iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Also, the trailers right before Primetime started were, in order, The Social Reckoning / Artificial/ You Can See Everything. We're living in a certain moment!!

1260

I did watch the show, but it is very much about that and this moment in history in really scathing ways

110

"I can work with that." 🤌🤌🤌🤌

020

So much Blue Velvet and Twin Peaks in this. And the visual palette's often tapelike look, with maxed out tone, mushy darks, and bleeding colors is the right kind of nostalgia; that is, toxic and corrosive. I also want the McMansion Hell long read on the architecture and design of the homes.

2280

I cannot fathom the perspective of anyone who thinks the movie is endorsing/redemptive of Chris Hansen and the entire To Catch A Predator enterprise OR overly sympathetic to the subjects of the program. The movie is focused on the different ways people justify their pursuit of fame, wealth, & power

4310

Flan @flanknits.bsky.social · 7h

Absolute sicko shit from everyone but Pattinson, Wever, and Oppenheim in particular. The abyss isn't just staring back, it's coming to your living room at 9 pm/8 Central. Oppenheim's assaultive collage of the news and pop culture of the time is perfect. You see how this looks, right? (complimentary)

A five-star Letterboxd review of PRIMETIME, reading:

If Merritt Wever told me to "stick to the sucking and being sucked" I would simply do what she says.

4521

Reposted by Daniel Suitor

The City of Minneapolis appears to have replaced nearly all the stop signs in my neighborhood with brand new signs in the last two weeks.

5186

Daniel Suitor @danielsuitor.com · 8h

Pablo F. v. Blanche, No. 26-CV-3889, 2026 WL 2874903 drive.google.com/file/d/1L5FN...

0582

Daniel Suitor @danielsuitor.com · 8h

Will is 100% right. Has happened to multiple clients of mine. One judge (not my case) has said that this isn't really release and ordered the person *actually* released. But it's forcing us habeas attorneys to win our cases twice (or more)

On September 9, 2026, Respondents permitted Pablo F. to exit the building where
he was detained, but he was immediately swarmed by four ICE officers and handcuffed as
soon as he stepped outside. (Doc. No. 25-3 at 4:48:45–4:49:26.)3
The officers drove him
to the back of the Whipple building and returned him to a holding cell. (Doc. No. 21 ¶¶ 8–
9; Doc. No. 25 ¶ 5.) During this encounter, officers dislocated Pablo F.’s shoulder. (Doc.
No. 21 ¶ 7.)4
Pablo F. now bringsthis Motion seeking to enforce the Court’s Order granting
the Petition.

Again, Respondents make no attempt whatsoever to support their assertion that
Pablo F. was released. Absent any such argument, the Court cannot agree that a reasonable
person would have felt free to leave when exiting the detention facility and immediately
being stopped by ICE officers. Likewise, absent some argument, the Court necessarily
concludes that Pablo F. was subject to restraints not shared by the public generally when
he took one step outside of the detention facility and was immediately stopped by ICE
officers who forcibly returned him to a detention cell. Because Respondents do not make
any legal argument that Pablo F. was ever meaningfully released from custody, the Court
grants the motion and orders Pablo F.’s release.6
6 To be clear, Pablo F. is not arguing, and the Court is not concluding, that an order of
release in a habeas matter renders unlawful any future arrests. Rather, the Court reaches
the narrow conclusion that because Respondents advance no legal argument in this case to
support their assertion that Pablo F. was released from custody, and because the
uncontested facts show that ICE officers immediately swarmed Pablo F. as soon as he
stepped out of the building, Pablo F. was not released from custody.

14599188

Daniel Suitor @danielsuitor.com · 15h

just one person's story, but an extra $2,100 a year sucks

3120

never apologize man, marriage is sick

010

I knew who the star of the show was 🙏

250

gotta use it as bulletin board material. "can you believe a guy who'd been up until 3am working the night before and was distracted by his kid didn't recognize the DFL-endorsed auditor candidate until he was walking away? only gonna make us knock more"

080

Paul Reubens' estate is being auctioned off and I really do think I need to own Pee-wee's copy of Antichrist

A group of eleven Blu-rays and DVDs from the Criterion Collection, still sealed, including:

-The 2011 DVD release of Todd Solondz' Life During Wartime (2009), in which Reubens plays “Andy."

-The 2011 Blu-ray release of Ken Loach's Kes (1969)

-The 2010 Blu-ray release of Lars Von Trier's Antichrist (2009)

-The 2010 Blu-ray release of Charles Laughton's Night of the Hunter (1955)

-The 2010 Blu-ray release of Fritz Lang's M (1931)

-The 2001 DVD release of Jaques Tati's M. Hulot's Holiday (1953)

-The 2001 DVD release of Bruce Robinson's Withnail and I (1987)

-The 2003 DVD release of Leonard Kastle's The Honeymoon Killers (1970)

-The 2004 DVD release of Laurence Olivier's Richad III (1955)

-The 2004 DVD release of Gillo Pontecorvo's The Battle of Algiers (1966)

-The 2008 DVD release of Eclipse Series 9: The Delirious Fictions of William Klein, which contains Who Are You, Polly Maggoo? (1966), Mr. Freedom (1969), and The Model Couple (1977)

Together with an unsealed copy of the 1999 Criterion DVD release of Marcel Camus' Black Orpheus (1959).

Overall: 7.75 x 5.5 x 8.25 in; 19.68 x 13.97 x 20.96 cm

Provenance: From the Estate of Paul Reubens

5735

Henry and I went to Powderhorn Park after school today and I saw a doorknock forming up. The only person I recognized was Larry so I swung through and said hey, and it was only after walking away did I go "I think that was Zack Filipovich." So it definitely looks like I bigtimed Zack for Larry lol

1100

this is all very funny for me, someone who has ridden the bus with one of you and accidentally texted the other's wife (no metaphor only literal)

180

as recently as March 2025, apparently.

Liberal Claim Trump’s Causing a Constitutional Crisis Ignores a Key Reality
Authorby John Yoo, Robert Delahunty
DateMarch 17, 2025
PublisherFox News

1121

can't find anything lately, but as of January 2021 he was alive and STILL COAUTHORING BULLSHIT with John Yoo www.aei.org/commentary/t...

1101

the OTHER torture memo guy taught at the local catholic law school for almost two decades and only retired during COVID

Robert Delahunty
Professor Emeritus

Education
Harvard Law School, Juris doctor
Oriel College, BA
Columbia University, BA
Resume or CV
Curriculum Vitae

MEMORANDUM FOR WILLIAM J. HAYNES n
GENERAL COUNSEL, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
FROM: John Yoo
Robal J. Delahtmty
- 'Special Counsel
and to g Taliban
You have asked for our Offce's views cooceming the erect of international a—ties and
fedaal laws on the treatment of individuals detained by the U.S. Amed Forces during the
conflict in Afghanistan In particular. you have asked wheüxer the laws of conflict apply
to the conditions Of detention and the proc«lures for rial of mcmbas Of Qada and the
militia. We conclude that. these. treaties do not protect manbct•s
organization, which as a non-Statc actor cannot bc a party to thc international avecmcats
go vcming war. We futtba conclude that that thuc treatis not apply to thc militia.
This manorandum cxpreSSCS DO view as to wheth< President should dccidc. a matt< Of
plicy. that the U.S. Forces should adhere to the standards of conduct in those trades
with respect to the treatment Of prisoners.

3211

10 years as a partner at Hogan is multigenerational wealth. And his wife was a whiteshoe law firm partner as well.

150

In many ways I very much agree with you, but that private practice was in the vaunted appellate practice at the firm now known as Hogan Lovells, one of the very most elite appellate practices in the country. He argued 18 Supreme Court cases for money. That is very much enough to set you for life.

130

It turns out my Form I-205 case is going to be reported. It's a little thing that probably happens to respectable attorneys all the time, but most of the work I've done in my career never gets close to Westlaw or the official reporters. I do feel proud of the little imprint I left on the law

Inti C.-L. v. Blanche
United States District Court, D. Minnesota. June 9, 2026 --- F.Supp.3d ----2026 WL 2474390 (Approx. 4 pages)

1310

Brat Summer is over it's Crooked Vizier Fall

020

Bill Childs @billchilds.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

Apropos of John Roberts feeling sad that he might be faced with the consequences of his actions, it's important to remember that he is a vain creature with an incredible preoccupation on his own legacy who really wants to be respected above all else. A shift may come www.nytimes.com/2026/10/01/u...

For a long time, the chief justice’s life here was a story of potluck dinners and easy friendships, according to a summer of interviews with more than two dozen residents. Neighbors reveled in his position but kept exchanges with him about it brief or light. At a long-ago annual summer party, he used to participate in touch football, then call dinner to order by proclaiming: “Oyez, oyez, oyez, the lobsters are ready.”

But in recent years, as the Supreme Court has reshaped American life and handed more power to President Trump, a very personal form of anger has been rising here at the chief justice, transforming his getaways.

His summer retreats, long a well-known fact, are now a source of debate. Neighbors have taken to the water to protest him. Calling themselves “kayak-tivists,” they form flotillas facing his island home, holding waterproof signs conveying their disappointment. A local newspaper columnist recommended that people in town give him the finger.

But the protesters did encounter another member of his household. After an August 2025 protest, Ms. Shaw Glaser and other demonstrators were standing near the Port Clyde dock when a young woman approached them with a serious look on her face. She asked them: What did they hope to accomplish? Had they considered how their actions affected the chief justice’s wife and children?

Only then did she identify herself. She said she was Josephine Roberts, the chief’s daughter, then 25, according to Ms. Shaw Glaser, who wrote about it in her journal. Another protester also wrote about the scene in a message to a friend afterward.

Her father wasn’t even home, Ms. Roberts told them. He respected that she had her own left-leaning political views, she said, according to the protesters’ written accounts. And he was a wonderful father, she added.

Longtime neighbors and friends said the chief justice drew back. With rising violent threats against public officials, including a 2022 attempt on Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s life, security has been tightened. The chief justice took walks and briefly dropped in on a concert this summer, but his detail stayed close around him. On Sundays after church, he used to hang out on the dock. Now, with the protesters, he stayed away all day.

The shift has been “hard to watch,” said Tamara Cody, the owner of Port Clyde Kayaks and a longtime friend of the chief justice’s.

The chief justice and his wife did attend cigar club gatherings, friends said, but some former members said in interviews that they sent their own regrets, in part because they were not interested in socializing with the Robertses.

4638

Reposted by Daniel Suitor

Include A Link To The PDF Of The Report You’re Covering Challenge

4588

you both are having a very thoughtful and nuanced and true conversation, but my crude hypothesis is that this whole thing is all YouTuber culture which is a wretched writhing mass of eldritch horror not meant to behold by people with good hearts

140

although, in my defense, my stance on that comes from my service in the Minneapolis Rent Control Wars circa 2021 - 2023, and from years of being told by the landlord lobbyists that every single marginal tenants rights measure, no matter how small, would be the sole cause of skyrocketing rent

010

unfortunately, I have contributed to this discourse in a confrontational way so many times over the years, and I'm glad Tony actually did what I always hoped someone smarter than me would do

130

It is extremely weird to have played a very small and minor role in how the murder of Renee Good was revealed to the world. Even if that hadn't happened, I would be extremely invested in seeing justice done against the ghouls who turned a militarized federal police force against my neighbors.

0581

It's too bad society can't be trusted with a SkellySpotter app that allows people to mark the locations and variant characteristics of giant skeletons, for viewing purposes

110

Complaints have limited legal value outside their case, but the one suing for the murder of Renee Good is an important cultural document. It tracks a grand opera of horror and hate that culminated in the death of a woman at the hands of her government. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

CASE 0:26-cv-04231-LMP-DJF Doc. 1 Filed 10/01/26 Page 1 of 149
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
BRENT GANGER, as Trustee for the Next of
Kin of RENEE NICOLE MACKLIN GOOD,
Deceased, and REBECCA GOOD,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JONATHAN ROSS, individually; STEPHEN
MILLER, individually; KRISTI NOEM,
individually; COREY R. LEWANDOWSKI,
individually; THOMAS D. HOMAN,
individually; TODD LYONS, individually;
GREGORY BOVINO, individually; and JOHN
DOE FEDERAL AGENTS 1–10, individually,
Defendants.
Case No. ________________
COMPLAINT
INTRODUCTION
1.
On the morning of January 7, 2026, Renee Nicole Macklin Good (“Renee”),
a thirty-seven-year-old United States citizen, poet, and mother of three, dropped her six
year-old son off at school, drove home through her own south Minneapolis neighborhood,
and stopped her car in the middle of Portland Avenue. Federal immigration agents were
operating there. They were masked, as was their practice throughout Operation Metro
Surge. Renee honked her horn to warn her neighbors. Her partner got out and began to
film. Renee stayed behind the wheel. She was not the target of any investigation, and she
was breaking no law that any federal officer had authority to enforce. Numerous vehicles,

316756

I am not trying to be rude to any one person, but it is ridiculous to report on a lawsuit and to not provide the actual complaint or even a case number!!!!! Luckily, it's already up on CourtListener storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

October 1, 2026 at 8:29 AM
Paul Walsh
Renee Good's family files two lawsuits

The family of Renee Good, the Minneapolis woman who was fatally shot by a federal immigration enforcement agent near her home in January, filed two federal lawsuits Thursday alleging wrongful death, among other contentions.

The suits names as defendants Jonathan Ross, the agent who killed Good as she sat in her SUV on Portland Avenue, numerous other federal agents and various current and former Trump administration officials.

“Renee’s death was not an accident,” read a news release from Chicago-based Romanucci & Blandin, the law firm representing Good’s family members. “It was the predictable result of a coordinated campaign by senior officials in this administration to target Minnesotans of Somali or Hispanic origin and silence anyone who dared to raise their voice in protest.

“Operation Metro Surge was built on exaggerated fraud accusations that the White House embraced as a pretext for thousands of masked, unidentified federal agents to rove neighborhoods and stop people based on how they looked. Administration officials told agents to force confrontations with observers like Renee and led agents to believe they would face no consequences for using force.”

Paul Walsh
This is what the lawsuit alleges

The suit’s allegations include the actions of ICE agent Jonathan Ross and Renee Good in the moments leading up to and including the shooting:

Good was unarmed, was suspected of no crime, and was not the subject of any law enforcement investigation.
Her stopped vehicle had not prevented traffic (including Ross’s own vehicle) from proceeding.
She had spoken to Ross moments earlier in calm and conciliatory terms.
She had turned her wheels away from Ross and was driving slowly away from him and the other agents.
Ross had moved his legs and body out of the vehicle’s path, and was out of its path, before he fired and then leaned toward the vehicle to improve his shooting position.
No person was in the path of the vehicle, and the second and third shots, including the fatal shot to Good’s left temple, were fired through the open driver’s side window from the side of the vehicle as it moved away.

69022

reply deadline day in this case filed the brief with a minute to spare what's up Always Be Suing ICE

Me walking through an empty campus at 1am

11109

well, see you guys in February.

1110

What are the Council Members supposed to do? They can't recall the Mayor, that's for the citizens. They have zero legal authority over the City Attorney's Office. I'm not trying to make them out to be helpless, but I don't know what levers they really have.

000

The kind of law firms that defend sexual harassment cases against employers are the kind of firms that do union-busting. I hate it too, but there aren't a lot of pro-worker firms that defend employers when works sue them for this kind of conduct.

050

I am glad that, after the closed door meeting, some Council Members have been transparent with the public, explaining the legal landscape and their reasoning. And it is still possible outside counsel could make a decision not to defend and indemnify if it finds "malfeasance" occurred. But a high bar

To constitute malfeasance or nonfeasance the conduct must be such as affects the performance of official duties rather than conduct which affects the official's personal character as a private individual. State ex rel. Martin v. Burnquist, 141 Minn. 308, 170 N.W. 201, 609. Although affecting the performance of official duties, the conduct ‘must relate to something of a substantial nature directly affecting the rights and interests of the public.’ State ex rel. Kinsella v. Eberhart, 116 Minn. 313, 321, 133 N.W. 856, 860, 39 L.R.A.,N.S., 788.
4
That which constitutes malfeasance in an official capacity is not susceptible of an exact definition. It ‘has reference to evil conduct or an illegal deed, the doing of that which one ought not to do, the performance of an act by an officer in his official capacity that is wholly illegal and wrongful.‘ 43 Am.Jur., Public Officers, s 195.1
5
With respect to nonfeasance it is the ‘neglect or refusal, without sufficient excuse, to do that which is the officer's legal dut to do.‘ 43 Am.Jur., Public Officers, s 196. We see no elements of nonfeasance in the present case.

0121