Sign in

Mark Schmitt

@mschmitt9.bsky.social
1.3K followers 920 following 206 posts

Political Reform Program, @NewAmerica. Previously, @rooseveltinst; @theprospect; @OpenSociety; US Senate for Bill Bradley, D-NJ.

PostsRepliesMedia
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 3h
I guess I'm going to see every possible pun on my last name today. That's OK--it was worth it.
010
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Kevin M. Kruse @kevinmkruse.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
When they get back in power, Democrats need to go all-in on higher education. We need a campaign of reinvestment in public universities across the country that makes the Morrill Land-Grant Act look like nothing by comparison *and* a GI Bill of Rights-style program of tuition grants.
20452221414
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
The election campaigns worth investing in, as a normal donor, are the ones you hadn't thought about before yesterday. NC leg, for example. That's a general rule, but especially this year as the "leans D" line moves quickly. But all those Ds will have *enough* money.
020
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Henry Farrell @himself.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
years ago, my colleague Steve Teles and @mschmitt9.bsky.social wrote what I think is still the definitive piece on how to think about this - hewlett.org/wp-content/u...
hewlett.org
312141
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
James Goodwin @jamesgoodwin.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
One of the reasons Trump is doubling down on AI is it has become essential to his administration's campaign to weaponize the administrative state. www.csmonitor.com/Environment/...
csmonitor.com
The EPA may deploy AI to regulate toxic chemicals. It’s not telling the public.
Federal law requires U.S. government agencies to disclose how they’re using AI tools in their work. But in the case of the EPA, this doesn’t appear to be…
2247
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
G Elliott Morris @gelliottmorris.com · 17/09/2026
notice how these people who were formerly all-in on the mythical power of ideological moderation have changed their tack and entire organizational orientation after discovering the wisdom of the ancients that most voters are not ideological at all. now it’s all about “heterodoxy.”
1834558
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Everyone's dunking on the disenfranchised Vineyard summer-er, but I'm struggling with the idea that people who hate Bill de Blasio, Eric Adams and Zohran Mamdani with equal passion would be voting in the Democratic primary in the first place. If you hate most Democrats, there's a party for you...
010
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Monica Potts @monicapotts.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Been wanting to write this piece for years. My magnum opus on not using the term "the working class." newrepublic.com/article/2155...
newrepublic.com
The Term “Working Class” Is Useless
Too many political analysts and pollsters are relying on education to define the working class, and it’s leading us to the wrong conclusions.
04520
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
As polls continue to show a big midterm advantage for Dems, reupping my piece about why some midterms just change the numbers, while others have had more transformational effects on the winning party and on politics generally. markschmitt.substack.com/p/making-mid...
markschmitt.substack.com
Making Midterms Matter
Most backlash elections change the numbers. A few have more lasting consequences.
131
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Something about the way VandeHei talks about the AI threat here reminds me of the way people like him talked about "the deficit" or "the debt" in the Obama era--a huge abstract thing that all *serious* people must focus on, to the exclusion of any democratic debate about other priorities.
010
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Mitchell Epner @mitchellepner.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
In the Fall of 1992, I learned one of the fundamental laws of the universe: Not enough bad things can happen to Ted Cruz.
39711
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
I found this guide to the political and ideological factions around AI extremely useful and accessible (from the perspective of an outsider without fixed views).
023
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
120
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Jonathan Bernstein @jonathanbernstein.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
From my outsider perspective I'd have some nitpicks, but the essentials are correct and important. "Like any democracy, the composition and leadership of these bodies are determined by whomever shows up." That's the deep, serious, for-real democracy we've built and is under threat now.
1175
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Jonathan Bernstein @jonathanbernstein.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
When I and others talk about parties being *permeable* - this is exactly what we're talking about. "I started with a Google search... I was elected to Post Seat Holder by a voice vote of everyone in the room at my third business meeting."
1254
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
This is such a great article and reminder that "the Democratic Party" is not some distant room where Schumer and Jeffries hand down directives. It's millions of people, in and out of the formal structures of the party. But state parties vary widely, and there's a lot to be learned in the variation.
14014
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 06/09/2026
Especially as broadcast ads become less significant, the difference between politicians who avoid many of their constituents (Comer and other GOP, but also Fetterman, Haley Stevens in her walk-away videos) and those who will go anywhere, talk to anyone, and can take tough questions will become key.
000
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 06/09/2026
Back in the blog era, I used to joke (because it was true) that conservative bloggers had one thing that progressives lacked: clients.
0194
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Perry Bacon @perrybaconjr.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
So many of these writers, entire sections, and at times outlets are not engaged in serious writing or thinking. "The Case for Reparations" and "The 1619 Project" remain excellent works of journalism. I am not sure either would have been published today in the outlets where they appeared.
333968
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
New America @newamerica.org · 24/08/2026
The U.S. has one of the widest age gaps between legislators and the people they represent in the world. New America's Oscar Pocasangre breaks down America's gerontocracy means for democracy. 🗞️ Read the @protectdemocracy.org + New America report: go.newamerica.org/age-divide-geront…
0159
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
I'm cranking the Substack back up this week. New post on why some midterms just shift the numbers in Congress, and others have lasting consequences, and the model for Dems to do more than just win numerical majorities. markschmitt.substack.com/p/making-mid...
markschmitt.substack.com
Making Midterms Matter
Most backlash elections change the numbers. A few have more lasting consequences.
010
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Andy Craig @andycraig.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
It's a bad system, perhaps the only idea genuinely and unambiguously worse than traditional FPTP and party primaries. I'm an electoral reform nerd and I would vote against it. California's very likely to repeal it soon, it's been such a complete failure.
19482113
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 16/08/2026
An essential post by @adambonica.bsky.social, who brings academic rigor to the question we all wonder about who those ridiculous spam PAC texts work on, and why it matters. It never ceases to upset me that the largest org working on money in politics now, End Citizens United, is a notorious spam PAC
161
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Matthew Downhour @matthewdownhour.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
In my view, the DSA passed an important test in Wisconsin: can you lose really close election & immediately keep your eye on the ball by joining the Dem coalition for the general?
1593991
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 07/08/2026
If Mitch McConnell is actually able to show up in the Senate in three months, GOP might be able to cause a lot of harm in the lame-duck session.
001
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 04/08/2026
I strongly agree. I'm convinced that Liz Cheney had no effect on the election outcome b/c most non-political people really don't know who Liz Cheney is, and the whole Bush-Cheney admin is lost in fog. Maybe time Harris spent with Cheney could have been better used elsewhere, but that's a minor point
111
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 03/08/2026
We're hosting a terrific virtual event this evening @politicalreform.newamerica.org, on younger voters--looking at both successful organizing to ensure young people are registered and vote, and also the structural changes that would break the gerontocracy: www.newamerica.org/events/the-n...
newamerica.org
The Next Generation of Voters
000
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Henry Farrell @himself.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
I remember seeing someone (very reasonably) complaining here a few days ago that there seems to be next to no visible thinking on left and center about how to join the dots on administration and democracy. This is the beginnings of an answer to that complaint donmoynihan.substack.com/p/rebuilding...
donmoynihan.substack.com
Rebuilding Democracy Requires Rebalancing Power
What does a power-shifting agenda look like?
11292109
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Henry Farrell @himself.bsky.social · 30/07/2026
Chris Hayes was good on this in a conversation with Ezra Klein before Mamdani was elected - www.nytimes.com/2025/06/28/o... - the whole discussion is good on the experimentation/attention dynamic.

I think it’s the most important question in some ways. One thing I would say is, I like experimentation and new ideas.

When he was asked about the public groceries — I think it’s in “The Bulwark Podcast” — he says: We’ll try it, and if it doesn’t work, c’est la vie.

I love that answer. Politicians never give that answer. The person who really most embodied that spirit is F.D.R.

If you go back and read about the first hundred days, they’re just trying a lot. We now think about F.D.R. as this colossus who remade the relationship between the citizen and the federal government. A lot of that stuff did not work — like, fully failed. A lot of the interventions failed.

They did a lot of clunky stuff. It was a totally different time. He had these enormous mandates, and it was a crisis.

I like the idea of experimentation and these ideas coming from outside of the consensus around sensible policy. The test for it is: Can you deliver?
25611
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Nathan Newman @nathansnewman.bsky.social · 26/07/2026
Reminder Brad Lander- while a past member of DSA - built his career and won his House seat with the support of the Working Families Party not DSA. Disproportionate media focus on DSA versus work of other left groups like Working Families Party across the US.
11710
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
Maybe everyone knew this, but I didn't: That for fifty years, 1937-1987, Rockefeller to Gates, there was not a single billionaire in the US. (from Ray Madoff's new book, The Second Estate: How the Tax Code Made an American Aristocracy)
245
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
jamelle @jamellebouie.net · 21/07/2026
"most americans have health insurance and don't like change" explains 90 percent of health care politics
11925105
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
When I worked in the Senate (eons ago), there was a phrase I remember hearing, often from senior staffers, if someone expressed total contempt for another senator, even if well deserved: "He got elected, too, the same way [our boss] did." It was a mark of basic respect for the democratic process.
47128
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Liberal Currents @liberalcurrents.com · 06/07/2026
"If you like democracy, you must resist the peculiar Americanism of anti-partyism. Be pro-party—as many of them as possible." www.liberalcurrents.com/make-politic...
liberalcurrents.com
Make Political Parties Great Again
The answer to Eric Swalwell and the top-two debacle in California is multiparty electoral reform.
34711
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Mark Harris @markharris.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
I'll just add that between handwringing Dem centrists and young Dem-adjacent socialists is a large group I would label "self-described liberals who are enraged/sick of this crap" and are ready to vote left/progressive. Don't underestimate them. And FFS don't scold them; they're also sick of that.
2046864
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
Before Diana DeGette, CO-1 was represented for 24 years by Pat Schroeder. In 1972, Schroeder was a 32-yr-old lawyer, an anti-war progressive insurgent who challenged the establishment Dem and then upset a GOP incumbent. Menat Kiros is a 29-yr-old lawyer and anti-war progressive insurgent. 1/2
230
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Murshed Zaheed @murshedz.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
Just how effing shortsighted and dumb this email looks now less than 24 hours later?
061
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Patrick Chovanec @prchovanec.bsky.social · 29/06/2026
The Supreme Court set the stage today for the next Democratic President to fire every single Trump appointee across the federal government on Day One. I assume there won’t be any complaints.
44740251
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 25/06/2026
If this means that Mr. Carville will no longer be sending me a half-dozen emails and texts every day, I will consider it a welcome development. DSA candidates are already improving my quality of life.
140
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 11/06/2026
This is a great example of the journalistic rule to report what people do or say, not what they might feel. I don't know if Exxon CEO Lee Raymond "doubted climate change," and neither does Bloomberg. All we know is that he *promoted doubt" about climate change. www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
bloomberg.com
Lee Raymond, Exxon CEO Who Doubted Climate Change, Dies at 87
Lee Raymond, the former head of Exxon Mobil Corp. who oversaw the biggest corporate merger in the history of the oil industry and was derided as “the Darth Vader of global warming” for his skepticism ...
2238
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Julia Azari @juliaazari.bsky.social · 09/06/2026
agree, and would add that the Democratic aversion to such orgs is partly driven by the hollowing of party (to quote Rosenfeld and Schlozman) - robustly organized parties aren't as vulnerable to concerns about orgs they share some affinity with but can't control.
031
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 09/06/2026
"Dems and billionaires" can't "rebuild" something like ACORN. They have to be willing to support and respect organizing that emerges from community, even if it makes donors and elected Dems uncomfortable. Orgs don't exist to elect Dems & might not follow the donors' preferred issue priorities. 1/
120
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 07/06/2026
This from Klobuchar exemplifies the language problem in Democratic messaging. It's not fancy words or academic jargon. It's that they yoke so many concepts together, with logical links that are almost impossible for anyone with a normal attention span to track. Don't be clever! Just say one thing!
060
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 03/06/2026
I'm thrilled to have been asked to become the board chair of scholars.org, one of my favorite organizations, and also to appear on their podcast, No Jargon, to talk about the recent paper and conference on strengthening US political parties that we published at @polreformna.bsky.social
scholars.org
Home | Scholars Strategy Network
Your one-stop resource for timely and reliable research. Get the expertise you need from our responsive network of America's top experts.
011
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Brian Beutler @brianbeutler.bsky.social · 29/05/2026
New, and I think important piece. Brainstorming policy ideas to address kitchen table issues is an important undertaking. But it is NOT the same thing as a Project 2025 analog, but for the pro-democracy movement to save the country. www.offmessage.net/p/project-20...
offmessage.net
Don't Call It Project 2029 If It's Not A Fighting Document
Policy remedies to kitchen-table issues won't end the fascist threat. I thought we learned this?
1311526
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 28/05/2026
Project 2025 was never a public-facing policy platform. It was a technical plan, often from old memos, for dismantling democratic institutions. The section on college accreditation, for example, is being implemented right now. Dems don't need more policies, we need plans to reconstruct institutions.
120
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Alan Elrod @aselrod.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
It’s really important that Democrats have people like Talarico (and Warnock and others) providing this kind of theologically and spiritually rigorous counter to Christian nationalism. Consigning evangelicals to the far right is a terrible mistake. Every person Talarico reaches is a badly needed win
23814164
Reposted by Mark Schmitt
Oscar P @oscarp.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
With growing interest on proportional representation in the US, thought I'd re-share this @newamerica.org piece on why I think this systems would be a major upgrade: www.newamerica.org/insights/eig...
newamerica.org
Eight Reasons to Champion Proportional Representation for the U.S.
Proportional representation would be a major and much needed upgrade for American elections.
099
Mark Schmitt @mschmitt9.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
Just noticed in TX GOP runoff, Paxton got about 4,000 more votes than in the multi-candidate March primary, in which he came in 2d, before Trump endorsed. Cornyn got *400,000 fewer* votes than in March. Trump didn't increase Paxton's base or get voters to switch. Cornyn's electorate simply vanished.
010