Sign in

Dr. Jane C

@janecragun.bsky.social
503 followers 686 following 342 posts

progressive, struggling optimist, pragmatist, wife, lifetime educator, UT-Austin alum, PhD/tenure-track survivor. Posts my own.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Jane Rosenzweig @janerosenzweig.bsky.social · 09/10/2026
No, you deserve questions! Questions about your ideas, about other ideas you may not have considered, about where you want to go from there. You might not be getting them already, but if the answer is this, then there is no point in the whole enterprise.
Know you’ve aced it before you
hit submit
Upgrade to Grammarly Pro today, so you can turn in papers you’re proud of.

Your big, brave ideas deserve credit, not questions from professors. Submit work you can stand behind, knowing your writing is clear, original, and policy-safe.
514542
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Seth Kahn (he/him) @badpacifist.bsky.social · 2h
And along with all that, the poll question "Do you trust higher education?" erases all kinds of nuance that matters. I wonder, for example, how many people who say no are really saying they don't trust management to run the places well (go figure!), or they don't trust whether it's worth the cost.
3112
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Jeff Greene @jeffgreene.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
What happens when you ask 30 experts in the learning sciences about the effects of Generative AI on learning? You get this report, which has insights and recommendations based on expert thinking and experience, not hype. The full report is worth a read, but here are a few highlights:
cehd.umn.edu
Expert consensus report: Ways generative AI can support and threaten learning in K-20 U.S. education
This report documents the findings and methodology of the consensus research project on Generative AI's impact on learning in K-20 U.S. education.
22011
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Benjamin Riley @benjaminjriley.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
There are seven listed vulnerabilities of learning when using AI, only one enhancement, and two “nuanced” areas. You love to see it.
0177
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Anna O. Law @unlawfulentries.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
Was at a Faculty Council yesterday & it was like I took crazy pills. Lots of talk of the challenge of the demographic cliff but 0 discussion of the distinct environment since Covid began, GOP attacks on higher ed, move of public unis toward vocational training, AI threat to declining enrollment. 1/
414819
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Elizabeth (Bit) Meehan, PhD @elizabethbitmeehan.com · 06/10/2026
Dan has been *the* reporter for all things NSF, and especially for SBE. We are losing a generation of scholars and scholarship.
1169
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Heidi M. Levitt @heidilevitt.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
Should researchers reflect on their commitments, assumptions, and positionality and describe this in their research reports? Some say no. Our article provides a methodological justification for how reflexivity strengthens the methodological integrity of both qualitative and quantitative research.
1112
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
David M. Perry @lollardfish.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
It’ll become easier for students to fall through the cracks. Options for discovery in a vast curriculum will diminish. We will still be able to train people for the careers, jobs and vocations of yesterday, but not so much for tomorrow.
11028
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Jane Rosenzweig @janerosenzweig.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Good read by @leifw.bsky.social on the problems of anthropomorphizing AI and obscuring human agency: www.nytimes.com/2026/10/01/o...
The reason this matters is that such anthropomorphic terms give us no ability to predict how the models will behave. Saying that models are “cheating” when they provide answers in the “wrong” way implies they are operating — or can operate — beyond the limits of human control. This, in turn, allows everyone to write off the accountability that clearly lies with the humans in charge of the process. In other industries, we might say that the companies in question committed a crime. The unusual thing here is that the companies are drawing a lot of attention to this fact.
22012
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
David M. Perry @lollardfish.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
I understand and share the impulse to blame university administrators. I have written plenty about them. But right now I’d like us to turn the focus to Minnesota politicians and Minnesota voters and ask what functions of the university do you want to see cut? What don’t you care about Amy Klobuchar?
213948
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Christopher Webb @cwebbonline.com · 30/09/2026
This is priceless. Check out how local news is reporting on Sen Eric Schmidt’s clown-show grilling of Jack Smith. They found Jack Smith at the game… “Top corner, section 109, row 1. In fact, that seat doesn’t even exist in Atlanta.”
839197376221
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Kevin M. Kruse @kevinmkruse.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
When they get back in power, Democrats need to go all-in on higher education. We need a campaign of reinvestment in public universities across the country that makes the Morrill Land-Grant Act look like nothing by comparison *and* a GI Bill of Rights-style program of tuition grants.
20752441427
Dr. Jane C @janecragun.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
The trend towards “workforce development” is coming at the expense of an educated society.
000
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Senator Andy Kim @kim.senate.gov · 26/09/2026
Trump’s summit with Xi left too many questions unanswered. This is one of them.
18616234
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Jane Rosenzweig @janerosenzweig.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Students can tell when every standard isn't really a standard but a slippery thing that we redefine for convenience and if things don't matter to us, how can we expect them to matter to our students?
02811
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
"Please Don't Use AI for Reviews" -- by @ffassnacht.bsky.social (repost from LinkedIN)
This goes out to everyone but particularly also to early stage researchers: 

Please do not use AI if you get invited for review papers for a scientific journal. There are several critical problems related to this: 1. It is not allowed to upload unpublished work to LMMs (copyright problems) 2. Be aware - editors will in 98% of the cases know that you used AI and it leaves a very bad impression on you 3. Be aware that editors would be perfectly capable to ask a LLM themselves if they would be interested AI's opinion. 4. An AI-review will force the editor to invite another reviewer and delay the process heavily. 5. Trust in your own capabilities - conducting reviews is actually also a good way to learn. Even a statement like "I cannot follow your thoughts in this section" may be helpful advice to the authors to improve their work. AI will not give such advice and is typically also not great at spotting problems in the experimental set-up.

So please - if you do not have the time to really review a manuscript or you are not capable of reviewing the manuscript adequately, just decline the invitation. Thanks!

AI-free artwork created in MS paint.
15616
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Alex Hanna @alexhanna.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
“AI” IS impacting labor, but not in the ways you think. In some cases, people generating “workslop” are making their colleagues’ jobs more difficult. Snippet from my video Myths of AI and Productivity, in which we at dispel 5 common myths around AI and labor. www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BO0...
There are three stacked screenshots from a video of Alex, a brown trans woman, sitting on a pink chair and speaking into the camera while holding a small microphone. She has short black curly hair and is wearing a blue long-sleeved shirt and light tan pants. Behind her is a cat-shaped pillow with an image of a tuxedo cat on it, and behind her chair are rows of books on a light blue wall. Underneath are captions from the video that say: “But generative AI can also reduce wages in other ways, namely by punishing workers who use the tools and pass on ‘workslop’ to their colleagues.”, “...researchers report that receiving generative AI text or images from colleagues results in lower perceptions of the competence of their colleagues.” and “Getting slop from your colleague makes you think worse of them. And if those workers are women or older, or people of color, then it confirms their co-workers’ biases against them.”
713841
Dr. Jane C @janecragun.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
And how many U.S. adults have delayed retirement until medicare kicks in or chosen to stay in a demoralizing job so they could have health insurance? Feeling tethered to a job to maintain access to "affordable" health care actually benefits the employer more than the employee.
000
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Robert Reich @rbreich.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
A recent survey found that 92% of U.S. adults have delayed or avoided medical care due to high costs. Meanwhile, a new study from Yale estimates that Medicare for All would save over 114,000 lives and $1 trillion a year. If this country was truly “pro-life,” we would have universal healthcare.
427126564307
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
S.E. Sinkhorn @sesinkhorn.com · 20/09/2026
I am forever thinking about how being in college was just me discovering that I like LEARNING. I liked learning things about the world I didn't previously know! it was a lot of fun! and I think of how many students don't get to love learning, they just get to be cogs in a machine.
014125
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Aparna Nair @disabilitystor1.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
if you need to "check everything" that an LLM spits out in peer review, aren't you just making MORE work for yourself? What is even happening, and why is adding more steps and labor somehow considered the "better" way to do peer review???
1648984
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Lisa Diedrich @lisadiedrich.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
UVA alum Carrington Epperson: “I recommend anyone to take an African American studies course because you will never understand how much you weren’t taught about it before.”
233092
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Asheesh Kapur Siddique @asheeshks.org · 15/09/2026
College students are digital natives who have been deprived exposure to analog media forms like printed books and paper. The challenge for them is to learn to make sense of these media forms, not learn how to use digital technology. They already know. It’s the printed book and paper that‘s strange.
46318
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Asheesh Kapur Siddique @asheeshks.org · 15/09/2026
This is a little mean but I also think the idea that “AI must be taught in college” is an older generation projecting their own tech incompetency and anxiety onto a younger one. It sounds interchangeable from saying “TikTok, Instagram, and Snapchat should be taught in college,“ which is just lame.
210019
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Alessandro Rigolon @alerigolon.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
University: bro, please use AI. It’s so so great. You’re gonna love it. Use it for teaching, research and everything University, a year later: bro, that stuff is expensive, people are using it too much. We’re gonna start charging for credits. 🤷‍♂️
3272
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Ben Williamson @benpatrickwill.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Many "existing peer-reviewed studies that say AI is an effective learning tool are based on flawed methodologies and analyses that rely on misapplied, miscalculated or misinterpreted statistics." Good to see the severe limits of research on AI in education covered in IHE here.
03423
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Sam Coleridge @samcoleridge.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
One of the USA's best political writers, bar none. Buy her real books. Sarah Kendzior @sarahkendzior.bsky.social
Sarah Kendzior

substack

1d

Subscribe

There's an Al-generated "biography" of me that is just my book "The Last American Road Trip" plagiarized near verbatim and sold under the byline of a non-existent person. Today I got an Al-generated email from a non-existent Al publicist. It was addressed to the non-existent Al author of my fake biography. They wanted the non-existent Al author to hire them to publicize it. An entire conversation between robots about my stolen work.

I hate Al.
3603229
Dr. Jane C @janecragun.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
I have the same questions when reading student submissions these days. AI has not only sown distrust, but also taken the joy out of so much reading.
000
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Jane Rosenzweig @janerosenzweig.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
I have consistently heard from students it that they use non university AI because they assume they are under surveillance in university systems. Would be curious to know the numbers on how many are using what universities provide. (But also: that $$ would pay for...a lot of writing centers!)
3206
Dr. Jane C @janecragun.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
Higher ed seems to have lost the thread…at my campus, we actively running away from point #5 with the soon to be launched updated strategic plan.
022
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Jess Calarco @jessicacalarco.com · 11/09/2026
"We're poisoning ourselves for productivity" is about as late stage capitalism as it gets. www.nytimes.com/2026/09/10/c...
nytimes.com
A.I. Data Center Pollution Poses Health Threat, Former E.P.A. Officials Warn (Gift Article)
Air pollution from gas-fired power plants to run data centers is expected to add at least $20 billion in annual health care costs by 2028, the group warns.
622179
Dr. Jane C @janecragun.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
Though the exact amount may vary by state, the economic contributions and job creation that international students is substantial in EVERY state.
000
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Kendra "Gloom is My Beat" Pierre-Louis @kendrawrites.com · 07/09/2026
There's a rich scholarship on why facts don't change minds. There's an even richer scholarship on why even when you know the facts it doesn't alter our behaviors.
theconversation.com
Cognitive biases and brain biology help explain why facts don’t change minds
Here are some reasons for the natural human tendency to avoid or reject new information that runs counter to what you already know – and some tips on how to do better.
314349
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Jeff, formerly of MN and MA, still God of Cookies @diasporaminnesotan.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
whenever I hear an instructor(!!!) say "It's great for brainstorming ideas" I die a little inside. It's literally the opposite of brainstorming and I just want to scream "Read the goddamn materials and see what strikes you!" Ugh. Everything boils down to "I'm lazy"
34711
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Nick Covington @covingtonedu.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
This is the equivalent of aliens studying human anatomy, concluding that the only purpose of food is nutrition, and replacing meals with a paste that provides 100% of our recommended dietary requirements. Eat your paste, kids.
1237
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Asheesh Kapur Siddique @asheeshks.org · 07/09/2026
AI in Ed advocates should just come out and say it: you want to replace human systems with tech bc humans can’t be as easily controlled. They can make demands, organize, strike, etc. It’s about labor discipline and control. Control higher ed workers and control students, the future workforce.
25519
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Anna Kornbluh @annakornbluh.bsky.social · 06/09/2026
there's the abject failure of university+college presidents to come together as a group on day 1 to stand up for the U.S.'s second largest export + most powerful engine of ideas +innovation then there's the abhorrent failure of Darmouth's president in particular www.nybooks.com/articles/202...
nybooks.com
The Dartmouth Exception | Jacob Weisberg
Among its peers in the Ivy League, Dartmouth was perfectly positioned to resist Trump’s attack on higher education. It chose not to.
714238
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Thomas Zimmer @thomaszimmer.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
There is no common ground to be had with conspiratorial extremists, even if they happen to hate certain things you also dislike. These are not good faith actors. Focus on their actual political project – not on some isolated snippets that make them sound sincere and reasonable.
114239
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Alondra Nelson @alondra.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
Heartily endorsing this important piece! As I argued earlier this year, social research did not just emerge from a prior moment of social change, it did crucial sensemaking about that change, up to and including the present. That work must continue and be independent. www.amacad.org/publication/...
amacad.org
Field Theory: AI as Social Science Question, Object & Tool
Uses of advanced artificial intelligence are changing how societies organize labor, govern, produce knowledge, and make meaning. In light of these developments, this essay argues that AI models, tools...
14420
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Ben Williamson @benpatrickwill.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
"'The tech industry wants us to believe that A.I.-powered early education is not only inevitable, but necessary. We do not see it that way,' Mayor Zohran Mamdani said in a statement."
110921
Dr. Jane C @janecragun.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
When you don't know who the president is in 2026...and he's your boss. 👇 #Idiot
000
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Nick Covington @covingtonedu.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
💯 Knowledge isn't an objective thing out there in the world, the brain is an organ for taking information it perceives as important enough to pay attention to and tries to make sense of it, to give it *meaning*. In being meaning makers, humans are by definition knowledge builders!
1115
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Benjamin Riley @benjaminjriley.bsky.social · 30/08/2026
More than arguable, public education itself represents one of our greatest efforts at "scaling" our collective cognition. What @carlhendrick.substack.com and ed-tech enthusiasts really mean is humans do not "scale" at *zero marginal cost* the way software does, and that is very, very revealing.
2339
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
David M. Perry @lollardfish.bsky.social · 30/08/2026
"Here’s an opportunity to move past the job-training consensus that has left our universities stripped threadbare and too driven by trends and vibes. But I promise you, students want real educations and will come for them, rather than be forced to listen to a CEO tell them that capitalism rocks."
startribune.com
Perry: Republicans fought ‘indoctrination.’ Now they’re telling students what to study.
The conservative attack on higher education in states like Iowa is hard to watch. But it also provides an opportunity for blue states like Minnesota.
319868
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Max Kennerly @maxkennerly.bsky.social · 29/08/2026
Update your priors, when you see "Johns Hopkins" you shouldn't think "good school" or "medical research," you should think "hedge fund that lives off taxpayer money and drops its claimed standards to collaborate with fascists" because that's what the school decided to make itself.
chronicle.com
Conservative Scholars Are Rare. Johns Hopkins Wants More of Them.
Ronald J. Daniels says the ideological imbalance is bad for the academy and for the country.
692319661
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
ApocalypticaNow @apocalypticanow.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
The purging of international students is also an attack on the financial stability of colleges and universities
7495138
Dr. Jane C @janecragun.bsky.social · 23/08/2026
“…getting their subjects fed to them…” Learning is not passive consumption, but rather requires effortful meaning making and practice for skills development. Educators understand this-people who think of education as a business do not.
000
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Ilana Horn @ilanahorn.bsky.social · 23/08/2026
You know what other government banned Sociology? Stalin's
161
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Kevin M. Kruse @kevinmkruse.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
Dorie Miller was only allowed to work in a Navy mess due to segregation, but he leapt to work a gun when the attack happened. In sharp contrast, Donnie Trump got five medical deferments to keep from having to fight in Vietnam. The USS Bone Spurs doesn‘t really sing
1071950547
Reposted by Dr. Jane C
Kevin M. Kruse @kevinmkruse.bsky.social · 22/08/2026
There are going to be Democrats who say we shouldn’t rip it all out — it’s already built, we have other priorities — but removing the visible signs of Trumpism is absolutely necessary.
43898982091