Sign in

Alex Piletska

@alexinlaw.bsky.social
656 followers 153 following 18 posts

Senior associate at Vanessa Ganguin Immigration Law. Contributing author to Free Movement and LexisNexis. Ranked in the Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners. All views are my own.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Jonathan Kingham @jonkingh.bsky.social · 18/03/2026
New immigration fees from 8 April 2026 just out. Most fees going up by 6 or 7%. Settlement (ILR) going up from £3,029 to £3,226 per applicant (so £12,904 for a family of 4). Cost to Home Office of deciding each application: £523 (£2,092 for a family of 4).
41914
Reposted by Alex Piletska
The New York Times @nytimes.com · 18/03/2026
We've got delicious ideas to help celebrate the end of Ramadan. nyti.ms/4rACjhH
Delicious Recipes for Your Eid al-Fitr Feast
0417
Reposted by Alex Piletska
CJ McKinney @cjmckinney.bsky.social · 16/03/2026
TLDR no, but an interesting read.
232
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Colin Yeo @colinyeo.bsky.social · 06/03/2026
Epic analysis of the new immigration rules by @alexinlaw.bsky.social
052
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Colin Yeo @colinyeo.bsky.social · 20/01/2026
Important write up by @alexinlaw.bsky.social of an important Court of Appeal case on children and the immigration rules freemovement.org.uk/important-co...
But this could potentially have enormous implications for children of British or settled parents for as long as the rule lasts. At present, child dependants of Appendix FM partners apply for limited leave, in line with their non-settled parent, and do not settle until they do, which takes five years at a minimum and sometimes longer. However, following this decision, where the British/settled sponsor is the child’s parent, it may be possible to apply for settlement for the child immediately under para 297(i)(f) instead of spending many years and many thousands of pounds on extension applications.

It is also possible for children already in the UK to apply for indefinite leave to remain under para 298, which has an equivalent provision. In circumstances where both parents are in the UK, one of whom is settled or British while the other has limited leave, it is difficult to imagine the Home Office reasonably concluding that the exclusion of their minor child is desirable, if the application is carefully prepared with strong evidence. This is particularly the case if the child is already living with them in the UK, as the disruption of the status quo is one of the factors that would be taken into account as part of the assessment.

This doesn’t just apply to people here in a family route like Appendix FM, either. There is nothing stopping, for example, a family in the UK in the Global Talent route from making this application on behalf of their minor child when the main applicant settles, provided the child is under 18 at the date of application. As the main applicant will usually qualify for indefinite leave to remain after three years, while dependant partners need to complete five years, this may help their children settle earlier.
188
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Chris Bertram @crookedfootball.bsky.social · 10/12/2025
A very useful guide from @alexinlaw.bsky.social at @freemovement.bsky.social
freemovement.org.uk
Briefing: the implications of the “earned settlement” proposals and what they might mean in practice - Free Movement
We’ve now had a few weeks to digest the “earned settlement” policy document, which outlines the proposed changes to the settlement system ahead of the public
043
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Ian Dunt @iandunt.bsky.social · 19/11/2025
It's time we asked a different question about migration: Why are so many British people leaving the UK? inews.co.uk/opinion/immi...
109450119
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Saul Staniforth @saulstaniforth.bsky.social · 17/11/2025
Vote Labour
201366469
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Colin Yeo @colinyeo.bsky.social · 17/11/2025
I'm reading through the white paper or whatever it is. RESTORING ORDER AND CONTROL: A statement on the government’s asylum and returns policy www.gov.uk/government/p...
gov.uk
Asylum and returns policy statement
This policy statement sets out significant reforms to the UK’s asylum and returns policy.
1113797
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Luke Piper @lukepiper.bsky.social · 26/10/2025
A friend and I spent a rainy day looking at this and there are some changes that essentially means that an "exceptional circumstances" test will be applied to those in this situation. Superior analysis here @alexinlaw.bsky.social : freemovement.org.uk/new-suitabil...
freemovement.org.uk
New suitability rules will apply to Appendix FM and other human rights applications - Free Movement
One of the biggest changes introduced by the most recent statement of changes is not so much the replacement of the Part 9 grounds for refusal with a new yet
013
Alex Piletska @alexinlaw.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
Well well well, if it isn’t the Tories doing something right for a change news.sky.com/story/ban-pa...
news.sky.com
Ban passengers playing loud music on public transport, say Tories
The Tories say they would change the law to so that nobody has to "endure somebody else's choice of crap music" while on the move.
130
Alex Piletska @alexinlaw.bsky.social · 15/08/2025
Really fun Tudor fact: Katherine Parr, Henry III’s sixth wife, is named after Catherine of Aragorn, his first wife, because her mother was her lady in waiting. Henry VIII was in the wife business for so long that his last wife was named after his first wife.
041
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Freedom United @freedomunitedhq.bsky.social · 05/07/2025
The UK’s National Referral Mechanism traps migrant workers like Cynthia—who escaped abusive employers—in limbo without the right to work, leaving them vulnerable to re-exploitation. Advocates demand real protections beyond this ineffective “band-aid” system. www.freedomunited.org/news/uk-surv...
freedomunited.org
UK system trapping survivors in “the grey zone” - FreedomUnited.org
Survivors in the UK are being left without the right to work, trapped in a grey zone facing ongoing uncertainty and insecurity.
0115
Reposted by Alex Piletska
The Empty City @davidallengreen.bsky.social · 27/05/2025
NEW Explaining a 31-month sentence for a tweet How a mixture of court process, law and sentencing policy led to the lengthy imprisonment of Lucy Connolly By me Substack: emptycity.substack.com/p/explaining... Personal blog: davidallengreen.com/2025/05/expl...
emptycity.substack.com
Explaining a 31-month sentence for a tweet
How a mixture of court process, law and sentencing policy led to the lengthy imprisonment of Lucy Connolly
21331124
Alex Piletska @alexinlaw.bsky.social · 27/05/2025
Court of Appeal really lays into the EUSS rules for being basically impenetrable in a recent case.
040
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Alasdair Mackenzie @alasdairmackenzie.bsky.social · 16/05/2025
So after months chasing after Reform votes and a major announcement which caused widespread offence and anger among everyone left of Robert Jenrick, a full four per cent of Reform voters now have a favourable impression of Labour, top work from all concerned
2238
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Sonia L @sonial77.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
I am obviously extra conscious of this since Alex's article (freemovement.org.uk/housesitters...) but a health warning on this would be sensible especially given the recent reports of tourists getting banged up on the US border
If your budget is tight, consider the Worldpackers travel and volunteering community. In exchange for a few hours of work, you get free accommodation in hostels, farms, homestays, eco-lodges, NGOs and schools, says Bhattacharya.
161
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Alex Piletska @alexinlaw.bsky.social · 08/03/2025
What a lot of people are missing about Trump’s meeting with Zelensky is that there was a massive language barrier which obviously hindered communication. But if Trump takes some English lessons before their next meeting, it might be more productive.
2133
Alex Piletska @alexinlaw.bsky.social · 08/03/2025
What a lot of people are missing about Trump’s meeting with Zelensky is that there was a massive language barrier which obviously hindered communication. But if Trump takes some English lessons before their next meeting, it might be more productive.
2133
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Free Movement @freemovement.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
In case you missed it: Housesitters and holiday swappers: what are the immigration law implications? | Alex Piletska
buff.ly
Housesitters and holiday swappers: what are the immigration law implications? - Free Movement
Companies like TrustedHousesitters have recently hit the news following a number of incidents whereby some of its international members tried to enter the UK
141
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Chris Bertram @crookedfootball.bsky.social · 24/02/2025
Interesting and very useful piece from @alexinlaw.bsky.social
freemovement.org.uk
Housesitters and holiday swappers: what are the immigration law implications? - Free Movement
Companies like TrustedHousesitters have recently hit the news following a number of incidents whereby some of its international members tried to enter the UK
155
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Colin Yeo @colinyeo.bsky.social · 02/01/2025
Top 10 Free Movement blog posts of 2024 by page views. Some of these were open access already and I’ve removed the lock on the others.
153
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Colin Yeo @colinyeo.bsky.social · 02/01/2025
4. There is no 180 day a year rule for visitors to the UK, @johnvassiliou.bsky.social , last republished 11 July 2023, 90,522 views freemovement.org.uk/there-is-no-...
freemovement.org.uk
There is no 180 day a year rule for visitors to the UK - Free Movement
One of the most common UK immigration myths is that there is a maximum permitted stay of 180 days in a year (or six months in 12 months) for UK visitors.
121
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Colin Yeo @colinyeo.bsky.social · 02/01/2025
5. High Court finds passport office prevented from refusing passport to person who may not actually be British, @alexinlaw.bsky.social, 24 July 2024, 74,536 views freemovement.org.uk/high-court-f...
freemovement.org.uk
High Court finds passport office prevented from refusing passport to person who may not actually be British - Free Movement
In a really interesting case, the High Court has held that issue estoppel prevents His Majesty's Passport Office from refusing to issue a passport to an
121
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Colin Yeo @colinyeo.bsky.social · 02/01/2025
6. “But I don’t know any barristers” – the case for scrapping the referee requirement for citizenship applications, @alexinlaw.bsky.social, 26 November 2024, 66,270 views freemovement.org.uk/but-i-dont-k...
freemovement.org.uk
"But I don’t know any barristers" – the case for scrapping the referee requirement for citizenship applications - Free Movement
Currently, anyone applying for British citizenship has to find two referees to vouch for their identity and confirm they are unaware of any reason why the
111
Alex Piletska @alexinlaw.bsky.social · 11/12/2024
The potential concession is a youth mobility scheme, possibly along the lines of free movement for under 30s but no details have been hashed out yet.
030
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Jon Featonby @jonfeatonby.bsky.social · 05/12/2024
Some positive news! The Home Office are piloting giving newly recogised refugees 56 days before they lose their asylum support instead of the current 28 days. Some concerns about the details, but 28 days isn’t long enough to find somewhere to live & another income www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/home...
standard.co.uk
'Move on' period for refugees doubled to 56 days in victory for the Standard
The Standard has secured a major victory in its A Place to Call Home winter appeal
411034
Alex Piletska @alexinlaw.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
I really want to spread awareness of this ridiculous Home Office requirement that doesn’t get enough coverage in the hopes that it will finally be scrapped (since even the Home Office probably doesn’t want it) so please RT widely!
53316
Reposted by Alex Piletska
CJ McKinney @cjmckinney.bsky.social · 10/10/2023
I was blown away to discover recently that fees for loads of stuff were only introduced in 2003. And the fees that did exist were pretty affordable - 33 quid for a student visa!
032
Reposted by Alex Piletska
Steve Peers @stevepeers.bsky.social · 10/10/2023
Immigration lawyer Alex Piletska @alexinlaw.bsky.social is here!
2166
Alex Piletska @alexinlaw.bsky.social · 10/10/2023
Quoting the new Home Office fees is painful but not as painful as it will be once IHS goes up as well 😬
163