Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczOded Ritov @oded-ritov.bsky.social · 30/09/2026Do chimpanzees value their friendships enough to pass on juicy pineapple? In our new paper, out now at Evolution and Human Behavior, we find that they do! www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... 15719
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczSheina Lew-Levy @sheinalew.bsky.social · 29/09/2026🚨 Our new lab paper, led by @amandinevisine.bsky.social, examines exploration, group composition, and play activities among BaYaka children and teens living in a village context! Amandine is currently on fieldwork following up on this for her PhD 🎯 www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...sciencedirect.comCongolese BaYaka children's learning and exploring in a village contextChildhood is a key period for acquiring and transmitting cultural knowledge and skill. Hunter-gatherer children, such as the Congolese BaYaka, learn a… 14418
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczMoira (Molly) Dillon @moiradillon.bsky.social · 29/09/2026📣 New paper in Open Mind! How do our concepts of others’ minds connect to language and to where we expect others to look? 🤔 We link phenomenal vs. intentional mental states to gaze, one of our earliest social cues from infancy. Led by Mohit Mukherji! 🎉 direct.mit.edu/opmi/article...direct.mit.eduDescriptions of Phenomenal Versus Intentional Mental States Are Differentially Associated With Gaze DirectionAbstract. Across cultures, humans reason about others’ mental states as being either phenomenal, reflecting shareable experiences, or intentional, reflecting agentive goals. Might our dissociated judg... 0214
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemeczingmarvisser.bsky.social @ingmarvisser.bsky.social · 28/09/2026This was a fantastic team effort across 30+ labs 🌍 Paper (open access), data & code all public. > 📄 doi.org/10.1111/desc... > 💻 github.com/manybabies/m... > #ManyBabies #InfantCognition #OpenScience #DevSci, lead team: Andreea Geambaşu, Melanie Soderstrom, and Claartje Leveltdoi.orgManyBabies 3: A Multi‐Lab Study of Infant Algebraic Rule LearningThe ability to learn and apply rules lies at the heart of cognition. In a seminal study, Marcus et al. (1999) reported that 7-month-old infants learned abstract rules over syllable sequences and were... 33822
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczOlúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò @olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social · 26/09/2026i think we should allow babies to decide the outcome of more philosophical debates 8715
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczVivian Paulun @vivianpaulun.bsky.social · 25/09/2026🚨 Preprint alert! 👶🧠🌊 "The Emergence of a Distinction between Things and Stuff" osf.io/preprints/ps... So excited to share my first infant study, with the wonderful Sanghee Song and Liz Spelke.🎉 Do babies expect sand to behave differently from solid objects? 🧵1/5 411833
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczMarlene Berke @marleneberke.bsky.social · 14/09/2026Do non-human primates have theory of mind? My new paper takes a new computational approach to this classic question. We implemented verbal theories of primates' mental representations as computational models. These models completed classic visual perspective-taking tasks. 28934
Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz @laurasn.bsky.social · 14/09/2026this finding brings together some of my 4yo's biggest current interests (Dinosaur Facts, Poop Facts) and was therefore met with big delight in our household 030
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczTrends in Cognitive Sciences @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social · 11/09/2026Online Now: The nativist–empiricist debate is brokendlvr.itThe nativist–empiricist debate is brokenThe nativist–empiricist debate has long organized cognitive science, framing cognitive mechanisms as either innate or learned. Recent advances in controlled rearing and scalable domain-general neural networks now allow this debate to be tested with unprecedented rigor, by raising newborn animals and deep neural networks under tightly matched developmental conditions. Strikingly, when pushed to this empirical limit, the debate does not resolve: the same developmental phenomena support both radical empiricism and radical nativism. We argue that this stalemate reflects a conceptual error. The debate conflates explanatory levels and ontological orientations, with nativists emphasizing stable symbolic structures and empiricists emphasizing the subsymbolic processes that produce those structures. We propose dissolving the dichotomy within a multilevel framework of cognitive development. 02312
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemeczmahwishkittur.bsky.social @mahwishkittur.bsky.social · 10/09/2026After years of analyzing thousands of drawings from hundreds of adults and children, I am excited to share my first ever paper (w/ @samiyousif.bsky.social )! Using a simple drawing task, we show how topological structure is represented in the mind and its importance in spatial memory.elifesciences.orgTopological structure in human spatial representation revealed through drawing 16024
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczAlissa Rivero @alissarivero.bsky.social · 04/09/2026My first paper (with Jared Vasil and Mike Tomasello) is officially published! 🎉 Question: When can children coordinate decisions with each other in groups? Answer: Age 3! Read it here: academic.oup.com/chidev/advan... 🧵 (1/6)academic.oup.comTwo- and three-year-olds coordinate decisions in dyads and triadsAbstract. Even young toddlers coordinate actions with a partner. But coordinating choices or decisions is more challenging, particularly in multi-party gro 14515
Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz @laurasn.bsky.social · 01/09/2026This is now out in Perspectives on Psych Science: doi.org/10.1177/1745...doi.orgSocial-Information Seeking in Development: The Child as Experimental Psychologist - Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz, Azzurra Ruggeri, 2026Research has established that children are “naive psychologists,” adept at understanding and navigating the social world from an early age. However, most of thi... 1126
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczSam Gershman @gershbrain.bsky.social · 01/09/2026If this makes you mad, submit your cognitive science research to @openmindjournal.bsky.social No APCs, no subscription fees. It's funded by university libraries, at low cost. 18934
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczTomer Ullman @tomerullman.bsky.social · 31/08/2026new paper out: *~*~*~*~ "Revisiting the 5- to 7-Y ear Shift: The Age of Metacognitive Control?" (by Brod @garvinbrod.bsky.social , McAuliffe @katiemcauliffe.bsky.social , Ullman) *~*~*~*~ sharable paper link: bit.ly/5to7_2026 free pdf draft: www.tomerullman.org/papers/5to7s...bit.lyRevisiting the 5- to 7-year shift: The age of metacognitive control?Abstract. The term 5- to 7-year shift refers to the marked changes in behavior observed as children transition from preschool age to school age. In 1996, a 45221
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczSev Harootonian @harootonian.bsky.social · 26/08/2026My main PhD paper is finally out in Nature Human Behaviour! The question: what cognitive strategies do people use when they teach, and can we nudge them toward a better one? Work with my PhD mentors @yaelniv.bsky.social, @markkho.bsky.social and @cocoscilab.bsky.social. 1/5 18318
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczSam Gershman @gershbrain.bsky.social · 18/08/2026@arthurpr4t.bsky.social has a new preprint with important results on a famous psychophysical law (Weber's law). It isn't, in fact, a law, because it can be broken. A more fundamental principle (efficient coding) shows when and why Weber's law holds true. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...biorxiv.orgEfficient coding makes and breaks Weber's lawWeber's law is a rare quantitative regularity in psychology, yet its origins remain debated. Here we provide causal evidence that it arises from the more fundamental principle of efficient coding. Thi... 413041
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczMelissa Kibbe @levelsof.bsky.social · 21/08/2026New from me and Jessica Applin! We find that infants' behavior in a cracker choice task is impacted by an agent’s partial knowledge of object quantity: infants choose based on the agent's (inaccurate) representation rather than their own 🤯 Now in press at JECP, preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps...osf.ioOSF 24114
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczFederico Rossano @federicorossano.bsky.social · 20/08/2026Chimpanzees usually fail a simple pointing task that human infants and dogs pass. In our new iScience paper, we provide a possible explanation: once their attention is engaged, chimpanzees use human pointing to find hidden food 73% of the time. Attention may be the missing piece. 16220
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczAndrew Shtulman @andrewshtulman.bsky.social · 11/08/2026Why do children claim unusual events are impossible? In a new paper with Goulding, Ronfard (@samuelronfard.bsky.social), and Friedman (@orifriedman.bsky.social), we synthesize two decades of research on children's possibility judgments and propose some answers. www.sciencedirect.com/science/chap... 03012
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczBrian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 11/08/2026Over the next several months, we will phase out some popular OSF features. These changes do not affect current public content, which remains safe and accessible. We have prepared support material to help users adapt. I am very sorry for the disruption to your work. Please read this post for details.cos.ioOSF Changes | Center for Open ScienceWe are preparing substantial changes to OSF that will reduce its functionality, focus OSF on its unique strengths, and move toward an integrated model with complementary services. As part of that shif... 10120113
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczMinds, Machines, and Brains (MMB) @mmb-journal.bsky.social · 02/08/2026Hello world! 👋 We’re Minds, Machines, and Brains (MMB) 👤🤖🧠 a new open access journal from @mitpress.bsky.social exploring the principles of intelligence and cognition across natural and artificial minds. Submissions open this Fall! 🔗 direct.mit.edu/mmbdirect.mit.eduMinds, Machines, and Brains | MIT Press 223793
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczOpen Mind @openmindjournal.bsky.social · 29/07/2026Children’s Representations of Possibility: Uncertainty About “What” Is Easier Than Uncertainty About “Where”direct.mit.eduChildren’s Representations of Possibility: Uncertainty About “What” Is Easier Than Uncertainty About “Where”Abstract. Young children struggle in situations involving mere possibility, such as when a target object could be in one of two possible locations. This difficulty is often interpreted as a general… 02812
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemeczxuan (ɕɥɛn / sh-yen) @xuanalogue.bsky.social · 25/07/2026I wasn't able to attend #CogSci26 this year, but happy to share that a paper I presented there two years ago is now published in journal-length form 😊 The paper studies how people can rationally infer others' goals in open-ended spaces, and yet do so rapidly and spontaneously. 1382
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczBenjamin Pitt @benjaminpitt.bsky.social · 23/07/2026New paper finally out in @NatureComms with E. Leib, D. O’Shaughnessy, C. Gallardo, @sferrigno.bsky.social, and @spiantado.bsky.social. 📝Children across cultures discover the latent algorithms that structure what they see, even without instruction, feedback, or formal schooling.🧵 tinyurl.com/4a238m2d 27321
Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz @laurasn.bsky.social · 22/07/2026very chill, very normal view from the conference venue #CogSci2026 0121
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczCantlonLab @cantlonlab.bsky.social · 21/07/2026Geometry is not something humans invented from scratch —congratulations to Jialin Li on her first, first author paper. More to come from this team… @spiantado.bsky.social @wenjieli.bsky.social @jialin21.bsky.social @emilymsanford.bsky.social www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...pnas.orgPNASProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans... 46723
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczMelissa Kibbe @levelsof.bsky.social · 20/07/2026New from me and Alan Leslie! We got the band back together to lay out our view on object representations in the infant mind: non-discursive indexes that operate within a language of thought, & which get development of a more complex object concept off the ground www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...sciencedirect.com 24717
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecztadegquillien.bsky.social @tadegquillien.bsky.social · 20/07/2026You roll a fair die, hoping to get a 6. If you are successful, did you *intentionally* roll a 6? In a new paper, I explain why people hesitate to call lucky outcomes intentional:🧵 direct.mit.edu/opmi/article... 22213
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczTobias Gerstenberg @tobigerstenberg.bsky.social · 16/07/2026Now out in Noûs: A communication-first account of explanation, with Jacqueline Harding (jacquelineharding.github.io) and Thomas Icard (stanford.edu/~icard/). Paper: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/... Preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2505.03732 05116
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczDanielle Navarro @djnavarro.net · 18/07/2026And so after a very brief hiatus, version 0.7.0 of "learning statistics with R" exists. Full rebuild in quarto, stylistic fixes, "epilogues from 2026" to comment on how the world changed since original publication, and as an added bonus, no longer misgenders the author learningstatisticswithr.comlearningstatisticswithr.comLearning Statistics with R 217146
Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz @laurasn.bsky.social · 18/07/2026I'm extremely stoked to go to #CogSci2026 next week! Will talk about our project on how children choose informative observations that allow them to learn about features of agents. Happening Friday afternoon in the "Development of social cognition" session. See you in Rio (or online) :) 1275
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczErik Brockbank @erikbrockbank.bsky.social · 16/07/2026When you meet someone new, what kind of questions do you ask? It’s tempting to think that *really* getting to know people is just a matter of asking the right questions. Excited to share the next chapter in ongoing work on what makes a *deep question* with amazing collaborators... 24615
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczScience Figures That Look Like Shitposts @science-shitpost.bsky.social · 16/07/2026a rare example of a science figure that looks like a shitpost which is just photos of real events: babies trying to climb into tiny toy cars, sit on tiny toy chairs, and slide down tiny toy slides doi.org/10.1126/scie... (fig. 1) 321228
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczFrancesco Poli @francescopoli.bsky.social · 13/07/2026New Preprint! We gave neural networks infant-like curiosity and let them free to explore. They grew brain-like architecture, followed human synaptic development, and even started to display compositional thought. So we think curiosity doesn't just come from a complex mind... it helps us build one 👇biorxiv.orgCuriosity shapes brain-like architectures and functionsHow does complex cognition emerge from simpler underlying processes? We show that two components are sufficient: infant-like curiosity and brain-like biophysical constraints jointly drive the emergenc... 17628
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczJulien Lie-Panis @jliep.bsky.social · 09/07/2026Why do societies rely on rigid moral rules? Don't lie. Keep your promises. Don't steal. We all recognize there are good reasons to make exceptions. So why are moral rules so often categorical? Our new paper proposes an answer. 🧵 48441
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczHope Kean @hopekean.bsky.social · 03/08/2025Is the Language of Thought == Language? A Thread 🧵 New Preprint (link: tinyurl.com/LangLOT) with @alexanderfung.bsky.social, Paris Jaggers, Jason Chen, Josh Rule, Yael Benn, @joshtenenbaum.bsky.social, @spiantado.bsky.social, Rosemary Varley, @evfedorenko.bsky.social 1/8tinyurl.comEvidence from Formal Logical Reasoning Reveals that the Language of Thought is not Natural LanguageHumans are endowed with a powerful capacity for both inductive and deductive logical thought: we easily form generalizations based on a few examples and draw conclusions from known premises. Humans al... 68133
Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz @laurasn.bsky.social · 08/07/2026Pride month is over but #CogSci2026 is coming up - if you identify as LGBTQ* and are heading to Rio, join our Queer in CogSci affinity group meetup! cognitivesciencesociety.org/cogsci-affin...cognitivesciencesociety.orgCogSci AFFINITY & DISCUSSION GROUPS - Cognitive Science Society 0102
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczEsra Nur Turan-Küçük @esranur.bsky.social · 07/07/20261/ New paper with Stephanie Alderete, Fei Xu and Melissa Kibbe @levelsof.bsky.social!! osf.io/preprints/ps...osf.ioOSF 12212
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczLuke Butler @lucaspbutler.bsky.social · 07/07/2026NEW PAPER with Bethany Lassetter, @nataliehutchins.bsky.social, & @andreicimpian.bsky.social out now in Cognition! Open access link (free until late August): authors.elsevier.com/a/1nNS02Hx32... Adults often agree with their ingroup even when evidence says otherwise. Why? 🧵 🧵 🧵 below:authors.elsevier.comPlease wait whilst we redirect youAll content on this site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply. 183
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczOpen Mind @openmindjournal.bsky.social · 06/07/2026Luck and Intentional Action: A Causal Accountdirect.mit.eduLuck and Intentional Action: A Causal AccountAbstract. Can you perform an action intentionally if there was only a small chance your action would succeed? Researchers studying the folk concept of intentional action have documented complex… 097
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczDeon T. Benton @deontbenton.bsky.social · 30/06/2026🚨 Officially out at Child Development! A few years ago in Science, Ashley Thomas (ashleyjthomas.bsky.social) and colleagues argued that saliva could be a cue infants use to infer the strength of social relationships. academic.oup.com/chidev/advan...academic.oup.comAn associative learning account of how saliva becomes a cue for comfortAbstract. A recent study by Thomas et al. (2022) showed that 8.5- to 10-month-olds use saliva sharing as an indicator of relationship closeness: infants ex 13612
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemeczlanguagemit.bsky.social @languagemit.bsky.social · 20/06/2026—— Open Mind is MIT Press’s Diamond Open Access Cognitive Science journal. We now have our first Impact Factor: 2.9 as of June 2026 Submit your papers to Open Mind direct.mit.edu/opmi 118372
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczTobias Gerstenberg @tobigerstenberg.bsky.social · 17/06/2026New paper in Cognitive Psychology on how people combine visual 👀, auditory 👂, and haptic information 🖐️ to make causal judgments. Led by Elyse Chase (www.elysechase.com), with Kevin Smith, and Sean Follmer. 📜 authors.elsevier.com/a/1nHnI2Hxok... 0264
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczTay (Antonio J. Osuna Mascaró) @biotay.bsky.social · 16/06/20261/16 Do other species understand death? In this study with cockatoos, we approach this question from its foundation, by studying one of its central components: sensitivity to the permanent loss of a function. I will explain it in this thread (with videos) (paper) www.nature.com/articles/s41... 26129
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczAlicia Chen @aliciamchen.bsky.social · 16/06/2026New paper with @rebeccasaxe.bsky.social "Expectations of reciprocal generosity are specific to equal relationships," in @openmindjournal.bsky.social. Thread below! Article: doi.org/10.1162/opmi... MIT News: news.mit.edu/2026/would-y...news.mit.eduWould you return a favor? Scientists say it depends on the relationshipPeople generally only engage in reciprocal generosity with others of equal or unknown status, MIT researchers experimentally demonstrated. During repeated interactions between people of different soci... 13512
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecztal boger @talboger.bsky.social · 15/06/2026Do we perceive animacy itself, beyond its lower-level visual correlates? In @elife.bsky.social, @chazfirestone.bsky.social and I leverage “visual anagrams” — images whose interpretations change with orientation — to suggest the answer is: yes! elifesciences.org/reviewed-pre... 47622
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczBarbu Revencu @barbu-revencu.bsky.social · 12/06/2026Representations of geometric shapes have syntactic structure w/ @maxencepajot.bsky.social and @standehaene.bsky.social is out & open-access in JEP:General doi.org/10.1037/xge0.... For an overview, see thread below!doi.orgAPA PsycNet 02711
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczNima Mussavifard @mussavifard.bsky.social · 11/06/2026🚨 Out in Mind & Language Inferential communication: The primacy of external representations With @gcsibra.bsky.social, we suggest a non-Gricean mechanism for interpreting communicative media that relies on mapping symbolic arrangements onto content; we then discuss its evolutionary implications.onlinelibrary.wiley.comInferential communication: The primacy of external representationsWe argue that intentionalist accounts of ostensive-inferential communication fail to adequately explain the role of external representations in human communication. We propose that the contents of a ... 0133
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-NemeczGabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 10/06/2026Can infants or other animals represent "mutually exclusive possibilities"? In a new paper in JEP:G, we argue for specifying: in thinking or seeing? We show that in object perception (shared with infants and many animals), the answer is yes. (w Peter Mazalik & Roman Feiman) osf.io/preprints/ps... /1osf.ioOSF 13916