ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 13/10/2026en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accusat... de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projekt... Sachen, über die man Bescheid wissen sollte, wenn man sich mit diesen Milieus (leider) auseinandersetzen muss :)en.wikipedia.orgAccusation in a mirror - Wikipedia 000
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 11/10/2026oh, i see now, yeah 👍 im too used to people being very confrontational online haha 110
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 11/10/2026I'm sorry, I don't quite follow, what is the relevance of this in context of my response? 100
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 11/10/2026consciousness isn't rigidly defined; arbitrarily defining some baselines that you can agree on is necessary to even have a meaningful discussion about it. if you just go 'nuh uh, i dont agree with that definition of consciousness', i mean, sure, you can do that, but we'll just go in circles forever 100
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticJames Medlock @jdcmedlock.bsky.social · 09/10/2026I'm taking my "Norway's wealth tax didn't reduce tax revenue" victory lap. 181614365
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 11/10/2026what'd be the difference to how LLMs already work? if they are conscious under these assumptions, they'd be conscious right now as well. I dont think the particular substrate matters 000
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 11/10/2026this whole debate is moot since consciousness is not a clearly defined term, neither claim can be falsified 1130
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 10/10/2026What is the problem with this argument? 1100
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticripley is spooky 👻 @ripleyisgood.bsky.social · 08/10/2026both of those dystopias offered more free will than these dipshit want 077911
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticAlejandra Caraballo @esqueer.net · 05/10/2026I was thinking about the Anthropic, SpaceX, and OpenAI IPOs. What this might be a harbinger of is the end of public markets as a mechanism for growing wealth. Wealth inequality is so extreme that VCs, PE funds, and wealth investors no longer need a public market for growth, just exit liquidity. 917631
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticDie Krautreporter @krautreporter.bsky.social · 05/10/2026Fakt: OpenAI brach unwissentlich in fremde Server ein, weil sie ihr eigenes Produkt nicht verstehen. Fiktion: Die KI verselbständigt sich. Was hier wirklich passierte, sagt mehr über die KI-Firmen aus, als über KI-Systeme. krautreporter.de/internet-und...krautreporter.deDie seltsamen Warnungen der KI-Bosse, verständlich erklärtDie großen KI-Geschäftsführer rufen dazu auf, KI besser zu überwachen. Aber sie sind es, die die Forschung überhaupt vorantreiben. Ich beantworte die wichtigsten Fragen zu diesem Widerspruch. 082
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticceej @ceej.online · 04/10/2026“how do we win back trump voters in 2026” we don’t. we create an environment where admitting to voting for trump is so socially embarrassing as to render them completely inert. you don’t “win back” trump voters. you demoralize them into staying home. you make it a dunce cap 152108622345
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 05/10/2026its the unfortunately common fallacy of 'Bad people used tool X to do bad things' and concluding that the bad part weren't the bad people wanting and doing bad things, it was tool X. But if you actually followed that logic through to the end, one wouldn't be able to do literally anything anymore 000
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 05/10/2026for a two party FPTP system id agree, in a multiparty system it is more complicated. 000
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 05/10/2026sentiment more or less correct i think, but too generalized. you only need around 10% or so of the electorate to be too dumb and/or evil and/or irresponsible to reliably swing the election into the wrong territory every time. IRL probs more than 10% but i also doubt its an actual majority 110
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticMarc Raschke @marcraschke.bsky.social · 01/10/2026Beim Deutschlandticket sind „hohe Energiekosten“ der Grund, weshalb es teurer wird. Beim Tankrabatt sind „hohe Energiekosten“ der Grund, warum Benzin „billiger“ wird. Und die CDU wundert sich, warum sie bei Wahlen abschmiert und bald keine Rolle mehr spielen wird? 502358632
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticChristian Stöcker @christianstoecker.de · 29/09/2026Der #Strandkorb und der #Wal haben viel gemeinsam. Beide zeigen, dass sozialmediale Aufmerksamkeitsmechanismen mit echter Relevanz wenig zu tun haben. Und dass traditionelle Massenmedien das Spiel einfach mitspielen, was alles noch schlimmer macht. Folge: Eskalierende Irrelevanz. 27838200
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 30/09/2026Der talentierteste Amtsinhaber in der USA momentan. Jede progressive Kraft sollte ganz genau hinschauen und daraus lernen. 080
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticMario Sixtus @sixtus.net · 27/09/2026Dass Krach im Wahlkampf lautsprecherte, mit ihm werde es *gar keine* Vergeselschaftungen von Immobilien geben macht klar: Er verteidigt hier nicht etwa private Immobilienbesitzer, sondern allein das Kapital, das viel Freude an den seit langem steigenden Wohnungsmieten gefunden hat. SeeheimerPD. 832066
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 27/09/2026But also yes, the fact that using theatrical breaks to appear like you are in deep thought and talking in big words alone about what are seen as 'smart people topics' is enough to convince people of your mental prowess is scary. Evidence that many seem to factor style over substance, unfortunately 050
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 27/09/2026I think the internet may be another factor in this. Your thoughts seem more well put-together as depersonalized text on screens that you were able to think about more than 10 seconds than speaking in person. Not a coincidence pseudointellectuals embarass themselves often in actual debate 280
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 25/09/2026ive heard about this. as usual with that particular sort of crowd, its a completely useless idea and nothing more than a waste of resources at no gain, based on a fundamental childlike misunderstanding of the base premise that will probably not happen anyway 000
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 23/09/2026What about an LLM being run locally on a MacBook, then 010
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 21/09/2026Die rechte Welle in Ostdeutschland ist natürlich alarmierend. Aber ich fände bspw. ein Ergebnis von zwischen 15-20% bei der AfD in NRW 2027 eine deutlich bedrohlichere Nummer, und diese Zahlen sind realistisch. Wenn man bei der BTW punkten will, muss man sich effizient fokussieren. 000
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 21/09/2026Ohne jetzt genaue Fraktionen zu nennen, aber ich würde es aus einer politisch strategischen Perspektive z.B. für sehr fragwürdig halten, wenn man jetzt anhand dieser LTW-Ergebnisse versuchen würde, seine Messaging-Strategie in bestimmte Richtungen anzupassen. 100
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 21/09/2026Ich will nicht sagen, dass die Ergebnisse kein Weckruf darstellen sollen, aber ich finde es ebenso wichtig, diese nun mal in Perspektive zu stellen. Zu viel wird auf die Prozentsätze geschaut; zu wenig auf die absoluten Zahlen. 100
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 21/09/2026Es gibt ca. 60 Millionen Wahlberechtigte in DE. Die Wahlbeteiligung bei der letzten BTW war um die 80%, also haben ca. 48 Millionen gewählt. In den ostdeutschen LTW dieses Jahr haben nach heutigem Stand ca. 1,3 Millionen Menschen die AfD gewählt. Das wären also bei einer BTW ca. dann 2,7% 100
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 20/09/2026How do you know our brains aren't actually graviton-based soul furnaces? Proving a negative is not rhetorically sound with these kind of questions. It takes an equal amount of unfounded confidence to claim human brains work just like LLMs. The only reasonable position atm is 'We don't know' 271
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticAnne Applebaum @anneapplebaum.wsocial.eu · 14/09/2026Your regular reminder: If the Russians stop fighting, the war ends. If the Ukrainians stop fighting, their land will be occupied, their leaders will be killed, their history and language will be erased, their children will be kidnapped to serve Russia. 5943728413398
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticReuters @reuters.com · 01/09/2026Scientists make potential breakthrough in search for dark matter reut.rs/4zOzPS5reut.rsScientists make potential breakthrough in search for dark matterScientists have made a possible breakthrough in the hunt for dark matter — observing hints of it during an experiment about a mile (1.6 km) underground in South Dakota — though they stopped short of saying they have finally detected this elusive cosmic component. 02012
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticryan cooper @ryanlcooper.com · 29/08/2026USAID was a free space for tankie and tankie adjacent dingbats to score edgy contrarian points by wildly exaggerating how imperialist it was, confident in the belief that it wouldn’t just disappear, except now it has and everyone is uncomfortably looking elsewhere 392546390
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticChristian Stöcker @christianstoecker.de · 27/08/2026Der kleine gelbe Kringel ganz rechts ist die „Renaissance der Atomkraft“, die „alle außer uns“ angeblich gerade betreiben. Das sind übrigens Strommengen (zusätzliche Terawattstunden), keine Leistung (Terawatt). Das Grüne und das Blaue ist das, was angeblich keiner außer uns baut. 512007843
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 26/08/2026erneuerbare retten mal wieder die weltwirtschaft ohne dafür dank zu kriegen 010
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 20/08/2026It's endlessly frustrating seeing the development of what should be a revolutionary new milestone kneecapped and made ineffective because of a focus on an exceedingly difficult and more importantly utterly irrelevant and unnecessary capability 000
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 20/08/2026A 100-ton-to-LEO fully reusable vehicle that launches once every two weeks is already setting a new paradigm. If you build 7 of those you can launch every two days, which probably already exceeds any real demand that would exist for launch services, even SpaceX's own ambitions (data centers are BS) 100
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 20/08/2026The (probably Musk-borne) obsession with RTLS and 'rapid reusability' (when you could have far better results and probably economy too with just a fleet of 'standard time reusable' starships) completely kneecaps the whole concept of Starship, when it could easily be a revolutionary launch vehicle. 100
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 15/08/2026'Aber die Story, dass Verbrenner immer und zu aller Zeit eine untaugliche Lösung gewesen wären, ist halt einfach dumm.' Gut also, das diese Story nirgends im Beitrag zu finden ist. 030
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticPeter Jelinek @peterjelinek.eurosky.social · 15/08/2026Wie dieser Clip in weniger als 2 Minuten die Mär der "Technologieoffenheit" vom Tisch räumt und aufzeigt, was der Verbrenner wirklich ist: haushoch dem E-Auto unterlegen. Genial! 8732301471
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 06/08/2026There's nothing worse than a good point made badly, as they say. 010
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticMatt Colville? @mattcolville.bsky.social · 06/08/2026The video game version of "movies that are produced, not written." Games that are produced, not designed. www.productionalchemist.com/p/inever-see...productionalchemist.comI Have Never Seen a Game Fail Because the Artists Were Too SlowAI is optimising the cheapest part of production 112621
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 05/08/2026Could you elaborate? Genuinely curious 000
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticCarlo "Realism, Gedankenfetzen und Rants" Masala @carlomasala1.bsky.social · 01/08/2026Wenn das ein hybrider Angriff gewesen wäre, um Europas Entschlossenheit, Zusammenhalt und Reaktionsfähigkeit zu testen, dann hat Europa den Test nicht bestanden. Das ist auch eine der Lehren der letzten 48 Stunden. 622544743
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticNatascha Strobl @nataschastrobl.bsky.social · 26/07/2026Ignoriert man das, dann schenkt man die nächste Generation von Buben ab 10, 11, 12 her, die in diese Communities kommen, anstatt das zu verhindern. Zu glauben, dass das zufällig und willkürlich passiert und es kein Muster gibt ist nicht hilfreich. 754829
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 26/07/2026Not that this isn't correct and an important point, but I'm pretty sure even without this factored in for fossils and AND you factor in grid upgrades into the price of renewables (which is already deliberately disfavoring them unfairly), wind and solar are STILL cheaper than fossils, no? 110
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 25/07/2026musks firmen tendieren dazu zwischen 0 bis 1 gutes produkt rauszubringen (tesla model s/3, falcon 9), und damit dann die nächsten 10 jahre investorgelder anzuschaffen, während die firmen selbst eigentlich nur stagnieren 100
ontologically axiomatic @correctimus.bsky.social · 25/07/2026Shouldve constructed more DSN redundancy years ago, it was way overdue. Something like this happening at some point was predictable. This is super unfortunate. Hopefully everyone is safe and operations can resume as soon as possible again. 000
Reposted by ontologically axiomaticJan Rosenow @janrosenow.bsky.social · 07/07/202610/ And one more thing. I find it somewhat ironic that some of the same people who told us heat pumps don't work now demand we all install heat pumps in the form of air conditioning. Because that is what an air conditioner is: a heat pump running in one direction. 1017317
