Reposted by Jon Frandsen
As several analysts have pointed out, this exposes catastrophic flaws in the current administration’s personnel appointments and routine vetting processes.
Jon Frandsen
@jcfrandsen.bsky.social
534 followers 203 following 1.9K posts
Dismayed retired journalist/writer; dog walker; cat herder. Proud father, grandfather & partner. “Not long lines. Long tables!”—Chef and future Nobel Peace Prize winner Jose Andres.
![IV. Conclusion
As the United States prepares to celebrate its 250th anniversary, the Court notes
that the demarcation of the rights of noncitizens in this country has not always been clear.
Indeed, nearly fifty years ago the Supreme Court noted:
[D]ecisions of this Court with regard to the rights of [noncitizens] living in our
society have reflected fine, and often difficult, questions of values. As a
Nation, we exhibit extraordinary hospitality to those who come to our
country, which is not surprising for we have often been described as “a
nation of immigrants.”
Foley v. Connelie, 435 U.S. 291, 294 (1978). Fifty years later, it is difficult to reconcile the
rights acknowledged by Zadyvdas with certain statements from Knauff and
Thuraissigiam. This Court has done its best to do so. If the Court is wrong, let another
court declare that a noncitizen with no criminal history, no history of flight, and an
adjudicated right to asylum may be detained indefinitely without running afoul of the Due
Process Clause.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:63qzp63fz5q45anhnxhoxhl5/bafkreid5ilaq2mcxtqzck6da7fsnrl7yealin6k5dyamb5vbgho3hiovhi)
