Sign in

Jon Ribbens

@jribbens.unequivocal.eu
73 followers 131 following 437 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Jon Ribbens @jribbens.unequivocal.eu · 27/08/2026
We have come to a fork in the road.
A road, with a fork in it (cutlery).
000
Reposted by Jon Ribbens
Sian Berry MP @sianberry.bsky.social · 04/06/2026
I have written to the Prime Minister and Bridget Phillipson, calling for the cruel and confusing EHRC Code of Practice to be rejected. Legislative action must be taken to create an equalities framework that protects trans people’s safety, dignity and humanity.
Image is a letter. It reads: Dear Keir and Bridget,
Reject the EHRC’s Code of Practice
I am writing as Interim Women and Equalities lead of the Parliamentary Green Party to raise
serious concerns over proposed guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission,
which is not fit for purpose and will harm trans people living in the UK.
The Code of Practice for services, public functions, and associations is the culmination of
years of well-funded campaigns to drive a minority group out of British public life. It sets out
a system of segregation where trans people are excluded from services and spaces that reflect
their gender, and in some cases also excluded from services and spaces that reflect their sex
assigned at birth. Where unisex facilities exist, trans people will be forced into them. Where
they do not exist, trans people will be left with nowhere to go.
Your own Equalities Impact Assessment1 on the code admits there will be a significant
impact on those with the protected characteristic of gender reassignment - from forcing trans
people to out themselves by using disabled toilets to putting trans women at greater risk of
sexual violence by making them use men’s services.
The Code of Practice is both cruel and confusing. Inconsistencies between the Code of
Practice and its Equalities Impact Assessment, the Gender Recognition Act and the European
Convention on Human Rights will leave organisations and service providers at risk of
litigation from all sides. Frontline staff in spaces like cafes, gyms, and offices will be forced
to police gender, whilst the costs of creating self-contained gender neutral facilities are
estimated by your advisors as reaching £600m, which the government is providing no
funding to cover.2 I am pleased to see associations, like the Women’s Institute and
Girlguiding, given a potential route to serving trans and cisgender women, but this does not
counteract the pain caused by the majority of the guidance.

Letter continued: By enacting this guidance, trans people will simply be scapegoated. Research by Translucent
found there was just one complaint to English Unitary Authorities in 2025 concerning trans
women’s use of single-sex spaces, such as toilets and changing rooms.3 By refusing to act,
your government is once again playing politics with trans people’s lives, rather than tackling
real problems, like the soaring cost of living, rising inequality and the ongoing climate
crisis.

Trans people of all ages and backgrounds exist in communities across the country - and
always have. They have every right to thrive just as their cisgender friends, family members,
and colleagues do. When Labour brought in the Gender Recognition Act in 2004 it promised
trans people they could live their lives with peace, privacy, and dignity. Now you are
breaking that promise.
I believe there is a real risk of trans people being essentially segregated from public spaces. I
urge you to withdraw the code and take legislative action to create an equalities framework
that protects trans people’s safety, dignity and humanity.
50817237
Reposted by Jon Ribbens
Jess O'Thomson @jessothomson.co.uk · 06/05/2026
Do this today. Even if your MP is awful. Don't let them claim that they only had emails from constituents opposing trans rights. It really does only take seconds to fill out.
716892
Reposted by Jon Ribbens
Anon Opin @anonopin.bsky.social · 04/02/2026
Life got too complicated. I shouldn't have to watch Martin Lewis every day in order to afford to heat my home, pay my taxes, and not starve in my retirement.
717616
Jon Ribbens @jribbens.unequivocal.eu · 27/11/2025
🤔 If, as reported, it was found by URL-guessing, did all the journalists who accessed the OBR budget report knowing it wasn't supposed to be published yet commit crimes under the Computer Misuse Act? (c.f. Dan Cuthbert who was convicted for doing the same thing in 2005.) @davidallengreen.bsky.social
010
Reposted by Jon Ribbens
Leighton Pritchard @widdowquinn.bsky.social · 31/10/2025
The Python Software Foundation rejected a $1.5 million U.S. government grant because it required them to renounce all diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. www.theregister.com/2025/10/27/p...
theregister.com
351701412
Jon Ribbens @jribbens.unequivocal.eu · 19/09/2025
I see BlueSky is again suddenly obsessed with showing me pictures of fungus that I really, really don't want to see and that it knows I really, really don't want to see.
010
Jon Ribbens @jribbens.unequivocal.eu · 29/06/2025
Woke did this
A metal door handle with a pull grip, which is labelled “push”.
120
Reposted by Jon Ribbens
Ian Dunt @iandunt.bsky.social · 13/06/2025
Judgement Day for the EHRC: How the equality watchdog turned into a toxic culture war campaign group iandunt.substack.com/p/judgement-...
iandunt.substack.com
Judgement Day for the EHRC
How the equality watchdog turned into a culture war campaign group
63787329
Reposted by Jon Ribbens
The Hijabi Whovian @famengkarakhussain.bsky.social · 17/04/2025
But here this… cross #pting and #tribble together and it’s the perfick intergalactic pet, no? #doctorwho #thirteenthdoctor #startrek
011
Jon Ribbens @jribbens.unequivocal.eu · 25/12/2024
I wonder how many millions of people are going to fail to watch #DoctorWho today due to iPlayer hiding it at the back of the cupboard.
020