iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Leonardo Puleo

Gianluca Piccolino @gippone.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

📣 Fiducia nelle istituzioni, democrazia, futuro dell'UE: la tua voce conta! Partecipa al sondaggio della Cost Action #EUPopLink sul futuro dell'Europa e aiutaci a diffonderlo! 🗳️ @eupoplink.bsky.social get.epoll.eu/index.php/48...

023

Leonardo Puleo @leonardo-puleo.bsky.social · 10/03/2026

Illiberalism in the making. “Vote Yes and we get the judiciary out of the way. They are firing squads, execution platoons.” These were the words used yesterday by Giusi Bartolozzi, head of staff to Justice Minister Nordio. (1/3)

110

Reposted by Leonardo Puleo

Laura Jacobs @lcjacobs89.bsky.social · 10/02/2026

I commented for POLITICO Europe 🗞️ on European far-right parties pushing ICE-style migration enforcement. Even without explicit Trump links, the same punitive logic is being normalized within European legal frameworks. 🔗 www.politico.eu/article/euro...

politico.eu

European far-right parties push for ICE-style police

Fringe figures want to follow the Trump playbook for tackling unauthorized migration.

001

Leonardo Puleo @leonardo-puleo.bsky.social · 03/02/2026

Italy. On a mainstream talk show, clashes between protesters and police in Turin. Demonstrators were labelled terrorists. Meloni called for attempted-murder charges. Measures shielding police and allowing 48h detention of protesters without offenses are under discussion. Illiberalism in the making.

021

Leonardo Puleo @leonardo-puleo.bsky.social · 28/01/2026

Bruxelles folks 👋 Tomorrow I’ll be presenting an overview of my new project on party-based illiberalism. Looking forward to the discussion!

000

Leonardo Puleo @leonardo-puleo.bsky.social · 03/01/2026

Odd how champions of liberalism endorse illiberal moves that violate international law and state sovereignty

160

Leonardo Puleo @leonardo-puleo.bsky.social · 28/12/2025

Back in Palermo for Christmas and dreaming of Serie A! 💖🖤⚽️

020

Reposted by Leonardo Puleo

Professor Daniele Albertazzi @dralbertazziuk.bsky.social · 24/12/2025

In her Christmas message, Meloni has attacked those "who say we shouldn't set up nativity scenes in schools since they offend people from other cultures". I have discussed the "rediscovery" of Christmas traditions by radical right parties with Politico: www.politico.eu/article/how-...

politico.eu

How the far right stole Christmas

Seasonal traditions and good cheer are being repurposed to serve political ends.

143

Reposted by Leonardo Puleo

Regional & Federal Studies @regfedst.bsky.social · 23/12/2025

🚨𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗹𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲! 🚨 🇮🇹 Twenty thousand leagues below the Po: 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 in the Lega (Nord) Read the new article by @gippone.bsky.social & Sofia Marini here 👉 doi.org/10.1080/1359... #Italy #Lega #party #career

doi.org

Twenty thousand leagues below the Po: career patterns and party institutionalisation in the Lega (Nord)

Party institutionalisation (PI) is a key concept in research on political parties, indicating organisational and ideological consolidation. In this study, we propose to consider the career patterns...

033

Reposted by Leonardo Puleo

Giuseppe Carteny @giucarny.bsky.social · 22/12/2025

New Publication out! 🔥 Italy’s right-wing politics has changed dramatically over the past two decades. With @gippone.bsky.social and @leonardo-puleo.bsky.social we started from a basic question: Why has the radical right surged inside Italy’s right coalition? Radicalisation or something different?

185

Leonardo Puleo @leonardo-puleo.bsky.social · 09/12/2025

Another piece of the illiberal puzzle? Some reflections on Italy’s new constitutional judicial reform: it risks weakening liberal democracy, especially alongside gov attacks on the judiciary, power shifts between PM and Pres of the Republic, and new limits on protest. @lseeuroppblog.bsky.social

blogs.lse.ac.uk

Will the Nordio reform weaken liberal democracy in Italy? - EUROPP

The Nordio reform in Italy might appear limited in scope, but it could lead to a further weakening of liberal democracy under the leadership of Giorgia Meloni.

022

Reposted by Leonardo Puleo

Kim Lane Scheppele @kimlanelaw.bsky.social · 13/11/2025

The Guardian gets it. The real importance of Orban's visit to see Trump was getting financial backing for Orban's tough upcoming election campaign. And all indications are he got it. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

theguardian.com

The Guardian view on special Trump treatment for Hungary: roll on the next election | Editorial

Editorial: As polls suggest that Viktor Orbán’s authoritarian rule is under threat, Brussels can only wait and hope

05426

Reposted by Leonardo Puleo

Mark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · 11/11/2025

We wrote the Strain on scientific publishing to highlight the problems of time & trust. With a fantastic group of co-authors, we present The Drain of Scientific Publishing: a 🧵 1/n Drain: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820 Strain: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/... Oligopoly: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...

A table showing profit margins of major publishers. A snippet of text related to this table is below.

1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.

A figure detailing the drain on researcher time.

1. The four-fold drain

1.2 Time
The number of papers published each year is growing faster than the scientific workforce,
with the number of papers per researcher almost doubling between 1996 and 2022 (Figure
1A). This reflects the fact that publishers’ commercial desire to publish (sell) more material
has aligned well with the competitive prestige culture in which publications help secure jobs,
grants, promotions, and awards. To the extent that this growth is driven by a pressure for
profit, rather than scholarly imperatives, it distorts the way researchers spend their time.
The publishing system depends on unpaid reviewer labour, estimated to be over 130 million
unpaid hours annually in 2020 alone (9). Researchers have complained about the demands of
peer-review for decades, but the scale of the problem is now worse, with editors reporting
widespread difficulties recruiting reviewers. The growth in publications involves not only the
authors’ time, but that of academic editors and reviewers who are dealing with so many
review demands.
Even more seriously, the imperative to produce ever more articles reshapes the nature of
scientific inquiry. Evidence across multiple fields shows that more papers result in
‘ossification’, not new ideas (10). It may seem paradoxical that more papers can slow
progress until one considers how it affects researchers’ time. While rewards remain tied to
volume, prestige, and impact of publications, researchers will be nudged away from riskier,
local, interdisciplinary, and long-term work. The result is a treadmill of constant activity with
limited progress whereas core scholarly practices – such as reading, reflecting and engaging
with others’ contributions – is de-prioritized. What looks like productivity often masks
intellectual exhaustion built on a demoralizing, narrowing scientific vision.

A table of profit margins across industries. The section of text related to this table is below:

1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.

The costs of inaction are plain: wasted public funds, lost researcher time, compromised
scientific integrity and eroded public trust. Today, the system rewards commercial publishers
first, and science second. Without bold action from the funders we risk continuing to pour
resources into a system that prioritizes profit over the advancement of scientific knowledge.

8644453

Leonardo Puleo @leonardo-puleo.bsky.social · 31/10/2025

💫Second great news of the day The book “Dissensus over Liberal Democracy: Insights from European Judges” is finally out with @bloomsburyacad.bsky.social @hartpublishing.bsky.social I’m truly happy to have co-edited this volume with Ramona Coman, Viktor Kazai, and Andrew Bradley. A thread 🧵 1/N

152

Leonardo Puleo @leonardo-puleo.bsky.social · 31/10/2025

🚀🚀🚀 First time posting here! I’m happy to share that I’ve just started a new FNRS-funded project at ULB (CEVIPOL/IEE): Party-Based Illiberalism in Europe. Over the next three years, I’ll study how illiberal ideas and practices spread across party systems and citizenry. @sciencepoulb.bsky.social

2121