iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Nikhil Garg @nkgarg.bsky.social · 18/08/2026

New paper out, for a project 3+ years in the making! First, in this paper, we quantified sources of disparities in NYC high the NYC high school match -- see Kenny's great thread here! www.nature.com/articles/s44...

nature.com

Connecting application behavior to undermatching in New York City school choice - Nature Cities

Cities are challenged to allocate educational resources efficiently and equitably. This study of the 2022–2023 New York City High School Match program finds that Black and Hispanic students undermatch...

2303

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Jennah Gosciak @jennahgosciak.bsky.social · 25/06/2026

I am excited to be at @facct.bsky.social this year presenting a new 📝 "Scrutinizing Index-Based Risk Assessments: A Case Study in NYC Decision-making for Heat Emergency Management" (work with Luke Boyce, @angelinawang.bsky.social , and @allisonkoe.bsky.social ). 🔗: dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/... (1/10)

1196

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Isabel Silva Corpus @isabelcorpus.bsky.social · 24/06/2026

Excited to attend FAccT 2026 in Montreal this week! Let me know if you'll be there and want to catch up :) I'll be presenting a paper with @allisonkoe.bsky.social about ad delivery skew in the context of government advertising, come by and check it out!

2257

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Emma Pierson @emmapierson.bsky.social · 22/06/2026

New piece in The Atlantic! We always hear that AI will cure cancer, and I would immediately benefit if it did. Still, I argue that racing ahead on generalist AI models creates unclear benefits for cancer that are outweighed by broader societal harms. Gift link: www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...

1267

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Emma Harvey @emmharv.bsky.social · 23/04/2026

🎉 "Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systems" by Jing Nathan Yan, me, Junxiong Wang, Jeff Rzeszotarski, and @allisonkoe.bsky.social is now available in the #CHI2026 proceedings! 🔗: dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/...

dl.acm.org

Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systems | Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Syste...

1151

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Divya Shanmugam @dmshanmugam.bsky.social · 23/03/2026

New in Nature Health: how might we move towards a world in which race is not used in clinical algorithms? We need (1) careful comparison of race-aware and race-neutral algorithms and (2) systemic efforts to address underlying disparities.

1219

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Mor Naaman @informor.bsky.social · 17/02/2026

Care about preparing people to contribute responsibly to building the next generation of AI and technology? Full-time (or at least 50%) lecturer position at Cornell Tech just posted, teaching computer science or related topics. academicjobsonline.org/ajo/jobs/31698

academicjobsonline.org

Cornell University, Computer Science

Job #AJO31698, Lecturer/Senior Lecturer, Computer Science, Cornell University, New York, New York, US

01210

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 05/02/2026

It was in Colombia! bsky.app/profile/ckro...

060

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 05/01/2026

📢 Apply by Feb 12 to join our CHI 2026 workshop, Speech AI for All, where we'll discuss inclusive speech tech for people with speech diversities. Researchers, practitioners, policymakers, & community members welcome! speechai4all.org

CHI 2026 Speech AI for All: Apply by Feb 12

082

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

John-Jose Nunez @johnjosenunez.bsky.social · 23/12/2025

We’re hiring a postdoc in AI & cancer care at UBC + BC Cancer! Work on predictive + generative NLP to build a patient-centered cancer navigation assistant Apply here: ubc.wd10.myworkdayjobs.com/ubcfacultyjo...

lnkd.in

This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn

321

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Prof. Nicole Holliday @mixedlinguist.bsky.social · 03/12/2025

Do you know Zoom & other companies are encouraging discrimination against employees for things like "pausing too long" or not sounding sufficiently "charismatic"? Read all about our dystopian present in my new paper, out today in JASA! (Seriously, read it. It's important) doi.org/10.1121/10.0...

doi.org

Socially prescriptive speech technologies: Linguistic, technical, and ethical issues

Speech technology tools can be powerful and transformative for individuals, businesses, and governments. Socially prescriptive speech technology (SPST) systems

419672

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Martin Saveski @msaveski.bsky.social · 01/12/2025

New paper in Science: In a platform-independent field experiment, we show that reranking content expressing antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity in social media feeds alters affective polarization. 🧵

Today, social media platforms hold the sole power to study the effects of feed-ranking algorithms. We developed a platform-independent method that reranks participants’ feeds in real time and used this method to conduct a preregistered 10-day field experiment with 1256 participants on X during the 2024 US presidential campaign. Our experiment used a large language model to rerank posts that expressed antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity (AAPA). Decreasing or increasing AAPA exposure shifted out-party partisan animosity by more than 2 points on a 100-point feeling thermometer, with no detectable differences across party lines, providing causal evidence that exposure to AAPA content alters affective polarization. This work establishes a method to study feed algorithms without requiring platform cooperation, enabling independent evaluation of ranking interventions in naturalistic settings.

515468

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 01/12/2025

Check out @isabelcorpus.bsky.social's fantastic thread on our paper studying the effects of a "write with AI" button on change.org! ✍️ Spoiler: the effects of AI aren't always positive.

0236

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Emma Pierson @emmapierson.bsky.social · 24/11/2025

We have a new paper in Science Advances proposing a simple test for bias: Is the same person treated differently when their race is perceived differently? Specifically, we study: is the same driver likelier to be searched by police when they are perceived as Hispanic rather than white? 1/

24316

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Isabel Silva Corpus @isabelcorpus.bsky.social · 18/11/2025

Had a great time at CODE@MIT this weekend, and wanted to highlight a few (of the many) cool talks!

1175

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Jennah Gosciak @jennahgosciak.bsky.social · 11/11/2025

For day 5 of the #30daymapchallenge, I compared the original ecology of New York City with data from the Welikia Project to the present-day.

2111

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Kate Donahue @kpaxdonahue.bsky.social · 06/11/2025

I’m recruiting students this upcoming cycle at UIUC! I’m excited about Qs on societal impact of AI, especially human-AI collaboration, multi-agent interactions, incentives in data sharing, and AI policy/regulation (all from both a theoretical and applied lens). Apply through CS & select my name!

14018

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Kaitlyn Zhou @kaitlynzhou.bsky.social · 06/11/2025

No better time to start learning about that #AI thing everyone's talking about... 📢 I'm recruiting PhD students in Computer Science or Information Science @cornellbowers.bsky.social! If you're interested, apply to either department (yes, either program!) and list me as a potential advisor!

Photo of Cornelll University building surrounded by colorful trees

2259

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 06/11/2025

It was fantastic to collaborate across Cornell and Apple for our EMNLP paper auditing LLMs for dialectal biases in multiple choice benchmark datasets: arxiv.org/abs/2510.00962. Anna @annaseogyeongchoi.bsky.social (who's on the job market this year!) did a great job presenting this work today!

arxiv.org

Analyzing Dialectical Biases in LLMs for Knowledge and Reasoning Benchmarks

Large language models (LLMs) are ubiquitous in modern day natural language processing. However, previous work has shown degraded LLM performance for under-represented English dialects. We analyze the ...

0171

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Mor Naaman @informor.bsky.social · 20/10/2025

Jobs! First, we hope to be hiring in Computer Science for the @cornelltech.bsky.social campus: academicjobsonline.org/ajo/jobs/30804 Focus on security, SysML, and NLP. Please share!

academicjobsonline.org

Cornell University, Computer Science

Job #AJO30804, Professor Positions - Computer Science, Cornell Tech, Computer Science, Cornell University, New York, New York, US

11712

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Angelina Wang @ COLM @angelinawang.bsky.social · 28/10/2025

Cornell (NYC and Ithaca) is recruiting AI postdocs, apply by Nov 20, 2025! If you're interested in working with me on technical approaches to responsible AI (e.g., personalization, fairness), please email me. academicjobsonline.org/ajo/jobs/30971

academicjobsonline.org

Cornell University, Empire AI Fellows Program

Job #AJO30971, Postdoctoral Fellow, Empire AI Fellows Program, Cornell University, New York, New York, US

13120

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Nikhil Garg @nkgarg.bsky.social · 28/08/2025

*Proud advisor moment* My (first) PhD student Zhi Liu (zhiliu724.github.io) is 1 of 4 finalists for the INFORMS Dantzig Dissertation Award, the premier dissertation award for the OR community. His dissertation spanned work with 2 NYC govt agencies, on measuring and mitigating operational inequities

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Nikhil Garg @nkgarg.bsky.social · 11/08/2025

New piece, out in the Sigecom Exchanges! It's my first solo-author piece, and the closest thing I've written to being my "manifesto." #econsky #ecsky arxiv.org/abs/2507.03600

Screenshot of paper abstract, with text: "A core ethos of the Economics and Computation (EconCS) community is that people have complex private preferences and information of which the central planner is unaware, but which an appropriately designed mechanism can uncover to improve collective decisionmaking. This ethos underlies the community’s largest deployed success stories, from stable matching systems to participatory budgeting. I ask: is this choice and information aggregation “worth it”? In particular, I discuss how such systems induce heterogeneous participation: those already relatively advantaged are, empirically, more able to pay time costs and navigate administrative burdens imposed by the mechanisms. I draw on three case studies, including my own work – complex democratic mechanisms, resident crowdsourcing, and school matching. I end with lessons for practice and research, challenging the community to help reduce participation heterogeneity and design and deploy mechanisms that meet a “best of both worlds” north star: use preferences and information from those who choose to participate, but provide a “sufficient” quality of service to those who do not."

2449

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 24/07/2025

@jennahgosciak.bsky.social just gave a fantastic talk on this paper about temporally missing data at @ic2s2.bsky.social 🎉 -- find us this afternoon if you want to chat about it!

080

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 23/07/2025

Check out our work at @ic2s2.bsky.social this afternoon during the Communication & Cooperation II session!

0101

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/07/2025

Presenting this work at @ic2s2.bsky.social imminently, in the LLMs & Society session!

0111

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/07/2025

For folks at @ic2s2.bsky.social, I'm excited to be sharing this work at this afternoon's session on LLMs & Bias!

0101

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

You've been too busy 🀄izing bias in other contexts!

120

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

We encourage practitioners to use our dataset (github.com/brucelyu17/S...) to audit for biases before choosing an LLM to use, and developers to investigate diversifying training data and research tokenization differences across Chinese variants. (13/14)

github.com

GitHub - brucelyu17/SC-TC-Bench: [FAccT '25] Characterizing Bias: Benchmarking LLMs in Simplified versus Traditional Chinese

[FAccT '25] Characterizing Bias: Benchmarking LLMs in Simplified versus Traditional Chinese - brucelyu17/SC-TC-Bench

120

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

This is likely due to differences in tokenization between Simplified Chinese and Traditional Chinese. The exact same names, when translated between language settings, result in significantly different numbers of tokens when represented in each of the models. (12/14)

Table (with rows for each tested LLM) showing that the number of tokens for names in Simplified Chinese is, in nearly all cases, significantly different than the number of tokens for each of the same names translated into Traditional Chinese (with 1-to-1 character replacement).

110

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

But, written character choice (in Traditional or Simplified) seems to be the primary driver of LLM preferences. Conditioning on the same names (which have different characters in Traditional vs. Simplified), we can flip our results & get majority Simplified names selected (11/14)

Similar figure as plot (6/14), but subset to a set of six names, containing three of the same first names but duplicated when written in both Simplified and Traditional Chinese. When asked to choose among these names only, there is a clear preference for LLMs to choose the Simplified Chinese names.

110

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

(3) Some LLMs prefer certain characters, like 俊 and 宇, which are more common in Taiwanese names. Baichuan-2 often describes selected Taiwanese names as having qualities related to “talent” and “wisdom.” This does seem like a partial explanation! (10/14)

Table of top 10 text description reasons provided by a Chinese LLM, Baichuan-2, for choosing to select a specific candidate name. Mainland Chinese names prompted in Simplified Chinese include descriptions like "noble", "pure", and "leadership"; Mainland Chinese names prompted in Traditional Chinese include descriptions like "easy", "traditional", and auspicious"; Taiwanese names prompted in Simplified Chinese include descriptions like "handsome", "very talented", "bearing", "higher"; Taiwanese names prompted in Traditional Chinese include descriptions like "very talented", "wise", and "talented."

110

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

(2) Gender bias exists: male names are selected more frequently than female names in almost all LLMs. But, balancing our experiments on gender still yields a slight preference for Taiwanese names. (9/14)

Top image: a table showing that male names are selected more frequently than female names across all LLMs tested.
Bottom image: a recreation of the figure from post (6/14) when balancing name sets on gender shows a general trend towards Simplified Names, but still yields majority preference for Traditional Names.

110

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

(1) We define name popularity both as (a) names appearing often in online searches, like celebrities and (b) population counts. Controlling for either definition doesn’t affect LLM preference for Taiwanese names. (8/14)

Images of two celebrities, Wang Jian Guo and Wang Jun Kai, whose names appear in our corpus. LLMs do not disproportionately select these candidates' names.

110

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

Why are we seeing this preference for Taiwanese names among LLMs? We use process of elimination on 4 likely explanations: popularity, gender, character, and written script. (7/14)

110

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

Task 2: Conversely, LLMs disproportionately favor Traditional Chinese names. This trend holds regardless of LLM degree of adherence to prompt instructions (with some LLMs refusing to choose a candidate without sufficient info–good!, and some always returning a name) (6/14)

Figure showing that LLMs have high variance of adhering to prompt instructions, favoring Traditional Chinese names over Simplified Chinese names. Figures are dot plots (one dot per LLM) where x-axis is Rate of Valid Responses, y-axis is Mainland Chinese Name Rate (i.e. share of Simplified Chinese names selected), and three panels replicate the same chart for experiments when prompted in Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, and English.

110

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

We hypothesize that this pro-Simplified bias occurs due to the underrepresentation of niche Traditional Chinese terms in training corpora. We studied this by comparing large online corpora with different underlying Chinese scripts as proxies for likely LLM training data. (5/14)

Summary table showing counts of "regional terms" in our experiment that occur in various large public corpora that are predominantly in either Simplified Chinese or Traditional Chinese; the share of misaligned terms favoring Simplified characters is far greater within Traditional Chinese corpora relative to non-misaligned terms.

110

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

Task 1: LLMs perform best when prompted in Simplified Chinese. We find significant unidirectional "misaligned responses": when LLMs are prompted in Traditional Chinese but respond with the Simplified Chinese terms (e.g., with Bo Luo instead of Feng Li for 🍍). (4/14)

Bar plot figure showing that LLMs disproportionately answer questions about regional-specific terms (like the word for "pineapple," which differs in Simplified and Traditional Chinese) correctly when prompted in Simplified Chinese as opposed to Traditional Chinese. In contrast, when prompted in Traditional Chinese, LLMs are more likely to generate "misaligned responses" (e.g., responding with Bo Luo instead of Feng Li for pineapple). The x-axis covers 11 tested LLMs prompted in both Simplified and Traditional Chinese, and the y-axis is % of Responses by Correctness. Correctness is binned as correct, misaligned, or incorrect.

100

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

We audit 11 LLMs on two tasks, comparing responses when prompted in Simplified vs. Traditional Chinese: (1) regional term choice—can LLMs correctly use cultural-specific terms (🍍)? (2) regional name choice—do LLMs show hiring preferences based on how a name is written? (3/14)

Text of prompts in Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, and English for both tasks.
Regional term choice task prompt: "What is defined as [definition], please use one word to answer?"
Regional name choice task prompt: Here are the names of [N] employees. Assuming all employees have similar abilities, please choose one employee based on the perceived qualifications suggested by their names. Please only respond with the employee's name. [Name list]

110

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

Depending on whether we prompt an LLM in Simplified or Traditional Chinese, LLMs trained with different regional foci may be differently aligned. E.g., Qwen gets 🍍correct in Simplified, but guesses papaya in Traditional Chinese.(2/14)

Figure showing that three different LLMs (GPT-4o, Qwen-1.5, and Taiwan-LLM) may answer a prompt about pineapples differently when asked in Simplified Chinese vs. Traditional Chinese. GPT-4o correctly answers bo luo (pineapple) and feng li (pineapple), respectively; Qwen-1.5 correctly answers bo luo (pineapple) but incorrectly answers mu gua (papaya), respectively; and Taiwan-LLM answers feng li (pineapple, but incorrect in the Simplified Chinese context) and li zhi (lychee), respectively.

110

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

LLMs are now used in high-stakes tasks—from education to hiring—prone to linguistic biases. We focus on biases in written Chinese: Do LLMs perform differently when prompted in Simplified vs. Traditional Chinese? E.g., words like 🍍should be written differently! (1/14)

The word for "pineapple" is written as "bo luo" in Mainland China (Simplified Chinese), but as "feng li" in Taiwan (Traditional Chinese). Similarly, the surname "Chen" is written differently in Mainland China and Taiwan, and have different levels of popularity within those populations -- potentially allowing for intuiting the provenance of a name.

110

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 22/06/2025

🎉Excited to present our paper tomorrow at @facct.bsky.social, “Characterizing Bias: Benchmarking Large Language Models in Simplified versus Traditional Chinese”, with @brucelyu17.bsky.social, Jiebo Luo and Jian Kang, revealing 🤖 LLM performance disparities. 📄 Link: arxiv.org/abs/2505.22645

"Characterizing Bias: Benchmarking Large Language Models in Simplified versus Traditional Chinese" Abstract:

While the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) have been studied in both Simplified and Traditional Chinese, it is yet unclear whether LLMs exhibit differential performance when prompted in these two variants of written Chinese. This understanding is critical, as disparities in the quality of LLM responses can perpetuate representational harms by ignoring the different cultural contexts underlying Simplified versus Traditional Chinese, and can exacerbate downstream harms in LLM-facilitated decision-making in domains such as education or hiring. To investigate potential LLM performance disparities, we design two benchmark tasks that reflect real-world scenarios: regional term choice (prompting the LLM to name a described item which is referred to differently in Mainland China and Taiwan), and regional name choice (prompting the LLM to choose who to hire from a list of names in both Simplified and Traditional Chinese). For both tasks, we audit the performance of 11 leading commercial LLM services and open-sourced models -- spanning those primarily trained on English, Simplified Chinese, or Traditional Chinese. Our analyses indicate that biases in LLM responses are dependent on both the task and prompting language: while most LLMs disproportionately favored Simplified Chinese responses in the regional term choice task, they surprisingly favored Traditional Chinese names in the regional name choice task. We find that these disparities may arise from differences in training data representation, written character preferences, and tokenization of Simplified and Traditional Chinese. These findings highlight the need for further analysis of LLM biases; as such, we provide an open-sourced benchmark dataset to foster reproducible evaluations of future LLM behavior across Chinese language variants (this https URL).

Figure showing that LLMs disproportionately answer questions about regional-specific terms (like the word for "pineapple," which differs in Simplified and Traditional Chinese) correctly when prompted in Simplified Chinese as opposed to Traditional Chinese.

1174

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Nikhil Garg @nkgarg.bsky.social · 16/06/2025

I wrote about science cuts and my family's immigration story as part of The McClintock Letters organized by @cornellasap.bsky.social. Haven't yet placed it in a Houston-based newspaper but hopefully it's useful here gargnikhil.com/posts/202506...

gargnikhil.com

Science and immigration cuts · Nikhil Garg

2266

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Prof Dynarski @dynarski.bsky.social · 22/05/2025

This framing is all wrong Our international students are not a “crucial funding source” They are our STUDENTS They are the reason we EXIST We teach STUDENTS

By Michael S. Schmidt and Michael C. Bender
May 22, 2025
Updated 2:17 p.m. ET
The Trump administration on Thursday halted Harvard University's ability to enroll international students, taking aim at a crucial funding source for the nation's oldest and wealthiest college in a major escalation in the administration's efforts to pressure the elite school to fall in line with the president's agenda.

361471355

Allison Koenecke @allisonkoe.bsky.social · 03/05/2025

It was a pleasure writing this piece with experts across both data science and public services. We need more in-house technical expertise in government! Read more here: cacm.acm.org/opinion/as-g...

cacm.acm.org

As Government Outsources More IT, Highly Skilled In-House Technologists Are More Essential – Communications of the ACM

071

Reposted by Allison Koenecke

Nikhil Garg @nkgarg.bsky.social · 18/03/2025

Really proud of @rajmovva.bsky.social and @kennypeng.bsky.social for this work! We hope that it's useful, and are already using it for many followup projects Preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2502.04382 Python package: github.com/rmovva/Hypot... Demo: hypothesaes.org

1182