Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 11hOne thing I like to do is present the standard (boring) layered onion view and then slam them with the glorious mess that is Halliday's diagram — to bring home the incredible interdisciplinarity of language as a phenomenon and field of study 010
Reposted by Mark DingemanseIris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 20hDear @erc.europa.eu , we DO already have common standards & frameworks. 'AI' likes to pose itself as 'special' but we do not need to reinvent the wheel. We already have established codes of conduct for research integrity. We just need to apply them. See below + more resources in thread🧵 216163
Reposted by Mark DingemanseMark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 27/08/2026As we conclude, > [LLM] users encounter a fundamental asymmetry: they must singlehandedly supply much of the sequential structure that is ordinarily co-constructed by multiple participants ... This hidden labour challenges accounts of LLM use that focus on performance and optimization 2229
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 28/09/2026This was incredible. Sharing some shots of the book table that was up during the event for inspiration — ft work by Bender & Hanna, Butler, Césaire, Fanon, Lorde, de Kom, O'Neill, Sheldrake, Simard, Stengers, Woolf, and many more 010
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 28/09/2026not about programming specifically but does include cases like this Haskell one 000
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 28/09/2026perhaps this kind of work by Marlou Rasenberg & us is relevant? doi.org/10.5281/zeno... We identify a set of practices we call (collectively) pre-emptive prompting, which people deploy in multistep tasks as part of managing sequentiality and action structuring in human-LLM exchangesdoi.orgPre-emptive prompting: How early adopters work around trouble with action projection in LLM interactionsThis paper investigates how a core component of human interaction – action projection – is realized in conversations with systems like ChatGPT, which are not able to recognize nor anticipate actions i... 100
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 27/09/2026The 'controversies' section here is a useful start en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neri_Ox...en.wikipedia.orgNeri Oxman - Wikipedia 120
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 25/09/2026Malt & Majid 2013 is beautifully written and satisfying in how it complicates English-only frames of mind yet shows constraints on diversity Malt, Barbara C., and Asifa Majid. 2013. ‘How Thought Is Mapped into Words’. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. doi.org/10.1002/wcs.... 240
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 25/09/2026For something fresh that conveys a sense of open questions in the field, perhaps try Levinson 2024, The Dark Matter of Pragmatics www.cambridge.org/core/element...cambridge.orgThe Dark Matter of PragmaticsCambridge Core - Sociolinguistics - The Dark Matter of Pragmatics 140
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 25/09/2026yet another of those places where I always felt there was a bit of a rift, and chatbots have the (useful yet disquieting) capacity to widen the chasm and show very clearly what side someone's on: putting in the effort & relishing the process of learning more, versus just phoning it in 1121
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 25/09/2026This weekend! Reclaiming our Futures, De Lindenberg, Nijmegen reclaimingourfutures.org A two-day festival of arts and sciences convened and curated by @samiraibnelkaid.bsky.social with funding from KNAW & our Futures of Language project Almost full — some last minute registrations still possible! 14419
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 25/09/2026yes and — when I see calls to stop anthropomorphising, they typically are directed not at "people" (unspecified) but at professionals in journalism and science, where these frames are most consequential and are often weaponised to erase accountability, obscure agency, and play into corporate agendas 1111
Reposted by Mark DingemanseKensy Cooperrider @kensycoop.bsky.social · 24/09/2026It's "advice to grad students" season! Here's a post I wrote several geological epochs ago, in 2019. My advice gets harder and harder to follow every year (even for me). But I think that means it gets better and better? kensycooperrider.com/blog/advice-...kensycooperrider.comAdvice to a young scholar — Kensy CooperriderTen tips for young scholars on doing good work (and living well at the same time). 2168
Reposted by Mark DingemanseUrsula K. Le Guin Bot @leguinbot.bsky.social · 23/09/2026How men feared women! she thought, walking among the late-flowering roses. Not as individuals, but women when they talked together, worked together, spoke up for one another - then men saw plots, cabals, constraints, traps being laid. 113655
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 22/09/2026As I wrote in 2020 about the same topic, all ingredients for an information heat death are on hand. ideophone.org/large-langua... I disagree with the quoted post's indiscriminate use & ascription of "intellect" and its conflation of textual products & cognitive processes; this is self-defeating 1143
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 22/09/2026Neat review of collaborative wayfinding by Fernandez Velasco & Sutton (open access) wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... Bringing together evidence from social ontology, distributed cognition, transactive memory, group problem-solving, and collaborative recallwires.onlinelibrary.wiley.comCollaborative Wayfinding: A Critical ReviewCollaborative wayfinding is ubiquitous in human life. Identifying research lessons from more established fields in collaborative cognition research, we suggest ways to test for emergence in collabora... 153
Reposted by Mark DingemanseIris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 20/09/2026"AI-praatkwadrant: praat over AI maar dan zonder ruzie" Helder en constructief stuk door @wiep.bsky.social 👏👏👏 📝 destaatvanhetweb.nl/2026/09/20/a...destaatvanhetweb.nlAI-praatkwadrant: praat over AI maar dan zonder ruzie - De Staat van het Web!Voordelen en labels die aan AI worden toegekend, zoals sneller werken, slimme keuzes, handig op kantoor, nieuw: zijn ze nu waar of niet? En hoe zit het met de nadelen van die technologie? Voor wie zij... 263
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 20/09/2026def closer to cogsci than cogpsy (let alone socpsy) maybe I'm just a cogspy from other realms or a cogfly on the wall 130
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 20/09/2026cognising for, by and with others you say @rjwatt42.bsky.social? beyond singlemindedness bat signal sent off 🦇 markdingemanse.net/beyond/markdingemanse.netBeyond Single-Mindedness – A Figure-Ground Reversal for the Cognitive Sciences 395
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 19/09/2026'for no reason' If you'd said 'sit down with someone who thinks LLMs are going rogue' I wager your OP would've elicited less friction (and made a better point imo) — maybe that phrase you used instead was inherently harmful 170
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 16/09/2026Le Guin's 'Rant on technology' is accessible and timeless — I wrote about it here futuresoflanguage.org/posts/librar... Less immediately accessible but a key STS take is Lucy Suchman on the 'thingness' of AI journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....futuresoflanguage.orgThe Stories We Weave Around “Technology”We need to talk about 'technology'. But where to start? This is one of those terms that co-evolves with the very things and processes it describes. Here I start from lucid remarks by Ursula Le Guin, w... 121
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 15/09/2026I think Levinson 1981 fits the bill pure.mpg.de/rest/items/i... Also surprisingly relevant in a time of chatty LLMs! Levinson, S. C. (1981). Some pre-observations on the modelling of dialogue. Discourse Processes, 4(2), 93-116. doi:10.1080/01638538109544510.pure.mpg.de 020
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 14/09/2026Zie het werk van @felienne.bsky.social op Hedy als je dat niet al kende — in dit stuk gaat het bv ook even over Arabisch: infedu.vu.lt/journal/INFE...infedu.vu.lt 011
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 13/09/2026✅ CogSci at Aarhus is unique and has an excellent reputation. Signed in a heartbeat 040
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 13/09/2026I say divert the stream of AI-generated and AI-'assisted' artefacts. Those interested in synthetic text can find it there; those who don't want to read what nobody could be bothered to write can easily continue to ignore it. It's the only way to keep any hope of a non-polluted info ecology 1145
Reposted by Mark DingemanseSonja Drimmer @sonjadrimmer.bsky.social · 12/09/2026It’s excellent getting to say to a group of students, We’re gonna read X & we’re gonna spend 75 minutes talking about it, & ideally the way you think about the world & yourself is gonna be a bit more nuanced, complex, & satisfying, & that’s today’s “product.” Or, as @cnygren.bsky.social & I said: 323253
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 11/09/2026going all in on the gleaming white female android imagery too — pygmalion displacement philarchive.org/rec/ERSPDWphilarchive.org 020
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 07/09/2026In case you'd like to try reading more than marketing claims and press coverage, this review article covers what makes it feel like LLMs do more than stringing together tokens: doi.org/10.5281/zeno... Includes recent research showing the brittleness of 'reasoning' that experts here refer to 063
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 06/09/2026Solidarity — and thank you for fighting the good fight. You're so right that it is worth it for the students 110
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 06/09/2026I recall this too, it was called the Panel Pledge in 2015-ish, but I'm not sure it has survived the past decade I see I blogged about it in my 'how to avoid manels' post but couldn't find a link then ideophone.org/how-to-avoid...ideophone.orgHow to avoid all-male panels (manels)The last time I blindly accepted an invitation to speak was in 2012, when I was invited to an exclusive… 1114
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 06/09/2026I am sorry to hear that. Too much of academia has been desensitised and has forgotten how play and creativity go hand in hand. I've tracked some inspiring counterexamples here but they are not numerous precisely because your experience remains the more common one 😔 ideophone.org/mindblowing-...ideophone.orgMindblowing dissertationsWe don’t generally see PhD dissertations as an exciting genre to read, and that is wholly our loss. As the… 000
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 06/09/2026I remember wondering whether this would survive typesetting but CUP clearly understood the assignment and kept my unicode ッ intact 1200
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 06/09/2026I love ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ so much that I used it in print in an academic paper 🌞 doi.org/10.1017/lang... 2130
Reposted by Mark DingemanseLisa Messeri @lmesseri.bsky.social · 04/09/2026I’ve been thinking a lot about the hugging face ‘hack.’ I’ve been checking my own bias (and desire to just say it’s distracting from the actual problems of genAI). I finally can articulate what has for me been a helpful framing. This was an oil spill. 1244
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 03/09/2026Actually that is an interesting outcome that might create room for more pluriform and less Eurocentric philosophies — I might vote for that 150
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 03/09/2026you're derailing the original thread with whataboutism yes there are other areas with hard-to-enforce standards no we don't dilute standards in response what's so hard to accept about the simple proposal in OP to (i) forbid LLM use in grant writing and (ii) have applicants sign off on it? 200
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 02/09/2026and yet here you are arguing (or 'just asking questions') against a proposal to *set* a standard for all you seem to want a system built around mistrust; I don't think that will improve matters btw bold of you to assume I don't know retraction watch ideophone.org/why-plos-one... 200
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 02/09/2026www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/go-ahead-a... I have no problem not using AI. And I'm sorry but the JAQ-ing about enforcement & honesty comes across as saying that you don't care about high standards or don't want to be held to them. Standards and principles ≠ laws BTW, to equate them is cop thinkinghamiltonnolan.comGo Ahead and Use AI. It Will Only Help Me Dominate You.A message of support for my fellow writers 100
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 02/09/2026I actually think it is harmful as posed. It is akin to the 'merchants of doubt' model of reasoning which, esp when coming from academics, can be weaponized against us. It is a species of 'just asking questions' that derails the OP 181
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 02/09/2026Again, we don't need to go cop state. We can also not reliably detect (within the constraints of the process) whether someone lied on their CV. Yet we set a standard & ask people to hold themselves to it. Re: fairness, designing a policy around the most dishonest actors is unfair to everyone 1292
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 31/08/2026“There appears to have been a profound shift, beginning in the 1970s, from investment in technologies associated with the possibility of alternative futures to investment technologies that furthered labor discipline and social control” — David Graeber, The Utopia of Rules, 2015 #quote #technology 15115
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 31/08/2026already 3 years ago > Some other patterns are worth noting. One is the rise of synthetic data especially for the instruction component. (...) The consequences of using synthetic reinforcement learning data at scale are unknown and in need of close scrutiny. dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3571884.3604316 180
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 30/08/2026relatedly, the inane verbosity of LLMs seems directly inspired by the annoyingly chatty portals and elevators of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation in H2G2 010
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 30/08/2026thank you for reading 🙏 when I came across that priceless quote in LHoD I was like, thats the argument I've tried to articulate for a few years and that's taken me a whole paper to express — and half a century ago she just made it in 19 words 🤯 reading Le Guin is always like that, so rich 140