so worried that such analyses aren't wanted anymore and people just want to be left alone to gloat while cheating on coursework and rot their brains with vibe coding... Thanks everyone. 💖
3264
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Michael Inzlicht @minzlicht.bsky.social · 26/05/2025
🚨 New preprint! 🚨 Inform and Do No Harm: A Novel Approach to Reduce Negative Effects of Mental Health Awareness My student Dasha Sandra tackled growing concerns about false self-diagnosis following awareness efforts and found a promising solution. Thread /1 osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io
OSF
22911
Rémy Furrer @remyfurrer.bsky.social · 27/05/2025
Our NEW STUDY on public views of neurotechnologies used for mood, memory, and motor🧠 conditions is out in @cellpress.bsky.social Device. 📰Open Access: cell.com/device/fullt... From the Neurotech Justice Accelerator (NJAM) at MGB, a Dana Center for Neuroscience and Society
cell.com
Public perceptions of neurotechnologies used to target mood, memory, and motor symptoms
Furrer et al. conducted a US-based survey on the perception of neurotechnologies for treating mood, memory, and motor symptoms. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) was seen as the most invasive and risky, le...
122
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 17/05/2025
I am seeing news that AI companies face “unexpected” obstacles in scaling up their AI systems. Not unexpected at all, of course. Completely predictable from the Ingenia theorem.
719961
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Mark Thornton @markthornton.bsky.social · 24/03/2025
New preprint! My entry into the ongoing AI empathy discussion: "Reframing the performance and ethics of 'empathic' AI: Wisdom of the crowd and placebos." osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io
OSF
2259
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Experimental Philosophy @xphilosopher.bsky.social · 12/03/2025
Suppose Person A orders Person B to hurt you. Then Person B does exactly what she was ordered to do. Who would you see as the main cause of what happened to you - Person A or Person B? Intriguing new work from @vanessachg.bsky.social osf.io/preprints/ps...
32513
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 21/02/2025
🧵Thread overview of ALL my publications related to "Cognition and Intractability" in chronological order: 🌟
Figure 3 from "The Tractable Cognition Thesis (van Rooij, 2008): "According to the Tractable Cognition thesis, the set of functions describing possible cognitive capacities is a subset of the set of tractable functions. The dotted line indicates that the set of tractable functions remains to be formalized."
1024458
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Mike Dickison @adzebill.bsky.social · 01/02/2025
The Internet Archive has to date downloaded 500 terabytes of US government websites, which it crawls at the end of every presidential term. The whole archive is fully searchable. This effort's housed by a donation-funded nonprofit, not a branch of the US government. blog.archive.org/2024/05/08/e...
blog.archive.org
End of Term Web Archive – Preserving the Transition of a Nation | Internet Archive Blogs
4803277012099
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Kristoffer Magnusson @rpsychologist.com · 11/12/2024
Introducing PowerLMM.js! A new tool for power analysis of longitudinal linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) – with support for missing data, plus non-inferiority and equivalence tests. powerlmmjs.rpsychologist.com Would really appreciate your feedback as I refine this app! Details below 🧵👇
11299110
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Jay Van Bavel, PhD @jayvanbavel.bsky.social · 22/09/2024
Interventions that enable individuals to circumvent obstacles, offers social support, provides incentives, and highlights healthy social norms are very effective at changing behavior. Changing emotions, attitudes, and beliefs, doesn't help much. www.nature.com/articles/s44...
25921
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Hallgeir Sjåstad @hallgeirsjastad.bsky.social · 08/12/2024
Pronin & Kugler (2010) found: People evaluated their own decisions & life events as less predictable than similar decisions & life events of others, presumably reflecting higher self-centered free will attribution. A replication team paper I played a small part in just published: Mostly successful.
1237
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Experimental Philosophy @xphilosopher.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
I was very struck by this new Moss et al. theory about why people sometimes endorse moral relativism Just wanted to say a little more to bring out what is so deep and interesting about their new idea
53712
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Eric Turkheimer @ent3c.bsky.social · 06/11/2024
Want to hear something funny? Yeah, me neither. But it's out of my control: My book, Understanding The Nature-Nurture Debate, was released today. Not today, but I hope everyone will forgive me if I write a little about it over the next few weeks. www.cambridge.org/gb/universit...
cambridge.org
Understanding the Nature‒Nurture Debate | Genetics
44213
Rémy Furrer @remyfurrer.bsky.social · 04/11/2024
Ahead of tomorrow's election, I published a piece in the BOSTON GLOBE based on our research showing that gradient maps—unlike typical red-blue maps—reduce perceived polarization and empower voters by making them feel their vote has a greater impact. www.bostonglobe.com/2024/11/03/o...
bostonglobe.com
A better way to map the election - The Boston Globe
Researchers have found that adding nuance to the way we represent voting results on election night could help combat polarization and voter apathy.
000
Rémy Furrer @remyfurrer.bsky.social · 17/05/2024
🚨 NEW STUDY!!🚨 Sharing our latest paper published in JAMA Network Open: jamanetwork.com/journals/jam... "Public Attitudes, Interests, and Concerns Regarding Polygenic Embryo Screening" I share some thoughts on the findings in Harvard Medical School's news release: hms.harvard.edu/news/study-r...
000
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Eli Holder @elibryan.bsky.social · 10/01/2024
The first study looks at election maps: "Red and blue states: dichotomized maps mislead and reduce perceived voting influence" by @remyfurrer.bsky.social , @kbschloss.bsky.social, @glupyan.bsky.social, @pniedent.bsky.social, @adriennewood.bsky.social doi.org/10.1186/s412...
doi.org
Red and blue states: dichotomized maps mislead and reduce perceived voting influence - Cognitive Res...
In the United States the color red has come to represent the Republican party, and blue the Democratic party, in maps of voting patterns. Here we test the hypothesis that voting maps dichotomized into...
101
Rémy Furrer @remyfurrer.bsky.social · 14/01/2024
Coverage of our research demonstrating that "dichotomized maps mislead and reduce perceived voting influence" + More dataviz studies related to politics in the journal from the data visualization society
010
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 20/12/2023
Deviating from a preregistration can be justified if it leads to a test with higher validity - even if this comes at the cost of a less severe test (which is likely still more severe than if you had not preregistered). I give examples in Table 1.
04019
Rémy Furrer @remyfurrer.bsky.social · 08/12/2023
The Boston Globe covers our study on public opinion towards polygenic screening of embryos. “… In the absence of regulation, at least in the United States, 'we need to start educating the public so that they can make informed decisions,' he says.” www.bostonglobe.com/2023/12/07/o...
430
Reposted by Rémy Furrer
Tobias Gerstenberg @tobigerstenberg.bsky.social · 20/11/2023
The talk recordings from the "Causality in Minds and Machines" workshop are live now. sites.google.com/view/causali... Thanks again to all the speakers and to the Society for Mathematical Psychology for sponsoring the workshop!
04816