Sign in

Mark Dingemanse

@markdingemanse.net
3.3K followers 550 following 4.6K posts

Language, interaction, tech • papers markdingemanse.net • blog ideophone.org • more colourful on fedi scholar.social/@dingemansemark • POSSE: Publish on Own Site, Syndicate Everywhere

PostsRepliesMedia
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 11h
One thing I like to do is present the standard (boring) layered onion view and then slam them with the glorious mess that is Halliday's diagram — to bring home the incredible interdisciplinarity of language as a phenomenon and field of study
layered onion of linguistics subfields: phonetics, phonology, morpholoyg, syntax, semantics, pragmaticsHalliday, Language as a Social Semiotic. Incredibly messy diagram with lines and arrows and polygons everywhere. Boxes of language as system, language as knowledge, language as behaviour; adjacent fields range from geography to literary studies to logic to physics, psychology, builogy, anthropology.
010
Reposted by Mark Dingemanse
Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 20h
Dear @erc.europa.eu , we DO already have common standards & frameworks. 'AI' likes to pose itself as 'special' but we do not need to reinvent the wheel. We already have established codes of conduct for research integrity. We just need to apply them. See below + more resources in thread🧵
Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles
We must protect and cultivate the ecosystem of human knowledge. AI models can mimic
the appearance of scholarly work, but they are (by construction) unconcerned with truth
— the result is a torrential outpouring of unchecked but convincing-sounding “informa-
tion”. At best, such output is accidentally true, but generally citationless, divorced from
human reasoning and the web of scholarship that it steals from. At worst, it is confidently
wrong. Both outcomes are dangerous to the ecosystem.
Olivia Guest, Iris van Rooij, Marcela Suarez, et al. (2025, n.p.)
Knowledge production is supposed to be safeguarded by (inter)national codes of conduct for research
integrity (ALLEA 2023; KNAW et al. 2018). Such codes forbid, for instance, fabrication of data,
falsification of results, plagiarism, and, generally, distortion of the scientific record. Many argue that
new rules are required to regulate academic AI use, but pre-existing guidelines fit the bill (cf. Tafani
216163
Reposted by Mark Dingemanse
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 27/08/2026
As we conclude, > [LLM] users encounter a fundamental asymmetry: they must singlehandedly supply much of the sequential structure that is ordinarily co-constructed by multiple participants ... This hidden labour challenges accounts of LLM use that focus on performance and optimization
2229
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 28/09/2026
This was incredible. Sharing some shots of the book table that was up during the event for inspiration — ft work by Bender & Hanna, Butler, Césaire, Fanon, Lorde, de Kom, O'Neill, Sheldrake, Simard, Stengers, Woolf, and many more
Book table 1Book table 2
010
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 28/09/2026
not about programming specifically but does include cases like this Haskell one
Excerpt 4A: ‘I will give you the necessary skeleton files’  wc_2585071; wc_usr_bb224b1286ec5e56 [conv_index: 5; ended at 21:57:58] 1 user: Use the Glasgow Haskell Compiler ghc to implement all the  functions specified  in Main.hs and in the skeleton files referenced by Main.hs. When a function  requirement specifies a restriction on how that function should be implemented,  your implementation must meet that  restriction.        Main.hs  A skeleton file which contains specifications for the some of the functions you  are required to write. For each function it..   -- rest of Main.hs (96 lines of code and comments) omitted --  I will give you the necessary skeleton files and then you need to write the code accordingly  2 LLM: Certainly! I'll provide implementations for the functions specified in the  Main.hs module you provided. Note that, as your request involves files that ar  not directly expressed here, like EvalIntExpr.hs, EvalIdExpr.hs,  EvalMaybeExpr.hs, and PostfixExpr.hs, I'll focus on implementing the  functions defined directly in Main.hs.   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  Implementation of Main.hs  -- 35 lines of code and comments omitted --
000
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 28/09/2026
perhaps this kind of work by Marlou Rasenberg & us is relevant? doi.org/10.5281/zeno... We identify a set of practices we call (collectively) pre-emptive prompting, which people deploy in multistep tasks as part of managing sequentiality and action structuring in human-LLM exchanges
doi.org
Pre-emptive prompting: How early adopters work around trouble with action projection in LLM interactions
This paper investigates how a core component of human interaction – action projection – is realized in conversations with systems like ChatGPT, which are not able to recognize nor anticipate actions i...
100
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 27/09/2026
The 'controversies' section here is a useful start en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neri_Ox...
en.wikipedia.org
Neri Oxman - Wikipedia
120
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 25/09/2026
Malt & Majid 2013 is beautifully written and satisfying in how it complicates English-only frames of mind yet shows constraints on diversity Malt, Barbara C., and Asifa Majid. 2013. ‘How Thought Is Mapped into Words’. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. doi.org/10.1002/wcs....
To English speakers, the distinctions between blue and green, cup and glass, or cut and break seem self-evident. The intuition is that these words label categories that have an existence independent of language, and language merely captures the preexisting categories. But cross-linguistic work shows that the named distinctions are not nearly as self-evident as they may feel. There is diversity in how languages divide up domains including color, number, plants and animals, drinking vessels and household containers, body parts, spatial relations, locomotion, acts of cutting and breaking, acts of carrying and holding, and more. Still, studies documenting variability across languages also uncover striking commonalities. Such commonalities indicate that there are sources of constraint on the variation. Both the commonalities and divergences carry important lessons for Cognitive Science. They speak to the causal relations among language, thought, and culture; the possibility of cross-culturally shared aspects of perception and cognition; the methods needed for studying general-purpose, nonlinguistic concepts; and how languages are learned
240
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 25/09/2026
For something fresh that conveys a sense of open questions in the field, perhaps try Levinson 2024, The Dark Matter of Pragmatics www.cambridge.org/core/element...
cambridge.org
The Dark Matter of Pragmatics
Cambridge Core - Sociolinguistics - The Dark Matter of Pragmatics
140
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 25/09/2026
yet another of those places where I always felt there was a bit of a rift, and chatbots have the (useful yet disquieting) capacity to widen the chasm and show very clearly what side someone's on: putting in the effort & relishing the process of learning more, versus just phoning it in
1121
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 25/09/2026
This weekend! Reclaiming our Futures, De Lindenberg, Nijmegen reclaimingourfutures.org A two-day festival of arts and sciences convened and curated by @samiraibnelkaid.bsky.social with funding from KNAW & our Futures of Language project Almost full — some last minute registrations still possible!
Iridiscently coloured ginger with slogan "The Future if Rhizomatic"
14419
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 25/09/2026
yes and — when I see calls to stop anthropomorphising, they typically are directed not at "people" (unspecified) but at professionals in journalism and science, where these frames are most consequential and are often weaponised to erase accountability, obscure agency, and play into corporate agendas
1111
Reposted by Mark Dingemanse
Kensy Cooperrider @kensycoop.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
It's "advice to grad students" season! Here's a post I wrote several geological epochs ago, in 2019. My advice gets harder and harder to follow every year (even for me). But I think that means it gets better and better? kensycooperrider.com/blog/advice-...
kensycooperrider.com
Advice to a young scholar — Kensy Cooperrider
Ten tips for young scholars on doing good work (and living well at the same time).
2168
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 24/09/2026
omg it me
130
Reposted by Mark Dingemanse
Ursula K. Le Guin Bot @leguinbot.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
How men feared women! she thought, walking among the late-flowering roses. Not as individuals, but women when they talked together, worked together, spoke up for one another - then men saw plots, cabals, constraints, traps being laid.
113655
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 22/09/2026
Exactly!
110
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 22/09/2026
As I wrote in 2020 about the same topic, all ingredients for an information heat death are on hand. ideophone.org/large-langua... I disagree with the quoted post's indiscriminate use & ascription of "intellect" and its conflation of textual products & cognitive processes; this is self-defeating
All ingredients for an information heat death are on hand. True human-generated and human-curated information —of the kind produced, for instance, by academics in painstaking observations and publications— will become more scarce, and therefore more valuable. Counterintuitively, there was never a better time to be a scholar.
1143
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 22/09/2026
Neat review of collaborative wayfinding by Fernandez Velasco & Sutton (open access) wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... Bringing together evidence from social ontology, distributed cognition, transactive memory, group problem-solving, and collaborative recall
wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Collaborative Wayfinding: A Critical Review
Collaborative wayfinding is ubiquitous in human life. Identifying research lessons from more established fields in collaborative cognition research, we suggest ways to test for emergence in collabora...
153
Reposted by Mark Dingemanse
Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
"AI-praatkwadrant: praat over AI maar dan zonder ruzie" Helder en constructief stuk door @wiep.bsky.social 👏👏👏 📝 destaatvanhetweb.nl/2026/09/20/a...
destaatvanhetweb.nl
AI-praatkwadrant: praat over AI maar dan zonder ruzie - De Staat van het Web!
Voordelen en labels die aan AI worden toegekend, zoals sneller werken, slimme keuzes, handig op kantoor, nieuw: zijn ze nu waar of niet? En hoe zit het met de nadelen van die technologie? Voor wie zij...
263
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 20/09/2026
def closer to cogsci than cogpsy (let alone socpsy) maybe I'm just a cogspy from other realms or a cogfly on the wall
130
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 20/09/2026
cognising for, by and with others you say @rjwatt42.bsky.social? beyond singlemindedness bat signal sent off 🦇 markdingemanse.net/beyond/
markdingemanse.net
Beyond Single-Mindedness – A Figure-Ground Reversal for the Cognitive Sciences
395
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 19/09/2026
'for no reason' If you'd said 'sit down with someone who thinks LLMs are going rogue' I wager your OP would've elicited less friction (and made a better point imo) — maybe that phrase you used instead was inherently harmful
170
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 19/09/2026
They really have no taste
110
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 16/09/2026
Le Guin's 'Rant on technology' is accessible and timeless — I wrote about it here futuresoflanguage.org/posts/librar... Less immediately accessible but a key STS take is Lucy Suchman on the 'thingness' of AI journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
futuresoflanguage.org
The Stories We Weave Around “Technology”
We need to talk about 'technology'. But where to start? This is one of those terms that co-evolves with the very things and processes it describes. Here I start from lucid remarks by Ursula Le Guin, w...
121
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 15/09/2026
I think Levinson 1981 fits the bill pure.mpg.de/rest/items/i... Also surprisingly relevant in a time of chatty LLMs! Levinson, S. C. (1981). Some pre-observations on the modelling of dialogue. Discourse Processes, 4(2), 93-116. doi:10.1080/01638538109544510.
pure.mpg.de
020
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 14/09/2026
Zie het werk van @felienne.bsky.social op Hedy als je dat niet al kende — in dit stuk gaat het bv ook even over Arabisch: infedu.vu.lt/journal/INFE...
infedu.vu.lt
011
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 13/09/2026
✅ CogSci at Aarhus is unique and has an excellent reputation. Signed in a heartbeat
040
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 13/09/2026
I say divert the stream of AI-generated and AI-'assisted' artefacts. Those interested in synthetic text can find it there; those who don't want to read what nobody could be bothered to write can easily continue to ignore it. It's the only way to keep any hope of a non-polluted info ecology
1145
Reposted by Mark Dingemanse
Sonja Drimmer @sonjadrimmer.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
It’s excellent getting to say to a group of students, We’re gonna read X & we’re gonna spend 75 minutes talking about it, & ideally the way you think about the world & yourself is gonna be a bit more nuanced, complex, & satisfying, & that’s today’s “product.” Or, as @cnygren.bsky.social & I said:
Suggestions
While in recent years universities have promoted student “productivity” (projects, online portfolios of their work, social media posts about their research papers, the list goes on), little of this push to deliver outputs and create content serves the actual purpose of education, which is to foster the capacity to think well, read well, listen well, and look well. Higher education strengthens the process; if we are going toteach sophisticated materials and challenging content, students need to learn how to think,read, listen, and look their way through it. The emphasis on “content creation” is detrimental to the educational mission.
323253
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 11/09/2026
going all in on the gleaming white female android imagery too — pygmalion displacement philarchive.org/rec/ERSPDW
philarchive.org
020
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 08/09/2026
Tapping the sign
02212
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 07/09/2026
In case you'd like to try reading more than marketing claims and press coverage, this review article covers what makes it feel like LLMs do more than stringing together tokens: doi.org/10.5281/zeno... Includes recent research showing the brittleness of 'reasoning' that experts here refer to
Although text-generating large language models have existed since 2018, it is only in the last few years that people have started to talk to them in earnest. The main reason is a series of innovations that enabled engineers to better tailor model output to human preferences and present it in a chat interface. Suddenly language models seemed to be much more than synthetic text extruding machine s (Bender and Hanna 2025) : they behaved as if following instructions, responded in ways that felt intuitive , and even seemed to have a mind of their own (Kockelman 2024). This interactivity, to a large degree enabled by unseen human labour, turned out to be tremendously compelling. My aim here is to demystify this phenomenon and so contribute some  interactional building blocks to the sprawling edifice of critical AI literacies (Guest et al. 2026).Research that looks behind the curtains of benchmark results finds something quite different. One study by Anthropic researchers found that chain-of-thought traces often “systematically misrepresent the true reason for a model’s prediction” and identified a range of biasing features that made explanation-shaped model output “plausible yet systematically unfaithful” (Turpin et al. 2023, emphasis theirs) . Another study found that large language models, even if they deliver plausible output, “often arrive at correct answers through incorrect reasoning” (Nguyen et al. 2024). Even when tested on simple syllogistic reasoning , model performance is highly brittle and susceptible to stylistic perturbations (Ariyani et al. 2025) . In multiple choice question answering, the simple inclusion of an answer like “none of the other answers”, which requires real reasoning rather than stumbling around in latent space, leads to average model performance dropping from 66% correct to 31% correct on MMLU questions  (Salido et al. 2026) . Meanwhile correct answers turn out to be hard to come by for truly new problems: when eight state -of-the-art models were tested on a set of brand new reasoning problems from the 2025 USA Math Olympiad, all performed dismally , and inspecting the “reasoning traces”, researchers found failures of logic, wrong assumptions, inability to choose between approaches, and miscalculations (Petrov et al. 2025).
063
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 06/09/2026
Solidarity — and thank you for fighting the good fight. You're so right that it is worth it for the students
110
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 06/09/2026
I recall this too, it was called the Panel Pledge in 2015-ish, but I'm not sure it has survived the past decade I see I blogged about it in my 'how to avoid manels' post but couldn't find a link then ideophone.org/how-to-avoid...
ideophone.org
How to avoid all-male panels (manels)
The last time I blindly accepted an invitation to speak was in 2012, when I was invited to an exclusive…
1114
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 06/09/2026
I am sorry to hear that. Too much of academia has been desensitised and has forgotten how play and creativity go hand in hand. I've tracked some inspiring counterexamples here but they are not numerous precisely because your experience remains the more common one 😔 ideophone.org/mindblowing-...
ideophone.org
Mindblowing dissertations
We don’t generally see PhD dissertations as an exciting genre to read, and that is wholly our loss. As the…
000
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 06/09/2026
I remember wondering whether this would survive typesetting but CUP clearly understood the assignment and kept my unicode ッ intact
1200
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 06/09/2026
I love ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ so much that I used it in print in an academic paper 🌞 doi.org/10.1017/lang...
Wall of text from 'Playful iconicity' (2020) with a circle around a line from the conclusions that ends in a shruggie: "Approaching iconicity using quantitative methods may seem to take away the magic of make-believe these words thrive on (Dingemanse, 2014). Likewise, explaining humour has been compared to dissecting an animal: you understand it better, but it dies in the process (White, 1941). If, as our study suggests, structural markedness helps to explain the relation between funniness and iconicity, at least we have killed two birds with one stone ¯\_(ツ)_/¯."
2130
Reposted by Mark Dingemanse
Lisa Messeri @lmesseri.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
I’ve been thinking a lot about the hugging face ‘hack.’ I’ve been checking my own bias (and desire to just say it’s distracting from the actual problems of genAI). I finally can articulate what has for me been a helpful framing. This was an oil spill.
1244
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 03/09/2026
Actually that is an interesting outcome that might create room for more pluriform and less Eurocentric philosophies — I might vote for that
150
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 03/09/2026
Dawn of Everything (2021)
010
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 03/09/2026
you're derailing the original thread with whataboutism yes there are other areas with hard-to-enforce standards no we don't dilute standards in response what's so hard to accept about the simple proposal in OP to (i) forbid LLM use in grant writing and (ii) have applicants sign off on it?
200
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 02/09/2026
and yet here you are arguing (or 'just asking questions') against a proposal to *set* a standard for all you seem to want a system built around mistrust; I don't think that will improve matters btw bold of you to assume I don't know retraction watch ideophone.org/why-plos-one...
200
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 02/09/2026
www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/go-ahead-a... I have no problem not using AI. And I'm sorry but the JAQ-ing about enforcement & honesty comes across as saying that you don't care about high standards or don't want to be held to them. Standards and principles ≠ laws BTW, to equate them is cop thinking
hamiltonnolan.com
Go Ahead and Use AI. It Will Only Help Me Dominate You.
A message of support for my fellow writers
100
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 02/09/2026
I actually think it is harmful as posed. It is akin to the 'merchants of doubt' model of reasoning which, esp when coming from academics, can be weaponized against us. It is a species of 'just asking questions' that derails the OP
181
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 02/09/2026
Again, we don't need to go cop state. We can also not reliably detect (within the constraints of the process) whether someone lied on their CV. Yet we set a standard & ask people to hold themselves to it. Re: fairness, designing a policy around the most dishonest actors is unfair to everyone
1292
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 01/09/2026
yeah how did that happen
110
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 31/08/2026
“There appears to have been a profound shift, beginning in the 1970s, from investment in technologies associated with the possibility of alternative futures to investment technologies that furthered labor discipline and social control” — David Graeber, The Utopia of Rules, 2015 #quote #technology
“There appears to have been a profound shift, beginning in the 1970s, from investment in technologies associated with the possibility of alternativefutures to investment technologies thatfurthered labor discipline and social control”
15115
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 31/08/2026
already 3 years ago > Some other patterns are worth noting. One is the rise of synthetic data especially for the instruction component. (...) The consequences of using synthetic reinforcement learning data at scale are unknown and in need of close scrutiny. dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3571884.3604316
Some other patterns are worth noting. One is the rise of synthetic data especially for the instruction component. Prominent examples are Self-Instruct (derived from GPT3) [54], and Baize, a corpus generated by having ChatGPT engage in interaction with itself, seeded by human-generated questions scraped from online knowledge bases [57]. This stretches the definition of LLM + RLHF architectures because the reinforcement learning is no longer directly from human feedback but has a synthetic component, in effect parasitizing on the human labour encoded in source models. The consequences of using synthetic reinforcement learning data at scale are unknown and in need of close scrutiny.
180
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 30/08/2026
relatedly, the inane verbosity of LLMs seems directly inspired by the annoyingly chatty portals and elevators of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation in H2G2
010
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 30/08/2026
thank you for reading 🙏 when I came across that priceless quote in LHoD I was like, thats the argument I've tried to articulate for a few years and that's taken me a whole paper to express — and half a century ago she just made it in 19 words 🤯 reading Le Guin is always like that, so rich
140