Sign in

Angelika Feldmann

@angelikafeldmann.bsky.social
97 followers 103 following 15 posts

Group Leader @DKFZ, Heidelberg, passionate about gene regulation and its timing

PostsRepliesMedia
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
Thank you, Pradeepa! Would be great to hear your feedback!
000
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
Thank you, Max, hope you’re doing well!
010
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
Thanks, @chribue.bsky.social !
000
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
6\ This study was spearheaded by the wonderfully talented PhD student Valeriia Smialkovska @smialkovska.bsky.social in close collaboration with the equally talented postdoc Ann-Kristin Reimann (nee Dicke) @akdicke.bsky.social. We would be excited to hear any input and further suggestions.
130
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
5\ Why does it matter? Failure to disrupt interactions is associated with a stronger transcriptional downregulation of the associated genes, suggesting that not only developmental gain, but also loss of interactions is important for transcriptional activity.
150
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
4\ Our results remind us of previous studies, where cohesin constantly disrupts interactions in ESCs (Rhodes et al., 2020) or cancer cells (Rao et al., 2017). Now we show that cohesin’s disruptive role is also required for genome reorganization in dynamic systems.
130
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
3\ What is so special about these sites? They are highly rewired early in differentiation, gaining many new interactions in a cohesin-dependent manner. This suggests that cohesin may indirectly promote interaction loss by guiding interaction anchors towards alternative sites.
130
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
2\ At first, we searched for sequence-specific factors, but instead found that, surprisingly, a subset of interaction loss is regulated by cohesin, usually a loop-promoting factor. This affects large, particularly strongly interacting polycomb domains that are highly occupied by DNA-binding factors.
130
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
1\ We know a bit about how 3D chromatin interactions are formed, but what do we know about how they are disrupted? We asked this question in our latest preprint: doi.org/10.64898/202..., focusing on the massive loss of promoter interactions during neuronal differentiation.
doi.org
Developmentally programmed loss of long-range Polycomb interactions is regulated by cohesin
Distal regulatory elements (DREs), such as enhancers, can regulate genes across megabase-long distances, presumably via coming into close spatial proximity. The establishment of new transcriptional programmes during cell type transitions is associated with widespread rewiring of the spatial organisation of the genome, including gain and loss of chromatin interactions. Extensive effort has been invested into understanding how chromatin interactions are formed during development, yet the mechanisms underlying their developmental loss remain largely unclear. By leveraging chromatin accessibility-assisted footprinting, acute protein degradation and chromatin conformation capture, we show that loss of promoter interactions cannot be explained by reduced binding of sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs). Instead, we identify a subset of interactions that depend on cohesin for programmed developmental disruption. These sites are characterized by high Polycomb enrichment and TF occupancy and engage in strong long-range interactions that undergo extensive differentiation-dependent rewiring. Preventing interaction loss by acute cohesin degradation results in the preferential downregulation of associated genes. Together, these results suggest that cohesin indirectly regulates developmental loss of Polycomb interactions by enabling the acquisition of other potentially regulatory contacts in a process that may shape transcriptional programs during cell type transitions. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. European Research Council Helmholtz Society, VH-NG-1604
24824
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 09/05/2026
Thank you very much, Dirk!
000
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Great to see this wonderful work out! Congratulations!
000
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Thanks, Emilia! I hope things are good in Oxford..
000
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Thank you, Maxim. Hope you’re well!
010
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 05/05/2026
Honored and grateful to be receiving this generous prize from the family of Hella Bühler and @uniheidelberg.bsky.social. Big thanks to my lab and colleagues @dkfz.bsky.social, esp. to our directly involved collaborators: @niopeklab.bsky.social, @banitolab.bsky.social, and Frank Westermann.
2170
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 01/04/2026
Congrats, such great news!
010
Reposted by Angelika Feldmann
mathiaseder.bsky.social @mathiaseder.bsky.social · 23/03/2026
🔥 How does CTCF shape enhancer–promoter communication? In our new preprint, we systematically test how the position and orientation of CTCF binding sites (CBSs) influence gene regulation at the mouse Sox2 locus. 🧪 full paper can be found here: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
biorxiv.org
12712