Sign in

Phil Swatton

@philswatton.bsky.social
312 followers 441 following 403 posts

Work as a senior data scientist at the Alan Turing Institute, background in political science. Views my own and not necessarily shared by my employer. philswatton.github.io

PostsRepliesMedia
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
I wrote up some thoughts on the socioeconomic effect of AI on knowledge work: dysfunctionalprogramming.substack.com/p/ai-and-the...
dysfunctionalprogramming.substack.com
AI and the Uncertain Future of Intellectual Labour
Why the ‘Internet of Landlords’ and ‘Digital Industrialisation’ are Better Metaphors than Technofeudalism
000
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
I think people are right to say there is a third option, but saying so starts from objecting to the combination of "by any any reasonable stabdard" and "very different from us".
100
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
Great primer for anyone looking to understand the Saxony-Anhalt result and how to properly contextualise it, along with why the BSW is important to the prospects of an AFD government there
110
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
Some reflections on @yuanfenyang.bsky.social's brilliant Rita Hinden memorial lecture hosted by @renewaljournal.bsky.social on ending 40 years of neoliberalism. dysfunctionalprogramming.substack.com/p/embracing-...
dysfunctionalprogramming.substack.com
Embracing Uncertainty
Reflections on the 2nd Rita Hinden Memorial Lecture by Yuan Yang
144
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
For non-AI folks, abliteration is a technique for removing safeguards from a model. The reason I think the OpenAI cybersecurity stuff is concerning is that open-weight models lag closed-source models in capability by ~6 months, meaning that soon, many attackers could get an uplift in capability
163
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
Great quote from a 100% correct piece. We know all of our models of the world are wrong, but we still have to do research and take action in the world. How do we balance those concerns?
011
Reposted by Phil Swatton
Hetan Shah @hetanshah.bsky.social · 08/08/2026
Oh this is a great piece from @add-hawk.bsky.social making the case that play and games are the meaning of life, drawing on The Grasshopper by Bernard Suits www.ft.com/content/7b95...
Imagine, says Suits, utopia - some future paradise where technology has solved all our practical problems. We have perfect medicine, unlimited energy and boundless resources. What would we do with our time?
We would play games, says Suits, or we would be bored out of our minds. And if playing games is all we do in utopia, then games must be the meaning of life.
95719
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
Two brief thoughts on why I think it's still worth keeping LLM use out of introductory programming for stats/data science: - You need to be a good programmer to get good code out of an LLM - You need to be a good programmer to evaluate the code you get out of an LLM
26510
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 01/06/2026
Very proud of my wife Samira for passing her viva today. Blessed to be married to such an intelligent and accomplished scholar
030
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 29/05/2026
This leaflet format is the British political equivalent of carcinisation
121
Reposted by Phil Swatton
maybe: annie rauwerda @annierau.bsky.social · 29/05/2026
"why use google?" webpage from 1999
8069991814
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 21/05/2026
Abundantly clear that we are in bloc politics and that Labour's strategy should reflect this. Also very clear that ultimate defeat of the far right in the UK will depend on the UK Conservatives reasserting themselves as the main party of the British right.
000
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
Checking the news like
000
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 10/05/2026
I once got a lift home after canvassing from Ken Skates. He mostly spoke very enthusiastically about theories of Rey's origin from the Disney Star Wars films (think this was before episode 8 came out)
000
Reposted by Phil Swatton
Stephen Farrow @stephenfarrow.bsky.social · 09/05/2026
Bloody hell.
Thread - on Threads - of three posts from someone whose screen name is 'blueskies 1977':

 blueskies1977
 | have been an election agent for the Labour Party for 8 years Yesterday, for
the first time ever, | cried at a count. Was it because we'd lost a lot of seats,
because we had? No. | cried because a very hard working, dedicated, British
born Councillor of Pakistani descent had the word "deport' written next to her
name on a ballot paper with a Reform vote. When the doubtful papers were
shown to candidates and agents, | challenged the Reform agent to disown the
vote and he refused.

 blueskies1977
 | saw a number of other ballot papers with racist, islamophobic and antisemitic
comments. I'm used to the abusive comments about parties and policies on
papers, we tend to have a laugh with them. I'm also used to the many pictures
of penises on ballot papers (you guys are all so original), but | haven't seen so
much hatred written on ballot papers. What are we becoming as a country?
Why do people feel emboldened to put their hatred out there? It's vile.

blueskies 1977
For those commenting that the ballot paper should be rejected, in law it can't be. If a
clear voting intent is shown for the correct number of candidates, it will only be
rejected it there is anything, such as a signature, initials or name, that could identify
the voter or the official mark is defaced or damaged.
41784377
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
Because I've been doing some work with it, I've written up an applied primer on optimal transport/transportation theory and its applications to measuring dataset distance: philswatton.github.io/2026/04/08/a... Hopefully of use to someone else! Grateful for corrections on typos or misunderstandings
philswatton.github.io
An Applied Primer on Optimal Transport for Measuring Dataset Distance
010
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 07/04/2026
When I think of the notion of 'living in truth' as expressed in Havel's essay and Carney's speech, responses like this are a choice to keep putting up the sign in the shop window www.politico.eu/article/dona...
politico.eu
Trump threatens to wipe out Iran’s ‘whole civilization.’ EU has no comment.
“Honestly if we reacted every time somebody posted something outrageous online, that is all we would do,” an EU official says.
000
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
Another one of my reports written at the Turing is now available online, which is an informal literature review on AI-generated text detection. A brief thread as I've seen some discussion on the topic ⬇️ Link: www.turing.ac.uk/sites/defaul... 1/5
First part of report cover page containing title saying "Detecting AI-Generated Text" followed by "Informal Literature Review" and the first paragraph of the executive summary.
111
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 26/03/2026
This is a great point: anyone who's not been plugged into AI discourse and encounters contemporary models is going to get Eliza'd into Yudkowski-adjacent views on AI safety
010
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 22/03/2026
Think this is basically correct, albeit some are making educated guesses while others are just making guesses.
011
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 16/03/2026
Guy who argues this aged well because in formal logic, X->Y is true whenever X is false
000
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 16/03/2026
Great obituary of Habermas by @mattpolprof.bsky.social: jacobin.com/2026/03/habe... I only recently learned of the outline of Habermas' thought after reading Matt's recent review of his career: www.liberalcurrents.com/also-a-revie...
jacobin.com
Jürgen Habermas Showed What Philosophy Could Be
The death of Jürgen Habermas has left philosophy and the Left poorer. Central to his work was a profound critique of irrationality in all its forms. Taken seriously, his philosophy provides an indispe...
141
Reposted by Phil Swatton
Thomas Prosser @prossertj.bsky.social · 10/03/2026
As promised, here’s my review of No Second Chances by @morganj0nes.bsky.social. Spoiler alert – I really dislike the extreme, anti-democratic and counter-productive People’s Vote campaign. www.thepathnottaken.net/p/fiasco-the...
thepathnottaken.net
Fiasco - the People’s Vote seven years on
A review of No Second Chances: the Inside Story of the Campaign for a Second Referendum
172
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 10/03/2026
Great post. I think the biggest examples of this kind of motivated causal attribution on my side of the aisle is the notion that Russian disinfo changed the outcomes of the 2016 EU Ref/2016 US Presidential election. Disinfo is v. concerning for a variety of reasons, but rarely changes vote choice.
231
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 06/03/2026
At some point I really need to bite the bullet and read Statistical Rethinking.
100
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 03/03/2026
Think my lastest stuff took the [No, Yes] route -- fun exercise
040
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 27/02/2026
I'm so glad I don't have to live in a world where Matt Goodwin is an MP
2588
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 22/02/2026
When reading Suzanne Heywood's biography of her late husband Jeremy Heywood, two things struck me about Brown: 1) The world and not just Britain were v lucky he was PM during the crisis. 2) The humanity of his eulogy to Jeremy, directly addressed to Jeremy's family
000
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 22/02/2026
I should probably write a new essay on something else sometime instead of re-upping this one, but I feel it remains relevant whenever something like the quoted post comes up: renewal.org.uk/blog/public-...
renewal.org.uk
Public Opinion and the Survey Response
Political scientists know that survey responses cannot be taken at face value. For most respondents, most of the time, responses are not the product of deeply held, pre-existing, coherent views on par...
000
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 21/02/2026
This thread is a very instructive of example of why the short form video is such a negative thing for our information environment, not least because many of those who see the video are unlikely to see it!
010
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 18/02/2026
V worth reading
010
Reposted by Phil Swatton
Thomas Prosser @prossertj.bsky.social · 17/02/2026
Smiling because my book with @ghostofchristo1.bsky.social is out today! In Beyond Woke and Anti-Woke (Bristol University Press), we examine the emergence of social justice ideology. Unlike polemical accounts, we use an analytic approach and academic theories and methods. More 👇
4143
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 14/02/2026
Fear of the machine's impact on work dates at least to the Luddites, but nonetheless fascinating to come across something like this from JFK's 1960 presidential campaign:
A JFK campaign poster with a picture of a machine with a face and several arms. An alarmed worker looks on. The text reads "If Automation takes over your job... who will you want in the White House?"
010
Reposted by Phil Swatton
Benjamin Lauderdale @benlauderdale.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
Nick Vivyan, Chris Hanretty (@chanret.bsky.social) and I have a new book out: “Idiosyncratic Issue Opinion and Political Choice”. The core of the book is making the argument that citizens’ views about political issues neither reduce to an ideological orientation nor to a lack of substance. (1/10)
34523
Reposted by Phil Swatton
William Cullerne Bown @williamcb.bsky.social · 08/02/2026
Fascinating thread on the enduring influence of Red Vienna’s scientific worldview.
131
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 08/02/2026
Read this earlier today and it's a great and thoughtful piece. Too much discourse among the left on AI has fallen into a lazy hostility largely disinterested in the technology. This piece is a real antidote
135
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 05/02/2026
Materialist vs post materialist values (though I don't think anyone sees it as sacrosanct??)
120
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 28/01/2026
Had no idea how interesting Alexandre Kojeve was as a personality. Some highlights: - Admitted to putting his opinions under Hegel's name - Sent a philosophical treatise to Stalin during WW2 - Had an affair w/ a married woman, her brother-in-law concluded she was right www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...
lrb.co.uk
Jonathan Rée · We are all layabouts now: Kojève v. Hegel
Alexandre Kojève described his book on Hegel as ‘very bad’, and he had a point. His take on the Phenomenology of...
081
Reposted by Phil Swatton
James Ball @jamesrball.com · 27/01/2026
If you want to know what actual political academics think of Matt Goodwin you can read quite a lot of their thoughts in this profile of him I wrote in 2024 (free with registration) www.thenewworld.co.uk/james-ball-m...
thenewworld.co.uk
Matt Goodwin’s fall into the abyss
How a once respected academic embarked on a “sad, depressing journey of radicalisation”
715466
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 21/01/2026
As others have said, this is brilliant in its clarity and its willingness to articulate an argument. Couldn't help but think of recent discussions on the lack of thought in British political life while reading it open.substack.com/pub/paulwell...
open.substack.com
The Carney doctrine
Open comment thread on the PM's Davos speech
010
Reposted by Phil Swatton
Stephen Bush @stephenkb.bsky.social · 20/01/2026
Mark Carney's speech really is terrific: full text is here and very much worth your time.
paulwells.substack.com
The Carney doctrine
Open comment thread on the PM's Davos speech
741959683
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 20/01/2026
The same is true of Britain and the longer we take to act on this reality the more painful it will be
010
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 18/01/2026
Absolutely fantastic piece. Mitchell is an all too rare voice of reason in the discourse around the intelligence of LLMs and other ML models
010
Reposted by Phil Swatton
Vicente Valentim @valentimvicente.bsky.social · 16/01/2026
It is central to the process of far-right normalization that, as these parties grow, they are able to attract more politicians with political experience and skill—often at the expense of mainstream right parties.
Excerpt from "The Normalization of the Radical Right" (OUP 2024):

"At the politician level, surfacing affects the calculus that politicians make when deciding whether to run for election. Under the latency equilibrium, potential radical-right candidates often refrained from running on a radical- right platform because they perceived that it was not very electorally viable. As the radical right becomes successful, however, they are likely to update these perceptions. They may realize that, unlike what they had thought, one can be electorally successful while running for election on a radical-right platform. The consequence is that, after skilled political entrepreneurs enter the political arena on a radical-right platform, other (often lower-ranked) politicians will be willing to follow suit.

A final implication of the surfacing phase concerns the skill of radical-right politicians. The difficulty in recruiting under the latency equilibrium reduces the average skill of radical-right politicians. After surfacing, however, more politicians are willing to join the radical right. In the previous phase in the process (activation), the skilled political entrepreneur joined a party whose politicians were typically less skilled. Now, in the surfacing phase, it becomes easier for the radical right to recruit more politicians even outside of leadership positions. More mid-level elites join the party, which increases their average skill, and also makes it easier to subsequently recruit skilled leaders again."
1199
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 16/01/2026
Looking forward to the @williamcb.bsky.social take on this: publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ld...
Cover page of a house of lords report titled 'Bleeding to death: the science and technology growth emergency'
100
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 15/01/2026
In the Anatomy of Fascism, Paxton highlights the fact that fascist regimes were essentially uneasy Alliances between fascists and traditional conservative elites. This often resulted in tension between the leadership and party. RR not necessarily fascist etc etc
110
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 15/01/2026
I think I'm surprised by Jenrick's plan to defect, in that: a) I'd assumed Jenrick's game plan was to wait till May and challenge for the leadership b) I can't imagine Jenrick being content with playing second fiddle to Nigel c) Reform's ascendancy is not nearly as guaranteed as it currently looks
000
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 13/01/2026
From Robert Paxton's 'Anatomy of Fascism': 'Fascists are close to power when conservatives begin to borrow their techniques, appeal to their "mobilising passions", and try to co-opt the fascist following.'
010
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
Would be interesting to see non-coalition govts included in this.
000
Phil Swatton @philswatton.bsky.social · 07/01/2026
I think this is true, but to a point - algorithms are designed, and different design decisions are available.
000