Sign in

Gabor Brody

@gaborbrody.bsky.social
196 followers 172 following 68 posts

Exploring language, concepts, and perception @ Yale www.gaborbrody.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Laura Gwilliams @lauragwilliams.bsky.social · 06/10/2026
delighted to share my review article, out now in Trends in Cognitive Sciences! i have been thinking a lot about dynamics lately. this article outlines three key principles - persistence, parallelism, and time-stamped encoding - that support human speech comprehension 🧠✨🌀
07224
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Urvi Maheshwari ツ @urvi.bsky.social · 06/10/2026
New w/ @drbarner.bsky.social in Cognitive Science! We explored how kids learn the “later-greater” principle — the idea that numbers that come later in a count are greater in magnitude. Turns out this simple property governing the count system doesn't come easy! dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs... 1/6
dx.doi.org
One, Two, Three, Four… What's More? Successor Relations, not Mappings to Approximate Magnitudes, Support Learning the Later‐Greater Principle
As we count up, number words that occur later in our count denote greater quantities. Here, we tested whether children's understanding of this “later-greater” principle originates from associating nu...
15919
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
Sorry but their response looks to me like deference to your expertise. I am not convinced something fixed the meaning of these terms internally
010
Reposted by Gabor Brody
David Barner @drbarner.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
A new paper, to appear in Dev Psych. Why do kids as old as 5 or 6 count parts of things as though they were whole objects? We argue that this is pragmatic failure due to kids' inability to access alternative descriptions like "piece of fork". osf.io/preprints/ps...
25310
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Jake Spinella @jakespinella.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Delighted to say that my paper "E Pluribus Unum: Costly Inference and Fragmented Belief" has been accepted for publication in Mind! You can find the paper at this PhilPapers link. Abstract follows in a reply. philpapers.org/rec/SPIEPU
philpapers.org
4267
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
First aww ☺️! And second, thanks for the great comments!
011
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Or did you learn that if you explain Vann McGee's counterexample three times, a McGee appears, and if a McGee appears, then if it isn't Vann, it's JaVale. sorry
150
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Museum of Science @museumofscience.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Want first access to Jacob Collier, The Happiness Lab with @lauriesantos.bsky.social, and Paul Rosolie up close? Member presale is officially live! Be among the very first to get a chance to purchase tickets to unforgettable events at the William and Charlotte Bloomberg Public Science Common.
123
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Benedek Kurdi @benedek.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
🚨 Nominations Open: ISCON 2026 Early Career Award! 🚨 Celebrating junior scientists making theoretical & empirical impact in social cognition. • Eligibility: PhD earned 2020 or later • Winner: Address at SPSP Preconf (Feb 2027) 🗓️ Deadline: Nov 1, 2026 🔗 socialcognition.net/early-career-award
084
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
I have a new preprint with Athulya Aravind. In it, we ask how can children learn the presuppositional meaning component of a word (e.g. "both" presupposing a |2| domain) Our claim... ...is that they can't. Presuppositional meanings are unlearnable. Preprint: lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/010...
1206
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Thus (1) these words are unlearnable, but (2) children learn them. This is clearly the type of fake paradox where (1) has to be wrong. In the paper we try to figure out how it is wrong and what gives. Let us know what you think!
030
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
This is because presuppositional meanings lack the signals that children use to learn words (they don't have diagnostic syntax, the information they carry is backgrounded, and very much not informative).
130
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
I have a new preprint with Athulya Aravind. In it, we ask how can children learn the presuppositional meaning component of a word (e.g. "both" presupposing a |2| domain) Our claim... ...is that they can't. Presuppositional meanings are unlearnable. Preprint: lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/010...
1206
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Debra Titone @dtitone.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
Two #Developmental TT positions at McGill.. Could include people who study #language and #multilingualism. Please forward to colleagues/advanced trainees who might wish to join us in Montreal, Canada! mcgill.wd3.myworkdayjobs.com/McGill_Caree...
mcgill.wd3.myworkdayjobs.com
Tenure-Track Position (Assistant Professor), Developmental Psychology, Department of Psychology
Please refer to the How to Apply for a Job (for External Candidates) job aid for instructions on how to apply. If you are an active McGill employee (ie: currently in an active contract or position at ...
03141
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Caren Walker @carenwalker.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
Hey! Come work with us. It's nice here.
043
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
This is such a cool paper on why and how a broken fork is "1 fork" www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
tandfonline.com
Children and adults’ treatment of partial objects in bounded quantificational contexts
When asked to count under specific instructions, for example, to count “the forks,” or to identify the referent of “a fork,” children have been shown to treat whole forks and detached parts of fork...
052
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Benedek Kurdi @benedek.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
🚀 Project Implicit’s critical work continues! Our website remains fully operational 24/7, collecting data and launching new studies. We are finalizing a new organizational structure to carry our research and educational mission forward. Thank you to our global community. ➡️ implicit.harvard.edu
September 17, 2026
Project Implicit Continues its Critical Work
We are more excited than ever to not only continue but to expand the scientific collabora-tion at the heart of Project Implicit. With the non-profit that served as our operational home for two decades shutting down, a new organizational structure is being finalized to carry our research and educational mission forward.
In the meantime, the Project Implicit website (http://implicit.harvard.edu/) remains fully operational and continues to collect data 24/7. New studies, programs, and educational ef-forts are actively underway. We expect public data to remain available in perpetuity, and new data from 2026 will be released in January of next year.
We express our deep gratitude to everyone who has helped create, sustain, and grow Pro-ject Implicit. This includes the founders, members of the Board of Directors and the Scien-tific Advisory Board, staff members of the non-profit, international collaborators, and the students across dozens of labs tending to tasks big and small. We are also thankful to our generous donors who have answered our calls and supported our mission, and especially the millions of annual visitors who continue to honor us with their curiosity, time, and data.
We look forward to providing more details in the weeks ahead.
Jordan Axt, McGill University
Yoav Bar-Anan, Tel-Aviv University
Benedek Kurdi, University of Illinois
Calvin Lai, Rutgers University
Ryan Lei, Haverford College
Curtis Phills, University of Oregon
Kate Ratliff, University of Waterloo
Colin Tucker Smith, Wilfrid Laurier University
Jennifer Steele, York University
Heidi Vuletich, University of Denver
02215
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Sami Yousif @samiyousif.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
My lab has been really interested in topological perception the past two years. In a new paper, we ask: How does a topological perspective (re-)shape our understanding of visual complexity? Work led by one of our many wonderful undergraduate students, Ashna Shah! link.springer.com/article/10.3...
link.springer.com
Topological structure and the creation of visual complexity - Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
What does it mean for something to be complex? Fundamentally, complexity is a cue that something is less easily represented by our minds. With this fact in view, complexity becomes a tool: By understa...
12812
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Dorsa Amir @dorsaamir.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Hey folks, I'll be considering PhD applications for the 2026-27 cycle over here at Duke Psych. To learn more about the lab, check us out at www.mindandculturelab.com and/or read through this short FAQ for prospective students: www.mindandculturelab.com/faq
05027
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Xinchi Yu @xinchiyu.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
Excited to share our new paper in Cerebral Cortex (w/ Ellen Lau)! In this MEG study on visual working memory (VWM), we showed that uni- and multi-variate signals complementarily track different aspects of VWM representations across different regions. academic.oup.com/cercor/artic...
academic.oup.com
Complementary univariate and multivariate signals in the parietal cortex for visual working memory pointers and features
Abstract. An emerging body of work in visual working memory (VWM) has embraced the theoretical construct of pointers: an object is mentally represented by
0277
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Best example: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chalced... and the meaning of "physis"
en.wikipedia.org
Chalcedonian schism - Wikipedia
000
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Well the test is reunion upon finding out that the doctrinal positions are compatible/orthognal. If the history of religion is an indication, it wont happen: these views also developed their hierarchies, liturgical habits, martyrs, and saints whose sanctity has to do with condemning the other side.
110
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
This is all to say, motivated misunderstanding differs from misunderstanding due to underspecification or ambiguity. People don't misunderstand what others mean by learning (most theories are explicit), they just want to presuppose/assume that their notion is the important one.
140
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
This is great! We should certainly make clear what we mean by "learning" we claim "X is (not) learned". But that is not about polysemy -- it is true of any scientific claim. If something is specific to this debate is the strategic non-acceptance for others' notion of learning as a valid.
131
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Juan Murillo Vargas @jimurillo98.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
Paper's now out (open access!). Shoutout to the lovely copyediting and proofs team at Ergo. If you're LoT curious feel free to check it out! journals.publishing.umich.edu/ergo/article...
journals.publishing.umich.edu
How Language-Like is the Language of Thought?
The language of thought hypothesis (LoTH) claims that thoughts are underpinned by language-like vehicles. A central motivation is that there is a relevant similarity between language and thought expla...
0244
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Jake Quilty-Dunn @quiltydunn.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
New paper, co-authored with Justin Wood, in @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social: The Nativist-Empiricist Debate Is Broken We argue that radical nativism and radical empiricism are compatible and, in some cases, both plausibly true. So something is wrong. 🧵 Author share link here, valid til Oct 31:
authors.elsevier.com
Please wait whilst we redirect you
All content on this site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
17630
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Aaron Baker @aajbaker.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Excited to share the first empirical article of my PhD work! We found that roles generated social expectations that were detectable WHILE participants were still reading about them. Evidence for roles as an important part of our rapid social cognition. See if you can experience the effects below!
1104
Reposted by Gabor Brody
International Congress of Infant Studies @infantstudies.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Liu (@diliu.bsky.social) and Feigenson (2026) found that infants understand surprise as a response to information that is new to the observer. Unlike happiness, repeated surprise from the same person suggests multiple new discoveries #infancypapers onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Infants Understand That Surprise Is Caused by Novel Information
Infants use others' emotional expressions to make inferences about the world, for example by inferring candidate causes of their happiness or sadness. However, one emotion—surprise—is less clearly li...
0175
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Lindsey Powell @lindseypowell.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
UCSD Psychology is hiring!! We’re seeking a new assistant professor colleague who studies high-level human cognition, broadly construed. Please share and/or apply! apol-recruit.ucsd.edu/JPF04646
apol-recruit.ucsd.edu
Assistant Professor in High-level Human Cognition
University of California, San Diego is hiring. Apply now!
09680
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
I call this the Aligner-alignment problem: How on earth we will make "aligners" even a tiny bit aligned with human values
140
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
can you successfully file a paper with false tags?
010
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
The hidden “sold as“ operator
020
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Rebecca Peretz-Lange @rebeccaperetzlange.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
We're hiring! Clinical Psychologists, come work in this beautiful building with me at Vassar! Please repost!
066
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 27/08/2026
I think he was very much right (and people trying to diffuse it was cringe, especially when everyone pretended they succeeded). Nevertheless I think it wasnt clear (maybe for him either) what him being right should mean for the practicing scientist, if anything.
010
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
I ofc agree that context sensitivity of language have to be taken into account. I just think polysemy is doing a horrible job at doing that, and it fails to identify the nature of the problem. It is a stipulation that says, "whatever you did, do it twice". Its a quick fix
000
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Melissa Kibbe @levelsof.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
New from me and Jessica Applin! We find that infants' behavior in a cracker choice task is impacted by an agent’s partial knowledge of object quantity: infants choose based on the agent's (inaccurate) representation rather than their own 🤯 Now in press at JECP, preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io
OSF
24114
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
For any explanatory project of X we have to establish its scope and domain of application. It feels silly to me to do this by doubling the semantics of "W" rather than doing science on X-s.
100
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Maybe the target category is broader than 'definition' and also involve other specifications (e.g. corresponding to a category). But I fail to see how saying that there are different senses (and therefore corresponding to multiple categories) is helpful
201
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
This is why the problem is not about polysemy, but with trying to provide definitions. Polysemy tells you "maybe I need more than one definition" but doesnt tell you that giving definitions is hopeless altogether
120
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Chiara Saponaro @chiarasaponaro.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
New paper out! 🎉 Can preverbal logical inferences scaffold the early acquisition of logical words? We asked this question with Mahham Fayyaz, Grace Pavalko and Nicolò Cesana-Arlotti, focusing on disjunction: escholarship.org/uc/item/3pf7....
escholarship.org
1124
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
Or did he?
static.klipy.com
Flynn Rider's Confident Smirk
ALT: Flynn Rider's Confident Smirk
080
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Sam Gershman @gershbrain.bsky.social · 18/08/2026
@arthurpr4t.bsky.social has a new preprint with important results on a famous psychophysical law (Weber's law). It isn't, in fact, a law, because it can be broken. A more fundamental principle (efficient coding) shows when and why Weber's law holds true. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
biorxiv.org
Efficient coding makes and breaks Weber's law
Weber's law is a rare quantitative regularity in psychology, yet its origins remain debated. Here we provide causal evidence that it arises from the more fundamental principle of efficient coding. Thi...
413041
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Liina Pylkkänen @liinapy.bsky.social · 16/08/2026
✨Excited to announce a new post-doctoral position in my lab, focussed on the neural capacity limits of language processing using magnetoencephalography! Apply here: wp.nyu.edu/neurolinglab...
wp.nyu.edu
Postdoctoral position – NYU Neurolinguistics Lab
04333
Reposted by Gabor Brody
tal boger @talboger.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
BBS recently published a great piece by @mdubova.bsky.social & @sabinasloman.bsky.social on “Excess capacity learning”. I argue D&S’s framework overlooks a special kind of representation that encodes information both minimally and perfectly: lossless compression. philpapers.org/archive/BOGC...
Figure for my BBS commentary ("Compression without compromise") on Dubova & Sloman's target article ("Excess capacity learning")
13011
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Andrew Shtulman @andrewshtulman.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
Why do children claim unusual events are impossible? In a new paper with Goulding, Ronfard (@samuelronfard.bsky.social), and Friedman (@orifriedman.bsky.social), we synthesize two decades of research on children's possibility judgments and propose some answers. www.sciencedirect.com/science/chap...
03012
Gabor Brody @gaborbrody.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
Wow this was a great read -- thanks!
010
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Sam McDougle @actlab.bsky.social · 23/07/2026
The cerebellum plays a role in motor learning and reinforcement learning. But does cerebellar learning generalize to all sorts of tasks? Here we test strong prediction: that cerebellar activity tracks passively learned sensory-sensory associations (statistical learning). See below for the answer!
25316
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Melissa Kibbe @levelsof.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
Our view (imo) best explains the infant data that we and others have collected over the past several decades, and contrasts with more "maximalist" views which posit a richer starting state for infants' object representations (i.e. Spelke objects). PDF available at philpapers.org/rec/KIBMOR
philpapers.org
071
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Melissa Kibbe @levelsof.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
New from me and Alan Leslie! We got the band back together to lay out our view on object representations in the infant mind: non-discursive indexes that operate within a language of thought, & which get development of a more complex object concept off the ground www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
sciencedirect.com
24717
Reposted by Gabor Brody
Sam Gershman @gershbrain.bsky.social · 09/07/2026
I recommend reading Chomsky's classic review of Skinner's book "Verbal Behavior" (perhaps the greatest take-down in intellectual history): chomsky.info/1967____/ Chomsky later wrote a review of "Beyond Freedom and Dignity" focusing on the sociological issues: www.nybooks.com/articles/197...
1221