Sign in

Lauren Sukin

@laurensukin.bsky.social
969 followers 349 following 43 posts

Associate Professor, Department of Politics and International Relations, Nuffield College, University of Oxford | Nuclear Weapons | Alliance Politics | Emerging Technology | Contact: lauren.sukin@politics.ox.ac.uk |

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Stanford CISAC @stanfordcisac.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
In a new article from CISAC affiliate @laurensukin.bsky.social and colleague Samuel Seitz, findings reveal how public opinion can play a significant role in shaping the credibility of nuclear threats. www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10....
tandfonline.com
Coercive nuclear threats under domestic dissonance: How public opinion shapes the nuclear credibility of autocracies and democracies
Reader environment loaded
011
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Stephen Herzog @herzogsm.bsky.social · 03/08/2026
2/2 The analysis draws on our @jpeaceresearch.bsky.social study from earlier this year. It uses a conjoint survey experiment to isolate how weapon type, civilian casualties, and operational effectiveness shape support for military strikes. doi.org/10.1093/jopr...
doi.org
Too brutal for war: comparing rationales for weapon taboos
Abstract. What makes a weapon too horrific to use? This study investigates public attitudes toward the use of different weapon types using a conjoint surve
032
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Stephen Herzog @herzogsm.bsky.social · 03/08/2026
1/2 Why do members of the US public reject some weapons even when they “work”? In a new piece for Irregular Warfare Initiative, @laurensukin.bsky.social, Dave Allison, & I explain why weapon choice & civilian harm can make force politically unsustainable. www.irregularwarfare.org/what-makes-a...
irregularwarfare.org
What Makes a Weapon Too Horrific to Use?
Editor's note: The "Short of War" Podcast discussing this article is AI-generated. Rules governing warfare are nearly as ancient as warfare itself. In the Iliad, Achilles loses favor with the gods an...
142
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Politics_Oxford @politicsoxford.bsky.social · 03/08/2026
New research co-authored by DPIR’s @laurensukin.bsky.social finds NATO allies don’t approach nuclear security the same way. Vulnerability and military capacity shape whether states hedge, strengthen deterrence, or seek greater strategic independence: tinyurl.com/m5hz7jhk
012
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Stephen Herzog @herzogsm.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
New #openaccess article in @sjms.bsky.social w/@jluisrodriguez.com & @laurensukin.bsky.social. We develop a typology of NATO member "nuclear types" & test w/survey of over 10k people across 10 countries. Cohesion depends on recognizing & managing differences. sjms.nu/articles/10....
084
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 29/04/2026
How effective is it when states claim they “didn’t do it”? Deniability is a common phenomenon in the gray zone. States can make aggression plausibly or implausibly deniable through combinations of transparent or obfuscating actors or means. In new research, we show how this affects escalation. 1/4
211
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Politics_Oxford @politicsoxford.bsky.social · 28/04/2026
@politicsoxford.bsky.social’s @laurensukin.bsky.social has co-authored a paper in Security Studies arguing that denials — or hiding state responsibility in conflict (e.g. through cyberattacks or proxy groups) — make escalation more likely, but also more limited: tinyurl.com/34fpxur9
032
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Stanford CISAC @stanfordcisac.bsky.social · 15/04/2026
In a new International Studies Quarterly article, alongside Helen Webley-Brown, CISAC affiliate @laurensukin.bsky.social reveals how U.S. political divisions at home are eroding global trust in America’s nuclear credibility, no matter which party is in power. academic.oup.com/isq/article/...
academic.oup.com
Divisions at Home, Broken Promises Abroad? How Domestic Politics Shapes the United States’ Nuclear Credibility
Abstract. How will the intensifying political challenges in the United States affect Washington’s nuclear credibility? Although the implications of US dome
021
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 11/04/2026
The Trump administration—including by its recent criticism of NATO—has put US credibility under threat. A key question looking forward is: How recoverable might the US reputation be? (1/4)
262
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 19/03/2026
Our new (open access) paper investigates weapons aversion across systems. We comprehensively compare attitudes about the use of cyber, conventional, cluster, chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, showing a clear preference hierarchy and lending insight into the underlying causes of aversion.
094
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Stephen Herzog @herzogsm.bsky.social · 09/03/2026
Piece w/ @laurensukin.bsky.social & @lanoszka.bsky.social out in Apr. 2026 issue of Journal of Conflict Resolution. We surveyed publics in 24 countries in 2023: Calibrated US restraint/support for Kyiv was reassuring. Strong resolve isn't the only thing that can reassure. doi.org/10.1177/0022...
066
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 07/03/2026
Consider applying to join Nuffield College and the Department of Politics and International Relations at Oxford as an associate professor in IR. This excellent post is for a non-tutorial fellowship (very little undergrad teaching). Please feel free to reach out with any questions. lnkd.in/eR6qBDNb.
lnkd.in
Job Details
023
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 29/01/2026
Are deterrence and disarmament compatible? In a new paper with @jluisrodriguez.com & @herzogsm.bsky.social, we question the common deterrence-disarmament divide. With a survey of nuclear attitudes, we show publics around the world simultaneously support both policies. tinyurl.com/5cbf76cx
0158
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Stephen Herzog @herzogsm.bsky.social · 16/01/2026
1/5 Great news! "Atomic Backfires: When Nuclear Policies Fail" is now #OpenAccess so that everyone can read it online. Thanks to generous support from @mitpress.bsky.social Direct to Open (D20). @managingtheatom.bsky.social @belfercenter.bsky.social Check it out here: doi.org/10.7551/mitp...
22114
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Hetan Shah @hetanshah.bsky.social · 15/01/2026
Please help spread the word on this, especially to those who may be feeling cold winds towards their research. We’ve opened the call for our International Fellowships, enabling early career researchers to work for two years at a UK research institution www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/funding/sche...
International Fellowships 2026
The International Fellowships Programme enables researchers to work for two years at a UK institution with the aim of building a globally connected, mobile research and innovation workforce.
Funding status
Open for applications
Career stage
Early-career
1173250
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Stephen Herzog @herzogsm.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
1/7 It's book publication day! "Atomic Backfires: When Nuclear Policies Fail" is out now from @mitpress.bsky.social in @belfercenter.bsky.social's Studies in International Security book series. Contents and discount codes below. @managingtheatom.bsky.social mitpress.mit.edu/978026205185...
12618
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 11/11/2025
Does public opinion matter for nuclear policy? We say yes, in @ejisbisa.bsky.social. Whether the public backs nuclear use can sway leaders’ preferences and affects external perceptions of the credibility of deterrence. doi.org/10.1017/eis....
doi.org
Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use | European Journal of International Security | Cambridge Core
Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use
095
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 21/10/2025
The old nuclear rulebook is out of date. From China's growing arsenal to a "crisis of faith" in US alliances, the world is facing a new, more complex nuclear landscape. Our discussion on all this and more with @laurensukin.bsky.social and Nicola Leveringhaus: tnsr.org/horns-of-a-d...
Navigating the New Nuclear Map with Lauren Sukin and Nicola Leveringhaus
142
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Stephen Herzog @herzogsm.bsky.social · 20/10/2025
1/5 In @foreignpolicy.com, @laurensukin.bsky.social, @lanoszka.bsky.social, and I provide analysis on how publics around the world viewed the Biden administration's extensive but restricted military aid to Ukraine in 2022-2023. foreignpolicy.com/2025/10/20/u...
foreignpolicy.com
Reliable Not Reckless
Why Washington’s measured support for Ukraine reassured the world.
145
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 13/10/2025
💥 "Navigating the New Nuclear Map" 💥 The nuclear landscape is more complex than ever. Our multi-author roundtable chaired by @laurensukin.bsky.social and @rohanmukherjee.bsky.social explores the evolving challenges, from Asia to Europe and the Middle East. 🌍⚛️ tnsr.org/roundtable/n...
tnsr.org
Navigating the New Nuclear Map - Texas National Security Review
The global nuclear order is undergoing rapid and complex transformations, driven by the expansion of arsenals, evolving doctrines, and the interplay of domestic and international politics. This…
111
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 30/09/2025
How are alliances like AUKUS and cooperation between Russia, China, and North Korea reshaping the nuclear order? @laurensukin.bsky.social and @rohanmukherjee.bsky.social introduce the essays and explore the effects of domestic politics and global competition. 📖 Read here: tnsr.org/roundtable/n...
"The Evolving Global Landscape of Nuclear Security" by Lauren Sukin and Rohan Mukherjee
154
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
At War on the Rocks, Gregory Winger, @drmagomez.bsky.social, and I show that, while the Trump administration has been supportive of U.S. Indo-Pacific partners in rhetoric, it has been neglectful of the personnel and mechanisms that sustain alliances. warontherocks.com/2025/09/wash...
warontherocks.com
Washington’s Ironclad Commitments Are Rusting in the Indo-Pacific
The recent wave of meetings between U.S. officials and allies in the Indo-Pacific have been studies in the duality of American diplomacy under President
110
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 13/09/2025
WARNING: An email account—“lauren.sukin.dr@hotmail.com”—has been created by the North Korean group Kimsuky to impersonate me. Please delete any emails you receive from this account. While it will soon be closed down, they are likely to create alternates.
230
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Stephen Herzog @herzogsm.bsky.social · 14/08/2025
Now out open access in the Journal of Conflict Resolution. @laurensukin.bsky.social, @lanoszka.bsky.social, & I investigate US reassurance efforts in 2023 during Russia's war on Ukraine. We conducted public opinion surveys in 24 countries on 6 continents. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
079
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Stanford CISAC @stanfordcisac.bsky.social · 14/08/2025
In a new article for the Journal of Conflict Resolution, CISAC affiliate @laurensukin.bsky.social & colleagues examine data from 24 countries finding early support for the US in the Russo-Ukrainian war came largely from approval of its restrained aid to Ukraine journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
journals.sagepub.com
Winning Hearts and Minds? How the United States Reassured During the Russo-Ukrainian War - Lauren Sukin, Stephen Herzog, Alexander Lanoszka, 2025
Decades of scholarship hold that great powers shore up global confidence during crises with strong demonstrations of resolve. A much smaller literature critique...
022
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Miguel Alberto Gomez @drmagomez.bsky.social · 25/07/2025
As great power competition in the Indo-Pacific intensifies, U.S. commitments to regional partners is under scrutiny. Our new article with @ghwinger.bsky.social & @laurensukin.bsky.social explores how the American public reacts to potential security crises. ⬇️ www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
tandfonline.com
Allies and partners: US public opinion and relationships in the Indo-Pacific
Competition between China and the United States spurs renewed emphasis on security cooperation in the Indo-Pacific. However, this development in security collaboration unfolds differently from the ...
121
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 24/07/2025
As Washington turns the screws on trade policy and burden-sharing against even its closest allies, Gregory Winger, Miguel Alberto Gomez, and I have a new article out at Contemporary Security Policy on alliance dynamics and the willingness to aid partners during crises. Here are three key takeaways:
110
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 07/06/2025
Seoul wants the bomb, China and North Korea are piling up warheads. What role should U.S. nuclear weapons play in Asia? Sam Seitz and I tackle this question in a new article at the Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament. Read our open access article here: www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1...
tandfonline.com
244
Reposted by Lauren Sukin
Stanford CISAC @stanfordcisac.bsky.social · 16/04/2024
To show resolve or restraint? That is the question for great powers facing major global crises. In a newly published paper, CISAC affiliate @laurensukin.bsky.social & Alexander Lanoszka show the benefits of restraint for reassuring allies during crises. Open access ⤵️ doi.org/10.1093/isq/...
doi.org
Credibility in Crises: How Patrons Reassure Their Allies
Abstracts. How do citizens of US allies assess different reassurance strategies? This article investigates the effects of US reassurance policies on public
022
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 31/10/2023
Had a great conversation with APLN last night on managing US extended deterrence in East Asia. You know it was good when the conference ended at 1am and you’re still thinking about it when you wake up! I love it when my job is talking about interesting problems with interesting people.
070
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 19/10/2023
Does the US need more nuclear weapons to face the “two-peer problem” posed by Russia’s and China’s nuclear arsenals? I revisit the nuclear superiority lit in my latest for Carnegie Endowment & argue this approach “is unlikely to be helpful” in the current geopolitical environment. t.co/fTCGpH9BeI
t.co
When Nuclear Superiority Isn’t Superior: Revisiting the Nuclear Balance of Power
Statistical analysis of nuclear crises tells an unexpected story about the usefulness of expanding nuclear arsenals.
020
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 13/10/2023
Honored to receive this award from the Army Strategist Association for my work with Katie Hedgecock on attribution and retaliation to cyber attacks. Read our JCR article here: journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1....
1110
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 02/10/2023
It was a pleasure to speak at this year’s NATO nuclear policy forum! I discussed my recent research on Russian and North Korean nuclear threats, which you can read about here: carnegieendowment.org/2023/05/04/r....
NATO representatives gathered at the 2023 NATO NPS
080
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 26/09/2023
Why does the US struggle to deter North Korea? What should we make of KJU’s visit to Russia? What role does China play in the Korean Peninsula? We discuss these questions and more in the latest edition of The Focus Podcast: sageinternational.com.au/video/u-s-st...
sageinternational.com.au
020
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 23/09/2023
Goodbye, CISAC! It was great to be back at Stanford for an excellent conversation about law, ethics, and nuclear weapons.
010
Lauren Sukin @laurensukin.bsky.social · 11/09/2023
Are bigger nuclear arsenals really better? Nuclear superiority makes states less likely to accomplish their goals during crises against adversaries that have much smaller arsenals. Read more in the new edition of Security Studies: doi.org/10.1080/0963...
doi.org
The Disadvantage of Nuclear Superiority
When crises occur between nuclear-armed states, do relative nuclear capabilities affect the outcome? The literature offers no consensus about nuclear superiority’s effect on crisis victory, but thi....
040