Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 18hNo, it's the top of "the old man of coniston" in the lake district. 020
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 19hMy contribution to the black and white photography in fog (well in this case, from inside a cloud). 110
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 19hSadly we still have to pay them, but at least their job is now much easier and cheaper so they can keep sending their kids to private schools. 000
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 23hThe management consultant model of chatbots? (Paying to be told there were good reasons for doing the thing you were going to do anyway.) This explains why university management loves AI so much! 111
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 29/09/2026This is a great question! Good luck with the network. 010
Reposted by Dan GoodmanRoberto De Filippo @roberto-defilippo.bsky.social · 22/09/2026created a website to convert any DOI to a elegant banner for presentations robertodf.github.io/doi-banner/robertodf.github.ioDOI Banner — paper citation banners for slidesPaste a DOI, get a transparent citation banner for your slides. PNG and SVG, no server, no tracking. 1267
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 27/09/2026SNUFA abstract submission is closed. Make sure to register for the conference if you would like to take part in voting for which abstracts get promoted from posters to talks! 0102
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 27/09/2026Also very weirdly short sighted by the journals. If AI can do all their functions then there's no need for them any more because we can just run our own AI. 020
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 27/09/2026Ooh I haven't tried that one. It seems I pass quite close to it when I run home from work. Looks a bit more affordable than the Mexican one. 010
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 27/09/2026Apparently there is only one in London too, and now I want to go there, but since the cheapest lunch menu is around $125 and academic salaries in the UK are not like in the US, I might have to skip it sadly. 110
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 26/09/2026We should also be able to turn up to interviews wearing pyjamas. 110
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 26/09/2026No YOU'RE the conservative! 😉🤣 OK yes, I agree it's not enough to complain about things that are bad and stop doing them, and it's important to think about collective governance. But I don't think it's wrong to complain about things that are bad and to stop doing them! This is probably step 1! 110
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 26/09/2026I'm not engaging in whataboutism. I agree with you that the problems pre-date LLMs. But I don't think switching to preferring non profit journals will help, and it's bad strategy because the effort required to shift science to non profit journals only is insanely high. Get rid of journals instead. 100
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 26/09/2026I dunno. I think it's ok to say that bad stuff is bad and that we should stop doing it, even if we don't have a proven alternative way of doing it. That's the criticism that's been used against socialists my entire life, and it's inherently conservative. 100
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 26/09/2026They're also bureaucracies that serve themselves foremost. It takes the membership dues of around 10,000 members just to pay the $1.1m salary of the executive director. 060
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 26/09/2026The claim is that these societies represent members' interests. Maybe that's partly true, but the main example I know of from the IEEE is that they lobby against publishing reform that would make science better and reduce costs wasted on publishing. 140
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 26/09/2026To be honest the distinction between a sham scientific society and a real one feels blurry to me. I was advised to join IEEE hoping that at some point they'll give me an award or title for my CV. But you pay thousands of $ over a career for this. www.nature.com/articles/d41...nature.comExclusive: Sham scientific societies are misleading star researchersA Nature investigation reveals a network of organizations that have been building their ranks through deceptive practices. 171
Reposted by Dan GoodmanDan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 26/09/2026I don't think this is necessarily true. Many scholarly societies use income from their journals to support their other activities (and huge salaries of directors). In this case I think they have almost identical interests to for-profit publishers. Indeed, they often lobby together against reform. 142
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 26/09/2026I don't think this is necessarily true. Many scholarly societies use income from their journals to support their other activities (and huge salaries of directors). In this case I think they have almost identical interests to for-profit publishers. Indeed, they often lobby together against reform. 142
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 26/09/2026I actually did get a coursework extension request this year from someone using OpenAI's Prism to write their thesis, and it went down a few days before the deadline. 020
Reposted by Dan GoodmanAlexandra Proca @aproca.bsky.social · 25/09/2026Submit your paper or extended abstract to UniReps 2026 in Paris! Deadline Oct. 4 AOE 🔵🔴 063
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 25/09/2026Check out Abdal's talk on spiking neural network models of neuromodulation from last week's Neuromodulation of Neuronal Circuits workshop at the Paris Brain Institute. www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF0H... And if you're at #BernsteinConference, come and meet Abdal at the poster session next week!youtube.comAbdal AlKilany - Rapid neuromodulation enables context-dependent sensory processingYouTube video by Neural Reckoning 090
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 25/09/2026Nicolas Dundov has poster 4-38 (first floor) on Wednesday (14:00-15:30) on "Blood and modularity: a brain-inspired approach to functional disentangled neural representations" neural-reckoning.org/nicolas_dund... 030
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 25/09/2026Abdal AlKilany has poster 4-3 (ground floor) on Wednesday (14:00-15:30) on "Neuromodulation improves robust and efficient sensory processing in spiking neural networks" neural-reckoning.org/abdelqader_a... Preprint: neural-reckoning.org/pub_neuromod... Talk: neural-reckoning.org/talk_2026_ne... 130
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 25/09/2026Yishu Zhang has poster P1-44 (first floor) on Tuesday (16:30-18:00) on "Do heterogeneous brains remember better?" neural-reckoning.org/yishu_zhang.... 120
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 25/09/2026Come and meet the Neural Reckoners at #BernsteinConference next week. I'll be talking about our recent work on neuromodulation at the satellite workshop below, and we have some posters. 1163
Reposted by Dan GoodmanMaciej Kania @kaniamaciej.bsky.social · 25/09/2026Train your model on a task, or fit it to biological data? And once it's optimized, what does it tell us about the brain? 🧠 In our #BernsteinConference satellite workshop, we'll discuss these questions through the lenses of different optimization methods. Check it out in Room 3.104! 🤓😉 44318
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 24/09/2026And so it begins. The next stage in the UK's rapidly accelerating programme to shoot itself in the foot in every sector of life where it does better than average. 020
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 24/09/2026Not a terrible evening to go for a run home though the city. 040
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 24/09/2026Oh that's cool will definitely check those out. We'll be there too. I should do a post too! 010
Reposted by Dan GoodmanBWJones @bwjones.bsky.social · 24/09/2026This is an important point. AI is not going rogue. It is behaving as it was designed to behave. The ones going rogue are the companies themselves who have violated norms, and are committing crimes daily from stealing IP to cybercrime. It did not have to be this way, but... Techbros. 214548
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 24/09/2026Last chance to get your SNUFA spiking neural network abstracts in, deadline tomorrow. Only 300 words and get a chance to give a talk in front of an audience of hundreds (plus YouTube upload gets hundreds more). snufa.net/2026/ And don't forget to register for the conference too. Tell your friends!snufa.netSNUFA 2026Spiking Neural Networks As Universal Function Approximators 051
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 23/09/2026This is an absolutely great metaphor for explaining why experimentally figuring out what the brain is doing is hard. I may have to steal this. 0182
Reposted by Dan Goodmanmegan peters 🧠 @meganakpeters.bsky.social · 23/09/2026Neuromatch Impact Scholars are smart, dedicated, motivated, and have also gone thru at least one of our courses! Mentoring them can lead to publications and other important outputs! Apply to mentor today -- fantastic opportunity! 0159
Reposted by Dan GoodmanMargot Finn @eicathomefinn.bsky.social · 23/09/2026'“While 77 per cent of respondents either somewhat or strongly supported the use of taxpayer money to fund research generally, such support dropped to 42 per cent for research that involved scientists’ use of AI at some stage of the scientific process,” the paper says.'sciencedirect.com 071
Reposted by Dan GoodmanBlake Richards @tyrellturing.bsky.social · 22/09/2026Two tenure track positions are open in Computer Science @mcgill.ca ! Secure Software mcgill.wd3.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/McGill... Quantum Computing mcgill.wd3.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/McGill... Come join our department, and live in the coolest city in North America! (Yeah, I stand by that.)mcgill.wd3.myworkdayjobs.comTenure-Track Faculty Position in Computer Science: Secure Software and Computer SystemsPlease refer to the How to Apply for a Job (for External Candidates) job aid for instructions on how to apply. If you are an active McGill employee (ie: currently in an active contract or position at ... 01811
Reposted by Dan GoodmanRomain Brette @romainbrette.bsky.social · 22/09/2026New preprint! “Active control of surface immobilization in the foraging behavior of Paramecium”. More about the elementary cognition of these little critters! www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...biorxiv.org 1121
Reposted by Dan GoodmanTim Vogels @tpvogels.bsky.social · 22/09/2026Playing Pong with spikes, dancing rate networks, composite engrams & #ihngrams4engrams. The labs most recent work-in-progress, now on biorxiv.com. Stay tuned for more Pong doi.org/10.64898/202... Dale doi.org/10.64898/202... Composite engrams doi.org/10.64898/202... Ihngrams doi.org/10.64898/202... 44115
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 22/09/2026Awesome stuff! Don't forget to submit something to SNUFA Tim! Deadline on Friday. 😉 010
Reposted by Dan GoodmanHardik Rajpal @h-rajpal.bsky.social · 22/09/2026Glad that this is put now in @cp-cellrepphyssci.bsky.social A higher order interaction with Alberto Liardi, @rhizoqualia.bsky.social, @frosas.bsky.social and Pedro Mediano. 073
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 21/09/2026I also find the pile ons unhelpful and damaging to mental health for people on the receiving end. But that's just a feature of social media. It was exactly like that on Twitter, and it got worse when the platform started algorithmically boosting far right opinions. 020
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 21/09/2026The postscript is actually a footnote to a sentence where he says the problem is not specific to Bsky. That's true. AI boosterism is profoundly unpopular in academia. For reasons that are understandable and valid. Bsky has a lot of academics on it, so of course it'll be unpopular here. 110
Reposted by Dan GoodmanBart Penders @penders.bsky.social · 21/09/2026Back of the envelope calculations: 3600 years of research time went into the collective application process. The research will fund 3200 years of research. We are 400 research years poorer as a result of this. 1/2 316386
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 21/09/2026But it's not just semantic because the system without the person operating and designing it, in my hypothetical case, achieves nothing. You can't understand the capacities of the system without the intellectual input of the operator. 000
Dan Goodman @neural-reckoning.org · 20/09/2026Who is doing the reasoning in that case? It seems clear to me that it's the person asking the question along with the designer of the system. Is it important whether or not the search is heuristic or exhaustive? 100