A new reading comprehension meta-analysis seems to cast doubt on the effectiveness of building knowledge.
But it omits at least 2 important studies and uses an unrealistic framework for evaluating results.
More in my new post:
nataliewexler.substack.com/p/reading-co...
nataliewexler.substack.com
Reading Comprehension Studies Can Mislead Us About What Works
A new meta-analysis takes on the “strategy instruction vs. knowledge-building” question. But that’s a false dichotomy.