Sign in

Bryan Lammon

@finaldecisions.org
1K followers 461 following 205 posts

Lawyer & law professor focused on appellate jurisdiction. Founder of Final Decisions PLLC (finaldecisions.org).

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Bryan Lammon
nicolebporter.bsky.social @nicolebporter.bsky.social · 06/02/2026
A little Q&A I did for the ABA Commission on Disability Rights regarding my latest empirical work on how courts are interpreting the definition of disability under the ADA. www.americanbar.org/groups/diver...
americanbar.org
Defining Disability Under the ADA: An Interview Exploring Federal Court Trends
The ABA Commission on Disability Rights interviewed Nicole Porter, Rita Anne Rollins Professor of Law at William & Mary Law School, about her article, “Troubling Trends: ADA Definition of Disability C...
141
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 08/12/2025
November's roundup features ineffective attempts at voluntarily dismissing discrete claims, which have me wondering whether courts are really dealing with discrete theories. Plus the appeal clock for granted post-judgment motions and more. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/the-month-in...
finaldecisions.org
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: November 2025 - Final Decisions PLLC
Ineffective attempts to voluntarily dismiss claims (or theories?), the appeal clock for successful post-judgment motions, appellate standing for privilege appeals, and more.
040
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 08/12/2025
This 11th Cir. decision—that a written, pretrial notice of intent not to pursue a theory was insufficient to resolve a "claim"—has me wondering: how often are courts addressing discrete claims rather than discrete theories of relief? #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/no-finality-...
finaldecisions.org
No Finality by Abandoning Claims Before Trial - Final Decisions PLLC
The Eleventh Circuit held that a defendant could not abandon a counterclaim before trial, and the attempt to do so precluded finality.
0100
Reposted by Bryan Lammon
Stacey A. Tovino, JD, PhD @staceytovino.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
Congratulations to Professor Nicole Buonocore Porter @WM.edu Law School for winning the AALS Section on Law Professors with Disabilities and Allies' 2026 Chai Feldblum Award!
1174
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 15/11/2025
The William & Mary Appellate Clinic just filed the brief discussed in this @law360.bsky.social article. We argued (among other things) that qualified immunity is not a defense in FMLA actions against public officials. Link to the brief next. www.law360.com/employment/a...
law360.com
Ex-Va. City Atty Tells 4th Circ. FMLA Doesn't Immunize Officials - Law360
The Family and Medical Leave Act doesn't contemplate qualified immunity, a former Virginia city assistant attorney told the Fourth Circuit on Thursday, arguing that a municipal attorney cannot appeal ...
130
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 07/11/2025
This roundup features a new split on appealing denials of anti-SLAPP motions under California law. The en banc 9th Cir. overruled its caselaw allowing these appeals, but only a few days later the Fed. Cir. held that these denials are appealable. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/the-month-in...
finaldecisions.org
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: October 2025 - Final Decisions PLLC
A new split on anti-SLAPP appeals, plus a panel's ability to expand a certificate of appealability, reviewing the remedy in qualified-immunity appeals, and more.
020
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 16/10/2025
One week after the 9th Cir. overrules its caselaw permitting immediate appeals of anti-SLAPP denials under California law, the Fed. Cir. held that those denials are immediately appealable. No mention of the 9th Cir.'s en banc decision. #AppellateSky www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-ord...
Screenshot of a judicial opinion. The relevant text reads:

We do not hold here that denials of anti-SLAPP motions to strike arising under any state's law are immediately appealable as a matter of right before this Court. Our holding today applies only, at this point, to California's anti-SLAPP statute. If we are presented with a case arising under another state's law, in determining whether we have appellate jurisdiction for a given case raising an issue regarding an anti-SLAPP motion to strike, we must evaluate the relevant state's anti-SLAPP statute at issue on appeal and evaluate how that tool has been exercised in practice to understand whether that given instance comports with the collateral-order exception to the final decision rule under Federal Circuit law.
020
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 07/10/2025
My September 2025 appellate-jurisdiction roundup features minute orders as separate documents, contract formation issues in arbitration appeals, pendent appellate jurisdiction over standing, and more. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/the-month-in...
finaldecisions.org
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: September 2025 - Final Decisions PLLC
Minute orders as separate documents, contract formation issues in arbitration appeals, pendent appellate jurisdiction over standing, and more.
020
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 09/09/2025
My August appellate-jurisdiction roundup features a new circuit split on the deadline for appealing qualified-immunity denials. There were also interesting decisions on injunction appeals and remand appeals, plus some more qualified-immunity issues. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/the-month-in...
finaldecisions.org
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: August 2025 - Final Decisions PLLC
The appeal clock for collateral-order appeals, appeals involving preliminary injunctions, remand appeals, and more.
1112
Reposted by Bryan Lammon
drfine.bsky.social @drfine.bsky.social · 21/08/2025
Interesting decision yesterday from the 11th Cir underscoring circuit precedent that could (and in this case did) catch the unwary. District ct granted a motion to dismiss but w/ leave to amend and with an order that the clerk should enter a separate dismissal order if the plaintiff didn't amend. 1/
221
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 08/08/2025
Catching up on July's appellate-jurisdiction developments, with decisions on the collateral-order doctrine, dismissals of plaintiffs via Rule 41, failures to object to magistrate judges' orders, and more. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/the-month-in...
finaldecisions.org
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: July 2025 - Final Decisions PLLC
Appeals via the collateral-order doctrine, Rule 41 dismissals of plaintiffs, failures to object to magistrate judge decisions, and more.
000
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 07/07/2025
New appellate-jurisdiction roundup featuring decisions on relating forward notices of appeal, automatic stays for remand appeals, deficient final judgments, preservation, and much more. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/the-month-in...
finaldecisions.org
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: June 2025 - Final Decisions PLLC
Relating forward notices of appeal, automatic stays for remand appeals, deficient final judgments, preservation, and more.
052
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 07/07/2025
The Fourth Circuit held that failure to object to a magistrate judge's order was a preservation issue, not a jurisdictional one. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/jurisdiction...
finaldecisions.org
Jurisdiction, Preservation & the Failure to Object to a Magistrate Judge’s Order - Final Decisions PLLC
The Fourth Circuit held that failure to object to a magistrate judge's order was a preservation issue, not a jurisdictional one.
023
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 19/06/2025
The Tenth Circuit had jurisdiction to review a civil-contempt order that imposed a $1,000/day fine. Although the ultimate sanction was not yet determined, it was sufficiently specific. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/contempt-app...
finaldecisions.org
Contempt Appeals with Specific-but- Unspecified Contempt Sanctions - Final Decisions PLLC
The Tenth Circuit held that a $1,000/day fine for civil contempt was a sufficiently specific sanction for the decision to be final.
001
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 18/06/2025
The Seventh Circuit explained both the problems of and the potential solutions to final judgments that fail to mention all claims. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/dealing-with...
finaldecisions.org
Dealing with Deficient Final Judgments - Final Decisions PLLC
The Seventh Circuit explained both the problems of and the potential solutions to final judgments that fail to mention all claims.
010
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 18/06/2025
Short post on the Supreme Court's decision in Parrish, which held that a premature notice of appeal relates forward to the district court's reopening of the appeal period. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/parrish-rela...
finaldecisions.org
Parrish & Relating Forward Notices of Appeal - Final Decisions PLLC
The Supreme Court held that a notice of appeal filed before the appeal period is reopened relates forward to the date of reopening.
000
Reposted by Bryan Lammon
Sean Marotta @smmarotta.bsky.social · 14/06/2025
I say this with no irony. I love dorky procedural issues. I often write briefs like I am slogging through molasses, but let me loose on an appellate-jurisdiction question and my fingers fly.
1281
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 12/06/2025
Invoking the longstanding federal practice of cumulative finality—which often gives effect to premature notices of appeal—the Supreme Court held in Parrish that a premature notice of appeal related forward to the reopening of the appeal period. #AppellateSky www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...
Screenshot of the first page of the Supreme Court's opinion in Parrish v. United States.
110
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 08/06/2025
The Ninth Circuit held that an appeal from a remand order does not automatically stay the remand. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/ninth-circui...
finaldecisions.org
Ninth Circuit: No Automatic Stays for Remand Appeals - Final Decisions PLLC
The Ninth Circuit held that an appeal from a remand order does not automatically stay the remand.
000
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 08/06/2025
The Fifth Circuit held that the government's failure to invoke an unconditional guilty plea waived the defendant's waiver of a suppression issue. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/waiving-or-f...
finaldecisions.org
Waiving (or Forfeiting) an Unconditional Guilty Plea - Final Decisions PLLC
The Fifth Circuit held that the government's failure to invoke an unconditional guilty plea waived the defendant's waiver of a suppression issue.
110
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 07/06/2025
The Seventh Circuit held that it lacked jurisdiction to immediately review an order that narrowed—but not denied—the potential injunctive relief in an action. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/narrowing-v-...
finaldecisions.org
Narrowing v. Denying Permanent Injunctive Relief - Final Decisions PLLC
The Seventh Circuit held that it lacked jurisdiction to immediately review an order that narrowed the potential injunctive relief in an action.
010
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 04/06/2025
New appellate-jurisdiction roundup, featuring effective injunction denials, appealing waiver-based remands, questioning the collateral-order doctrine and pendent appellate jurisdiction, and more. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/the-month-in...
finaldecisions.org
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: May 2025 - Final Decisions PLLC
Effective injunction denials, appealing waiver-based remands, questioning the collateral-order doctrine and pendent appellate jurisdiction, and more.
110
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 04/06/2025
A Fifth Circuit decision expressed some doubts about the collateral-order doctrine and pendent appellate jurisdiction. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/questioning-...
finaldecisions.org
Questioning the Collateral-Order Doctrine & Pendent Appellate Jurisdiction - Final Decisions PLLC
A Fifth Circuit decision expressed some doubts about the collateral-order doctrine and pendent appellate jurisdiction.
000
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 04/06/2025
The Supreme Court will decide if defendants can immediately appeal from the denial of derivative sovereign immunity via the collateral-order doctrine. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/cert-grant-o...
finaldecisions.org
Cert Grant on Derivative-Sovereign-Immunity Appeals - Final Decisions PLLC
The Supreme Court will decide if defendants can immediately appeal from the denial of derivative sovereign immunity via the collateral-order doctrine.
110
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 02/06/2025
The Supreme Court will address whether defendants can immediately appeal the denial of derivative sovereign immunity via the collateral-order doctrine.
100
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 22/05/2025
A recent Sixth Circuit decision has me thinking that Carson's three-part test for effective injunction denials probably shouldn't apply when parties expressly sought a preliminary injunction. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/carsons-test...
finaldecisions.org
Carson’s Test for Effective Injunction Denials - Final Decisions PLLC
Carson's three-part test for effective injunction denials probably shouldn't apply when parties expressly sought a preliminary injunction.
000
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 20/05/2025
Thanks so much to my wonderful 1Ls at W&M, and congratulations to all of them for making it through their first year of law school. law.wm.edu/news/stories...
law.wm.edu
Class of 2027 Recognizes Visiting Professor Bryan Lammon as Outstanding Teacher
One year after Bryan Lammon came to William & Mary Law School as a Visiting Professor of Law, the Class of 2027 honored him as the 1L Professor of the Year.
130
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 20/05/2025
The en banc Fifth Circuit overruled In re Weaver and held that 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) does not bar review of waiver-based remands. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/appealing-wa...
finaldecisions.org
Appealing Waiver-Based Remands, Part II - Final Decisions PLLC
The en banc Fifth Circuit overruled In re Weaver and held that 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) does not bar review of waiver-based remands.
000
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 16/05/2025
The Fifth Circuit split over whether a party could appeal from the district court’s delay in deciding a preliminary-injunction motion and raised an interesting question of how to determine when delay = denial. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/claimed-urge...
finaldecisions.org
Claimed Urgency & Effective Denials of Injunctions - Final Decisions PLLC
The Fifth Circuit split over whether a party could appeal from the district court’s delay in deciding a preliminary-injunction motion.
011
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 06/05/2025
This month's roundup features claims and theories for Rule 54(b), plus appealing TROs, denials of litigation privileges, denials of church-autonomy defenses, and more. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/the-month-in...
finaldecisions.org
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: April 2025 - Final Decisions PLLC
Claims and theories for Rule 54(b), plus appealing TROs, denials of litigation privileges, denials of church-autonomy defenses, and more.
010
Reposted by Bryan Lammon
nicolebporter.bsky.social @nicolebporter.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
Finished my first year of teaching at William & Mary Law School. The 3L class does this really cool thing where they give hand-written thank you cards to every faculty member. Although I did not have a ton of 3Ls in my classes this year, I am continually impressed by their intelligence and diligence
081
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 18/04/2025
The Third Circuit split over the meaning of "claims" for purposes of Rule 54(b), with the dissent arguing that distinct elements means distinct claims. But the majority has it right, as there's a difference between claims and theories of relief. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/claims-theor...
finaldecisions.org
Claims & Theories in Rule 54(b) Appeals - Final Decisions PLLC
The Third Circuit split over the meaning of "claims" for purposes of Rule 54(b), with the dissent arguing that distinct elements means distinct claims.
041
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 16/04/2025
Really interesting 3d Cir. split over what counts as a "claim" under Rule 54(b). The majority said the district court resolved a distinct theory of recovery but not a claim. The dissent argued that post-Twiqbal we define claims by their elements. www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/241...
Screenshot of a court opinion with highlighted text:

That is because their warranty counts are an alternative theory of recovery to their fraud counts rather than separate “claims” for purposes of Rule 54(b). So the District Court’s Rule 54(b) judgment as to the fraud counts did not finally resolve a “claim.”Screenshot of a court opinion with highlighted text:

Those decisions did more than articulate plausibility as the standard for evaluating the sufficiency of allegations – they also structured the inquiry around the elements needed to prove a claim....

Applying that principle here, the fraud-based counts in the amended complaint do not have the same elements as the breach-of-warranty counts in that pleading.
110
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 14/04/2025
The Eleventh Circuit addressed the immediate appealability of Florida’s absolute and qualified litigation privileges. Absolute was appealable. Qualified was not. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/appealing-fl...
finaldecisions.org
Appealing Florida’s Litigation Privileges - Final Decisions PLLC
The Eleventh Circuit addressed the immediate appealability of Florida’s absolute and qualified litigation privileges
000
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 04/04/2025
New appellate-jurisdiction roundup, featuring the TRO v. preliminary injunction debate, Brady issues in qualified-immunity appeals, pendent appellate jurisdiction without appellate jurisdiction, and more. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/the-month-in...
finaldecisions.org
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: March 2025 - Final Decisions PLLC
Distinguishing TROs and preliminary injunctions, Brady issues in qualified-immunity appeal, pendent appellate jurisdiction without appellate jurisdiction, and more.
010
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 26/03/2025
Some blog catchup: The Second Circuit appeared to exercise pendent appellate jurisdiction over a plaintiff's cross appeal even though it dismissed the defendants' qualified-immunity appeal for a lack of jurisdiction. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/pendent-appe...
finaldecisions.org
Pendent Appellate Jurisdiction Without a Valid Appeal? - Final Decisions PLLC
The Second Circuit appeared to both dismiss a qualified-immunity appeal for a lack of jurisdiction and exercise pendent appellate jurisdiction over a plaintiff’s cross-appeal.
100
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 10/03/2025
I put together some new data on the frequency of fact-based qualified-immunity appeals and the time it takes to decide them. My findings were almost identical to what I found in 2020: at least 43 fact-based appeals, an average of 431 days to decide. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/the-year-in-...
finaldecisions.org
The Year in Fact-Based Qualified-Immunity Appeals: 2024 - Final Decisions PLLC
Some new data on the frequency of fact-based qualified-immunity appeals and the time it takes to decide them.
000
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 06/03/2025
Yesterday, I filed an amicus brief in Parrish v. United States on the history and continued existence of the cumulative-finality doctrine. Huge thanks to William & Mary Law School's Appellate & Supreme Court Clinic for helping with this brief. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/new-amicus-b...
finaldecisions.org
New Amicus Brief on Cumulative Finality - Final Decisions PLLC
I filed an amicus brief on the history of cumulative finality and how it continues to exist alongside the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
020
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 05/03/2025
My new appellate-jurisdiction roundup features another rejection of pure Bivens appeals, Perlman appeals in the grand-jury context, mandatory stays during remand appeals, and much more. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/the-month-in...
finaldecisions.org
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: February 2025 - Final Decisions PLLC
Another rejection of pure Bivens appeals, Perlman appeals in the grand-jury context, mandatory stays during remand appeals, and more.
010
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 25/02/2025
Some recent 4th Cir. decisions illustrate the various approaches to cases in which the district court did not expressly resolve all claims. #AppellateTwitter finaldecisions.org/overlooked-e...
finaldecisions.org
Overlooked & Effectively Resolved Claims in the Fourth Circuit - Final Decisions PLLC
Some recent Fourth Circuit cases illustrate the various approaches to cases in which the district court did not expressly resolve all claims.
121
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 12/02/2025
A divided Fourth Circuit held that a court must stay proceedings—and not process a remand order—if the defendant appeals before the district court can send the remand order to the state court. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/mandatory-st...
finaldecisions.org
Mandatory Stays & Remand Appeals - Final Decisions PLLC
A divided Fourth Circuit held that a court must stay proceedings—and not process a remand order—if the defendant appeals before the district court can send the remand order to the state court.
120
Reposted by Bryan Lammon
Luke Norris @lukenorris.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
If you’re working on civil procedure projects, boy do we have a workshop for you! The tenth (!) annual Civil Procedure Workshop will be held at Richmond on June 2-3rd. Check out the link below and submit your abstract by March 3rd.
law.richmond.edu
10th Annual Civil Procedure Workshop - School of Law - University of Richmond
0114
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 10/02/2025
The 2d Cir. held that a grand jury target could take a Perlman appeal from an order directed to the target's attorneys, even after the Supreme Court's decision in Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/perlman-appe...
finaldecisions.org
Perlman Appeals in the Grand Jury Context - Final Decisions PLLC
The Second Circuit held that the target of a grand jury investigation could appeal a subpoena directed to the target's lawyers.
000
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 07/02/2025
The 5th Cir. said that a government entity could appeal the denial of sovereign immunity without moving to dismiss/for summary judgment on immunity grounds. That's not how this should work—you need a denial of immunity for appellate jurisdiction. #AppellateSky www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/unp...
Screenshot of a court opinion with highlighted text:

The DPS appealed, arguing that the district court should have granted summary judgment on Count 6 because of its sovereign immunity. See P.R. Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139, 141 (1993) (recognizing that an order denying sovereign immunity is an appealable collateral order).Screenshot of a court opinion with highlighted text:

It did not, however, raise that defense in its motion to dismiss or its motion for summary judgment. And it does not appear that the district court ever ruled on it. But the Supreme Court “has said that the Eleventh Amendment bar may be asserted for the first time on appeal.” Wis. Dep’t of Corr. v. Schacht, 524 U.S. 381, 393–94 (1998) (Kennedy, J., concurring) (citing, e.g.,
010
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 04/02/2025
The 11th Cir. became the fifth court of appeals to reject pure Bivens appeals. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/one-more-rej...
finaldecisions.org
One More Rejection of Pure Bivens Appeals - Final Decisions PLLC
The Eleventh Circuit became the fifth court of appeals to reject pure Bivens appeals.
177
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 04/02/2025
The government is now 0-5 when it comes to taking pure Bivens appeals via the collateral-order doctrine. #AppellateSky media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub...
Screen shot of a court opinion. The body of the opinion reads:

Patience is a virtue. At least, that’s the message Title 28, United States Code, Section 1291, conveys. Section 1291 gives us jurisdiction over district courts’ “final decisions.” In contrast, we ordinarily lack jurisdiction over district courts’ decisions that don’t end the litigation—meaning litigants must wait for a final judgment before they can appeal. But a judge-made rule called the “collateral-order doctrine” offers a limited exception to this final-decision rule. The collateral-order doctrine extends § 1291’s jurisdictional grant to interlocutory appeals of “a small class of collateral rulings that, although they do not end the litigation, are appropriately deemed ‘final.’” Mohawk Indus., Inc. v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100, 106 (2009) (cleaned up). This case requires us to determine whether to expand the collateral-order doctrine to permit an im- mediate appeal when a district court recognizes a cause of action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), outside the context of addressing a qualified-immunity claim.

Screenshot of an opinion, the relevant part of which reads:

We join all four other circuits that have considered this question in declining to move the fenceposts of the collateral-order doctrine. The doctrine is a minimal exception to the general rule that only final judgments are appealable. It covers only orders that threaten important interests that become moot if an appeal is not interlocutory. But orders recognizing Bivens claims, unlike orders denying immunity from those claims, do not fall into this class. So we dismiss this interlocutory appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
1132
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 03/02/2025
The latest appellate-jurisdiction roundup has something for (almost) everyone (who is interested in appellate jurisdiction), including a decertified §1292(b) appeal, what "appellate standing" really means, qualified-immunity appeals, and more. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/the-month-in...
finaldecisions.org
The Month in Federal Appellate Jurisdiction: January 2025 - Final Decisions PLLC
Last month produced decisions involving a variety of appellate-jurisdiction issues, including § 1292(b), appellate standing, qualified immunity, and more.
010
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 24/01/2025
A new cert petition asks if the denial of derivative sovereign immunity is immediately appealable via the collateral-order doctrine. #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/new-cert-pet...
finaldecisions.org
New Cert Petition on Derivative Sovereign Immunity Appeals - Final Decisions PLLC
A new cert petition asks whether the denial of derivative sovereign immunity is immediately appealable via the collateral-order doctrine.
000
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 23/01/2025
The Supreme Court will address whether a would-be appellant must file a second notice of appeal after a court treats the first notice as a motion to reopen the time to appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6). #AppellateSky finaldecisions.org/cert-grant-o...
finaldecisions.org
Cert Grant on Post-Reopening Notices of Appeal - Final Decisions PLLC
The Supreme Court will address whether a would-be appellant must file a second notice of appeal after a court treats the first notice as a motion to reopen the time to appeal under Federal Rule of App...
010
Bryan Lammon @finaldecisions.org · 18/01/2025
This 9thCir. decision has a lot of jurisdiction in it (appellate and otherwise). But the rule regarding notices of appeal and would-be intervenors is particularly interesting, generally requiring appeals before intervention is granted. #AppellateSky cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/me...
Screenshot of the linked court opinion with highlighted text:

Prospective intervenors are subject to the same 60-day time limit as parties, even while their motions to intervene are pending. A motion to intervene alone is not construed as a motion to extend the deadline.Screenshot of the linked opinion with highlighted text:

AEC did not move to extend the time to appeal under Rule 4, but did file a notice appealing the Phase One order on April 16, 2020, within 60 days of the Phase One order but before its motion to intervene was denied on July 24, 2020.Screenshot of the linked opinion with highlighted text:

Chesapeake, for its part, did not file a motion to extend the time for filing an appeal and filed a notice of appeal on May 29, 2020, outside of the 60-day window.... As Evans made clear, notices of appeal filed after the 60-day deadline, where the parties have taken no action to extend the deadline, are untimely.
010