Sign in

Gabriele Contessa

@gabecontessa.bsky.social
1.3K followers 519 following 54 posts

Philosopher @ Carleton University 🇨🇦 SocEpi/PhiSci/PolPhi/PhiEcon Science Denial: Post-Truth or Post-Trust (CUP, 2025) (philpapers.org/rec/CONSDP-2) It Takes a Village to Trust Science (philpapers.org/rec/CONITA-5) He/him

PostsRepliesMedia
Gabriele Contessa @gabecontessa.bsky.social · 29/06/2026
I am delighted to share that my paper “Am I Trapped in an Echo Chamber? A Skeptical Argument for Epistemological Communitarianism” has now been accepted at *Episteme*. philpapers.org/rec/CONAIT-18
philpapers.org
193
Gabriele Contessa @gabecontessa.bsky.social · 16/06/2026
Another great review of my book on “science denial”, this one from Tommaso Piazza. social-epistemology.com/2026/06/12/a...
social-epistemology.com
A Review of Gabriele Contessa’s Science Denial, Tommaso Piazza
Gabriele Contessa’s Science Denial (2025) offers an exceptional illustration of how philosophy, when done at its best, can illuminate and help us make sense of issues that fall outside its traditional...
020
Gabriele Contessa @gabecontessa.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
Maya Goldenberg wrote a fantastic review of my book on "science denial." I've never seen a book review that so well complements and improves on the book it reviews! Thanks to Maya for such a generous and thoughtful read! social-epistemology.com/2026/04/29/s...
social-epistemology.com
Science Denial, Post-Trust, and Epistemic Blame: A Review of Contessa’s Science Denial, Maya Goldenberg
1163
Gabriele Contessa @gabecontessa.bsky.social · 04/02/2026
Here is a short and accessible post on the contrast between #posttruth and #posttrust diagnoses of #sciencedenial for the blog of the American Philosophical Association. blog.apaonline.org/2026/02/03/s...
blog.apaonline.org
Science Denial: From Post-Truth to Post-Trust | Blog of the APA
Philosophers Stephen Nadler and Lawrence Shapiro open their book When Bad Thinking Happens to Good People with a dire warning. “Something is seriously wrong,” they write. “An alarming number of citize...
000
Gabriele Contessa @gabecontessa.bsky.social · 17/11/2025
My Element on science denial is free to download until December 1st! Get it for free while you can! doi.org/10.1017/9781...
doi.org
Science Denial
Cambridge Core - Philosophy: General Interest - Science Denial
24326
Gabriele Contessa @gabecontessa.bsky.social · 25/06/2025
Excited to share that this is forthcoming as part of the Cambridge Elements in Philosophy of Science series! (Preprint downloadable through the link) philpapers.org/rec/CONSDP-2
philpapers.org
Gabriele Contessa, Science Denial: Post-Truth or Post-Trust? - PhilPapers
Over the last couple of decades, there has been increasing concern about the alleged rise of various forms of science denial. But what exactly is science denial? Is it really on ...
2112
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Kate Klonick @klonick.bsky.social · 29/11/2024
I’m super excited to announce I'm part of an amazing team (<3 @williambrady.bsky.social @killianmcloughlin.bsky.social @mjcrockett.bsky.social) that just published a paper in @science.org on the role of outrage in spread of misinformation Link here: science.org/doi/10.1126/... Summary in🧵🔽 1/
1232644982
Gabriele Contessa @gabecontessa.bsky.social · 29/11/2024
How long before higher-ed admins finally realize that, if they eliminate instructors completely, they can cut costs and turn their university/college into an all-inclusive resort for those who want the “college experience” without the burden of getting an education in the process?
270
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Matt Jope @mattjope.bsky.social · 28/11/2024
Nice idea, Gabriele. In this article, Michel Croce and I argue against the view that the norms of good friendship require epistemic partiality by appealing to the idea that friendship requires understanding.
philpapers.org
Michel Croce & Matthew Jope, Understanding friendship - PhilPapers
This article takes issue with two prominent views in the current debate around epistemic partiality in friendship. Strong views of epistemic partiality hold that friendship may require biased beliefs ...
131
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Corey Dethier @cdethier.bsky.social · 27/11/2024
This is the most recent one and thus my favorite. The title is descriptive: it's about how to apply norms of testimony / assertion to the presentation of graphs (and other depictions). Plus what (some) philosophers of science get wrong about honesty. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
How do you assert a graph? Towards an account of depictions in scientific testimony
I extend the literature on norms of assertion to the ubiquitous use of graphs in scientific papers and presentations, which I term “graphical testimony.” On my account, the testimonial presentation o...
0163
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Will Fleisher @willfleisher.bsky.social · 27/11/2024
Here, I try to ground epistemic normativity in the internal rules of epistemic social practices. The view also vindicates the idea that reasons concerning social inquiry - what I call inquisitive reasons - can be counted as epistemic reasons in good standing. philpapers.org/rec/FLEEPA
philpapers.org
Will Fleisher, Epistemic practices: A unified account of epistemic and zetetic normativity - PhilPapers
This paper presents the epistemic practices account, a theory about the nature of epistemic normativity. The account aims to explain how the pursuit of epistemic values such as truth and knowledge ...
1141
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Josh Habgood-Coote @impractknow.bsky.social · 27/11/2024
This is a service paper, trying to put the conceptual (and very basic formal) tools together to think about what collective inquiry is link.springer.com/article/10.1...
link.springer.com
Group Inquiry - Erkenntnis
Group agents can act, and they can have knowledge. How should we understand the species of collective action which aims at knowledge? In this paper, I present an account of group inquiry. This account...
041
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Michael Hannon @michaelhannon.bsky.social · 27/11/2024
Knowledgeable voters are perhaps more dangerous to democracy than ignorant ones because they use their knowledge and intelligence to twist the facts and reason their way to whatever they want. philpapers.org/rec/HANASV
philpapers.org
Michael Hannon, Are Knowledgeable Voters Better Voters? - PhilPapers
It is widely believed that democracies require knowledgeable citizens to function well. But the most politically knowledgeable individuals also tend to be the most partisan, and the strength of partis...
0111
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Fabienne Peter @fabiennepeter.bsky.social · 27/11/2024
In this chapter on political deference, I argue that we can be required to defer to others on the ground of their epistemic authority. The account also explains why political deference to experts is not normally required, however. academic.oup.com/book/46053/c...
academic.oup.com
Political Deference
Abstract. Political deference, as I understand it, is deference to others on what the right political decision is in a given situation. If they defer polit
0162
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Jana Bacevic 🌲🌳✊🏴 @unsocialtheory.bsky.social · 27/11/2024
When you discredit knowers because of their identity, that's epistemic injustice. But when you limit their knowledge claims to their identity - by reducing it to 'experience' or to a fixed domain of knowledge (like gender studies) - that's epistemic positioning. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
journals.sagepub.com
Epistemic injustice and epistemic positioning: towards an intersectional political economy - Jana Bacevic, 2023
This article introduces the concept of epistemic positioning to theorize the relationship between identity-based epistemic judgements and the reproduction of so...
1203
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Kevin Zollman @kevinzollman.com · 27/11/2024
This is a paper where I argue that game theory is a critical tool for even the most "pure" of social epidemiologists. link.springer.com/article/10.1...
link.springer.com
The theory of games as a tool for the social epistemologist - Philosophical Studies
Traditionally, epistemologists have distinguished between epistemic and pragmatic goals. In so doing, they presume that much of game theory is irrelevant to epistemic enterprises. I will show that thi...
1182
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Aidan McGlynn @aidanmcglynn.bsky.social · 27/11/2024
Upcoming handbook chapter offering an overview of the philosophical debate about epistemic injustice kicked up by Miranda Fricker's work, with an eye towards more sharply delineating the target phenomena from her particular theoretical and terminological choices:
philpapers.org
Aidan McGlynn, Epistemic Injustice: Phenomena and Theories (Author's preprint) - PhilPapers
Epistemic injustice has become one of the most widely discussed topics in social epistemology, and has revived interest in issues in the intersections between epistemology and ethics and political phi...
0141
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 27/11/2024
Group belief ascriptions are highly ambiguous. What’s more, in many cases, neither the available contextual factors nor known pragmatic considerations are sufficient to allow the audience to identify which of the many possible meanings is intended. I argue we shouldn’t make such ascriptions.
philpapers.org
1131
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Jenny Saul @jennysaul.bsky.social · 27/11/2024
"Bald-Faced Bullshit and Authoritarian Political Speech: Making Sense of Johnson and Trump. (Co-authored with Tim Kenyon). Defends a new definition of bullshit, which allows for audience variation. Discusses the role of Power Bullshit in authoritarianism. www.researchgate.net/publication/...
1233
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Alex Worsnip @aworsnip.bsky.social · 27/11/2024
philpapers.org/rec/WORSCB The fact that a belief of yours is suspiciously convenient to you is a reason for you to become less confident that it's true. A kind of ideal epistemological theory can be used to resist this conclusion, but that only brings out the pathologies of such ideal theory.
philpapers.org
Alex Worsnip, Suspiciously Convenient Beliefs and the Pathologies of (Epistemological) Ideal Theory - PhilPapers
Public life abounds with examples of people whose beliefs—especially political beliefs—seem suspiciously convenient: consider, for example, the billionaire who believes that all taxation is unjust, or...
3192
Gabriele Contessa @gabecontessa.bsky.social · 27/11/2024
Social Epistemologists: I was trying to populate a starter pack for us manually but got lazy and thought it would be much more fun to turn this into a game! Post a link to your favourite paper you wrote on the topic below with a post-length abstract and I’ll add you to it! #PhilSky #SocEpis
357623
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Alan Richardson @alanrichardson.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
One project: arguing that information and its negations and perversions (mis/disinformation) are too epistemologically thin to bear the weight the current trust in science literature places on them.
141
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
José Marichal @josemarichal.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Not a trained philosopher, but hoping I'm allowed to play :) AI has the potential to "re-enchant" the world.. that might be a good thing, but it's probably a very bad thing.
011
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Lauri Snellman @laurijosnellman.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
I'm developing a logic of worldviews. What are world-views? How do they function as sign-systems? How do world-views, frameworks, Gestalts, ethical orientations, rules for arguments, etc. hang together? How can one compare world-views rationally? #philosophy #worldview #logic
181
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Sebastian Watzl @sebastianwatzl.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
When is attention good and when bad? What makes it good or bad?
031
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Jeremy Killian @jeremykillian.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
People are not primarily attracted to conspiracy theories because of pathology, personality traits, or political commitments. Instead, people are drawn to CTs for aesthetic reasons: they have a taste for a particular type of story.
031
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Sara Protasi @saraprotasi.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Courage has been neglected among the virtues (yes, I have receipts). Fear is underestimated and understudied by philosophers (esp. moral). Empirical and philosophical literatures on both attitudes tend to not talk much with other. My new book project will be an attempt at remedying these issues.
071
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Sally-Anne Wherry @sawherry.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Knowingly killing people with haemophilia is bad and traumatised their kids and families. Then they don't trust you anymore or any healthcare. You need to do trauma informed care. Be better.
031
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Nikhil Venkatesh @nikvenkatesh.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
I prefer total, act, scalar utilitarianism, but with groups as well as individuals recognised as moral agents (which gets some of the benefits of rule utilitarianism and some of the politics of socialism). An objective account of welfare incorporating Marx's values as well as Bentham's.
131
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Nikhil Venkatesh @nikvenkatesh.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Currently working on a couple of papers slightly nuancing this, by discounting the welfare of the far future, non-humans, and highly improbable outcomes
031
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Hane @hane.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
the disease debate in philosophy of medicine needs to attend more to the historical, social, and institutional factors that inform pathologization and depathologization. I'm applying this through work with a gender affirming healthcare service to explore implications of a depathologization model.
4535
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Uğur Aytaç @uguraytac.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Workers should have a labor right to protected in-group communication and information sharing as a means of securing more foundational labor rights such as the rights to strike and unionization.
071
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Robin McKenna @rbnmckenna.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Many social epistemologists argue that distrusting experts is rational. I am looking at biomedical cases where it is not just rational, but the "patient experts" make a contribution to biomedical knowledge. The aim is to identify the structural features of these groups that allow them to do that.
1141
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Barrett Emerick @barrettemerick.bsky.social · 25/11/2024
I created a Social Philosophy Starter Pack. Please tell me who I should add (including you)! #philsky
8917945
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
H.K. Andersen @hkandersen.bsky.social · 23/11/2024
Reminder that you can still submit an abstract; deadline is Nov 26. Nancy Cartwright, Hasok Chang, and Eran Tal keynoting - this discussion will be high energy ☄️🔥 #philsky #philsci
An announcement for a workshop on Pragmatism and Measurement at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Philosophy of Science. There is a call for abstracts to give a talk. Abstracts of 500-800 words can be submitted until November 26, 2024. The workshop is March 15-16, 2025.
0235
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Heather Douglas @heatherdouglas.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
Paper on public engagement with science, showing that there are different kinds of publics that can be engaged, with normative differences and important implications for democratizing science #philsci #philsky #science #sts www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
tandfonline.com
Engaging publics in science: a practical typology
Public engagement with science has become a prominent area of research and effort for democratizing science. In the fall of 2020, we held an online conference, Public Engagement with Science: Defin...
0318
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Anna Alexandrova @annaalexandrova.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
Preparing my remarks on this important new book by Leah McClimans. She is visiting Cambridge HPS today and the reading group on the book expertly organised and chaired by @miguelohn.bsky.social and @cristianlarph.bsky.social is finally meeting the author! #philsky #medsky
blackwells.co.uk
Patient-Centered Measurement
Patients often are asked to fill out questionnaires before or after going to the doctor's office or hospital. What is the point of these questionnaires? Why do
6375
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Dr Keith 🎃 Wilson @keithwilson.eu · 19/11/2024
I’ve created a new feed for #philosophy job listings. It includes posts with the hashtags #PhilJob, #PhilJobs or #PhilosophyJobs, as well as links to philjobs.org. Save/pin and like the feed if you find it useful! 🙏 #PhilSky #academia bsky.app/profile/did:...
918173
Gabriele Contessa @gabecontessa.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
So as a philosopher primarily interested in social epistemology and science & value stuff what feeds should I follow (and how do I even follow them)? #noobquestions #philsky
430
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Rose Schmits @roseschmits.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
Its only philosophy if it comes from the oxford region otherwise its just sparkling proletariat rabblerousing
26312
Gabriele Contessa @gabecontessa.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
Thanks for being such a good example of how *not* to collectively trust science, Florida!
020
Gabriele Contessa @gabecontessa.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
PSA for BlueSky noobs like me!
020
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Alisa Bokulich @alisabokulich.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
There is no algorithm here on Bsky except the chronological posts of people you follow. Means it's easy to miss people's posts unless you/they use tags & feeds. You make your own algorithm here using topic feeds for whatever you are interested in & making use of their tags.
031
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Heather Douglas @heatherdouglas.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
Lots of great papers are now out from PSA 2022. Here is where I disagree with what I said in 2021, and argue that not every responsibility in science should have an accountability mechanism! #philsci #sciencepolicy #philsky www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
cambridge.org
Structuring Institutions for Responsible and Accountable Science | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core
Structuring Institutions for Responsible and Accountable Science - Volume 91 Issue 5
0213
Gabriele Contessa @gabecontessa.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
Don't get me wrong: I love to have almost 500 followers here, but does anyone actually see my posts?!? Hello, hello hello, is there anybody out there?
6492
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Anna Alexandrova @annaalexandrova.bsky.social · 21/11/2024
Mark your calendars for the main conference on philosophy and methodology of economics! Sept 17-19 2025 in Bayreuth w great keynotes by @richardpettigrew.bsky.social @furmank.bsky.social, Wendy Carlin. The organisers and the Program Com are meticulous and inclusive #econsky #philsci #philsky
phil.uni-bayreuth.de
17th Biennial INEM Conference
Universität Bayreuth
14420
Reposted by Gabriele Contessa
Gabriele Contessa @gabecontessa.bsky.social · 22/12/2023
It's often assumed that #publictrustinscience is individualistic (ie it is primarily people who (mis)trust science) but it is actually social (ie it is primarily communities that (mis)trust science). This should lead us to rethink the ways in which we collectively use science to serve our purposes.
3546
Gabriele Contessa @gabecontessa.bsky.social · 21/11/2024
Okay I’m giving BlueSky another try. Let’s try this again!
031