Sign in

Kiri Kuroda

@kirikuroda.bsky.social
79 followers 109 following 8 posts

Postdoc @arc-mpib.bsky.social, @mpib-berlin.bsky.social Interested in human social/group decision-making. Also working as a social media team at ARC. kirikuroda.com/en

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Julian Berger @officialberger.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
New paper out in @pnas.org 🚨 Human learning is an understudied but promising lever for boosting human–AI synergy @jasonburton.bsky.social @ralfkurvers.bsky.social @stefanherzog.bsky.social @dirkwulff.bsky.social
12113
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Ralf Kurvers @ralfkurvers.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
Very proud of @kirikuroda.bsky.social for preprinting this study on social influence and information cascades in experienced based decision making. osf.io/preprints/ps... @arc-mpib.bsky.social. Great collab with @simyciri.bsky.social @dirkwulff.bsky.social
osf.io
OSF
1179
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Ralf Kurvers @ralfkurvers.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
Proud of the whole team, esp of @alexschakowski.bsky.social for putting together this review: Toward a psychology of real-life decision-making. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... @mpib-berlin.bsky.social @scioi.bsky.social @arc-mpib.bsky.social
sciencedirect.com
13019
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Julian Berger @officialberger.bsky.social · 29/06/2026
Sharing our latest endeavour here. How reproducible is your paper? @philipjakobbln.bsky.social and I built rigor.me to ease the burden of computational reproducibility. If you provide a paper, data and code, we execute it and tell you what works (and what fails). Beta is available now: rigor.me
rigor.me
Rigor
44315
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Ralf Kurvers @ralfkurvers.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
New preprint led by @lucasmolleman.bsky.social investigates social information use across the human lifespan. Testing >40,000 participants aged 6-80 in museums in Berlin and Japan. psyarxiv.com/hec96
13921
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Center for Adaptive Rationality (MPIB, Berlin) @arc-mpib.bsky.social · 02/06/2026
🌞 The Summer Institute on Bounded Rationality @mpib-berlin.bsky.social returns next week. At its core, we ask: how do minds make good decisions under genuine uncertainty by drawing on an adaptive toolbox of simple heuristics tuned to their environment? www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/res...
1119
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Wataru Toyokawa @watarutoyokawa.bsky.social · 18/04/2026
In which I’m a bit contributing in this paper led by Mehdi Moussaid @fouloscopie.bsky.social and Ralf Kurvers @ralfkurvers.bsky.social royalsocietypublishing.org/rstb/article...
royalsocietypublishing.org
Asymmetrical social copying drives behavioural cascades following a shock event
Abstract. When facing disruptive events, such as epidemics, terrorist attacks or financial crises, individuals often exhibit protective behaviours, includi
023
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Wataru Toyokawa @watarutoyokawa.bsky.social · 18/04/2026
Phil Trans Roy Soc B theme issue ‘The evolution of collective intelligence’ is out! royalsocietypublishing.org/rstb/issue/3...
royalsocietypublishing.org
Volume 381 Issue 1948 | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B | The Royal Society
Influential themed journal issues across the life sciences.
13119
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Center for Adaptive Rationality (MPIB, Berlin) @arc-mpib.bsky.social · 23/02/2026
📢 Reminder: Applications are still open for Summer Institute 2026 @mpib-berlin.bsky.social (June 8–16)! This year's theme focuses on AI and decision-making — a great opportunity for early-career researchers in this space. ⏰ Application deadline: March 16 🔗 www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/res...
175
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Center for Adaptive Rationality (MPIB, Berlin) @arc-mpib.bsky.social · 10/02/2026
📣 Applications for the 23rd Summer Institute on Bounded Rationality are now open! ✨Join us in Berlin @arc-mpib.bsky.social June 08–16, 2026, to explore the topic of “Decision Making in the Age of AI”. ✏️ More details + application form (deadline: March 16): www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/res...
02724
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Alexander Schakowski @alexschakowski.bsky.social · 30/01/2026
Very happy to see our ice-fishing paper on the cover of @science.org this week! 🎣🎉 We tracked large groups of Finnish competitive ice-fishers to study how social foragers use social information when searching for resources. 🐟 Link: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... (contact me for open access)
science.org
59643
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Max Planck Institute for Human Development @mpib-berlin.bsky.social · 29/01/2026
❄️🎣 What ice-fishing competitions reveal about human decision-making. New paper in @science.org by researchers from @mpib-berlin.bsky.social, @scioi.bsky.social, and the University of Eastern Finland. 👉 Read more: www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/newsroom/new... 📄 Paper: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
03310
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Dirk Wulff @dirkwulff.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
🚨 New preprint 🚨 Excited to share new work led by @tikhomirova.bsky.social, presenting a large-scale evaluation of the accessibility of psycholinguistic information in transformer language models. Preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2601.03798
175
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Simon Ciranka @simyciri.bsky.social · 23/12/2025
NEW: We show and replicate socioeconomic gradients in heuristics for decision-making under uncertainty, possibly reflecting adaptations varying levels of scarcity and competition for resources 🫰 Shoutout and thanks to @danielnettle.bsky.social & @coraliechevallier.bsky.social ❤️‍🔥 tinyurl.com/mu7rzz6k
sciencedirect.com
Low socioeconomic status amplifies the perceived rarity of large rewards
Decision-making relies on heuristics derived from past experiences that likely vary with socioeconomic status. We investigate socioeconomic difference…
02412
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Lisa Oswald @lfoswaldo.bsky.social · 11/12/2025
It's out!! www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... Big thank you to my coauthors @small-schulz.bsky.social and @lorenzspreen.bsky.social, and to all participants who discussed 20 political issues over 4 weeks in 6 subreddit, 3 experimental conditions and let us observe.
57733
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Simon Ciranka @simyciri.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
🥳!!NEW PREPRINT!!🥳 We show that the tendency to compress complex social information into priors about social structures becomes more pronounced during adolescence. osf.io/preprints/ps... I am soooooo excited to share this work, together with @mkwittmann.bsky.social and @yongling.bsky.social.
1217
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Anna Thoma @annaithoma.bsky.social · 17/10/2025
🚨 New preprint: What does the research landscape of behavioral reinforcement learning look like 🌍? We developed an LLM-powered bibliometric analysis to characterize article clusters, investigate their connections, and examine the distribution of topics across the landscape. osf.io/6c2va_v1
osf.io
OSF
22912
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Dominik Deffner @dominikdeffner.bsky.social · 15/10/2025
Which processes underlie collective intelligence in naturalistic human groups? In new work led by Valerii Chirkov, we show that payoff selectivity is key in transforming a group of individuals into an intelligent collective 🤝🧠 www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY7n... Preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps...
youtube.com
First-Person Perspective of the Voluntary Payoff-Sharing (VP) Condition
YouTube video by Valerii Chirkov
23118
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Simon Ciranka @simyciri.bsky.social · 29/09/2025
😍 Our latest is out now in @commspsychol.nature.com. 🤩 We show with Bayesian modelling and experimental manipulation of uncertainty that developmental differences in social influence depend on differences in the internal uncertainty people have about their choice doi.org/10.1038/s442...
doi.org
Internal uncertainty impacts social information use in risky choice across adolescence - Communications Psychology
Adolescents’ choices are influenced by others. A social risky choice experiment and Bayesian modelling reveal that age differences in internal uncertainty, being unsure how to choose, relate to differences in susceptibility to social influence.
25021
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
IMPRS on Learning, Institutions, and Future Evolution (LIFE) @imprs-life.bsky.social · 14/10/2025
Important new work by LIFE fellow @lkerbl.bsky.social, Zoe Rahwan, Ralph Hertwig, & @simyciri.bsky.social of @arc-mpib.bsky.social out now! www.cell.com/trends/cogni...
cell.com
More than incurious: the development of deliberate ignorance
In an information-rich world the ability to choose not to know is an important cognitive tool. But what are the developmental origins of deliberate ignorance? We identify a selection of cognitive capa...
063
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Dirk Wulff @dirkwulff.bsky.social · 09/10/2025
🚨 New article 🚨 Excited to share this article, presenting a full tutorial on mouse tracking and other movement tracking techniques in psychological research, with examples from our R package mousetrap. Paper: link.springer.com/article/10.3... R package: pascalkieslich.github.io/mousetrap/in...
075
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Center for Adaptive Rationality (MPIB, Berlin) @arc-mpib.bsky.social · 05/09/2025
🍎 Do we really make 200 food decisions a day? In our latest podcast, Almudena Claassen @mpib-berlin.bsky.social reveals why that catchy number is flawed—and what really matters when studying eating habits. It's not about "magic numbers", but about context. www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuDO...
youtube.com
Almudena Claassen: Beyond the 200 Food Decisions Myth—Observing Behavior to Improve How We Eat
YouTube video by Unraveling Behavior
063
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Samuel Aeschbach @aeschbach.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
New semantic network paper in @plosone.org with @ruimata.bsky.social at @unibas.ch and @dirkwulff.bsky.social at @arc-mpib.bsky.social! We ran large-scale simulations to test how well common behavioral tasks measure a person's semantic network. doi.org/10.1371/jour...
doi.org
Measuring individual semantic networks: A simulation study
Accurately capturing individual differences in semantic networks is fundamental to advancing our mechanistic understanding of semantic memory. Past empirical attempts to construct individual-level sem...
1104
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Ezequiel Lopez-Lopez @eloplop.bsky.social · 28/07/2025
New research out!🚨 In our new paper, we discuss how generative AI (GenAI) tools like ChatGPT can mediate confirmation bias in health information seeking. As people turn to these tools for health-related queries, new risks emerge. 🧵👇 nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
NYAS Publications
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) applications, such as ChatGPT, are transforming how individuals access health information, offering conversational and highly personalized interactions. Whi...
1159
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Center for Adaptive Rationality (MPIB, Berlin) @arc-mpib.bsky.social · 22/07/2025
🚨We are seeking a student assistant to support web programming @mpib-berlin.bsky.social (Deadline: August 15) There are also opportunities to work with eye tracking, EEG, VR, 3D printing, and scientific computing. See the link for more details!👇 www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/2110361/2025...
mpib-berlin.mpg.de
Studentische Hilfskraft im Bereich Web-Programmierung | Forschungsbereich Adaptive Rationalität
154
Kiri Kuroda @kirikuroda.bsky.social · 16/07/2025
"Individual differences in speed–accuracy trade-off influence social decision-making in dyads" 🚨Our paper has been published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B doi.org/10.1098/rspb... w/ Alan Tump @alantump.bsky.social, Ralf Kurvers @ralfkurvers.bsky.social @royalsocietypublishing.org 1/ 🧵👇
Abstract: Speed–accuracy trade-offs are a fundamental aspect of decision-making, requiring individuals to balance collecting more information against making faster decisions. Although speed–accuracy trade-offs have been studied at the individual level, their role in human decision-making in social settings remains poorly understood—even though faster, and possibly more error-prone, decisions often have more social influence than slower decisions. We examined how individual differences in speed–accuracy trade-off preferences shape decision-making in pairs, using an interactive online experiment and drift–diffusion modelling. Participants first performed a perceptual task alone, allowing us to estimate their individual drift rates and decision thresholds, the key cognitive determinants of speed–accuracy trade-off preferences. They then performed the task in pairs, sharing decisions in real-time. Pair accuracy depended on the faster (and thus more error-prone) member, and not on the slower (but more accurate) member. Social decisions were not worse than individual ones because faster members increased their thresholds in the social condition and became more accurate, while slower members incorporated less social information. These findings show that individuals adjusted their social information use to the speed–accuracy trade-off preferences of their partners, highlighting the importance of such individual differences for understanding social behaviour.
33712
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Simon Ciranka @simyciri.bsky.social · 25/06/2025
🤩IT'S A PREPRINT 😍 Adolescents' social sensitivity isn't a bad thing—it's adaptive! In our new study, led by amazing Andrea Gradassi @connectedmindslab.bsky.social, we show that teens learned to copy successful peers faster than adults in a new multiplayer exploration task. osf.io/preprints/os...
32711
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Ana Sofia Morais @anasofiamorais.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
Nudging has shaped behavioral policy for years—but what are its downsides? In our latest episode, 𝐑𝐚𝐥𝐩𝐡 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐰𝐢𝐠 makes the case for shifting from nudging to 𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠—an alternative behavioral science approach that fosters people’s agency, self-control, and decision-making skills. tinyurl.com/3yvfwxc8
0107
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Anna Thoma @annaithoma.bsky.social · 10/04/2025
1/n 🆕📄: How do children learn to adapt to different environments when making repeated choices? And what do cognitive immaturity and probability matching have to do with it? Our new article explores how kids & adults differ in probability learning across statistical task structures: mpib.berlin/R3RFy
psycnet.apa.org
APA PsycNet
11911
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Philipp Lorenz-Spreen @lorenzspreen.eurosky.social · 13/03/2025
Very happy supervisor with the publication of Pietro Nickl's article on global trends in online headlines: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
The evolution of online news headlines - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications - The evolution of online news headlines
03215
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Center for Adaptive Rationality (MPIB, Berlin) @arc-mpib.bsky.social · 06/03/2025
🚨New paper: Chimpanzees explore just like us! 🐵🔍 Lou Haux @mpib-berlin.bsky.social shows that chimpanzees adapt their exploration strategies to changes in the environment—exploring more in unstable conditions. Now out in Nature Communications @naturecomms.bsky.social www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Chimpanzees adapt their exploration to key properties of the environment - Nature Communications
Exploration helps reduce uncertainty in daily life, but the evolutionary roots of adaptive exploration are unclear. Here, the authors show that chimpanzees, like humans, tailor their exploration depen...
12812
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Ana Sofia Morais @anasofiamorais.bsky.social · 04/03/2025
New episode of 𝐔𝐧𝐫𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐁𝐞𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐫 is live!🎙️ In this episode, I'm joined by @simyciri.bsky.social as we dive into why teens engage in risky behaviors—not out of recklessness, but due to a complex mix of developmental, social, and environmental factors. tinyurl.com/bdcn2b4r
tinyurl.com
How Brains, Peers, and Environments Fuel Risky Behaviors in Teens
01611
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Center for Adaptive Rationality (MPIB, Berlin) @arc-mpib.bsky.social · 28/02/2025
Just over one week left to apply for this year's Summer Institute on Bounded Rationality! Applications close midnight (Berlin time) next Sunday, March 9, 2025, so don't delay if you want to take part in an unforgettable experience this summer in Berlin! www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/res...
mpib-berlin.mpg.de
Summer Institute
11410
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Center for Adaptive Rationality (MPIB, Berlin) @arc-mpib.bsky.social · 19/02/2025
In case you missed our previous post: We're back!! 🥳 Applications for the 22nd Summer Institute on Bounded Rationality are now open! Join us in Berlin from June 17–25, 2025 to explore "Decision Making in a Digital World". Details in the link below👇 www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/res...
mpib-berlin.mpg.de
Summer Institute
063
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Center for Adaptive Rationality (MPIB, Berlin) @arc-mpib.bsky.social · 04/02/2025
🚨 Applications for the 22nd Summer Institute on Bounded Rationality are now open! 🌐 Join us in Berlin @mpib-berlin.bsky.social from June 17–25, 2025 to explore "Decision Making in a Digital World". ✏️ Application deadline is March 9 - more info at 👇!! www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/res...
mpib-berlin.mpg.de
Summer Institute
02826
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Max Planck Institute for Human Development @mpib-berlin.bsky.social · 31/01/2025
🔍 Big decisions, uncertain futures—how do we choose? Our latest podcast episode dives into transformative life decisions with Shahar Hechtlinger and @anasofiamorais.bsky.social — both from @arc-mpib.bsky.social. Listen now! 🎧 #DecisionMaking www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/1956201/unra...
mpib-berlin.mpg.de
The Psychology of Life's Most Important Decisions
074
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Stefan Herzog @stefanherzog.bsky.social · 23/01/2025
🌟🧠💪📝 #BOOSTING: Empowering citizens with behavioral science New, freely available paper in Annual Review of Psychology. PDF: tinyurl.com/boosting2025 For more: scienceofboosting.org @arc-mpib.bsky.social @mpib-berlin.bsky.social @annualreviews.bsky.social #policy #behavioralscience 1/ 🧵👇
The image is the cover page of an article from the "Annual Review of Psychology" titled "Boosting: Empowering Citizens with Behavioral Science" by Stefan M. Herzog and Ralph Hertwig. It features a brief abstract, keywords, and publication details. The abstract outlines the concept of "boosting" as a behavioral public policy that emphasizes empowering individuals to make informed decisions, in contrast to "nudging," which subtly steers behavior. The abstract reads:

Behavioral public policy came to the fore with the introduction of nudging, which aims to steer behavior while maintaining freedom of choice. Responding to critiques of nudging (e.g., that it does not promote agency and relies on benevolent choice architects), other behavioral policy approaches focus on empowering citizens. Here we review boosting, a behavioral policy approach that aims to foster people's agency, self-control, and ability to make informed decisions. It is grounded in evidence from behavioral science showing that human decision making is not as notoriously flawed as the nudging approach assumes. We argue that addressing the challenges of our time—such as climate change, pandemics, and the threats to liberal democracies and human autonomy posed by digital technologies and choice architectures—calls for fostering capable and engaged citizens as a first line of response to complement slower, systemic approaches.List with summary points:

1. Behavioral public policy garnered widespread attention with the introduction of nudging, which aims to steer behavior while maintaining freedom of choice.
2. Criticisms of nudging include that it does not promote agency and competences and that it relies—overly optimistically—on the presence of benevolent choice architects.
3. The proliferation of environments threatening people's autonomy, the slow pace of systemic approaches to tackling societal issues, and the intrinsic benefits of empowerment make empowering citizens an indispensable objective of behavioral public policy.
4. Boosting is a behavioral public policy approach to empowerment grounded in evidence from behavioral science that shows that humans’ boundedly rational decision making is not as flawed as the nudging approach assumes.
5. Boosts are interventions that improve people's competencies to make informed choices that conform to their goals, preferences, and desires.
6. In self-nudging boosts, people learn to use architectural changes in their proximate choice environment to regulate their own behavior—that is, they are empowered to adapt their own choice environments.
7. There are boosts to foster core competences in many domains, including finance, online environments, and health, as well as broader, overarching areas, such as motivation, risk, and judgment and decision making. Boosts should be part of a policy mix that also includes system-level approaches.
8. When implementing boosts, policy makers need to avoid the trap of individualizing responsibility and to be mindful that, due to differences in cognition and motivation, inequalities in the desirable effects across boosted individuals may emerge.
29341
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Center for Adaptive Rationality (MPIB, Berlin) @arc-mpib.bsky.social · 06/01/2025
🎙️ New Episode! ARC's Shahar Hechtlinger talks about transformative life decisions—becoming a parent, changing careers, or moving abroad. This episode gives you simple strategies and real-life examples to navigate the decisions. #Podcast #UnravBehavior www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKEK...
youtube.com
Shahar Hechtlinger: The Psychology of Life's Most Important Decisions
YouTube video by Unraveling Behavior
084
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Friederike Stock @fstock.bsky.social · 17/12/2024
People in 26 countries prefer more control over their online environment

 In a conjoint study (N = 11,868), we explored preferences for regulating online environments by examining binary choices between different regulation scenarios. Preprint:https://osf.io/preprints/osf/haqu9
44823
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Anna Thoma @annaithoma.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
🥁 Exciting news: Our new article on repeated risky choices is out now! How do children and adults make repeated choices when they learn about probabilities from description (i.e., graphical representation)? Not as expected! 👀 Full text: mpib.berlin/PUMtN 1/n
mpib.berlin
Do children match described probabilities? The sampling hypothesis applied to repeated risky choice
One way in which children can learn about probabilities of different outcomes before making a decision is from description, for instance, by observing…
1279
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Center for Adaptive Rationality (MPIB, Berlin) @arc-mpib.bsky.social · 13/12/2024
🚨Next week's talk at ARC We cordially invite you to join the talk titled "Social foraging across species" by ARC's Ralf Kurvers (@ralfkurvers.bsky.social) 📅 19 Dec 11:00 (Local Time Germany) @arc-mpib.bsky.social or online See the link for details👇 www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/events/40244...
mpib-berlin.mpg.de
Social foraging across species
0114
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Dirk Wulff @dirkwulff.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
🚨 New article 🚨 Can experienced-based simulations help communicate financial risks? Replicating and extending past work, this article with Tomás Lejarraga and Kavitha Ranganathan concludes that the benefits of experienced-based simulations are limited. Article: doi.org/10.1017/jdm....
083
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Mubashir Sultan @msultan.bsky.social · 15/11/2024
Very happy to share that our work is now published in PNAS! 🎉 It's a systematic look into how demographic and psychological factors are associated with misinformation susceptibility. @arc-mpib.bsky.social Thread below and can be read in full here: www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Screenshot of the study page on the PNAS website.
02412
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Stefan Herzog @stefanherzog.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
🌟🤖📝 **Boosting human competences with interpretable and explainable artificial intelligence** How can AI *boost* human decision-making instead of replacing it? We talk about this in our new paper. doi.org/10.1037/dec0... #AI #XAI #InterpretableAI #IAI #boosting #competences 🧵👇
Article information

Title: Boosting human competences with interpretable and explainable artificial intelligence.

Full citation: Herzog, S. M., & Franklin, M. (2024). Boosting human competences with interpretable and explainable artificial intelligence. Decision, 11(4), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000250

Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming integral to many areas of life, yet many—if not most—AI systems are opaque black boxes. This lack of transparency is a major source of concern, especially in high-stakes settings (e.g., medicine or criminal justice). The field of explainable AI (XAI) addresses this issue by explaining the decisions of opaque AI systems. However, such post hoc explanations are troubling because they cannot be faithful to what the original model computes—otherwise, there would be no need to use that black box model. A promising alternative is simple, inherently interpretable models (e.g., simple decision trees), which can match the performance of opaque AI systems. Because interpretable models represent—by design—faithful explanations of themselves, they empower informed decisions about whether to trust them. We connect research on XAI and inherently interpretable AI with that on behavioral science and boosts for competences. This perspective suggests that both interpretable AI and XAI could boost people’s competences to critically evaluate AI systems and their ability to make accurate judgments (e.g., medical diagnoses) in the absence of any AI support. Furthermore, we propose how to empirically assess whether and how AI support fosters such competences. Our theoretical analysis suggests that interpretable AI models are particularly promising and—because of XAI’s drawbacks—preferable. Finally, we argue that explaining large language models (LLMs) faces similar challenges as XAI for supervised machine learning and that the gist of our conjectures also holds for LLMs.
47323
Reposted by Kiri Kuroda
Dominik Deffner @dominikdeffner.bsky.social · 19/11/2024
How to link theory and data in cultural evolution (and beyond)? We propose a computational workflow that starts from generative models of empirical phenomena and logically connects statistical estimates to both theory and real-world explanatory goals. Out now in PNAS: www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
pnas.org
Bridging theory and data: A computational workflow for cultural evolution | PNAS
Cultural evolution applies evolutionary concepts and tools to explain the change of culture over time. Despite advances in both theoretical and emp...
14823
Kiri Kuroda @kirikuroda.bsky.social · 11/10/2024
How does speed–accuracy trade-off shape pair decisions? Using cognitive models, we show that group accuracy depends on the faster (and more error-prone) members, but that members use social information adaptively. Preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps... w/ Alan Tump, Ralf Kurvers @arc-mpib.bsky.social
032