Reposted by Andrea
Minnesota, you have an opportunity to select an extraordinary person and public servant as your next U.S. senator. Please take it!
Andrea
@bethecricket.bsky.social
2.2K followers 1.1K following 1K posts
Democrat, mom, LGBTQ+ parent/ally, forever with Hillary and Kamala, I stand with Ukraine. No lists, please.
![By “avoid[ing] the clear error standard of review for factual findings,” Op.
86 (Paez, J., dissenting), the panel legally erred and issued a decision
that conflicts with numerous decisions of this Court, the Supreme Court,
and other courts of appeals, see Fed. R. App. P. 40(b)(2)(A)-(C).
In addition, the panel’s decision implicates questions concerning
the separation of powers that are of exceptional importance. See Fed. R.
App. P. 40(b)(2)(D). If allowed to stand, the panel’s decision will
significantly limit judicial review of administrative subpoenas issued to
harass and intimidate those associated with causes disfavored by the
President, rendering meaningless the statutory restraints imposed by
Congress to limit agencies’ investigative power.
This Court should grant rehearing en banc to resolve the conflicts
created by the panel’s decision and to address the important questions
raised by these proceedings.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreiafit23lnpbvz7axgmfkaeafufjpf6v3r3wl7jrclphjhkfwgk2xa)
