Sign in

Jessica Harriet

@jessicaharriet.bsky.social
1.9K followers 421 following 220 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Natacha @natacha.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
One of these organizations is on an @splcenter.org list of hate groups www.splcenter.org/resources/ex... At least one other is known to openly support conversion therapy - a form of torture, another is an group claiming to represent represent “LGB” people, nothing to do with trans healthcare…
33710
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
TACC @tacc.org.uk · 11/08/2025
Wes Streeting held a meeting with: • Genspect • Bayswater Support Group • CAN-SG • Integrated Psychology Clinic • LGB Alliance • Transgender Trend "To discuss gender policy issues"
Screenshot of a table row with the following information: "Wes Streeting", "31/07/2024", "• Genspect • Bayswater Support Group • CAN-SG • Integrated Psychology Clinic • LGB Alliance • Transgender Trend", "To discuss gender policy issues".
41746267
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
TACC @tacc.org.uk · 11/08/2025
From the SM Letter to the Minister of State for Science, Research and Innovation, which is publicly available. Calling for 'some bravery' from the Minister, like Falkner, Cass, and Streeting have shown.
Screenshot of text that reads, "In order to do this you will need to face up to the inadequacy of current practice, which is based on gender-identity ideology, and which is not in line with data-protection principles. This requires some bravery, as Baroness Kishwer Falkner, Baroness Hilary Cass and Secretary of State Wes Streeting MP will tell you."
3285
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
TACC @tacc.org.uk · 10/08/2025
Have you submitted an FOI regarding the EHRC? We would like to know. Please get in touch or send us a copy of the response at mpfoi@tacc.org.uk. ❤️
65720
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
DAVIEWoOOoO 👻 🎃🕸️ @daviemoo.bsky.social · 09/08/2025
How many more god damn times do we have to say “they hate us all” before people believe it.
0207
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Ashleeee 🌊🪭 @reactiveashley.cat · 08/08/2025
Please remember that every word spoken at the EHRC is subject to disclosure and may be examined by the courts. Moreover, I am not aware of any novel point of law emerging that would demolish my argument regarding the in personam nature of contraventions and exceptions under the Equality Act 2010.
110918
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
TACC @tacc.org.uk · 07/08/2025
Today, we’ve formally informed the EHRC that we no longer recognise it as a national human rights institution. This was not a decision taken lightly. But there can be no accountability without action. We urge other organisations to consider their stance and speak out.
416244
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Victoria McCloud 🏳️‍⚧️🌈‍♾️ @humanrightsvicky.bsky.social · 03/08/2025
Sometimes I post pieces which are recent and which others may not have seen. This is a reminder why groups like GLP, Trans Exile Network, TACC, TLC and so many lovely allies stand up to GCIM ideology and why the UK is literally red flagged for genocide right now. goodlawproject.org/parliament-s...
goodlawproject.org
Parliament surrenders to anti-trans activists on toilet policy
The UK parliament has thrown trans people under the bus on toilets, abandoning its own policy to placate activists who accosted a trans barrister on the parliamentary estate.
26619
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Rose Schmits @roseschmits.bsky.social · 03/08/2025
I wish on Wes Streeting that he gets to feel no safer than any trans woman in this country
442283
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Natacha @natacha.bsky.social · 02/08/2025
Before all the transphobes gets on their high horse about this, every Labour policy about trans people constitutes violence or proxy-violence against trans people’s bodies. And all Labour’s transphobic policies have been implemented completely undemocratically, without even any votes in parliament.
29627
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
TACC @tacc.org.uk · 02/08/2025
If your organisation no longer recognises the EHRC as a national human rights institution, we’ve prepared an email template you can adapt. It can be sent to public bodies like the WEC, the JCHR, and relevant ministers to raise formal concerns about the EHRC’s loss of independence and credibility.
docs.google.com
Subject: Urgent: Withdrawal of [Organisation type: i
Subject: Urgent: Withdrawal of [Organisation type: i.e. CSO, service-provider, etc] Recognition from the EHRC [Make your own amendments and additions to this email.] Dear [Minister name, or Public Bod...
214071
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
TACC @tacc.org.uk · 02/08/2025
If you’re an individual, you can write to your MP to express your concerns, and state that you no longer recognise the EHRC as a NHRI. We’ve prepared a letter you can personalise and send. It helps show this issue matters to constituents.
docs.google.com
Subject: I No Longer Recognise the EHRC as a National Human Rights Institution
Subject: I No Longer Recognise the EHRC as a National Human Rights Institution [Make your own amendments and additions to this email.] Dear [MP's Name], I am writing to express my deep concern regardi...
57733
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
DAVIEWoOOoO 👻 🎃🕸️ @daviemoo.bsky.social · 01/08/2025
Asking Corbyn and Sultana to reaffirm their commitment to protecting trans people is normal and if you whine about it youre asking people to support a party whose position is unclear, and that makes you look weird. I support what I know, not what I think, not what I imagine.
2436
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Equality Amplified @equalityamplified.org.uk · 01/08/2025
The EHRC’s appointment of Dr. Mary-Ann Stevenson, a figure with known anti-trans views, makes clear it no longer serves all people. Equality Amplified no longer recognises the EHRC as a human rights body. Read our full statement here: www.equalityamplified.org.uk/blog/stateme...
equalityamplified.org.uk
Statement from Equality Amplified on the Appointment of Dr. Mary-Ann Stevenson as Chair of the EHRC — Equality Amplified
Equality Amplified no longer recognises the EHRC as a legitimate human rights institution. The appointment of Dr. Mary-Ann Stevenson—who holds anti-trans views—signals a clear and dangerous shift towa...
1238111
Jessica Harriet @jessicaharriet.bsky.social · 31/07/2025
We must challenge the mechanisms of our oppression not fuel them. Providing any weight behind the EHRC strengthens the indefensible and irrefutable abuse of their accreditation, a status we need to dismantle. I sincerely hope other orgs take the same position as us at TACC.
37520
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
TACC @tacc.org.uk · 31/07/2025
@commonswec.parliament.uk and JHRC have been ignored to fuel the erasure of trans folk. This was no surprise from @bphillipsonmp.bsky.social who is the equality minister, who serves only a minority of transphobes, with total disregard for anyone else. www.gov.uk/government/n...
gov.uk
Government confirms Dr Mary-Ann Stephenson as the next EHRC chair
Minister for Women and Equalities Bridget Phillipson has confirmed that Dr Mary-Ann Stephenson will be appointed as the new Chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).
1111440
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
TACC @tacc.org.uk · 27/07/2025
With Labour having introduced a new section 28 just for trans kids, the wonderful @jessicaharriet.bsky.social has the lowdown. tacc.org.uk/2025/07/27/l...
tacc.org.uk
Labour’s Section 28 with a twist
The shameful era of Section 28 echoes in the trauma of those subjected to government-sanctioned homophobia, embedding silence and stigma that continues to harm LGBTQIA+ people today. Margaret Thatcher...
04819
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Faith Elisabeth Lilley @stormknight.bsky.social · 27/07/2025
Trans Kids Deserve Better are legends.
A coffin painted in the colours of the trans flag with the words, "RIP DIGNITY" on the lidA dozen young trans people staging a die-in outside the UK Supreme CourtTrans Kids Deserve Better carrying a coffin, painted in the colours of the trans flag, from the Department of Health to the Supreme Court.Trans Kids Deserve Better carrying a coffin, painted in the colours of the trans flag, from the Department of Health to the Supreme Court.
324465
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
TACC @tacc.org.uk · 20/07/2025
Bridget Phillipson’s choice to appoint Mary-Ann Stephenson as Chair risks cementing this abusive "course correction," despite warnings from two parliamentary committees. @jessicaharriet.bsky.social covers this in her amazing piece: tacc.org.uk/2025/07/20/p...
tacc.org.uk
Phillipson’s Choice – Trans Advocacy and Complaints Collective
26017
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Caroline Litman @alicemydaughter.bsky.social · 17/07/2025
BREAKING 🧨 I'm now in possession of evidence confirming a second trans youth suicide, where the patient's data was NOT sent to NHS England, for inclusion in Appleby's flawed DHSC report "Review of suicides and gender dysphoria at the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust: independent report"
gov.uk
Review of suicides and gender dysphoria at the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust: independent report
25937310
Jessica Harriet @jessicaharriet.bsky.social · 16/07/2025
"Schools should avoid language and activities which repeat or enforce gender stereotypes" But tell young people they are defined by birth written classification of biological requirements and should they deviate from this they'll be labeled second-class citizens.
46310
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
She Guevara @sheg7.bsky.social · 12/07/2025
Breaking: EHRC select committee have opposed the appointment of Mary-Ann Stephenson. Good outcome, potentially. They can still appoint her anyway... but if they persist in appointing her, it's just more evidence to justify the lemkin institutes warning that trans people are at risk in the UK
0487
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Emily Shepherd 💚 @emi.ly · 10/07/2025
The @libdems.org.uk have lost their damned minds. @cajardinemp.bsky.social sacked as Women & Equalities spokesperson for voting against a nasty Tory amendment to the Universal Credit & PIP Bill. Christine is one of the only LibDems taking the assault on transgender rights seriously.
3153
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
TACC @tacc.org.uk · 10/07/2025
🧵We sent an FOI to the EHRC about the “81% satisfaction rate” claim. We got a response back. Which revealed a letter to the Women and Equalities Committee. What we found goes far beyond a misleading “approval rating.” committees.parliament.uk/publications...
Screenshot of a letter titled "Your Freedom of Information Request" addressed to "Dear Trans Advocacy and Complaints Collective". The letter states, "Thank you for your request, detailed below, which we received on 11 June 2025." It includes the quote: "During a recent meeting between the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) and the Women and Equalities Committee, Baroness Kishwer Falkner referred multiple times to an "81% satisfaction rate" in relation to the EHRC's performance or public perception." The letter requests "The full source of the 81% satisfaction rate cited by Baroness Falkner, including: - The title and date of the survey, report, or research from which this figure is drawn. - The commissioning body, if applicable. - The sample size, methodology, and target population of the survey." Contact information is provided: "T: 0161 829 8100 E: foi@equalityhumanrights.com Arndale House, The Arndale Centre Manchester, M4 3AQ equalityhumanrights.com".Screenshot of a document regarding a Freedom of Information Act request. It lists three points asking for: "The specific question(s) asked that produced this figure," "Any documents, reports, internal communications, or datasets held by the EHRC that provide further detail, breakdowns, or analysis of this satisfaction figure (including demographic data or comparison with previous years, if available)," and "A direct link (if publicly available) or a copy of the original source document(s) or dataset(s)." The document states, "This request is being handled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000." The response indicates that the Equality and Human Rights Commission does not hold the requested information. It further clarifies that Baroness Falkner did not refer to an 81% "satisfaction rate" at a meeting, and the figures quoted refer to media sentiment analysis, with additional information available on the UK Parliament website here.
1223289
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
TACC @tacc.org.uk · 08/07/2025
One of our members has painstakingly broken the EHRC FOI PDF into individual email threads and letters to make it easier to analyse. We've made this available to the community, because transparency shouldn’t come with barriers, like unusual ordering of emails. drive.google.com/drive/folder...
drive.google.com
FOI Files - Google Drive
012448
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Katy Montgomerie 🦗 @katymontgomerie.com · 07/07/2025
Ok I am quoted in this article so take my general praise with a pinch of salt, BUT! I have specific praise for how they specifically point out that there isn't a binary definition of sex, that medical transition changes sex and that none of this bullshit helps any women at all! MORE OF THIS
9690145
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Rose Schmits @roseschmits.bsky.social · 07/07/2025
This is fucking horrible and very much conversation therapy
5678125
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
She Guevara @sheg7.bsky.social · 06/07/2025
These are the heinous terrorists the government is protecting you all from... The fact we aren't rioting is shameful, frankly. Y'all need to grow a set and fight for someone else before you find yourself alone fighting for your life.
2256
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Cal Horton (they/them) @fiercemum.bsky.social · 06/07/2025
There is NO way of doing a meaningful conversion therapy ban in the UK in 2025. Conversion practices are fundamental to the NHS under 18s healthcare service. Criminal ban on medication + Transition denied + Search for alternative cause + Mandatory identity investigation = conversive practice.
4637173
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Equality Amplified @equalityamplified.org.uk · 05/07/2025
Here is our draft letter to the Women and Equalities Committee regarding Rosie Duffield MP’s transphobic conduct. You can read it here: equalityamplifiedltd-my.sharepoint.com/:w:/g/person... You can add your name as a signatory here: forms.office.com/e/gwpJsm6ZMH.
forms.office.com
Microsoft Forms
31255127
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
QueerAF @wearequeeraf.com · 05/07/2025
A new investigation has revealed significant lobbying efforts by gender critical groups. 👇 www.wearequeeraf.com/freedom-of-inf…
wearequeeraf.com
Freedom of information request uncovers gender critical bias within EHRC
A new investigation has revealed significant lobbying efforts by gender critical groups.
25821
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
TACC @tacc.org.uk · 05/07/2025
A huge thank you to @wearequeeraf.com for covering our FOI investigation into the EHRC and its close ties with anti-trans hate groups. Thanks to QueerAF, more people now know the truth: the EHRC has been captured, and the public deserves accountability.
23310
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Sarah Viktoria 🇬🇧🏳️‍⚧️⚧️🦗 @sarahviktoria.bsky.social · 03/07/2025
#CroxallGate #BBC #Impartiality #DueImpartiality #CirclingTheDrain #bbcpm The BBC responded to CroxallGate. The BBC has no self respect at this stage.
BBC News, Martine Croxall's report about the UK heatwave, 21 June 2025
01 July 2025
Summary of complaint

We received complaints from people who were unhappy with Martine Croxall’s addition to the autocue saying “women” after “pregnant people”, as part of a BBC News report about staying safe during the heatwave.
Our response

During a sequence about heatwaves, Martine Croxall was reading a script that directly quoted a report from The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. As the language wasn’t clearly attributed, she used her editorial judgement to make a live adjustment.

We’re happy that this was duly accurate and impartial in line with the BBC’s Editorial guidelines.
2104
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Equality Amplified @equalityamplified.org.uk · 03/07/2025
🚨 We’ll be writing to the Women and Equalities Committee regarding Rosie Duffield MP’s conduct on July 1st, which we believe breaches multiple codes of conduct. She must be held accountable. A draft will be shared tomorrow evening and open for co-signatories for 24 hours. Keep an eye out 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈
214038
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Nate O @nateo.bsky.social · 03/07/2025
At this point I think I may be one of an incredibly small number of people to have read the second Sullivan report in detail. It is uniformly poor scholarship, containing flagrant fabrications and misrepresentations, calling into question Alice Sullivan's ability to conduct basic academic research
22604191
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Nate O @nateo.bsky.social · 02/07/2025
An investigative journalist could look into how the UK state produces legitimacy for its actions by either commissioning a report from a right-wing extremist to produce skewed results that justify its actions or accepts a white paper from a right-wing pressure group operating out of a single address
210513
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Nate O @nateo.bsky.social · 02/07/2025
Guardian’s ed editor, Richard Adams, follows house style and does not mention the report’s author, Alice Sullivan, is one of the loudest anti-trans campaigners at a UK university. Add this report to the pile of similar official reports, such as ‘Racist Finds UK Not Institutionally Racist’,
15875232
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Sarah Viktoria 🇬🇧🏳️‍⚧️⚧️🦗 @sarahviktoria.bsky.social · 02/07/2025
Since the EHRC clearly funnelled its own ideas of what the law should be into the Supreme Court ruling, then this plugs a single issue anti-minority lobby group into the legal system. Which raises the question of who is running Britain? #r4today
22511
Jessica Harriet @jessicaharriet.bsky.social · 02/07/2025
This is no longer a case of outside influence. SexMatters have been handed a partnership, redefining the EHRC's operational function and guiding their involvement in this orchestrated "course correction" of erasure. This is a monumental scandal. Excellent work by @tacc.org.uk
17732
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
TACC @tacc.org.uk · 01/07/2025
The EHRC is meant to protect everyone’s rights. But internal documents reveal a different story: repeated meetings with anti-trans lobbyists, legal bias, and secret coordination. We filed the FOI. Here’s what we found. tacc.org.uk/2025/07/01/f...
tacc.org.uk
FOI Exposes EHRC Bias: Private Meetings, Legal Echoes, and Policy Capture - Trans Advocacy and Complaints Collective
Let’s be honest. The Equality and Human Rights Commission is not acting like a neutral regulator. It is not standing above the fray.
32952479
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Rose Schmits @roseschmits.bsky.social · 01/07/2025
“Problems for women who wanted to not have to share society with trans women” Yeah prospective ehrc head believes its good that trans people can now be segregated
312923
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Helen 🏳️‍⚧️✊🏻💕 @mimmymum.bsky.social · 01/07/2025
⚠️ The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention publishes a statement calling the ongoing hostile actions by the U.K. Government and Media towards trans people “genocidal intent” (Excerpts in below thread) 👉🏻 www.lemkininstitute.com/_files/ugd/b... @bphillipsonmp.bsky.social @sarahowen.org.uk
Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention
Red Flag Alert on Anti-trans and intersex Rights in the UK
Released on 30th of June 2025
The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention and Human Security would like to bring attention to and condemn recent judicial and governmental developments in the United Kingdom, which attempt to harm transgender and intersex people in the UK by stripping them of privacy and segregating them as 'others.' The Lemkin Institute believes these moves are part of a broader process of erasure. It is not only government action but also the media narrative that has fuelled hostility to and debate about the humanity of trans and intersex people while ignoring their voices. We see evidence of genocidal intent and actions targeting these communities.
In April this year, the United Kingdom's Supreme Court (UKSC) delivered a judgment declaring that, for the purposes of the Equality Act (2010), "sex" refers to "biological sex," which it did not define clearly. The Equality Act (2010) provides protection against discrimination on a variety of grounds in public spaces. This ruling at the UK's highest court means that individuals are now protected from discrimination on the basis of their assigned at birth sex, regardless of how that corresponds to their gender identity, lived gender, or sex characteristics. The decision is the result of a court challenge brought by the gender critical group For Women Scotland, which is financially backed by author J.K. Rowling and characterises itself as "feminist."' The UKSC decision creates dual legal categories for people who have gender recognition certificates, making them one sex for the purpose of the Equality Act (2010) and another for all other legal purposes, stripping people with Gender Recognition Certificates (GRCs) of crucial protections and privacy.
Despite the UKSC's assurances in their reasoning that the decision in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers would not be disadvantageous to trans indiv…"important protections," the practical repercussions for trans and intersex individuals are clear and serious. Since the ruling, "birth sex," "biological sex," and "natal sex" have all been used interchangeably, ignoring the multiple relevant components of biological sex and the existence of intersex people. Analysts immediately warned that the decision could be used to render single sex spaces off limits for trans people, including hospital wards, sports, and domestic violence shelters. For a group especially vulnerable to domestic violence, exclusion from specialised shelters is nothing short of cruel and could, in some cases, prove a death sentence. Transgender and intersex people may find themselves excluded not only from spaces of their current sex but also from spaces for their sex assigned at birth. Trans men would find themselves excluded from both male spaces on the basis of their assigned sex at birth, and female spaces if they are deemed to look too much like men.
In the two months since the UKSC's decision, the situation has only worsened for the trans and intersex communities in the UK. For example the proposed NC21 amendment would have all public institutions record people by their sex assigned at birth and only include gender identity alongside this if they have a GRC, stripping transitioned people of privacy. Although this particular amendment was defeated, the Government has stated its desire to comply with the recommendations of the Sullivan review at a future date, which would require public institutions to collect someone's sex assigned at birth, leading to forced outing of transitioned people. This attempt to forcibly out transitioned people in public life is not limited to documentation. Head of the UK's Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) Baroness Falkner recently stated in the annual meeting with the Women and Equalities Committee that neither she nor the UKSC believe that transitioned people have a right to privacy around their gende…Again, intersex people are left ignored. For example, it is not clear how this guidance would apply to an intersex woman who was originally recorded as male at birth and had her birth certificate amended to female. When asked if intersex people had been considered in this guidance, Baroness Falkner responded that intersex people had not been considered as they are not included in the Equality Act (2010). Baroness Falkner is not alone in her lack of consideration for intersex people in the UK. The UK scored a 0.0 for intersex bodily integrity on the Rainbow Map. Notably, in the United Kingdom, genital mutilation of intersex babies is still legal. If one compares this lack of protection for intersex infants to the efforts against Female Genital Mutilation in the United Kingdom, the overt interphobia of the United Kingdom's Government and judiciary becomes clear.
Intersex surgeries are but one part of a documented public health crisis that strips bodily autonomy from people who fall outside of the sex and gender binary. The UK's Government commissioned "Cass Report" on gender-affirming care for transgender youth has not been peer reviewed and is, in fact, internationally criticised as methodologically flawed. Yet, it remains the basis upon which the government has now permanently banned puberty blockers for transgender youth despite evidence of the harm it is causing to transgender youth. Guardians who wish to provide gender-affirming care that has been found to have 'positive mental health and psychosocial functioning outcomes' are forced to take their children out of the country and are at risk of scrutiny by social care services and even legal action.
For adults too, gender affirming care in the United Kingdom is in crisis. Transgender adults face incredibly long wait times for such care, sometimes waiting years for an initial appointment.
Government calls from both the UK's previous Conservative and current Labour government have advocated for transgender people to…binaries second-class citizens, it will also lay the groundwork for increased genital mutilation of intersex infants and conversion therapy of transgender people.
This escalation of anti-trans actions has done nothing to appease For Women Scotland, who are contemplating additional legal action against the Scottish government to ensure further erasure of trans people from public life. One representative of the group underscored the need to place trans women in male prisons, ostensibly for the safety of women prisoners. This would subject trans prisoners to discrimination and violence. In the United States, where many trans women have already been moved to male prisons, they face solitary confinement for their 'safety' and often suffer sexual abuse at the hands of guards. Despite the efforts of gender-critical groups to manipulate facts, there is no evidence of any danger posed by trans women to the safety of cis women prisoners.
All of the actions described above fit neatly into the 9th Pattern of Genocide: "Denial and/or Prevention of Identity." As we have repeatedly stated over the years, genocide does not only manifest in the killing of an entire group. In the case of trans and intersex people, genocide is often perpetrated by making it impossible for individuals to exist as their true selves. The erasure of a group from public life is a step towards an attempt to erase that group's existence, which is the very definition of genocide. The UKSC's decision puts trans and intersex people at peril by forcing them to either out themselves or break the law, both of which run the risk of violent backlash. To explicitly confirm this, gratitude was extended in the UKSC ruling Ben Cooper KC, acting on behalf of Sex Matters. The latter is an explicitly anti-trans lobbying group that has since written to the NHS claiming that transitioning "becomes a major, permanent social problem for those (transgender) young people" - a claim that flies in the face of all serious research …
2294154
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
TACC @tacc.org.uk · 01/07/2025
The Lemkin Institute has condemned the UK gov and court actions targeting trans & intersex people as evidence of genocidal intent. Stripping privacy, banning care, and forcing people to out themselves, all part of an erasure campaign. This is a crisis. Read their full warning.
lemkininstitute.com
Red Flag Alert on Anti-trans and intersex Rights in the UK | Lemkin Institute
35929
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Gregk Foley @gregk.co.uk · 30/06/2025
Note the entire conversation around Bob Vylan concerns the individual who started the chant and the BBC's role in broadcasting it, rather than questions of how or why so many regular people in attendance enthusiastically chanted along, because those questions are a bit harder to answer succinctly.
916337
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
She Guevara @sheg7.bsky.social · 29/06/2025
08917
Reposted by Jessica Harriet
Sarah Murphy @13sarahmurphy.bsky.social · 29/06/2025
Nothing better sums up the threat to our democracy and country than this far right cosplaying champion of the working class lolling about in a Belgravia club and the Sunday Times giving him a megaphone to honk out his ruinous Trumpian populism to a public tired of govt failure (that he helped cause)
Photo of Farage grinning as he reclines on leather seats in a Belgravia club


Reform UK leader Nigel Farage in the bar of Boisdale of Belgravia, his unofficial office, last week
SUNDAY TIMES PHOTOGRAPHER RICHARD POHLE
Nigel Farage: If I can't give young men a voice, wait till what comes after me The Reform leader on his plan for taking power, starting by tearing down the parliamentary system
1851701556