Evan Selinger and Albert Fox Cahn are the authors of Move Slow and Upgrade: The Power of Incremental Innovation.

Silicon Valley and the U.S. government are positioning their frustration over European regulation as ideological, as a defense of freedom over government control.

Optimists cling to a faith in the old alliance, but the best we can achieve is an amicable divorce, says Guardian Europe columnist Nathalie Tocci

Only a small percentative of people engage in toxic activity online, but they’re responsible for a disproportionate share of hostile or misleading content on nearly every platform. Because super-users are so active, they dominate our collective impression of the internet. Much of that distortion can be traced back to a few hyperactive online voices -Just 10% of users produce roughly 97% of political tweets. -A mere 0.1% of users share 80% of fake news. This leads many of us to believe that society is more polarized, angry, & deluded than it really is. The problem isn’t just the individual extremists, of course – it’s the platform design and algorithms that amplify their content. These algorithms are built to maximize engagement, which means they privilege content that is surprising or divisive. The system is optimized to promote the users who are most likely to distort our shared perception of reality. Most of us aren’t spending time on our phones trolling our foes. We’re busy working, raising families, spending time with friends, or simply trying to find some harmless entertainment on the internet. Yet, our voices are drowned out. We have effectively handed over a megaphone to the most obnoxious people and let them tell us what to believe and how to act. In a series of experiments, we recently paid people a few dollars to unfollow the most divisive accounts on X. After a month, they felt 23% less animosity towards other political groups. Their experience was so positive that half declined to refollow those hostile accounts after the study and they felt less animosity 11 months later. Platforms could easily redesign their algorithms to stop promoting the most outrageous voices and prioritize more representative or nuanced content. The internet is a powerful, and often valuable tool. But if we keep letting it reflect only the funhouse mirror world created by the most extreme users, we’ll all suffer the consequences. You can read my full essay in the The Guardian here: https://lnkd.in/eSvPymKc | 14 comments on LinkedIn

As countries race to power artificial intelligence, a yawning gap is opening around the world.

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1.  Background.

When an AI model for code-editing company Cursor hallucinated a new rule, users revolted.

Entergy seeks regulatory approval to shift constructions costs for gas plants needed to power Meta's facility to its entire customer base.

The European Commission will enforce its digital rulebook without fear, said Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

Winning means deploying, not just developing, the best technology.

Joseph Stabile considers the trajectory of online threat actors, voluntary platform commitments to counter terrorism, and international regulatory regimes.

The EU lawmakers and the minister who personally negotiated the AI Act sent a letter to the European Commission today raising “great concern” about the EU code of practice for making risk measures rel...

Musk’s loyalists at DOGE have infiltrated dozens of federal agencies, pushed out tens of thousands of workers, and siphoned millions of people’s most sensitive data. The next step: Unleash the AI.

A directive from the National Institute of Standards and Technology eliminates mention of “AI safety” and “AI fairness.”

The prime minister is set to announce major reforms to the way the state works, saying global instability means it is crucial to make changes quickly. Civil servants should not be spending their time ...