Sign in

Pierce Ekstrom

@pierceekstrom.bsky.social
521 followers 211 following 31 posts

Asst prof at University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Former postdoc at Wash U and UMN grad student. Political Psychologist. Studies morality, group ID, conflict, polarization. pierceekstrom.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Kyle Walker @kylewalker.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
The classic Racial Dot Map inspired me and a whole generation of mapmakers. Today, I'm publishing a modern take on this map, built with the geospatial tools I've been developing over the past decade. Interact with the map here: walker-data.com/maps/census-...
1186
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 27/08/2026
Psychological Science special issue call 📣 Ever had your research denigrated bc it's "only descriptive", "what's the mechanism though?" and "but what are the theoretical implications?" Now has come your time to shine. Send your best descriptive work! www.psychologicalscience.org/publications...
Psychological Science invites submissions that advance psychological science through careful description of psychological phenomena. Psychological research often focuses on explaining and predicting phenomena before we have a sufficiently detailed understanding of them. It can be difficult to build strong theories on incomplete empirical foundations of the phenomena themselves. Careful descriptive research helps establish shared empirical reference points developed around well-characterized phenomena. As such, descriptive research contributes to psychological science both by improving our understanding of the phenomena themselves and by providing a stronger foundation for future theory-building, explanation, and prediction.

We are interested in manuscripts that:

Deepen our understanding of psychological phenomena, including what they look like, how they vary, and how they unfold;
Draw on a variety of sources of evidence and methods, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches; research conducted in naturalistic settings; intensive, longitudinal, or small-sample designs; and open or large-scale datasets; 
Provide necessary context for interpreting what is being described, including who is represented in the data, the settings and circumstances in which phenomena occur, and the broader social contexts in which they are situated; and/or
Make a substantive contribution to psychological science through the quality, depth, or significance of the description provided.
The deadline for submitting regular manuscripts is April 15, 2027. Registered Reports will also be considered. The deadline for submitting Stage 1 Registered Reports is November 15, 2026. Authors should indicate in the “Comments to Editor” box during submission that the manuscript is intended for the “Descriptive Research in Psychological Science” special issue.
7244128
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Claire E. Robertson, PhD @crobertson500.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Is social media truly making us more politically polarized, or does it simply over-represent our most extreme opinions? In our new preprint, @small-schulz.bsky.social and I present *punishing evidence* that social media systematically overrepresents users’ most extreme political opinions. 1/n
25232
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Calvin Lai @calvinklai.bsky.social · 23/02/2026
Heading to Chicago for #SPSP2026? Come check out work from our lab! 🙂 We’re presenting 2 talks & 2 posters on interventions to promote confrontations of sexism, identity safety cues, multiracial identity, and stereotyping about nationality.
Izilda Pereira-Jorge, Sandra Manfreda, Brianna Lopez, Selin Toprakkiran
0102
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Calvin Lai @calvinklai.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
Project Implicit is facing an existential threat. After almost 30 years, 60 million visitors, and hundreds of published papers, funding for our work has disappeared. We’ve never held a fundraising drive before, but we need your support to keep our site running. Please consider donating! 🙏
03125
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Lily Mason @lilymasonphd.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
New post-doc position working with me in a new lab at @snfagora.bsky.social ! It's one year appointment, renewable for up to 5 years. The position includes data analysis and independent research, mentorship of lab members, and participation in SNF Agora Institute life. apply.interfolio.com/178796
apply.interfolio.com
Apply - Interfolio {{$ctrl.$state.data.pageTitle}} - Apply - Interfolio
14341
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 13/11/2025
New write-up of our political scandal experiments for SPSP's (@spspnews.bsky.social) blog. We find that partisan voters allow politicians to get away with hostile, defensive "explanations" for scandal, esp when the politician is high-status and when party goals are at stake spsp.org/news/charact...
spsp.org
Do Voters Punish Politicians Who Apologize? | SPSP
Politicians may deny scandals not just for themselves but because voters let them.
022
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 07/10/2025
I was trained in Social Psych and now I'm very happy here. If you (as a student or mentor) have questions about life across disciplines, feel free to reach out. 3/3
000
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 07/10/2025
And it's not just me and Ingrid. As I say every year, we have 6 faculty with explicit interest in political psych and an unknown number of faculty with secret interest in it. So when I say "political psych" I mean that very broadly. 2/3
110
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 07/10/2025
We're recruiting PhD students to join us at Nebraska! Spreading word: Whether you (or your student's) current home is in Psych or PoliSci, if you're interested in political psych, you could be a great fit. I run a joint lab (www.pierceekstrom.com/ekstromlab) with Ingrid Haas (paclab.unl.edu). 1/3
166
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
G Elliott Morris @gelliottmorris.com · 07/10/2025
Why most polls overstate support for political violence www.gelliottmorris.com/p/most-polls...
gelliottmorris.com
Why most polls overstate support for political violence
Misperceptions about the popularity of violence increase public support for it — but you can help change that.
116869
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
ISPP @polpsyispp.bsky.social · 01/10/2025
ISPP Small Grants are back for 2026! 💡 $50k total available; request up to $5k for research or network/workshop projects. Open to current ISPP members. Proposals due Dec 1, 2025. Selection uses a lottery among proposals that meet all criteria. Apply: ispp.org/funding/smal...
01010
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Jay Van Bavel, PhD @jayvanbavel.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
We argue that moral expressions—that signal one’s sense of right and wrong—are highly sensitive to social norms. These norms can amplify moral expressions (eg social media) or restrain them (eg work settings) See our new paper on How Social Influence Shapes Moral Expression: osf.io/preprints/ps...
12212
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 22/09/2025
Pre-Print: osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io
OSF
000
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 22/09/2025
We thought partisans would *punish* in-party apologies. Instead we found that apologies & denials of wrongdoing worked equally w/ in-partisans. So we think partisans "enable" rather than "incentivize" denials of wrongdoing. (Posted this when it first came out online but re-upping)
100
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 22/09/2025
Our paper on partisan reactions to political scandal is officially published in PSPB: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.... Partisans were more receptive to defensive, hostile "explanations" for misconduct from in-(vs out-)party politicians. Seems driven by desire to win > identity-protective motive
journals.sagepub.com
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
184
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Allie Sinclair @asinclair.bsky.social · 08/09/2025
🌟 Excited to share that I'm recruiting PhD students in Psychology for my new lab at Rice University this cycle (Signal boost appreciated!) To learn more, check out the Learning & Behavior Change Lab website: www.sinclairlab-rice.com Applications are due Dec 1st: psychology.rice.edu/graduate/pro...
sinclairlab-rice.com
Sinclair Lab
The Learning & Behavior Change Lab at Rice University, directed by Dr. Sinclair
26248
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Nebraska CYFS @unlcyfs.bsky.social · 21/08/2025
CYFS research affiliate Jenna Finch, asst professor of psychology, is exploring the factors that shape students’ transitions from second to third grade. ▶️ Watch news story via KMTV 3 News Now: www.3newsnow.com/lincoln/unl-... #EdResearch #STEM #EarlyMath #NUforNE #GoBigResearch #NSFfunded
Screen shot of Jenna Finch being interviewed by Omaha's 3 News Now.
042
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Alex Garlick @garlicksauce.bsky.social · 22/07/2025
Here's a treat for state politics and policy researchers: Ethan Dee and I published a dataset in Nature: Scientific Data with the universe of state legislative bills since ~2009 coded by 28 policy areas. We used a machine learning model built off open source components.
nature.com
Policy agendas of the American state legislatures - Scientific Data
Scientific Data - Policy agendas of the American state legislatures
22710
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 02/06/2025
Replacing "Best wishes [etc]," with "Tomorrow comes,"
141
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 31/05/2025
Thanks!
010
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
mark brandt @mjbsp.bsky.social · 30/05/2025
The political slant of psych research (e.g., left vs. right) is not related to replicability, although more slant (in any direction) may be associated with less replicability journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
1275
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
I’ve been hesitant to promote some “regular” work lately bc I do a lot of “polarization” research - I don’t think that’s the biggest problem in politics right now. But I think Zeenat’s project gets at *the* problem of democratic erosion, and I’m very grateful and proud to be a part of this work.
020
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
So pointing out when politicians violate democratic norms might reduce support for them – a little bit. But changing vote intentions (even in our hypothetical scenarios) was hard, and in the real world – where these “call-outs” will be contested – it’ll be much harder.
120
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
Here’s the figure from the more representative study. Interaction wasn’t significant, but you can see each treatment made some difference on its own, but they didn’t add together nicely. We think both made violations more salient.
A bar graph showing approval and willingness to vote for senators engaged in undemocratic behavior. Bars vary across four combinations of two manipulations: 1) democratic principles reported before vs. after judgments of the politician and 2) Low-Salience vs. High-Salience undemocratic behavior. Approval for senators engaged in undemocratic behavior was consistently low (at or below 2.5 on a 5-point scale) across conditions (but was highest in the condition where violations were not made salient and judged before participants reported their democratic principles). Willingness to vote for the undemocratic senator was consistently at or above 4 on a 7-point scale, but again, was highest in the condition where violations were not made salient and judged before participants reported their democratic principles
100
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
If Ps just don’t notice democratic violations, maybe pointing them out when Ps read about them will make them salient and reduce support for those politicians (“This policy is inconsistent with the principle that people should be allowed to protest in groups!”). This worked - small effect.
100
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
Our students were unwilling to vote for those politicians too (phew). Ps in our nat’l sample, though, were at best “not sure” how they’d vote, and unwilling to vote against the in-party. So we did see some willingness to choose party over democracy. Could we reduce that?
100
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
Plus, we find strong beliefs that things like civil liberties and rule of law are important to a democracy and that the U.S. should be a democracy. Among both Dem and Rep participants, in both samples. Also, Ps consistently disapproved of undemocratic policies/behavior.
100
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
If Ps don’t know what “counts” as democratic, having Ps articulate their principles pre-judgment should give them clearer evaluative standards and reduce support. Principles reported post-judgment should be weaker, to rationalize their support for in-party violators. Neither happened (consistently).
100
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
Participants (Ps) read about hypothetical in-party senators who each violated some fundamental democratic principle (e.g., free assembly, free press, rule of law). We recruited two samples (one student, one demographically representative of American partisans by age/race/gender).
100
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
New preprint with my grad advisee, Zeenat Ahmed. When and why do Americans prioritize party wins over democracy? Not because they don’t know what democracy is. Maybe, sometimes bc they don’t notice that in-partisans are violating democratic principles. There are some caveats. osf.io/preprints/os....
osf.io
OSF
2102
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Calvin Lai @calvinklai.bsky.social · 09/05/2025
Come join us! I have startup funds to hire a postdoc for Fall 2025 at Rutgers to study intergroup relations. The job ad is at jobs.rutgers.edu/postings/249... & evaluations begin in 1 wk (5/16) w rolling evaluation. See 🧵below for a write-up on what I'm looking for in a postdoc. Please share widely!
26055
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 13/01/2025
*If your paper was a poster OR paper at ISPP in Santiago, that paper can be nominated.
021
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 13/01/2025
Last call for ISPP 2025 Awards Nominations! (@polpsyispp.bsky.social) I'm helping review for two early-career paper awards. -"Early career"=within 8 yrs of PhD. -Awards are for papers presented this past year at ISPP (in Santiago). -Nominees must be current ISPP members. ispp.org/awards/sigel/
153
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 14/12/2024
The one of the side, though it is fun to me how desolate the breezeway looks in B&W.
000
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 14/12/2024
I've really enjoyed all these photos, but I really really like that shot of Elliott Hall.
010
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Eliane Roy @elianeroy.bsky.social · 05/12/2024
New JPSP article is out, with @jordanaxt.bsky.social, @calvinklai.bsky.social, and many collaborators! We organised a contest study with an open call for interested researchers to submit their discrimination-reduction intervention ideas. doi.org/10.1037/pspa...
44420
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 04/12/2024
You could always put them in competition or make some minimal groups. Or (obviously top-of-mind for me) tell them about a moral disagreement they have. ...how much do you want them to dislike each other?
010
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Tierney Lorenz @tierneylorenz.bsky.social · 21/11/2024
Want to learn more about machine learning with a healthy dose of memes and jokes? Check out this new beginners guide, written by our very own, very talented London Wolff: londonwolff.github.io/machine_lear... No background in ML needed (although some familiarity with R is helpful).
londonwolff.github.io
Beginners Guide to Machine Learning Binary Classification Problems in R
195
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Chanel Meyers @chanelkmeyers.bsky.social · 02/09/2024
Curtis Phills and I are hiring a full-time lab manager here at the University of Oregon, where we are co-leading the C-squared Lab. If you are interested in stereotypes, prejudice, diversity, and social cognition, please apply! Job ad here: tinyurl.com/c2labmanager
tinyurl.com
Lab Manager Position at University of Oregon
13325
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 12/08/2024
UNL Poli Sci is hiring an assistant prof in Race & Ethnic Politics! employment.unl.edu/postings/92973 "The position is open with respect to particular subfields, though candidates with an interest in or research focus in public policy are especially encouraged to apply."
employment.unl.edu
Assistant Professor
The Department of Political Science at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln seeks a tenure-track assistant professor in the area of Race and Ethnic Politics. The position is open with respect to particu...
021
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Geoff Lorenz @geofflorenz.bsky.social · 08/08/2024
Come join us at Nebraska! My department is searching in REP with a policy emphasis. Not on committee but happy to answer questions. Job ad here: employment.unl.edu/postings/92973
employment.unl.edu
Assistant Professor
The Department of Political Science at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln seeks a tenure-track assistant professor in the area of Race and Ethnic Politics. The position is open with respect to particu...
014
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Calvin Lai @calvinklai.bsky.social · 01/07/2024
🌟New paper! Grace Drake, Jenn Beatty, & I argue that diversity training (DT) is best understood as teaching. Seeing DT as just teaching illuminates many ways we could make trainings so much more effective than they are currently! Link: osf.io/preprints/ps... 1/6
4125
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 02/07/2024
Looks like the book I read was Kline's Principles & Practice of SEM, which does have some stuff on multi-level
130
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 02/07/2024
For my dissertation, at least, I used the standard fit indices in the standard way, even for the multilevel models. I hope that was right? I did read up at the time and saw nothing suggesting it was wrong.
120
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 16/05/2024
We thought partisans would actively *punish* in-party apologies, but they did not. Instead we found that apologies & denials of wrongdoing worked equally w/ in-partisans. So we think partisans "enable" rather than "incentivize" denials of wrongdoing. Free version: osf.io/preprints/ps...
000
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 16/05/2024
New paper in PSPB on partisan reactions to political scandal: journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1... Partisans were more receptive to defensive, hostile "explanations" for misbehavior from in-(vs out-)party politicians. Seems to be driven by desire to win > identity-protective motives but both matter
journals.sagepub.com
Sage Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
112
Reposted by Pierce Ekstrom
Jin X. Goh | 吴晋勋 @jinxungoh.bsky.social · 06/05/2024
Hi political science/ psych friends, what are some good and crucial research that I should know about the influence of local vs federal governments on influencing/ predicting/ shaping people's beliefs and attitudes (broadly defined)??
356
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 25/03/2024
My colleagues are hiring an RA! Looking for recent college grads: employment.unl.edu/postings/90660 Job is to support a grant-funded project on foreign-policy decision-making in Congress, including some neuro stuff. 30 hrs with benefits, about $17/hr, in-person Please share w/ anyone interested
010
Pierce Ekstrom @pierceekstrom.bsky.social · 07/02/2024
It's my 1st grad student's 1st SPSP! Come see Zeenat Ahmed present her poster: Party over democracy: When do Americans stand by democratic principles? For once, the news is not all bad. Friday morning session, 8 AM. @spspnews.bsky.social
020