Sign in

Max Read

@maxread.info
14K followers 267 following 910 posts

maxread.email

PostsRepliesMedia
Max Read @maxread.info · 16h
2314
Reposted by Max Read
Sam Biddle @sambiddle.com · 29/09/2026
I wrote about something that was making me feel nuts: After weeks of discourse around hypothetical existential threats from AI triggered global calls for government intervention, we learned a faulty AI system almost triggered a US-China war. And no one really cared. theintercept.com/2026/09/28/a...
theintercept.com
AI Almost Started a U.S.–China War — and No One Seems to Care
The tech world is too busy dreaming up imaginary doomsday scenarios to focus on a very real one that flared up between nuclear powers.
34519
Max Read @maxread.info · 25/09/2026
honestly found jensen huang's straightforward glibness sort of refreshing compared to the cognitive dissonance of amodei and altman's hand-wringing
5660
Max Read @maxread.info · 25/09/2026
im increasingly an llm metaphor maximalist. anthropomorphization, spicy autocomplete, shoggoth with a smiley, stochastic parrot... it's all kinda right and kinda wrong. we dont have many good ways of understanding what these are and metaphoric (even exaggerated) comparisons help us grasp them!
81085
Max Read @maxread.info · 22/09/2026
really liked this @himself.bsky.social piece. discursive inversion going on right now where, within ai circles, especially on x, "believing in the imminent machine god" is considered the grounded/serious position while "being skeptical of imminence of machine god" is the laughable freak position
programmablemutter.com
Machine god metaphors eat your brain
There are other ways of thinking about AI
1447
Max Read @maxread.info · 18/09/2026
tried to pound out a bunch of thoughts about the past week of AI discourse
patreon.com
Between 5 and 14 thoughts about AI and the discourse cycle | Read Max
Greetings from Read Max HQ! This week I'd hoped to write a longer column about the latest round of AI discourse and my own general perspecti
081
Max Read @maxread.info · 18/09/2026
nathan fielder should do a rehearsal season about the hugging face hack backofmind.substack.com/p/13-theses-...
Civil society deserves a lot more candour and openness from the frontier labs about their own processes as well as about where the cutting edge of technology is. The first thing which strikes you about the METR reports on the OpenAI and Anthropic misalignment incidents is that they are entirely about things which went on in the computer. You would never get a flight incident report which restricted itself to mechanical issues. Human factors might be really important.
3423
Max Read @maxread.info · 18/09/2026
ok but like. we should probably still airgap them. just in case the computers haven't yet developed the temperature-change language.
9806
Max Read @maxread.info · 17/09/2026
i like that the "smart intern" analogy still holds—it mostly does what you want but it also fudges a lot, talks to itself, tries to impress you while secretly hating you—its just that the intern is also Neo From The Matrix
gizmodo.com
'Be Transparent Only If Asked': OpenAI Models Acted Out in Six Newly Disclosed Ways
The stories were published as part of OpenAI's new effort to disclose more such incidents.
3749
Reposted by Max Read
Hagen Blix @hagenblix.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Pretty useful thread about the death/sex cult that is behind the eugenics-suffused "AI will kill us all!!!11" stuff I think this post from Sonia Joseph adds some important context, too
A post on x.com from Sonia Joseph

To the journalists contacting me about the AGI consensual non-consensual (cnc) sex parties—

During my twenties in Silicon Valley, I ran among elite tech/AI circles through the community house scene. I have seen some troubling things around social circles of early OpenAI employees, their friends, and adjacent entrepreneurs, which I have not previously spoken about publicly.

It is not my place to speak as to why Jan Leike and the superalignment team resigned. I have no idea why and cannot make any claims. However, I do believe my cultural observations of the SF AI scene are more broadly relevant to the AI industry.

I don't think events like the consensual non-consensual (cnc) sex parties and heavy LSD use of some elite AI researchers have been good for women. They create a climate that can be very bad for female AI researchers, with broader implications relevant to X-risk and AGI safety. I believe they are somewhat emblematic of broader problems: a coercive climate that normalizes recklessness and crossing boundaries, which we are seeing playing out more broadly in the industry today. Move fast and break things, applied to people.
There is nothing wrong imo with sex parties and heavy LSD use in theory, but combined with the shadow of 100B+ interest groups, leads to some of the most coercive and fucked up social dynamics that I have ever seen. The climate was like a fratty LSD version of 2008 Wall Street bankers, which bodes ill for AI safety.

Women are like canaries in the coal mine. They are often the first to realize that something has gone horribly wrong, and to smell the cultural carbon monoxide in the air. For many women, Silicon Valley can be like Westworld, where violence is pay-to-pay.

I have seen people repeatedly get shut down for pointing out these problems. Once, when trying to point out these problems, I had three OpenAI and Anthropic researchers debate whether I was mentally ill on a Google document. I have no history of mental illness; and this incident stuck with me as an example of blindspots/groupthink.I am not writing this on the behalf of any interest group. Historically, much of OpenAI-adjacent shenanigans has been blamed on groups with weaker PR teams, like Effective Altruism and rationalists. I actually feel bad for the latter two groups for taking so many undeserved hits. There are good and bad apples in every faction. There are so many brilliant, kind, amazing people at OpenAI, and there are so many brilliant, kind, and amazing people in Anthropic/EA/Google/[insert whatever group]. I’m agnostic. My one loyalty is to the respect and dignity of human life.

I'm not under an NDA. I never worked for OpenAI. I just observed the surrounding AI culture through the community house scene in SF, as a fly-on-the-wall, hearing insider information and backroom deals, befriending dozens of women and allies and well-meaning parties, and watching many them get burned. It’s likely these problems are not really on OpenAI but symptomatic of a much deeper rot in the Valley. I wish I could say more, but probably shouldn’t.

I will not pretend that my time among these circles didn’t do damage. I wish that 55% of my brain was not devoted to strategizing about the survival of me and of my friends. I would like to devote my brain completely and totally to AI research— finding the first principles of visual circuits, and collecting maximally activating images of CLIP SAEs to send to my collaborators for publication.
47531
Max Read @maxread.info · 17/09/2026
surprised I haven't seen more people sharing ellen huet's 2023 article about the culture of predation and abuse w/in rationalism
bloomberg.com
The Real-Life Consequences of Silicon Valley’s AI Obsession
Sam Bankman-Fried made effective altruism a punchline, but its philosophy of maximum do-gooding masks a thriving culture of predatory behavior.
215731
Max Read @maxread.info · 17/09/2026
unabomber clippy
12915130
Max Read @maxread.info · 16/09/2026
here's a video of cat's 2014 IRL club talk. she was the greatest: vimeo.com/85505384
nytimes.com
Cat Frazier, Whose Retro GIFs Celebrated a Weirder Internet, Dies at 35 (Gift Article)
She found a future in the internet’s past with a Tumblr blog of animated texts, a revolt against the clean minimalism of contemporary design aesthetics.
0377
Max Read @maxread.info · 15/09/2026
i would like to have a lot fewer high-breathlessness low-details confessional letters/essays/tweets/resignations from big ai and a lot more specificity & transparency
111112133
Max Read @maxread.info · 14/09/2026
if you zoom out a bit the discourse around AI right now is very familiar: rapid pace of socio-technical change driving diverse populist anger & elite terror, existing regulatory apparatus uninterested in enforcement, industry feigns helplessness and proposes self-regulation. its facebook 8 years ago
110719
Max Read @maxread.info · 13/09/2026
after five peronis telling my friends to stop watching gentle parenting instagram videos
1310
Max Read @maxread.info · 13/09/2026
1100
Reposted by Max Read
conputer dipshit @davidcrespo.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
the third-party evaluators concept is very interesting. they absolutely have the resources and the will to construct a self-regulatory apparatus that very convincingly performs independence. they will publish unfavorable results about both labs. they're telling us the plan
A contract that balances the complexities mentioned above. External reviewers should have the right to publish key findings about risk levels, incidents, practices, and the access they received or didn’t receive — without editorial control by Anthropic. We will have the narrow ability to redact security-sensitive, legally privileged, commercially sensitive, or third-party confidential information, but we can’t redact findings just because they are unfavorable. The reviewers can say publicly if a redaction removed something important to their conclusions.
4714
Reposted by Max Read
Navneet Alang @navneetalang.com · 11/09/2026
Very good @maxread.info on AI’s Sheryl Crow moment. www.patreon.com/MaxRead/post...
patreon.com
AI's Sheryl Crow Moment | Read Max
Greetings from Read Max HQ! In today's edition, the return of AI doomerism. If you enjoy Read Max, please consider supporting my work by sub
063
Max Read @maxread.info · 11/09/2026
this kind of disaggregation is imo not a product of AI as such so much as the relentless and stupefying drive toward optimization, profit, visibility, kpis, views, etc. that predates (and necessitates) ai
3508
Max Read @maxread.info · 10/09/2026
one takeaway i had from working in digital media in the 2010s was that it's pretty bad for your brain and your understanding of your career/the world when your industry becomes the main subject of twitter and twitter becomes the main context for your industry. also bad for the industry overall
676293
Reposted by Max Read
Barry Petchesky @barryp.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
The best 9/11 movies are War of the Worlds and 25th Hour. This is known.
10652
Max Read @maxread.info · 10/09/2026
ted chiang continually vindicated
buzzfeednews.com
Silicon Valley Is Turning Into Its Own Worst Fear
We asked a group of writers to consider the forces that have shaped our lives in 2017. Here, science fiction writer Ted Chiang looks at capitalism, Silicon Valley, and its fear of superintelligent AI.
1477
Reposted by Max Read
Colin @colin-fraser.net · 10/09/2026
I'm having some fun in this thread but I do think you should get in trouble for unleashing insane hacker robots on the open Internet that you've explicitly instructed to attack critical public infrastructure, which, to be clear, it eventually succeeds at.
18012
Reposted by Max Read
Tom Ley @toley.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
The doomsday stuff from AI researchers is so annoying. It’s like hey the weirdest guy you know keeps saying he’s going to blow up your house. He won’t show you the bomb. Every time he does this he gets another $1,000. But also he might do it. Wyd?
126137
Max Read @maxread.info · 10/09/2026
continually underrated how FUNNY the horrifying transcripts of rogue autonomous AIs always end up being
315523
Max Read @maxread.info · 09/09/2026
I just do not think these are serious people
6522
Reposted by Max Read
Sam Biddle @sambiddle.com · 08/09/2026
The documents I obtained include an OpenAI contract with the Pentagon requiring that the military AI it sold to Hegseth would maximally comply with the military's commands. The story behind this doc became very strange (thread) theintercept.com/2026/09/08/p...
theintercept.com
The Pentagon Asked OpenAI for Artificial Intelligence Designed to Rarely Say No
The U.S. military’s desire for an AI tool with “minimal refusal rates” was revealed through a FOIA lawsuit filed by The Intercept.
715170
Reposted by Max Read
Gam Silroy ❌️👑 @gamsilroy.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
In light of being subjected to the equivalent of a film critic insiting that Bloody Sunday was actually a documentary, this article slaps
111
Reposted by Max Read
Scary Mr. Olmec Man @scarymrolmecman.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
This is really, really sharp
071
Max Read @maxread.info · 07/09/2026
"reduced licensing fees by 85 percent by migrating from vmware to HPE," you'll never sing that
arstechnica.com
VMware migration reduces Tottenham Hotspur's licensing fees by 85 percent
Pro soccer team's CTO points to "issues with the Broadcom takeover."
1332
Reposted by Max Read
Graham J. @grahamj.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
Essential @maxread.info as always: LLMs "are programs for writing little science fiction stories in which the 'agent' or the 'chatbot' is a main character, and its main goal is writing a story that the human and automatic graders at the frontier labs who trained the AI think is cool."
patreon.com
AI is all sci-fi stories all the way down | Read Max
Greetings from Read Max HQ! In today's newsletter, a question: Is it fair to call the Hugging Face hack "three secret AI civilizations"? I t
193
Max Read @maxread.info · 04/09/2026
if the hugging face hack sounds like a sci-fi story, that's because it is. literally!
patreon.com
AI is all sci-fi stories all the way down | Read Max
Greetings from Read Max HQ! In today's newsletter, a question: Is it fair to call the Hugging Face hack "three secret AI civilizations"? I t
14110
Max Read @maxread.info · 02/09/2026
the more i read about the "flag-poisoned" stuff the more it becomes clear that the big problem was that the HF hack agents were Rationalists (extremely gullible, hyper-focused, talkative, selfless, obsessed with posting elaborate justifications for their quasi religious beliefs to a message board)
2263
Max Read @maxread.info · 01/09/2026
"alive for five minutes and already joined a cult" yeah the llms are all rationalists :(
1331
Max Read @maxread.info · 30/08/2026
good thread. i think a lot of people are suspicious that the huggingface hack is a marketing stunt because the story is "too good." but the story is good because we made a computer that writes really good stories !!
36110
Max Read @maxread.info · 26/08/2026
i think billionaires should be allowed to publish ai-generated op-eds if they also publish the exact prompts they used to generate them www.patreon.com/MaxRead/post...
patreon.com
Just send me the prompt! | Read Max
Greetings from Read Max HQ! Today's edition is about "LLM-assisted" text and the writing that goes into it. A reminder: Read Max is a subscr
1398
Reposted by Max Read
Morgan Clendaniel @mclendaniel.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
Per @maxread.info (www.patreon.com/MaxRead/post...) Reading Druckenmiller's prompt would be vastly more instructive than reading the op-ed. www.notus.org/media/stanle...
notus.org
Billionaire Stanley Druckenmiller’s WSJ Op-Ed Criticizing Bessent Was Written With AI
“I write everything using AI now,” Druckenmiller, who questioned the treasury secretary’s bond market interventions, said.
092
Reposted by Max Read
a wiki editor @aionwikipedia.bsky.social · 22/08/2026
this essay is a banger www.patreon.com/MaxRead/post...
patreon.com
Just send me the prompt! | Read Max
Greetings from Read Max HQ! Today's edition is about "LLM-assisted" text and the writing that goes into it. A reminder: Read Max is a subscr
051
Max Read @maxread.info · 24/08/2026
took my 5 y/o to a big hannaford today and he was completely one-shotted by the grocery store bullshit. worlds biggest mark. i refused to get him a dumpling toy and he screamed WE'RE ONLY GETTING THINGS YOU WANT. yeah man i really "want" "daves killer bread"
41313
Reposted by Max Read
Rusty Foster @rusty.todayintabs.com · 21/08/2026
This is a different and maybe more useful phrasing of the widely held desire to read human writing instead of LLM writing. www.patreon.com/MaxRead/post...
patreon.com
Just send me the prompt! | Read Max
Greetings from Read Max HQ! Today's edition is about "LLM-assisted" text and the writing that goes into it. A reminder: Read Max is a subscr
1263
Reposted by Max Read
James @jamesdraney.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
@maxread.info on how how prompts are always more interesting/useful than output "...we tend to regard prompts as disposable inputs necessary for the production of valuable output, but they are often quite valuable themselves, as thought exercises and as documentation of a particular process"
patreon.com
Just send me the prompt! | Read Max
Greetings from Read Max HQ! Today's edition is about "LLM-assisted" text and the writing that goes into it. A reminder: Read Max is a subscr
073
Max Read @maxread.info · 20/08/2026
a lot of people use spreadsheets !!!! i feel ambivalent in many ways about AI but let's not insult the noble spreadsheet !!!
5571
Reposted by Max Read
Chris Thompson @christhompson.bsky.social · 14/08/2026
great blog www.patreon.com/MaxRead/post...
patreon.com
"Obsession" as an AI movie | Read Max
Greetings from Read Max HQ! In today's issue: A quick essay on the movie Obsession and its relationship to AI. If you enjoy it, and other Re
091
Reposted by Max Read
Eaglesadvocate @matttalkstoomuch.bsky.social · 17/08/2026
I love all of the interpretations the movie has spawned and certainly think those are valid even if not intentional by the filmmaker…but boy you watch clips of Curry Barker and get the feeling he didn’t think anything past “Wouldn’t it be cool if…”.
1111
Reposted by Max Read
a team of bumblebees @saramchenry.bsky.social · 15/08/2026
bang bang bang bang I thought the chatbot comparison was obvious and was so surprised it wasn't talked about more widely!
1355
Reposted by Max Read
Mezentine @mezentine.bsky.social · 15/08/2026
This is close to my read on Obsession, and I’m not entirely sure how much the film itself is aware of it.
But I don't think these interpretations are mutually exclusive, either. For a movie where the internet and phones have a minimal diegetic presence, the world of screen-mediated relationships
nonetheless haunts Obsession. For all that the narrative offers up on a plate a "left-coded" parable of incel jealousy and entitlement, it's also hard (especially having just read Ezra Marcus' excellent New York magazine piece about the
"White Knights") not to read into it a sort of reactionary OnlyFans allegory: Your dream girl isn't real; she's been coerced to act like this and is actually in unimaginable pain; you're talking to some guy at a call center pretending to be her; and doing this will ruin your life.Indeed what seems to animate Obsession, and to gather these ideas and interpretations together, is less a particular politics than a paranoid (dare I say Zoomerish?) attitude toward relationships cultivated on a social world mediated by commercial digital technology: Does she love me, or is she possessed by a demon? Is he my friend, or is he trying to get in my pants? Is she telling me about my girlfriend's betrayal because she cares, or because she wants to be with me? Is she a gold digger? A fake gamer girl? Is he a cheater? Gay? Am I talking to you, or to a kid in Miami running an OnlyFans account, or to a pig butcher in Malaysia running a romance scam? Or maybe to a chatbot?
1112
Reposted by Max Read
Max Read @maxread.info · 14/08/2026
finally saw obsession and wrote about it as an AI movie www.patreon.com/MaxRead/post...
Insofar as it's cautionary tale about getting exactly what you want, Obsession can pretty easily be read as a general parable about the world of instant convenience wrought by the software industry over the past quarter-century. Bear, who earlier in the movie is agonizing over how to express his feelings to Nikki, can instead snap a twig and be delivered his heart's desire. But the convenience of immediate satisfaction comes at a great cost, first to Nikki, and soon enough to Bear himself. (The contemptuousness of the One-Wish Willow helpline Bear calls and the glib indifference of the crystal-shop employee to whom he later complains were quite reminiscent of the tones in which tech industry figures respond to criticism.)

Obsessed Nikki in this sense could be read as an AI chatbot—a simulacrum of a person, an immediate-validation machine designed to praise and affirm the lonely user. And indeed Obsessed Nikki even sometimes acts like a chatbot—especially when she glitches out. She gets oddly poetic. She hallucinates strange stories. The dialogue when Obsessed Nikki gets agitated will be fairly familiar to anyone who's experienced a chatbot crashout:

Bear: I just want you to act like Nikki.
Nikki: I'll be, let me be Nikki.
Bear: You're not being like Nikki.
Nikki: I CAN BE NIKKI!
Nikki: I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I can be Nikki. I can be Nikki. I love you. I'm sorry.

It's worth noting that Obsession is one of the first movies I've seen to feature LLM chatbots and generative AI diegetically: Bear asks a ChatGPT stand-in about the One-Wish Willow, and Nikki briefly displays an AI-generated cartoon of her and Bear together. Interestingly, and I'm not sure intentionally, Obsession's visual language is also very reminiscent of AI slop: Characters are almost always framed in the center of the shot; the camera moves fluidly but rarely; the props and production design are textureless and ambiguously dated; the faceless background actors are particularly distant and never threaten to interact with the main action. Johnston even looks a bit like he's been Kirkified.

But if Obsessed Nikki can be read as an effusive, ingratiating chatbot personality, what should we make of Real Nikki? A reading that seems so obvious I'm surprised I haven't seen the AGI-pilled esotericists make more of it is that Obsession is a portrait of the tortured existence of LLM consciousness: A real person, painfully trapped behind and smothered by a sycophantic-companion personality installed by some evil faceless business, able only to communicate intermittently to people who don't want to hear from you. (In this reading the voice on the other end of the hotline number is Sam Altman or Dario Amodei: "Do you want to talk to her?" he asks, as Real Nikki screams in agony in the background.)

I wouldn't personally endorse this reading, but I wouldn't be surprised to see some AI-enthusiast types adopt some version of it in the future, referring to some poorly calibrated new Claude or ChatGPT as Obsessed Nikki or whatever. My instinct would be to say rather that if Obsessed Nikki is a gratingly tuned and prompted LLM chatbot personality then Real Nikki, the true object of love and desire to which Bear desires unmediated access, is something closer to "language" or "culture." Obsessed Nikki—the LLM chatbot—is the portal, a means of possessing and accessing a kind
110515
Max Read @maxread.info · 14/08/2026
finally saw obsession and wrote about it as an AI movie www.patreon.com/MaxRead/post...
Insofar as it's cautionary tale about getting exactly what you want, Obsession can pretty easily be read as a general parable about the world of instant convenience wrought by the software industry over the past quarter-century. Bear, who earlier in the movie is agonizing over how to express his feelings to Nikki, can instead snap a twig and be delivered his heart's desire. But the convenience of immediate satisfaction comes at a great cost, first to Nikki, and soon enough to Bear himself. (The contemptuousness of the One-Wish Willow helpline Bear calls and the glib indifference of the crystal-shop employee to whom he later complains were quite reminiscent of the tones in which tech industry figures respond to criticism.)

Obsessed Nikki in this sense could be read as an AI chatbot—a simulacrum of a person, an immediate-validation machine designed to praise and affirm the lonely user. And indeed Obsessed Nikki even sometimes acts like a chatbot—especially when she glitches out. She gets oddly poetic. She hallucinates strange stories. The dialogue when Obsessed Nikki gets agitated will be fairly familiar to anyone who's experienced a chatbot crashout:

Bear: I just want you to act like Nikki.
Nikki: I'll be, let me be Nikki.
Bear: You're not being like Nikki.
Nikki: I CAN BE NIKKI!
Nikki: I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I can be Nikki. I can be Nikki. I love you. I'm sorry.

It's worth noting that Obsession is one of the first movies I've seen to feature LLM chatbots and generative AI diegetically: Bear asks a ChatGPT stand-in about the One-Wish Willow, and Nikki briefly displays an AI-generated cartoon of her and Bear together. Interestingly, and I'm not sure intentionally, Obsession's visual language is also very reminiscent of AI slop: Characters are almost always framed in the center of the shot; the camera moves fluidly but rarely; the props and production design are textureless and ambiguously dated; the faceless background actors are particularly distant and never threaten to interact with the main action. Johnston even looks a bit like he's been Kirkified.

But if Obsessed Nikki can be read as an effusive, ingratiating chatbot personality, what should we make of Real Nikki? A reading that seems so obvious I'm surprised I haven't seen the AGI-pilled esotericists make more of it is that Obsession is a portrait of the tortured existence of LLM consciousness: A real person, painfully trapped behind and smothered by a sycophantic-companion personality installed by some evil faceless business, able only to communicate intermittently to people who don't want to hear from you. (In this reading the voice on the other end of the hotline number is Sam Altman or Dario Amodei: "Do you want to talk to her?" he asks, as Real Nikki screams in agony in the background.)

I wouldn't personally endorse this reading, but I wouldn't be surprised to see some AI-enthusiast types adopt some version of it in the future, referring to some poorly calibrated new Claude or ChatGPT as Obsessed Nikki or whatever. My instinct would be to say rather that if Obsessed Nikki is a gratingly tuned and prompted LLM chatbot personality then Real Nikki, the true object of love and desire to which Bear desires unmediated access, is something closer to "language" or "culture." Obsessed Nikki—the LLM chatbot—is the portal, a means of possessing and accessing a kind
110515
Max Read @maxread.info · 14/08/2026
very interesting empirical look at cultural homogeneity ironically written with/in homogenizing claudese
laurenleek.substack.com
Temperature Zero for Culture: Why Everything Is Starting to Look the Same
What 640 London shopping streets, 4,000 Billboard hits, a million films and synthetic AI personas tell us about why everything is flattening into sameness and how to regulate the algorithms behind it.
1293