Sign in

Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz

@laurasn.bsky.social
1.2K followers 795 following 76 posts

Cognitive scientist, postdoc at iSearch lab (TU Munich), studying how children think & learn about other people. i have a kid & i like cooking & queer stuff. she/her

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Oded Ritov @oded-ritov.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Do chimpanzees value their friendships enough to pass on juicy pineapple? In our new paper, out now at Evolution and Human Behavior, we find that they do! www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Screenshot of the paper header on ScienceDirect. Evolution and Human Behavior, Volume 47, Issue 6, November 2026, article 106948. Title: "Chimpanzees steal less from their friends and expect them to do the same." Authors: Oded Ritov, Christoph J. Völter, Liran Samuni, Avi Benozio, Dacher Keltner, Jan M. Engelmann, Laura S. Lewis, Esther Herrmann.
15719
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Sheina Lew-Levy @sheinalew.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
🚨 Our new lab paper, led by @amandinevisine.bsky.social, examines exploration, group composition, and play activities among BaYaka children and teens living in a village context! Amandine is currently on fieldwork following up on this for her PhD 🎯 www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
sciencedirect.com
Congolese BaYaka children's learning and exploring in a village context
Childhood is a key period for acquiring and transmitting cultural knowledge and skill. Hunter-gatherer children, such as the Congolese BaYaka, learn a…
14418
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Moira (Molly) Dillon @moiradillon.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
📣 New paper in Open Mind! How do our concepts of others’ minds connect to language and to where we expect others to look? 🤔 We link phenomenal vs. intentional mental states to gaze, one of our earliest social cues from infancy. Led by Mohit Mukherji! 🎉 direct.mit.edu/opmi/article...
direct.mit.edu
Descriptions of Phenomenal Versus Intentional Mental States Are Differentially Associated With Gaze Direction
Abstract. Across cultures, humans reason about others’ mental states as being either phenomenal, reflecting shareable experiences, or intentional, reflecting agentive goals. Might our dissociated judg...
0214
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
ingmarvisser.bsky.social @ingmarvisser.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
This was a fantastic team effort across 30+ labs 🌍 Paper (open access), data & code all public. > 📄 doi.org/10.1111/desc... > 💻 github.com/manybabies/m... > #ManyBabies #InfantCognition #OpenScience #DevSci, lead team: Andreea Geambaşu, Melanie Soderstrom, and Claartje Levelt
doi.org
ManyBabies 3: A Multi‐Lab Study of Infant Algebraic Rule Learning
The ability to learn and apply rules lies at the heart of cognition. In a seminal study, Marcus et al. (1999) reported that 7-month-old infants learned abstract rules over syllable sequences and were...
33822
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò @olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
i think we should allow babies to decide the outcome of more philosophical debates
8715
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Vivian Paulun @vivianpaulun.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
🚨 Preprint alert! 👶🧠🌊 "The Emergence of a Distinction between Things and Stuff" osf.io/preprints/ps... So excited to share my first infant study, with the wonderful Sanghee Song and Liz Spelke.🎉 Do babies expect sand to behave differently from solid objects? 🧵1/5
411833
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Marlene Berke @marleneberke.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Do non-human primates have theory of mind? My new paper takes a new computational approach to this classic question. We implemented verbal theories of primates' mental representations as computational models. These models completed classic visual perspective-taking tasks.
28934
Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz @laurasn.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
this finding brings together some of my 4yo's biggest current interests (Dinosaur Facts, Poop Facts) and was therefore met with big delight in our household
030
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Trends in Cognitive Sciences @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
Online Now: The nativist–empiricist debate is broken
dlvr.it
The nativist–empiricist debate is broken
The nativist–empiricist debate has long organized cognitive science, framing cognitive mechanisms as either innate or learned. Recent advances in controlled rearing and scalable domain-general neural networks now allow this debate to be tested with unprecedented rigor, by raising newborn animals and deep neural networks under tightly matched developmental conditions. Strikingly, when pushed to this empirical limit, the debate does not resolve: the same developmental phenomena support both radical empiricism and radical nativism. We argue that this stalemate reflects a conceptual error. The debate conflates explanatory levels and ontological orientations, with nativists emphasizing stable symbolic structures and empiricists emphasizing the subsymbolic processes that produce those structures. We propose dissolving the dichotomy within a multilevel framework of cognitive development.
02312
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
mahwishkittur.bsky.social @mahwishkittur.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
After years of analyzing thousands of drawings from hundreds of adults and children, I am excited to share my first ever paper (w/ @samiyousif.bsky.social )! Using a simple drawing task, we show how topological structure is represented in the mind and its importance in spatial memory.
elifesciences.org
Topological structure in human spatial representation revealed through drawing
16024
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Alissa Rivero @alissarivero.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
My first paper (with Jared Vasil and Mike Tomasello) is officially published! 🎉 Question: When can children coordinate decisions with each other in groups? Answer: Age 3! Read it here: academic.oup.com/chidev/advan... 🧵 (1/6)
academic.oup.com
Two- and three-year-olds coordinate decisions in dyads and triads
Abstract. Even young toddlers coordinate actions with a partner. But coordinating choices or decisions is more challenging, particularly in multi-party gro
14515
Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz @laurasn.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
This is now out in Perspectives on Psych Science: doi.org/10.1177/1745...
doi.org
Social-Information Seeking in Development: The Child as Experimental Psychologist - Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz, Azzurra Ruggeri, 2026
Research has established that children are “naive psychologists,” adept at understanding and navigating the social world from an early age. However, most of thi...
1126
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Sam Gershman @gershbrain.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
If this makes you mad, submit your cognitive science research to @openmindjournal.bsky.social No APCs, no subscription fees. It's funded by university libraries, at low cost.
18934
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Tomer Ullman @tomerullman.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
new paper out: *~*~*~*~ "Revisiting the 5- to 7-Y ear Shift: The Age of Metacognitive Control?" (by Brod @garvinbrod.bsky.social , McAuliffe @katiemcauliffe.bsky.social , Ullman) *~*~*~*~ sharable paper link: bit.ly/5to7_2026 free pdf draft: www.tomerullman.org/papers/5to7s...
bit.ly
Revisiting the 5- to 7-year shift: The age of metacognitive control?
Abstract. The term 5- to 7-year shift refers to the marked changes in behavior observed as children transition from preschool age to school age. In 1996, a
45221
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Sev Harootonian @harootonian.bsky.social · 26/08/2026
My main PhD paper is finally out in Nature Human Behaviour! The question: what cognitive strategies do people use when they teach, and can we nudge them toward a better one? Work with my PhD mentors @yaelniv.bsky.social, @markkho.bsky.social and @cocoscilab.bsky.social. 1/5
18318
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Sam Gershman @gershbrain.bsky.social · 18/08/2026
@arthurpr4t.bsky.social has a new preprint with important results on a famous psychophysical law (Weber's law). It isn't, in fact, a law, because it can be broken. A more fundamental principle (efficient coding) shows when and why Weber's law holds true. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
biorxiv.org
Efficient coding makes and breaks Weber's law
Weber's law is a rare quantitative regularity in psychology, yet its origins remain debated. Here we provide causal evidence that it arises from the more fundamental principle of efficient coding. Thi...
413041
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Melissa Kibbe @levelsof.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
New from me and Jessica Applin! We find that infants' behavior in a cracker choice task is impacted by an agent’s partial knowledge of object quantity: infants choose based on the agent's (inaccurate) representation rather than their own 🤯 Now in press at JECP, preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io
OSF
24114
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Federico Rossano @federicorossano.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
Chimpanzees usually fail a simple pointing task that human infants and dogs pass. In our new iScience paper, we provide a possible explanation: once their attention is engaged, chimpanzees use human pointing to find hidden food 73% of the time. Attention may be the missing piece.
Figure 2. Three photos showing the experimental conditions. Left: the experimenter points toward the baited container while calling the chimpanzee’s name and making food grunts. Center: he points without vocal attention-getting cues. Right: he provides gaze and food grunts but does not point. Chimpanzees succeeded only when attention-getting cues and pointing were combined.
16220
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Andrew Shtulman @andrewshtulman.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
Why do children claim unusual events are impossible? In a new paper with Goulding, Ronfard (@samuelronfard.bsky.social), and Friedman (@orifriedman.bsky.social), we synthesize two decades of research on children's possibility judgments and propose some answers. www.sciencedirect.com/science/chap...
03012
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
Over the next several months, we will phase out some popular OSF features. These changes do not affect current public content, which remains safe and accessible. We have prepared support material to help users adapt. I am very sorry for the disruption to your work. Please read this post for details.
cos.io
OSF Changes | Center for Open Science
We are preparing substantial changes to OSF that will reduce its functionality, focus OSF on its unique strengths, and move toward an integrated model with complementary services. As part of that shif...
10120113
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Minds, Machines, and Brains (MMB) @mmb-journal.bsky.social · 02/08/2026
Hello world! 👋 We’re Minds, Machines, and Brains (MMB) 👤🤖🧠 a new open access journal from @mitpress.bsky.social exploring the principles of intelligence and cognition across natural and artificial minds. Submissions open this Fall! 🔗 direct.mit.edu/mmb
direct.mit.edu
Minds, Machines, and Brains | MIT Press
223793
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Open Mind @openmindjournal.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
Children’s Representations of Possibility: Uncertainty About “What” Is Easier Than Uncertainty About “Where”
direct.mit.edu
Children’s Representations of Possibility: Uncertainty About “What” Is Easier Than Uncertainty About “Where”
Abstract. Young children struggle in situations involving mere possibility, such as when a target object could be in one of two possible locations. This difficulty is often interpreted as a general…
02812
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
xuan (ɕɥɛn / sh-yen) @xuanalogue.bsky.social · 25/07/2026
I wasn't able to attend #CogSci26 this year, but happy to share that a paper I presented there two years ago is now published in journal-length form 😊 The paper studies how people can rationally infer others' goals in open-ended spaces, and yet do so rapidly and spontaneously.
Topics in Cognitive Science
Original Article
Open Access
Infinite Ends From Finite Samples: Open-Ended Goal Inference as Top-Down Bayesian Filtering of Bottom-Up Proposals
Tan Zhi-Xuan, Gloria Kang, Vikash Mansinghka, Joshua B. Tenenbaum

Open-ended goal inference as top-down Bayesian filtering of bottom-up proposals. We model inference in open-ended goal spaces as the combination of two processes: (a) Bottom-up sampling—you (observer) see your friend (agent) enter the kitchen and come up with several plausible goals (making tea, getting a snack, grabbing drinks, checking the pot, and so on) based on the context cue that your friend is in the kitchen. (b) Top-down filtering—your friend opens the fridge, which would be irrational if they were making tea or checking the pot; these goals are hence filtered out as poor explanations. By repeating these processes as actions unfold, we can model how people draw broadly rational inferences about others' goals even when the space of possibilities is infinite or just too large for explicit enumeration.
1382
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Benjamin Pitt @benjaminpitt.bsky.social · 23/07/2026
New paper finally out in @NatureComms with E. Leib, D. O’Shaughnessy, C. Gallardo, @sferrigno.bsky.social, and @spiantado.bsky.social. 📝Children across cultures discover the latent algorithms that structure what they see, even without instruction, feedback, or formal schooling.🧵 tinyurl.com/4a238m2d
27321
Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz @laurasn.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
Happening now, come by! #CogSci2026
a sign indicating the queer in cogsci meetup
061
Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz @laurasn.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
very chill, very normal view from the conference venue #CogSci2026
view from above onto a dreamy beach, like a postcard, blue water, palmtrees, a city in the distance
0121
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
CantlonLab @cantlonlab.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
Geometry is not something humans invented from scratch —congratulations to Jialin Li on her first, first author paper. More to come from this team… @spiantado.bsky.social @wenjieli.bsky.social @jialin21.bsky.social @emilymsanford.bsky.social www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
pnas.org
PNAS
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
46723
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Melissa Kibbe @levelsof.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
New from me and Alan Leslie! We got the band back together to lay out our view on object representations in the infant mind: non-discursive indexes that operate within a language of thought, & which get development of a more complex object concept off the ground www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
sciencedirect.com
24717
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
tadegquillien.bsky.social @tadegquillien.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
You roll a fair die, hoping to get a 6. If you are successful, did you *intentionally* roll a 6? In a new paper, I explain why people hesitate to call lucky outcomes intentional:🧵 direct.mit.edu/opmi/article...
22213
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Tobias Gerstenberg @tobigerstenberg.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
Now out in Noûs: A communication-first account of explanation, with Jacqueline Harding (jacquelineharding.github.io) and Thomas Icard (stanford.edu/~icard/). Paper: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/... Preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2505.03732
05116
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Danielle Navarro @djnavarro.net · 18/07/2026
And so after a very brief hiatus, version 0.7.0 of "learning statistics with R" exists. Full rebuild in quarto, stylistic fixes, "epilogues from 2026" to comment on how the world changed since original publication, and as an added bonus, no longer misgenders the author learningstatisticswithr.com
learningstatisticswithr.com
Learning Statistics with R
217146
Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz @laurasn.bsky.social · 18/07/2026
I'm extremely stoked to go to #CogSci2026 next week! Will talk about our project on how children choose informative observations that allow them to learn about features of agents. Happening Friday afternoon in the "Development of social cognition" session. See you in Rio (or online) :)
first slide of my cogsci talk, showing the title "Children select informative observations to test hypotheses about agents", as well as the names and photos of my coauthors, Georgina Török and Azzurra Ruggeria figure illustrating the reasoning by which we propose children solve the task in our study
1275
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Erik Brockbank @erikbrockbank.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
When you meet someone new, what kind of questions do you ask? It’s tempting to think that *really* getting to know people is just a matter of asking the right questions. Excited to share the next chapter in ongoing work on what makes a *deep question* with amazing collaborators...
24615
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Science Figures That Look Like Shitposts @science-shitpost.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
a rare example of a science figure that looks like a shitpost which is just photos of real events: babies trying to climb into tiny toy cars, sit on tiny toy chairs, and slide down tiny toy slides doi.org/10.1126/scie... (fig. 1)
three panels of a figure showing infants committing scale errors

caption: 
Fig. 1. Three examples of scale errors. (A) This 21-month-oldchild has committed a scale error by attempting to slide down aminiature slide; she has fallen off in this serious effort to carryout an impossible act. (B) This 24-month-old child has openedthe door to the miniature car and is repeatedly trying to forcehis foot inside the car. (C) This 28-month-old child is lookingbetween his legs to precisely locate the miniature chair that he is inthe process of sitting on.
321228
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Francesco Poli @francescopoli.bsky.social · 13/07/2026
New Preprint! We gave neural networks infant-like curiosity and let them free to explore. They grew brain-like architecture, followed human synaptic development, and even started to display compositional thought. So we think curiosity doesn't just come from a complex mind... it helps us build one 👇
biorxiv.org
Curiosity shapes brain-like architectures and functions
How does complex cognition emerge from simpler underlying processes? We show that two components are sufficient: infant-like curiosity and brain-like biophysical constraints jointly drive the emergenc...
17628
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Julien Lie-Panis @jliep.bsky.social · 09/07/2026
Why do societies rely on rigid moral rules? Don't lie. Keep your promises. Don't steal. We all recognize there are good reasons to make exceptions. So why are moral rules so often categorical? Our new paper proposes an answer. 🧵
Screenshot of article title page, "Why human societies adopt rigid moral rules"
48441
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Hope Kean @hopekean.bsky.social · 03/08/2025
Is the Language of Thought == Language? A Thread 🧵 New Preprint (link: tinyurl.com/LangLOT) with @alexanderfung.bsky.social, Paris Jaggers, Jason Chen, Josh Rule, Yael Benn, @joshtenenbaum.bsky.social, ‪@spiantado.bsky.social‬, Rosemary Varley, @evfedorenko.bsky.social 1/8
tinyurl.com
Evidence from Formal Logical Reasoning Reveals that the Language of Thought is not Natural Language
Humans are endowed with a powerful capacity for both inductive and deductive logical thought: we easily form generalizations based on a few examples and draw conclusions from known premises. Humans al...
68133
Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz @laurasn.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
Pride month is over but #CogSci2026 is coming up - if you identify as LGBTQ* and are heading to Rio, join our Queer in CogSci affinity group meetup! cognitivesciencesociety.org/cogsci-affin...
cognitivesciencesociety.org
CogSci AFFINITY & DISCUSSION GROUPS - Cognitive Science Society
0102
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Esra Nur Turan-Küçük @esranur.bsky.social · 07/07/2026
1/ New paper with Stephanie Alderete, Fei Xu and Melissa Kibbe @levelsof.bsky.social!! osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io
OSF
12212
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Luke Butler @lucaspbutler.bsky.social · 07/07/2026
NEW PAPER with Bethany Lassetter, @nataliehutchins.bsky.social, & @andreicimpian.bsky.social out now in Cognition! Open access link (free until late August): authors.elsevier.com/a/1nNS02Hx32... Adults often agree with their ingroup even when evidence says otherwise. Why? 🧵 🧵 🧵 below:
authors.elsevier.com
Please wait whilst we redirect you
All content on this site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
183
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Open Mind @openmindjournal.bsky.social · 06/07/2026
Luck and Intentional Action: A Causal Account
direct.mit.edu
Luck and Intentional Action: A Causal Account
Abstract. Can you perform an action intentionally if there was only a small chance your action would succeed? Researchers studying the folk concept of intentional action have documented complex…
097
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Deon T. Benton @deontbenton.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
🚨 Officially out at Child Development! A few years ago in Science, Ashley Thomas (ashleyjthomas.bsky.social) and colleagues argued that saliva could be a cue infants use to infer the strength of social relationships. academic.oup.com/chidev/advan...
academic.oup.com
An associative learning account of how saliva becomes a cue for comfort
Abstract. A recent study by Thomas et al. (2022) showed that 8.5- to 10-month-olds use saliva sharing as an indicator of relationship closeness: infants ex
13612
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
languagemit.bsky.social @languagemit.bsky.social · 20/06/2026
—— Open Mind is MIT Press’s Diamond Open Access Cognitive Science journal. We now have our first Impact Factor: 2.9 as of June 2026 Submit your papers to Open Mind direct.mit.edu/opmi
118372
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Tobias Gerstenberg @tobigerstenberg.bsky.social · 17/06/2026
New paper in Cognitive Psychology on how people combine visual 👀, auditory 👂, and haptic information 🖐️ to make causal judgments. Led by Elyse Chase (www.elysechase.com), with Kevin Smith, and Sean Follmer. 📜 authors.elsevier.com/a/1nHnI2Hxok...
0264
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Tay (Antonio J. Osuna Mascaró) @biotay.bsky.social · 16/06/2026
1/16 Do other species understand death? In this study with cockatoos, we approach this question from its foundation, by studying one of its central components: sensitivity to the permanent loss of a function. I will explain it in this thread (with videos) (paper) www.nature.com/articles/s41...
26129
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Alicia Chen @aliciamchen.bsky.social · 16/06/2026
New paper with @rebeccasaxe.bsky.social "Expectations of reciprocal generosity are specific to equal relationships," in @openmindjournal.bsky.social. Thread below! Article: doi.org/10.1162/opmi... MIT News: news.mit.edu/2026/would-y...
news.mit.edu
Would you return a favor? Scientists say it depends on the relationship
People generally only engage in reciprocal generosity with others of equal or unknown status, MIT researchers experimentally demonstrated. During repeated interactions between people of different soci...
13512
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
tal boger @talboger.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
Do we perceive animacy itself, beyond its lower-level visual correlates? In @elife.bsky.social, @chazfirestone.bsky.social and I leverage “visual anagrams” — images whose interpretations change with orientation — to suggest the answer is: yes! elifesciences.org/reviewed-pre...
47622
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Barbu Revencu @barbu-revencu.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
Representations of geometric shapes have syntactic structure w/ @maxencepajot.bsky.social and @standehaene.bsky.social is out & open-access in JEP:General doi.org/10.1037/xge0.... For an overview, see thread below!
doi.org
APA PsycNet
02711
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Nima Mussavifard @mussavifard.bsky.social · 11/06/2026
🚨 Out in Mind & Language Inferential communication: The primacy of external representations With @gcsibra.bsky.social, we suggest a non-Gricean mechanism for interpreting communicative media that relies on mapping symbolic arrangements onto content; we then discuss its evolutionary implications.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Inferential communication: The primacy of external representations
We argue that intentionalist accounts of ostensive-inferential communication fail to adequately explain the role of external representations in human communication. We propose that the contents of a ...
0133
Reposted by Laura Schlingloff-Nemecz
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 10/06/2026
Can infants or other animals represent "mutually exclusive possibilities"? In a new paper in JEP:G, we argue for specifying: in thinking or seeing? We show that in object perception (shared with infants and many animals), the answer is yes. (w Peter Mazalik & Roman Feiman) osf.io/preprints/ps... /1
osf.io
OSF
13916