Reposted by marilyn grell-brisk. cis. she/her
I guess I'm going to be that jerk and ask . . . how did a paper that makes really big claims about preprints while presenting no data in support of the claims get past peer review? And isn't it more than a little ironic for such a paper to be a complaint about preprints? 🔭🧪
arxiv.org/abs/2609.35787
arxiv.org
The Preprint Evolution: The Rise of Unreviewed Drafts on arXiv and its Implications for Astronomy
The arXiv preprint server originally democratized astronomical research by digitizing the circulation of early manuscripts and removing the financial barriers of journal subscriptions. However, a syst...