Sign in

Kops Lab

@kopslab.bsky.social
162 followers 85 following 20 posts

Interested in all things chromosome segregation and aneuploidy | Director & PI at Hubrecht Institute

PostsRepliesMedia
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 23/02/2026
While some cell biologists might intuitively feel uncomfortable with extensive diversity within groups, they should question their intuition in the face of overwhelming evidence for phylogenetic monophyly. We welcome constructive discussion with anyone willing to study the opposing arguments. (3/X)
040
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 23/02/2026
While the root is not fully resolved, the validity of phylogenomics to uncover deep evolutionary relationships is unquestionable. This approach unequivocally shows a monophyly of Euglenozoa invalidating the hypothesis that kinetoplastids/glycomonads split first from all other living eukaryotes.(2/3)
100
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 23/02/2026
As a cell biology lab, we acknowledge the decades-long impressive efforts to uncover evolutionary relationships using advanced phylogenomics methods. These approaches undergo continuous improvements that lead to adjustments of data interpretation, as is the case in every scientific field. (1/3)
162
Reposted by Kops Lab
Max Raas @maxraas.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
Recently, a Hypothesis was posed in @jcellsci.bsky.social in which the root of eukaryotes was placed between kinetoplastids and all other eukaryotes. From this, it was implied that LECA did not have a kinetochore. We argue this is highly unlikely. A 🧵(1/12) Read our reply here: tinyurl.com/n87myhpr
tinyurl.com
The LECA had a conventional kinetochore and the kinetoplastid kinetochore is a derived feature – a critical evaluation of Akiyoshi, 2025
Summary:Akiyoshi, 2025 presented a hypothesis with implications for the early evolution of eukaryotes and eukaryotic cell division machinery. In this Correspondence, the authors conclude that this hyp...
23218
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
New preprint from our lab! Led by Emine Ali and @maxraas.bsky.social See the highlights below!
061
Reposted by Kops Lab
Max Raas @maxraas.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
Our story on the kinetochore composition of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila is out now on bioRxiv! We find surprisingly many orthologs of conventional kinetochore components, but also components that have very different evolutionary origins. A 🧵 (1/11) Check it out here: tinyurl.com/4ectm9x4
tinyurl.com
22710
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 04/11/2025
Surprise — it wasn’t: RNA-seq and histology show that moderate/high CIN causes massive cell death, triggering regeneration without immune infiltration — providing the non–cell-autonomous push that fuels tumorigenesis. (5/5)
110
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 04/11/2025
One possibility of such a mechanism: CIN may mimic TPA in promoting tumorigenesis. Indeed, moderate/high CIN could partially replace TPA in the DMBA/TPA regimen. But what TPA effect was CIN mimicking? Inflammation? (4/5)
100
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 04/11/2025
Now the twist: despite being induced under moderate/high CIN, these tumors are made of low CIN cells across other tumor types. So what’s happening? Moderate/high CIN drives the outgrowth of rare low-CIN tumor cells through a non–cell-autonomous mechanism which doesn't happen in only low CIN. (3/5)
110
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 04/11/2025
CIN levels matter! We used CiMKi mice to induce and monitor skin tumors across five CIN levels in combination with DMBA/TPA treatment. Low → more tumors but no effect on onset or growth Moderate → more tumors earlier onset and larger growth High → fewer tumors but earlier and earlier growth (2/5)
111
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 04/11/2025
Ever wondered how chromosomal instability (CIN) influences tumorigenesis? And how does it contribute to shaping the tumor microenvironment? In our latest preprint, we used the CiMKi model to induce and monitor skin tumors across five levels of CIN tinyurl.com/52tuk88z Here's what we find (1/5):
tinyurl.com
Non-cell-autonomous mechanisms of tumor initiation and relapse by chromosomal instability
Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a hallmark of cancer, and a primary cause of genetic heterogeneity in tumors. Depending on the degree of CIN and the affected tissue, CIN can promote or suppress tumor...
192
Reposted by Kops Lab
Hubrecht Institute @hubrechtinstitute.bsky.social · 26/09/2025
Ready to establish your own research group at the Hubrecht Institute for Molecular and Developmental Biology? We’re seeking a tenure-track group leader to develop an innovative research line within our vibrant scientific community. Learn more & apply! f.mtr.cool/jncxfqkuds
01514
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 09/07/2025
Altogether, our findings highlight the need to explore the tissue context of p53 responses to aneuploidy. We propose that future efforts should integrate the use of appropriate models of diverse healthy and pre-cancer human tissues. (8/8)
000
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 09/07/2025
Finally, we show that losses, but not gains, are more universally linked with p53 deficiency across cancer types. This association has been previously made and highlights an exciting direction to explore the role of p53 responses to aneuploidy. (7/8)
100
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 09/07/2025
Surprisingly, we find that neither arm-level or whole-chromosome CNAs correlate with p53 deficiency. This is particularly interesting given the role of p53 in responding to DNA damage, which is often linked to arm-level copy number alterations. (6/8)
100
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 09/07/2025
This lead us to ask the following question: can specific features of aneuploidy better distinguish p53 proficient and deficient tumors? To explore this we focused on the type (arm- or whole-chromosome) and direction of copy-number alteration (CNA). (5/8)
100
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 09/07/2025
We were excited to find that p53 inactivation is neither sufficient nor necessary for tumors to accumulate a high degree of aneuploidy. We find that tumors with high aneuploidy yet intact p53 are common, and also that p53 inactivation does not invariably lead to highly aneuploid tumors. (4/8)
110
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 09/07/2025
To fully capture the p53 status we defined p53 deficiency as either TP53 mutations or alterations that phenocopy TP53 loss. Aneuploidy was defined as arm- or whole-chromosome copy number alterations (CNAs). (3/8)
100
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 09/07/2025
Despite decades of research, it is still unclear whether p53 protects against particular forms of copy number alterations and whether it does so universally across cancer types. To investigate this we systematically analyzed TCGA tumors across 31 cancer types. (2/8)
100
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 09/07/2025
Our new preprint is out! We revisit the associations between p53 status and cancer aneuploidy using TCGA data. Here’s a breakdown of our findings. Important work spearheaded by the talented PhD candidate Joana Marques. Check it out here: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1... (1/8)🧵
biorxiv.org
Cancer type-specific association of p53 deficiency with aneuploidy and chromosome losses
Aneuploidy and mutations in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene are among the most frequent genetic alterations in cancer, and p53 inactivation is considered an important contributor to the emergence of cancer aneuploidy. It is unclear, however, if p53 protects against particular forms of copy number alterations and whether it does so universally across cancer types. By analyzing p53 status and various aneuploidy features in 31 cancer types in the TCGA database, we verify that on a pan-cancer level p53-deficient cancers tend to have a higher degree of aneuploidy. However, for many cancer types, the average degree of aneuploidy is similar in p53-proficient and -deficient samples, and a substantial degree of aneuploidy can accumulate with intact p53 in almost all cancer types. Neither arm-level nor whole chromosome aneuploidy but rather chromosome loss events distinguish p53-deficient from proficient cancers. p53 inactivation is therefore neither sufficient nor necessary for the emergence of cancer aneuploidy, but is associated with the degree of aneuploidy in a subset of cancer types and more universally with chromosome losses. Our findings underscore the poorly understood nature of aneuploidy emergence in cancer and shed new light on the role of p53 therein. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Dutch Cancer Society (KWF Kankerbestrijding) European Research Council, ERC-SyG 855158
1111
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 08/07/2025
A few weeks ago, we said goodbye to long-term Kops lab member Emine Ali, our resident protistologist. We wish Emine all the best in her future career.
040
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
Spending a few days in beautiful Heidelberg for the 5th EMBL partnership conference. Our Hubrecht institute is EMBL partner and it has been wonderful to see the exciting science of the other partner institutes! @embl.org @hubrechtinstitute.bsky.social
091
Kops Lab @kopslab.bsky.social · 25/03/2025
An amazing inaugural Hubrecht Symposium on Developmental Biology, bringing the Dutch community together and getting inspired by amazing science! A big thank you to the speakers, the organizing committee and the many dedicated Hubrechters who made it happen.
020
Reposted by Kops Lab
Iva Tolić @ivatolic.bsky.social · 10/03/2025
🚀Ever wondered if there's a universal rule of spindle scaling across eukaryotes? Turns out, there is! Our study reveals an evolutionarily conserved principle driven by a surprising factor: chromosome crowding. 🧵👇 shorturl.at/MmPNr
1185
Reposted by Kops Lab
Hubrecht Institute @hubrechtinstitute.bsky.social · 14/02/2025
How do cells measure time? Despite its fundamental role in development, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. An NWO ENW-XL grant allows a research consortium from the Hubrecht Institute, AMOLF, TU Delft, and ENS Paris to study timing regulation in C. elegans. www.hubrecht.eu/how-do-cells...
Expression of the timing protein LIN-39 (green) in C. elegans
071
Reposted by Kops Lab
Journal of Cell Science @jcellsci.bsky.social · 09/01/2025
Ana Almeida, Helder Rocha, Maximilian Raas, Geert Kops, Reto Gassmann, Helder Maiato @i3suporto.bsky.social, et al. dissect the relationship between kinetochore size & CENP-E dependence for chromosome alignment. journals.biologists.com/jcs/article/... journals.biologists.com/jcs/article/...

Phylogenetic profile of CENP-E across holocentric and monocentric taxa. (A–D) CENP-E conservation in (A) the phylum Nematoda, (B) the phylum Vertebrata, (C) the insect order Hemiptera and (D) the insect order Diptera. Lineages with an inferred CENP-E loss are highlighted with a coloured box. Holocentric lineages are indicated with ‘H’ and monocentric lineages with ‘M’, as well as with a graphic depiction of holocentric and monocentric chromosomes.
164