Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 5hIf you think the burden of proof for rape cases should be something less than beyond a reasonable doubt, you'll find a lot of powerful people agreeing with you because they would love to be able to have that power. 100
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 5hYou'll notice I didn't accuse you of mansplaining just because I've tried to protect innocence people from prison (and deportation) and seen the system beat them into submission. 000
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 5hI don't tell you how to write opinion pieces so why do you think you're qualified to tell me how the judicial system works? 100
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 5hYou did. "Who cares about D.A. won ratios?" But are you saying you did mean only win ratios for rape cases? 000
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 7hYou didn't say voters don't care about DA win rates in rape cases. You intentionally made your statement broader than that. So yes, we are. 100
Reposted by Jack QAlan Elrod @aselrod.bsky.social · 18hI think it’s important to explore these comments and the political dimensions of male supremacy because the GOP is clearly becoming *more* hospitable to these views as it becomes more authoritarian. There is a generation of young men coming up in this. www.liberalcurrents.com/the-illusion... 324752
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 12hAnd I don't even mean getting convicted. When you lower the bar for prosecution, that means innocent people being arrested and held in a cell before they can even defend themselves. That does immense damage to their lives. And we *already* incarcerate the most people on the planet. 100
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 12hYou're okay with innocent people being put in jail awaiting a trial for a crime they didn't commit. I'm not. I think it's bad when that happens. 200
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 12hI don't care what most would think. Mob rule is bad. I care about what the evidence is and what the burden of proof is and what the jury thinks about those things. 000
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 12hYou're either lying or being lied to. It's that simple. There is no honest reporting that shows real wages stagnant for 30 years. 000
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 12hI don't think the country with the highest incarcerated population has a problem with not prosecuting enough. I think seeing the outcome here, which is an injustice, and thinking "we need to punish people more" instead of "we need to build a better society" is short sighted. 000
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 12h"we are not talking about innocent people" as far as the law is concerned, you are. No one is saying you can't think they're guilty. But you're saying the standard for prosecution should be lowered. You specifically said you don't just mean in this one instance too. 100
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 12hI actually think our legal system operating with a presumption of innocence until proven guilty is a good thing. 100
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 13hAs someone who hates prosecutors, good. I don't need them sending even more innocent people to jail while pretending that is in pursuit of justice. 100
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 14hLook man, it's totally possible that YOUR wages haven't gotten better. But that's different than making a sweeping (incorrect) statement about the economy. 110
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 14hSee it's like the spider verse. Hitler is an anchor event. We all understand Hitler is bad, but he has to happen for reasons. So anyone standing in the way of that is the real bad guy. 010
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 14hWhy would you want a prosecutor to prosecute people that by the standards of our judicial system do not seem guilty. 100
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 14hAnd if you demand that the prosecutor prosecute more so you feel better, that's what will happen, more innocent people losing their jobs, their homes (even if they are acquitted), and their freedom. 000
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 14hThere were obvious mistakes made here in this case by lots of people, but I don't think this is one of them. You do not want a justice system that prioritizes prosecuting loser cases to appear like a fighter *more* than already happens. Innocent people shouldn't have to deal with trials. 100
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 15hHigh win rate for prosecution isn't about padding stats (or shouldn't be) it's about justice meaning not prosecuting loser cases is a way to protect everyone's rights 100
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 15hYou shouldn't prosecute cases you don't think you can win because if you don't think you can prove someone's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, it would be unethical to prosecute someone presumed innocent anyway. This would be a terrible standard. 100
Reposted by Jack QJason Kuznicki @jkuznicki.bsky.social · 16hAs @jacobtlevy.bsky.social put it: www.niskanencenter.org/democracy-fo... 1228
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 06/10/2026One out of every 6 sailors and a quarter of all marines are stationed in San Diego 011
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 06/10/2026Okay, but I think "let's do things to seize power and wipe out opposition" sounds more extreme than "let's wait around for this to inevitably fail and then my preferred ideology can rise from the issues" I guess. 130
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 06/10/2026Ah, I guess only Vance's mentor Peter Thiel and Elon Musk are explicitly Yarvin supporters. 011
Reposted by Jack QKyle Cheney @kyledcheney.bsky.social · 05/10/2026Judge Stadtmueller, a Reagan appointee in Wisconsin, orders the release of an ICE detainee in part because of the "systemic rigging of bond hearings against detainees." storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us... 212832961
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 05/10/2026The only mention of willpower in the show is Hal saying he was trying to will Kane to stay in the last episode by staring at her 000
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 05/10/2026Hoping they have John Stewart go Parallax, subbing in Rushville for Coast City. Then Hal becomes the Spectre and mentors Kyle Rayner from beyond the grave to stop him. (They won't) 110
Reposted by Jack QMartyn @martynpedler.com · 05/10/2026Harry Potter isn't just your usual "don't give money to a bad person" boycott. It's "don't fund a hate group". Come on, people. 0256
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 05/10/2026Was it though? Or was there a lot of winking and nudging going on with that? 000
Reposted by Jack QMicah @rincewind.run · 05/10/2026the reason these people need to be stripped of almost all of their money is so that they stop thinking that it gives them the right to nominate themselves for the "benevolent dictator" position 412674557
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 05/10/2026At this point I just want someone to spoil the shit out of it for me. 000
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 05/10/2026He has voted against the vast majority of trump judge nominees. 100
Jack Q @jackq.bsky.social · 05/10/2026You'll apologize for this but not for telling other people how their own religion works? What a piece a work. 000