Sign in

Robin McKenna

@rbnmckenna.bsky.social
1.2K followers 691 following 564 posts

Scottish philosopher at the University of Liverpool. Likes to do philosophy by reading about things that are more interesting than philosophy. Some sort of social epistemologist. robinmckenna.weebly.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 05/08/2026
New paper! It's a commentary on Ari Deller's "The Epistemic Costs of Super-Persuasive AI" in Philosophy & Technology. I agree with Deller about the potential epistemic costs of persuasive AI, but I don't think AI needs to be super-persuasive for these costs to exist link.springer.com/article/10.1...
link.springer.com
Persuasive Capacity, Not Persuasive Power: A Commentary on Ari Deller’s “The Epistemic Costs of Super-Persuasive AI” - Philosophy & Technology
In a recent article in this journal, Ari Deller has argued that there are some severe epistemic costs to super-persuasive AI. In this commentary I explain why, while I agree with Deller about the epis...
020
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
This is a new paper on why political epistemology needs to be less parochial. It appears in a volume I edited with Hana Samaržija on The European Face of Political Epistemology. I wrote this *years* ago so it is nice to see it, and the volume, in print. link.springer.com/chapter/10.1...
link.springer.com
Parochialism in Political Epistemology
Political epistemology has recently emerged as an area of analytic epistemology. While it may not be an entirely new area, and its precise boundaries are up for negotiation, recent political events in...
080
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 17/07/2026
There are lots of guides to how to give a great academic talk. But what if you are unambitious, lazy, or spiritually European and just want to give a mediocre talk? I fit into all these categories, and give lots of mediocre talks, so I'm well placed to help. rbnmckenna86.substack.com/p/how-to-giv...
rbnmckenna86.substack.com
How to Give an Average Talk
A guide for mediocre, unambitious and spiritually European academics
1101
Reposted by Robin McKenna
Social Epistemology Journal @socialepistemology.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
➡️ 🔓 [OPEN ACCESS] "Doing Your Own Patient Activist Research" by Robin McKenna www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
tandfonline.com
Doing Your Own Patient Activist Research
The slogan ‘Do Your Own Research’ (DYOR) is often invoked by people who are distrustful, even downright sceptical, of recognised expert authorities. While this slogan serves various rhetorical purp...
021
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 08/06/2026
glad to be finished with parental leave because it means I can return to the thing I really love: emailing students to inform them they have been accused of misusing AI in a recent assignment and asking them if they did it or not.
1120
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 25/05/2026
New Substack piece where I argue for the need to give symmetrical explanations of political beliefs--you can't explain the ones you don't like by saying they serve some psychological or social need and the ones you like by saying they just reflect the evidence. open.substack.com/pub/rbnmcken...
open.substack.com
A Strong Programme in Political Epistemology
Why the study of political belief keeps flattering the people doing it—and how to fix this
4234
Reposted by Robin McKenna
Pilar Lopez-Cantero @lopezcantero.bsky.social · 16/05/2026
“The problem is when you try to have it both ways: the elegance of traditional philosophy directed at real-world problems. If the result is elegant, it won’t help you understand the problem. If it helps you understand the problem, it probably won’t be very elegant.”
021
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 16/05/2026
New piece defending the applied turn in analytic philosophy. I say what the applied turn is, how it differs from the social turn, and why it isn't just left progressivism cloaked in the language of analytic philosophy. open.substack.com/pub/rbnmcken...
open.substack.com
In Defence of the Applied Turn
Plus why it is not the same as the social turn
2164
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 08/05/2026
We're living through a crisis of knowledge and trust in institutions. This new piece argues that a common diagnosis--we're overdoing politics--is wrong. The real problem is the lack of avenues for meaningful political activity. open.substack.com/pub/rbnmcken...
open.substack.com
What is Wrong with Politicisation?
This is a lightly edited version of a paper I will be giving this summer at a conference organised by the “Knowledge in Crisis” project. I’m going to talk about politicisation because, in my view, the...
011
Reposted by Robin McKenna
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
I wrote this on why it's a bad thing that political epistemologists talk constantly about Brexit, Trump and the pathologies of US politics. I also suggest what they might do instead. open.substack.com/pub/rbnmcken...
open.substack.com
Parochialism in Political Epistemology
Why it can be, but is not always, a bad thing
184
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
I wrote this on why it's a bad thing that political epistemologists talk constantly about Brexit, Trump and the pathologies of US politics. I also suggest what they might do instead. open.substack.com/pub/rbnmcken...
open.substack.com
Parochialism in Political Epistemology
Why it can be, but is not always, a bad thing
184
Reposted by Robin McKenna
Keith Raymond Harris @kraymondh.bsky.social · 24/04/2026
Amazing lineup for the @knowledgecrisis.bsky.social Knowledge conference this summer @floresophize.bsky.social @rbnmckenna.bsky.social @elisewoodard.bsky.social #philsky
0175
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 15/04/2026
Being a member of an editorial board: generally seen as a good idea, or more work than it is worth? If, as I suspect, the answer is "it depends", then say what it depends on in the comments.
100
Reposted by Robin McKenna
Caleb Ward @calebw.bsky.social · 13/04/2026
Well the author is a self-declared effective altruist, so he’s probably mostly bummed that there’s no “basically pleasant murder bureaucrat” option
413413
Reposted by Robin McKenna
Andrew Tan @andrewtanyongyi.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
'Do Your Own Research' (DYOR) is often invoked by people who are distrustful, even downright sceptical, of recognised expert authorities. ... I use case studies of patient activist groups ... They demonstrate ... the necessity of not simply deferring to recognised experts. - Robin McKenna
tandfonline.com
Doing Your Own Patient Activist Research
The slogan ‘Do Your Own Research’ (DYOR) is often invoked by people who are distrustful, even downright sceptical, of recognised expert authorities. While this slogan serves various rhetorical purp...
032
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
New post on Robert Talisse's Overdoing Democracy. I think he's right that we're overdoing something, but what we're overdoing isn't democracy. Talking about politics has become a substitute for political action--talking about politics less won't fix that. open.substack.com/pub/rbnmcken...
open.substack.com
Are We Overdoing Democracy?
We're overdoing something, but I'm not sure it is democracy
052
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 18/03/2026
What, if any, are the upsides of reviewing grant applications for the ERC (European Research Council)?
000
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
Chris Ranalli and I are organising a workshop on the "Politics of Scepticism" at VU Amsterdam, 23-24th June. Registration is free but you need to contact me (r.j.mckenna@liverpool.ac.uk) or Chris Ranalli (c.b.ranalli2@vu.nl) if you want to attend.
Conference banner. Contains the list of speakers: J Adam Carter, Mikkel Gerken, Allan Hazlett, Anne Meylan, Miriam McCormick, me, Lena Mudry and Chris Ranalli. Also some art but that's not essential.
042
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 23/02/2026
running a mailing list is a surprising amount of work, but running a mailing list that doesn't work properly is far more work.
010
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 11/02/2026
This argues that a popular approach to science communication is best understood as a form of propaganda. It's a synthesis of my interest in the ethics of science communication and my new-found interest in propaganda. I try to connect this with science scepticism, though that might be a stretch.
open.substack.com
Science Communication as Propaganda
A Strategic Approach to Manufacturing Consensus
042
Reposted by Robin McKenna
Lars Weisbrod @weisbrod.bsky.social · 05/02/2026
Ich halte den stumpfen Vorzeichenwechsel von woke zu anti-woke nicht für einen echten „vibe shift“. Es ist derselbe vibe, nur von der anderen Seite. Ich habe das Buch AGAINST IDENTITY noch nicht gelesen, aber immer wenn ich den Titel sehe, denke ich: Ja, DAS wäre ein echter Shift! Guter Text dazu:
031
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 05/02/2026
I wrote this for the Republic of Letters about why the right response to an increasingly politicised environment is not to lean into that politicisation but to try and escape it. Also contains an argument that politicisation is a deeper problem than polarisation. open.substack.com/pub/therepub...
open.substack.com
Be More Interesting
I started studying philosophy in a windy town on the east coast of Scotland in 2004.
041
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 20/01/2026
I think something like this would be good in philosophy, though I may personally publish a bit too much to be able to say it entirely in good faith.
020
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
Today I read some proper analytic epistemology the first time in a while. It was perfectly good but there was something I found a bit odd about it. This is my attempt to explain what that is. open.substack.com/pub/rbnmcken...
open.substack.com
A Pathology of Analytic Philosophy
This is admittedly a little niche
293
Reposted by Robin McKenna
Anna Alexandrova @annaalexandrova.bsky.social · 09/01/2026
Our special issue with @martinkusch.bsky.social is finally complete and here’s at long last our introduction. I pitched the idea to him in 2019! Thank you for your patience and generosity, Martin. I am proud of this manifesto and hope colleagues will join us in rethinking this old debate #philsci
sciencedirect.com
"Why do we argue about the specialness of the social sciences?"
28328
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 07/01/2026
This semester I am teaching a course about technocracy and its discontents. It will be a mix of theory (what is technocracy, why do we have it) and case studies. Ideas for reading suggestions? They need to be relatively accessible, and make a good basis for discussion.
383
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 03/01/2026
I've been meaning to write this for *months*. I'm increasingly unhappy with the focus on epistemic injustice and cataloguing the various things that can go wrong in information exchange. But I suspect my reasons for being unhappy are different to the usual. open.substack.com/pub/rbnmcken...
open.substack.com
Against "Epistemic Injustice"
On the Epistemic Injustice as a Central Organising Concept
2162
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
I can tell I’m becoming some sort of political philosopher because now when I get the chance to order free books to not read I choose things like this rather than books like “Can you know the bank is open on Saturday? It depends” and “10 new kinds of epistemic injustice”.
Various Routledge books including Popper's The Open Society and its Enemies, a book on Expertise, Weber's The Protestant Work Ethic, Weil's The Need for Roots, Schumpeter's Socialism, Democracy and Capitalism, Murdoch's Sovereignty of Good and Midgely's Myths we live by.
1100
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 11/12/2025
Reading about belief as a feeling of conviction. Seems like a problem for the theory that I presumably have beliefs but have no idea what conviction is meant to feel like. Starting to worry I might be a philosophical zombie.
130
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 11/12/2025
I suspect the current/looming graduate jobs crisis is going to lead to an uptick in applications for Masters programmes. I must admit to being in a real moral quandary here, given that the vast majority of such programmes won't materially improve job prospects. But what else is there?
3101
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
Reading The End of History for teaching next week. Has anyone ever considered that Fukayama might have been wrong?
290
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 19/11/2025
My dept has to redesign our BA Philosophy (for reasons). I am struggling to think of a good reason why a typical philosophy graduate needs to know any 20th/21st century epistemology (if they did, it would be knowledge first epistemology, but that's difficult). Am I wrong?
771
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 31/10/2025
Chris Ranalli and I have a new paper in the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism. We argue that philosophical scepticism need not lead to political conservatism. We also suggest that scepticism may support an anti-political stance that is worth cultivating. brill.com/view/journal...
brill.com
044
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 09/10/2025
Very happy to see this out. It's a critical piece with @martinkusch.bsky.social on one of my very favourite philosophers, Hilary Kornblith. Published in a new book, Kornblith and His Critics, edited by Josh DiPaolo and Luis Oliveira. doi.org/10.1002/9781...
doi.org
Kornblith, Naturalism, Relativism
Three core commitments run through Kornblith's work in epistemology. First, epistemologists should investigate knowledge itself rather than the concept of knowledge. Second, knowledge is a natural ki...
0111
Reposted by Robin McKenna
Chris @multiplicityct.bsky.social · 30/09/2025
We have nothing to worry about from AI's hyper-persuasiveness...as long as we're truly masters of our own beliefs, the claims of social epistemology are wrong, and we can fully understand how & why models are influencing us. In other words, it's an issue. Great new @rbnmckenna.bsky.social article.
philpapers.org
Robin McKenna, Sophistry on Steroids? The Ethics, Epistemology and Politics of Persuasive AI - PhilPapers
This paper examines the ethical, epistemological, and political implications of persuasive AI technologies. Recent research suggests that AI is roughly as persuasive as humans in many contexts. Should...
0113
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 30/09/2025
constantly
Academic spam from a "publication coach" at "Editage" with the subject line: "worried about standing out this conference season?"
020
Reposted by Robin McKenna
lastpositivist.bsky.social @lastpositivist.bsky.social · 22/09/2025
Just got an email from a scam academic journal asking if I wanted to "explore new advances in White Psychodrama" and it's just got me like: buddy, I can watch the news myself.
9993131
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 22/09/2025
Available open access: a new paper arguing that, even though persuasive AI technologies won't destroy the world, we should be worried about them. doi.org/10.1007/s001...
doi.org
Sophistry on steroids? The ethics, epistemology and politics of persuasive AI - AI & SOCIETY
This paper examines the ethical, epistemological, and political implications of persuasive AI technologies. Recent research suggests that AI is roughly as persuasive as humans in many contexts. Should...
020
Reposted by Robin McKenna
Alexander Douglas @axdouglas.bsky.social · 16/09/2025
open.substack.com
My Philosophical Manifesto
This interview with Contralytic ended up being my philosophical manifesto.
1137
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 15/09/2025
New paper w/Chris Ranalli explaining why I don't think there need be a close connection between skepticism and political conservatism. It's a critical discussion of a new book, Jonathan Ichikawa's Epistemic Courage, but we sketch our favored form of skepticism at the end. philpapers.org/rec/MCKSAC-4
philpapers.org
Robin McKenna & Christopher Ranalli, Skepticism and Conservatism - PhilPapers
In his excellent new book Epistemic Courage Jonathan Ichikawa argues that epistemology evinces a bias towards the skeptical. In its most extreme forms (i.e. radical skepticism), this leads to complete...
042
Reposted by Robin McKenna
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 09/09/2025
New paper in AI & Society on why we should be worried about persuasive AI technologies even if you are, like me, sceptical that we are about to enter a world of AI "hyper-persuasion". philpapers.org/rec/MCKSOS-2
philpapers.org
Robin McKenna, Sophistry on Steroids? The Ethics, Epistemology and Politics of Persuasive AI - PhilPapers
This paper examines the ethical, epistemological, and political implications of persuasive AI technologies. Recent research suggests that AI is roughly as persuasive as humans in many contexts. Should...
0103
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 09/09/2025
New paper in AI & Society on why we should be worried about persuasive AI technologies even if you are, like me, sceptical that we are about to enter a world of AI "hyper-persuasion". philpapers.org/rec/MCKSOS-2
philpapers.org
Robin McKenna, Sophistry on Steroids? The Ethics, Epistemology and Politics of Persuasive AI - PhilPapers
This paper examines the ethical, epistemological, and political implications of persuasive AI technologies. Recent research suggests that AI is roughly as persuasive as humans in many contexts. Should...
0103
Reposted by Robin McKenna
Anthony Moser @anthonymoser.com · 01/09/2025
it's a common mistake but actually Dr Frankenstein was the monster
3087786
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 20/08/2025
Short Substack post where I explain why selective cynicism--something you see quite often on the social media feeds of heterodox academics--really annoys me. open.substack.com/pub/rbnmcken...
open.substack.com
Against Selective Cynicism
It won’t surprise readers of this Substack to learn that I am, at heart, a cynic and a pessimist.
040
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 13/08/2025
New Substack post where I talk some more about my current obsession: propaganda. This is a review of a book that I very strongly recommend, Cory Wimberly's How Propaganda Became Public Relations: Foucault and the Corporate Governance of the Public. open.substack.com/pub/rbnmcken...
open.substack.com
The Manufacture of Subjects
A Review of Cory Wimberly's How Propaganda Became Public Relations
041
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 07/08/2025
The International Journal of Philosophical Studies were kind enough to do a special issue on my book (really a hybrid: articles on ideal and non-ideal epistemology plus some critical commentaries). Thanks to everyone who contributed for making it a fantastic collection. philpapers.org/rec/MCKIAN
philpapers.org
Robin McKenna & Gerry Dunne, Ideal and Non-Ideal Theory in Epistemology - PhilPapers
This is the editors' introduction to a special issue on Ideal and Non-Ideal Theory in Epistemology in the International Journal of Philosophical Studies.
14211
Reposted by Robin McKenna
Jakob Ohlhorst @jakobohlhorst.bsky.social · 31/07/2025
Don't mind Robin, his book is great, and we (Nastja, Nora, and I) wouldn't have been able to make these criticisms without Robin's groundwork!
051
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 30/07/2025
Good criticisms of my book on Non-Ideal Epistemology in this critical notice in Analysis. I've come to agree with a lot of the criticisms in here, so if someone wants to write a better book that does all these things please do. academic.oup.com/analysis/adv...
academic.oup.com
Non-ideal enough?
In recent years, the traditional outlook and methods of analytic epistemology with its thought experiments, Gettierology and definition-mongering have beco
190
Reposted by Robin McKenna
Aidan McGlynn @aidanmcglynn.bsky.social · 29/07/2025
Haven't had a chance to read this double review-essay from @catsaintcroix.bsky.social on Greco and @rbnmckenna.bsky.social's books on idealisation in epistemology yet, but it looks really interesting
philpapers.org
Catharine Saint-Croix, Greco (2023) _Idealization in Epistemology_ and McKenna (2023) _Non-Ideal Epistemology_ - PhilPapers
Epistemology is rife with idealization. And, although concern about particular idealizations—logical omniscience, infinite iterations of common knowledge, and so on—is long-standing, systematic metaep...
1152
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 18/07/2025
I'm teaching a class on Philosophy and Social Change in september. It will look at different theories of and responses to social change: conservative, liberal, radical. But I'm really struggling for readings that are (a) accessible (b) high quality. Any suggestions?
340