iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Joana Lobo Antunes @joanala.bsky.social · 27/08/2026

“The country singer was an advocate for vaccines, public health, literacy and marginalized communities.” Thank you, Dolly Parton. (How cool, to have a singer and actress celebrated in Nature? Uber cool). www.nature.com/articles/d41...

nature.com

Dolly Parton dies aged 80 — researchers celebrate her contributions to science

The country singer was an advocate for vaccines, public health, literacy and marginalized communities.

02212

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Prof Christina Pagel @chrischirp.bsky.social · 14/07/2026

It's a strong public health system and preventative care and considering health impacts across all policies. UK should be proud of our world-class biomedical research but it's not a failure of translation of that research that is behind our ill-health. 4/4

17421

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Hetan Shah @hetanshah.bsky.social · 09/05/2026

Good data is essential for policy. Today it’s been a year since we had a permanent National Statistician. No news on what is happening with the current recruitment which began Oct 2025. This is an under the bonnet issue that points to state failure 🧵 uksa.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/news/stateme...

uksa.statisticsauthority.gov.uk

Statement: Sir Ian Diamond steps down as National Statistician

Today the UK Statistics Authority has announced the resignation of Sir Ian Diamond as the UK’s National Statistician. Since joining the organisation more than five and a half years ago, Sir Ian has l...

2264122

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

John Bistline @bistline.bsky.social · 01/04/2026

This is my favorite climate change chart. Japanese monks, aristocrats, and emperors kept meticulous records of cherry blossom festivals for 1,200 years and accidentally built the world's longest climate dataset.

168183436900

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Jonathan Wosen @jonathanwosen.bsky.social · 19/03/2026

Thanks to these researchers and 25 others for trusting us with their stories. We've published two initial pieces on the survey, with more coverage in the works. Links to our stories below. (Main story) www.statnews.com/2026/03/19/n... (Accompanying piece) www.statnews.com/2026/03/19/n...

statnews.com

National survey of NIH-funded researchers shows precarious state of U.S. science — ‘This is like the Titanic’

A nationwide STAT survey of NIH-funded researchers reveals that, a year after Donald Trump's return to the White House, many scientists are reeling

02615

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Nature @nature.com · 04/03/2026

The makers of cancer blood tests claim the tests can detect dozens of cancer types - but some scientists say they could be missing many cancers or delivering the wrong diagnosis go.nature.com/4rZFJeA

go.nature.com

Cancer blood tests are everywhere. Do they really work?

Their makers claim they can detect dozens of cancer types — but some scientists say they could be missing many cancers or delivering the wrong diagnosis.

0167

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Prof Rachel Oliver @profrachelgan.bsky.social · 12/01/2026

Following coverage over the weekend of Sir Paul Nurse's comments that suggested that the only reason that a Fellow should be expelled from @royalsociety.org is scientific misconduct, I have written to him to explain the risks such an attitude poses of increasing sexual harassment in STEM.

Dear Sir Paul,

Re: Royal Society Code of Conduct

I am sure that many scientists have written to you about the specific question of Elon Musk’s Fellowship and whether, under the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct, his retaining that Fellowship is appropriate. I will not rehash these issues. Instead, as a female scientist with extensive experience of activities aiming to increase equality, diversity and inclusion in the engineering and physical sciences sector, I am writing to you (in a personal capacity) to ask you to reconsider the statements you have recently made in this context to the UK press about the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct and how it is applied.

A 2018 report from the joint National Academies of the United States of America, concluded that “sexual harassment is common in academic science, engineering, and medicine” and that “greater than 50 percent of women faculty and staff and 20–50 percent of women students encounter or experience sexually harassing conduct in academia”. This report described codes of conduct that make clear that sexual harassment is unethical and will not be tolerated as a “powerful incentive for change”. The authors also noted that sexual harassment can have significant and damaging effects on the integrity of research. In my own praxis, I have found that clear and consistently-implemented codes of conduct that address these issues make female scientists and engineers safer, and allow them to focus more effectively on their research. For codes of conduct to have such a positive effect, it is vital that sanctions for actions which transgress the code are meaningful and substantial.

I was hence aghast to realise that in an interview with the Financial Times published on 9/1/26, you appear to have suggested that the Royal Society “should only expel fellows if their science proved “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective””. Moreover, in a further interview with the Guardian on 11/1/26 you suggested that the code “may need to be looked at again”, with the implication that your aim would be to remove the option of sanctions on Fellows for reasons not strictly related to faults or defects in their research.

I suggest that changing the Royal Society’s code of conduct so that the likelihood of serious sanctions for sexual harassment is reduced, would directly endanger women who interact with the Royal Society at events or otherwise, and would provide a licence to harass to the already powerful people on whom the Society bestows fellowship. The implications of your words - that under your leadership the only infringements of the code which are likely to receive the sanction of the Fellowship being removed are those related to research misconduct - already risk empowering harassers. You stated, in the Financial Times interview, that “there’s many bad people around, but they have made scientific advances”. Given this awareness of the possibility of bad actors in our scientific community, it is wholly irresponsible to suggest that the Royal Society would not act to sanction these people if they harass more vulnerable scientists.

I am hence writing to request that you retract any suggestion that the Society’s Code of Conduct should be changed so that the only reason a Fellow might be sanctioned by the removal of their Fellowship is “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective” research. This action is necessary to safeguard female scientists, a requirement placed on the Society by safeguarding legislation and UK statutory guidance.

Yours sincerely,

Professor Rachel A. Oliver.

25819298

Dr Alexis B Webb @lexbwebb.bsky.social · 09/11/2025

My Watson memory: I was interviewing for a postdoc at the LMB in the late 00s, arriving in Cambridge from the US to find that JW was also giving a talk that day. The other students and postdocs had an over/under of 5 on how many racist or sexist comments might be littered in his talk. The overs won

001

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

University of Oxford @ox.ac.uk · 11/09/2025

NEW: Oxford-led researchers have delivered the most comprehensive analysis yet of cancer diagnosis in patients with vague symptoms (like fatigue or weight loss) - tackling one of primary care’s biggest challenges. Find out more ⬇️

ox.ac.uk

New study evaluates effectiveness of cancer diagnosis pathway for

A major UK study, led by researchers at the University of Oxford’s Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, the National Institute for

066

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Keith @hirosh7.bsky.social · 30/08/2025

The paper: A survey of over 800 scientists, educators, and communicators reveals a clear shift: for networking, public engagement, and staying informed, they now find Bluesky more effective than X—marking a significant platform change for the science community.

academic.oup.com

Scientists no Longer Find Twitter Professionally Useful, and have Switched to Bluesky

Synopsis. Social media has become widely used by the scientific community for a variety of professional uses, including networking and public outreach. For

0155

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Renée Graham 🏳️‍🌈 @rygraham.bsky.social · 29/08/2025

The pro-pediatric brain cancer administration.

08332

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈 @whysharksmatter.bsky.social · 19/08/2025

Here is a press release/ summary blog post about our new paper. Key conclusion: For every single professional use that scientists used to use Twitter for, Twitter is much worse now than it used to be, and Bluesky is better that Twitter currently is. www.southernfriedscience.com/twitter-suck...

southernfriedscience.com

“Twitter sucks now and all the cool kids are moving to Bluesky:” Our new survey shows that scientists no longer find Twitter professionally useful or pleasant

My colleague Dr. Julia Wester and I have a new paper out in the journal Integrative and Comparative Biology reporting on the results of a survey distributed to over 800 scientists, science educator…

20786252

Dr Alexis B Webb @lexbwebb.bsky.social · 13/08/2025

Slightly diminish a band: Minivan Halen

010

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Jim Woodgett @jwoodgett.bsky.social · 24/07/2025

Good grief, the US National Cancer Institute projects it will fund only one in 25 RO1 grant applications in 2026. This is massively defunding cancer research. Despicable vandalism. www.cancer.gov/grants-train...

National Cancer Institute projection of a 4% pay line in FY2026.

5302152

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · 10/06/2025

Durbin to Bhattacharya: "I can't understand it. I disagree w/ this admin on so many things. But this is the one that really gets to me personally. To think this nation would walk away from medical research. For God's sake...cancer, your budget requests a 38% cut to the National Cancer Institute"

498164815540

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Chanda Prescod-Weinstein 🌌 @chanda.blacksky.app · 31/05/2025

Just gonna re-up these slides about how the Nazis destroyed German physics 🧪

3263127

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Peter Gleick @petergleick.bsky.social · 31/05/2025

There are 2 previous historical cases of countries destroying their science and universities, crippling them for decades: Lysenkoism in the USSR and Nazi Germany. The Trump administration will be the 3rd. It's not just budgets but research, institutions, expertise, and training the next generation.

Graphs showing 25 years of budgets for the National Institute of Health, NASA, and the NSF. In all cases, the proposed budget for next year is far, far below any year of the previous quarter century.

449151517827

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick @reichlinmelnick.bsky.social · 22/05/2025

Here's the letter Noem sent Harvard, as posted on X. Nothing alleges ANY specific violation of the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. Nothing. She cites no law violated, no regulation broken, no policy ignored. I don't care what you think of Harvard; this is clear weaponization of government.

Secretary Kristi Noem
@Sec_Noem
This administration is holding Harvard accountable for fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus.

It is a privilege, not a right, for universities to enroll foreign students and benefit from their higher tuition payments to help pad their multibillion-dollar endowments.

Harvard had plenty of opportunity to do the right thing. It refused.

They have lost their Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification as a result of their failure to adhere to the law.

Let this serve as a warning to all universities and academic institutions across the country.

Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program Decertification
I am writing to inform you that effective immediately, Harvard University's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification is revoked.
As I explained to you in my April letter, it is a privilege to enroll foreign students, and it is also a privilege to employ aliens on campus. All universities must comply with Department of Homeland Security requirements, including reporting requirements under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program regulations, to maintain this privilege. As a result of your refusal to comply with multiple requests to provide the Department of Homeland Security pertinent information while perpetuating an unsafe campus environment that is hostile to Jewish students, promotes pro-Hamas sympathies, and employs racist "diversity, equity, and inclusion" policies, you have lost this privilege.
The revocation of your Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification means that Harvard is prohibited from having any aliens on F- or J- nonimmigrant status for the 2025-2026 academic school year. This decertification also means that existing aliens on F- or J- nonimmigrant status must transfer to another university in order to maintain their nonimmigrant status.
This action should not surprise you and is the unfortunate result of Harvard's failure to comply with simple reporting requirements.
On April 16, 2025, I requested records pertaining to nonimmigrant students enrolled at Harvard University, including information regarding misconduct and other offenses that would render foreign students inadmissible or removable. On April 30, 2025, Harvard's counsel provided information that he represented as responsive to my request. It was not.
As a courtesy that Harvard was not legally entitled to, the Acting DHS General Counsel responded on my behalf and afforded Harvard another opportunity to comply. Harvard again provided an insufficient response.
Consequences must follow to send a clear signal to…

If Harvard would like the opportunity of regaining Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification before the upcoming academic school year, you must provide all of the information requested below within 72 hours.
Please be advised that providing materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent information may subject you to criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Other criminal and civil sanctions may also apply.
I expect full and complete responses to the following requests:
1. Any and all records, whether official or informal, in the possession of Harvard University, including electronic records and audio or video footage, regarding illegal activity whether on or off campus, by a nonimmigrant student enrolled in Harvard University in the last five years.
2. Any and all records, whether official or informal, in the possession of Harvard University, including electronic records and audio or video footage, regarding dangerous or violent activity whether on or off campus, by a nonimmigrant student enrolled in Harvard University in the last five years.
3. Any and all records, whether official or informal, in the possession of Harvard University, including electronic records and audio or video footage, regarding threats to other students or university personnel whether on or off campus, by a nonimmigrant student enrolled in Harvard University in the last five years.
4. Any and all records, whether official or informal, in the possession of Harvard University, including electronic records and audio or video footage, regarding deprivation of rights of other classmates or university personnel whether on or off campus, by a nonimmigrant student enrolled in Harvard University in the last five years.
5. Any and all disciplinary records of all nonimmigrant students enrolled in Harvard University in the last five years.
6. Any and all audio or video footage, in the possession of Harvard University, of any protest activity involving a nonimmigrant student on a Harvard Univer…

811986702

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick @reichlinmelnick.bsky.social · 22/05/2025

There is no doubt that Trump and Noem's actions here are that of an authoritarian; using the federal government to blow a hole in Harvard's budget and punish thousands of students who have done nothing wrong just because they don't like Harvard. Our country is in crisis.

3509110

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

James Briscoe @jamesbriscoe.bsky.social · 19/05/2025

New Faraday Fellowships for international applicants moving to the UK Up to £4 million per researcher over 5-10 years Fast-track option for mid-career researchers looking to relocate to the UK

03521

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

The BMJ @bmj.com · 07/05/2025

The US National Institutes of Health will no longer approve research grants that involve “subawards” to foreign researchers, potentially spelling an end to the type of international multicentre studies that have delivered breakthroughs in many diseases www.bmj.com/content/389/...

02518

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Arthur Webber 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @bernietranders.bsky.social · 02/05/2025

You’re telling me that right wing voters that Labour was trying to appeal to voted for a right wing party anyway and left wing voters decided not to vote for Labour because they’re too right wing now? Who could have possibly predicted this.

22096942327

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Buzz Baum @buzzbaum.bsky.social · 11/04/2025

With a heavy heart I have decided not to attend a meeting in the US this June. I can’t act as if things are normal when science, universities, dissent & truth are all under threat. And I feel I can’t attend when there are scientists who are not able to travel to the US without fear of arrest.

818432

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

APHA @apha.org · 09/04/2025

HHS Secretary RFK Jr. is a danger to the public’s health and should resign or be fired, says APHA. In just a few short weeks, his actions on vacccines, fluoride and other public health science have shown how wrong he is for the job. Read & share our statement: apha.org/news-and-med...

20925417

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Dan Garisto @dangaristo.bsky.social · 08/04/2025

The NSF's flagship fellowship program typically gives offers to 2,000+ young scientists. This year, in the face of looming budget cuts, that number was halved: only 1,000 received an offer. Our story on what that means for the science talent pipeline: www.nature.com/articles/d41...

nature.com

NSF slashes prestigious PhD fellowship awards by half

US National Science Foundation announces lowest number of Graduate Research Fellowship Programme recipients in 15 years.

5219159

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Research Professional News @resprofnews.bsky.social · 04/04/2025

UKRI’s budget will fall in 2025-26 compared with the previous year, the government has confirmed. It will receive £8.8 billion for 2025-26—compared with the £8.9bn initially set out for the previous year, Dsit announces. www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-r...

researchprofessionalnews.com

Ministers confirm UK Research and Innovation budget will fall - Research Professional News

Agency’s 2025-26 allocation drops by £300m compared to previous year’s spending, despite rising Dsit budget

001

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Eric Boodman @ericboodman.bsky.social · 02/04/2025

Trump promised to “get the cure for cancer" among other things. But in the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs, there's “No money for kidney cancer. No money for pancreatic cancer. No money for lung cancer." Must-read from @angusrohan.bsky.social www.statnews.com/2025/03/24/t...

statnews.com

Cancer research, long protected, feels ‘devastating’ effects under Trump

Cancer research has had bipartisan support. But Trump administration budget cuts and delays threaten to reverse progress of recent years, experts say.

1178

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Jen Bendery @jbendery.bsky.social · 02/04/2025

Were you one of the thousands of HHS/CDC/FDA scientists, public health experts, researchers who Trump just cut? I am very interested in hearing from you. I want to know more about the good work you did and what is now lost. jen.bendery@huffpost.com / jbendery@proton.me On Signal: jbendery.41 🙏

27042

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Kathleen Bachynski @bachynski.bsky.social · 01/04/2025

“This will go down as one of the darkest days in modern scientific history in my 50 years in the business,” says Michael Osterholm, an infectious-diseases epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. “These are going to be huge losses to the research community.”

nature.com

‘One of the darkest days’: NIH purges agency leadership amid mass layoffs

In shock move, four institute directors at the US biomedical agency are removed from their posts.

10136981392

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Ida Bae Wells @nhannahjones.bsky.social · 02/04/2025

What happened in Wisconsin is an example of what is most feared: That in a true democracy regular people have more power than a billionaire, that all the money in the world doesn’t change one person one vote.

413003667

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Naomi Klein @naomiaklein.bsky.social · 02/04/2025

This is, in large part, pandemic revenge. As far as these oligarchs are concerned, all science does is tell them stuff they cannot do. They can't keep spewing carbon. They can't keep businesses open as usual when millions are dying. They have concluded that research is the enemy of profit.

183135654628

Dr Alexis B Webb @lexbwebb.bsky.social · 02/04/2025

Things that make the recent darkness brighter: 1. Sunshine in Glasgow ☀️ 2. @booker.senate.gov speaking truth to power for over 24 hours 3. the election of Susan Crawford in Wisconsin despite all of the dirty money and shenanigans

010

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Jeremy Berg @jeremymberg.bsky.social · 28/03/2025

Try to imagine a situation where you are not allowed to do your job (e.g. working with applicants to formulate successful proposals), you and and your long-time colleagues are fearful of losing their job, ... 1/n

310456

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Jim Woodgett @jwoodgett.bsky.social · 28/03/2025

Unless the medical research community unites to come to the aid of the NIH staff, who are the only hope for stopping the descent of the whole system, that community itself will be shredded. There is no plan B to defunding NIH. Business cannot go on. Stop normalizing.

611427

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Dr. Becca @docbecca.bsky.social · 27/03/2025

OK we all get that this is literally impossible though, right? Europe and Canada do not have the resources to absorb 75% of US scientists and btw getting jobs in these places was already competitive for the people who live there.

36438118

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Mike Feigin 🥯 @mikefeigin.bsky.social · 27/03/2025

Jesus. Fucking. Christ. 20 THOUSAND people responsible for keeping us healthy and safe were just fired.

95514

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Alt NIH Bluesky 🧪 @altnih4science.bsky.social · 27/03/2025

Control procurement, HR, and IT and they control the money, the people, and the computer systems — the systems that allow NIH to run. If you’re a scientist in the US it’s time to speak up now. This seems innocuous but it’s devastating for American science. They’re trying to slip this through.

16614

Dr Alexis B Webb @lexbwebb.bsky.social · 03/03/2025

This is devastating for diversity in science. Which unfortunately is the point 😞 As a first gen college student at a small liberal arts school, the NSF REU program gave me the opportunity to do R01 research, working with grad students and postdocs. It helped me apply to and get into grad school.

050

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

MwahahahahahadScientist @mads100tist.bsky.social · 01/03/2025

If you're in the US, considering Europe for your PhD, and you identify as a minority, I will chat with you and review any application documents you need 🧪

7340168

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Karen K. Ho @karenho.bsky.social · 28/02/2025

breaking the collection of long datasets in science (incl. weather, climate, and cancer research), economics, and other fields, through mass layoffs of federal employees and cuts to NIH funding, will be impossible to recover from, and everyone will suffer as a result, not just people in the US.

327854

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Scottish Greens @scottishgreens.org · 28/02/2025

Donald Trump's state visit to Scotland must be met with protest. The UK faces an urgent choice. Either we stand reunited with democratic Europe, or we assist Trump in ushering in a new era where international law is replaced by the whim of tyrants and their billionaire backers.

16244104

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Charles Я. Davis @charliearchy.bsky.social · 28/02/2025

No, this is the most ashamed you've felt as an American *so far*.

118119222193

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Rolling Stone @rollingstone.com · 18/02/2025

“There are currently four people remaining over there to do the work of 15 people. The danger to the national airspace can’t be understated." "This is a very real threat to the American flying public.” EXCLUSIVE ⤵️

rollingstone.com

FAA Employees Say Trump and Musk's Purge Is a 'Threat' to Air Safety

Donald Trump and Elon Musk fired hundreds of Federal Aviation Administration employees. The administration argues it won’t affect air safety.

27288584171

Reposted by Dr Alexis B Webb

Needhi Bhalla 💅🏽 @needhibhalla.bsky.social · 18/02/2025

There are actions in: Atlanta, GA Austin, TX Boston, MA Chicago, IL Los Angeles, CA St. Paul, MN Newark, NJ New Brunswick, NJ New Haven, CT New York, NY Philadelphia, PA Portland, OR Seattle, WA State College, PA St. Louis, MO and Washington, DC if you can make one of these actions, please join! 🧪

314193