“Indiscriminate mass surveillance," a Meta Muse scoop, and more in today's daily newsletter.

Applausi a scena aperta! > Norway has become the first major country to propose a temporary ban on the use of AI glasses in selected public places amid growing privacy concerns over wearable technology. > > The rich Scandinavian country’s center-left government said on Monday that it would introduce a law to parliament soon on a temporary ban for places such as parks, beaches, schools, and kindergartens. It will also set up an expert group to propose permanent national rules. > > “I am concerned about the introduction of powerful new technology where people risk being photographed, filmed, or recorded without their knowledge,” said Torgeir Micaelsen, Norway’s digitalization minister. A temporary ban “will give us time to conduct a thorough assessment and hold an informed debate that can lay the foundation for permanent regulation,” he said. Source: _AI glasses face their first major government crackdown – Ars Technica_ If you like this post, please consider sharing it.

È un concetto ormai radicato nel gergo giovanile e spiegarlo non è molto cool, ma forse i video delle “battaglie d'aura” hanno confuso qualcuno

Nel 2024 una studentessa denuncia alla polizia del campus sette membri della confraternita Chi Phi che l’avrebbero drogata e violentata per una notte. Sul piano penale agli accusati non è successo nulla. A settembre una causa civile ha riportato la vicenda al centro del dibattito

Grande vittoria per google in USA Faccia quel cavolo che gli pare con i contenuti degli altri, perchè non c’è mai stato un contratto e non è detto che search ed AI siano cose diverse Una sentenza da azzeccagarbugli ridicola nel senso delle cose. In Europa la situazione è diversa per effetto del quadro regolamentare che consente gli snippet, per cui i gruppi internazionali, secondo me, è probabile che cercheranno di giocarsela in Europa. > Judge Mehta said Penske and Chegg failed to show there was any actual agreement through which Google “promised to ‘sell’ Plaintiffs any specific amount of traffic – or any traffic whatsoever – in exchange for ‘buying’ their content”. > > There was no communication between Google and the publishers “from which mutual assent to engage in a transaction could plausibly be inferred”. > > Judge Mehta said: “Plaintiffs have pleaded only that they have an ‘expectation’ that Google will send them search traffic if they make their content available for free. But an expectation is not an agreement. It is simply how a general search engine works.” > > … > > But Judge Mehta found the publisher had not “plausibly alleged that general search and AI Overviews are separate products, as opposed to an integrated search experience”. Source: _Penske Google AI Overviews lawsuit dismissed – Press Gazette_ If you like this post, please consider sharing it.

La stima preliminare dell'inflazione italiana tendenziale euro-armonizzata a settembre è peggiore delle attese: 4,1% contro 3,7%. Variazione mensile +2% contro 1,7% atteso. L'indice NIC è a +4,2% Superfluo segnalare che torna a porsi con forza il tema del fiscal drag. https://www.istat.it/comunicato-stampa/prezzi-al-consumo-dati-provvisori-settembre-2026/

‘If you’re not in the internal market, you don’t get the same protection,’ says French minister of policy designed to curb Chinese competition