Sign in

Anonymous Scientist

@accursedhats.bsky.social
62 followers 28 following 348 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 10/06/2026
I know you know this @drugmonkey.bsky.social but others may not. This RFI is a joke. If they cared about the putative goals ("maximize scientific productivity and innovation"), they wouldn't have throttled grants or used multi-year funding. They want to kill us; this is just another salvo.
133
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 03/02/2026
She is nothing less than an American hero. her courage and conviction is breathtaking. deep down they know she is right and that is why she is targeted. We support you @jenna-m-norton.bsky.social
020
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 16/01/2026
G Elliot Morris is not serious. Every piece of data always shows how great Dems are doing. In this example party ID exactly where it was in Trump 1. Real progressives are serious about data.
000
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 19/11/2025
The reporting on Larry Summers has totally missed the point. It’s not just about him pal-ing around with Epstein. It’s about his predatory actions against junior Female colleagues and mentees. Notice that he doesn’t even apologize for the despicable sexual harassment he was doing
131
Reposted by Anonymous Scientist
Jenna Norton @jenna-m-norton.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
Is it “radically leftist” to believe that marginalized groups should not be excluded from NIH research? …that throwing away public resources by terminating studies just before they complete? If so, I wear the label proudly. And it is absolutely my job to criticize such policies at work.
28011
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
A true American hero and patriot. Thank you @jenna-m-norton.bsky.social. We see your courage.
000
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 12/09/2025
Director Bhattacharya is a liar. NIH staff oftern send emails to PIs telling them to remove specific words from grants. This is a fact.
000
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 10/09/2025
Some additional framing on the MYF tragedy:
000
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 09/09/2025
Imagine all the discoveries that will not be made. Imagine the young scientists who will leave science, who won't make more discoveries in the future either. We won't even know what we have lost.
000
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 09/09/2025
Ask Kevin Hall about this who was purged when he refused to change his science to align with this administrations ideology. Shameful.
000
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 08/09/2025
Giving clear orders while maintaining plausible deniability is a hallmark feature of mobsters. Which is what Trump and he cronies are fundamentally.
051
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 08/09/2025
I used to think science was like law. A lot of people carefully studying intricacies, making discoveries, applying lessons learned. But this Supreme Court shows that it is just a facade, a conclusion looking for a justification. As though as a scientist invented a finding out of whole cloth.
362
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 05/09/2025
I was thinking more about @azfaust.bsky.social's comments about Memoli. How easy it was for him to slide into $500 million in funding for his pet project... No need for study section for this guy! No need to even write a grant application!
221
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
To build on this point, the house bill does not prohibit OMB’s multiyear funding requirement, as in the senate. This is as important as the topline budget. This requirement is equivalent to a 25-30% NIH cut.
123
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
Jenna is on point here as always
010
Reposted by Anonymous Scientist
skelly @iid.bsky.social · 28/08/2025
It’s crazy that America just like. Destroyed science. Just looked at its golden goose and went “wow should we kill this? And not for the gold, but just because we fucking hate this thing” And if you tell random people about it they go “no, that doesn’t seem true” and just refuse to believe you
11654474
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 18/08/2025
This point is worth highlighting...
000
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 16/08/2025
If MYF gets removed by Congress for FY26, I would hope IC’s try to fund some of these apps in late cycle FY25 that got absolutely screwed.
010
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 15/08/2025
This nugget is new info for me. An important detail as we have now reached “pocket rescissions day” Wouldn’t bet my life on this guarantee though.
000
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 06/08/2025
This 2016 Plos One paper is an incredible trove of NIH grant data. So interesting. journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...
journals.plos.org
How Criterion Scores Predict the Overall Impact Score and Funding Outcomes for National Institutes of Health Peer-Reviewed Applications
Understanding the factors associated with successful funding outcomes of research project grant (R01) applications is critical for the biomedical research community. R01 applications are evaluated thr...
000
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 06/08/2025
This anecdote from an interview 3 months ago tells you everything you need to know about who is running things at NIH. Memoli the complicit yes man. Vought and OMB the puppet masters. Bhattacharya just happy to be there and do podcasts.
020
Reposted by Anonymous Scientist
Don Moynihan @donmoyn.bsky.social · 29/07/2025
What can you do? Contact members of Congress to flag this issue. Focusing on members on the appropriations committee is especially relevant right now. Senate appropriations is doing markup on NIH *this week* donmoynihan.substack.com/p/alert-the-...
Contact your Congressional representatives. It is best to show up in person. Explain and tell them to oppose this forward funding mandate. Share this article if it helps! Tell them to protect NIH funding.

For researchers: Make noise within your institution. Ask your research office what they’re doing to push back. Talk to your program officers. Demand transparency.

Tell your local press that Trump is destroying US medical research, and find local activist groups to reach out to.

There are many engaged citizens across the country affected by cancer, or Alzheimer's, that want more information from scientists to help them advocate to their elected officials and to the press. Offer to talk to them, and help them do that.
36629
Reposted by Anonymous Scientist
Dr. David Miller 🏳️‍🌈 @davidimiller.bsky.social · 30/07/2025
If you've ever *benefitted* from NIH research (big population), CALL YOUR SENATOR now to let them know. ⏰ Tmrw morning, Senate appropriators will mark up NIH's FY26 budget. Personal examples help. My own case: decades of *sustained* investment in NIH-funded cancer research saved my life.
26439
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 30/07/2025
Everyone we must call our senators about the multi year funding plan!!!
001
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 30/07/2025
We shouldn’t be taking victory laps this morning if the multiyear funding policy is still in place. We need to keep up the pressure on Vought and OMB.
020
Reposted by Anonymous Scientist
BWJones @bwjones.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
From the @sltrib.com, @bagleycartoons.bsky.social
A cartoon showing Elon Musk cutting off the head of the golden goose who has laid eggs for science, pharmaceutical drugs, and tech. Elon says “we’re going to save billions in bird feed”.
213754
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
@maxkozlov.bsky.social it is clear you get this, but others seem not to understand yet that the NIH no longer is acting in good faith
001
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
Journalists reporting on the NIH foreign subs prohibition are far too credulous about the justifications for these policies. When will they learn that you cannot take these justifications on good faith?! www.nytimes.com/2025/05/06/h...
nytimes.com
N.I.H. Bars New Funding From U.S. Scientists to Partners Abroad
000
Reposted by Anonymous Scientist
Ferric Fang, MD @fangferric.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
Thank you for confronting him, Jeremy. Thanks to you, Jocelyn Kaiser, and Adam Kucharski, we are already getting a taste of how he will approach his job. Denial, deflection, deception, condescension, hypocrisy-- all coated with a thin veneer of sanctimony.
0344
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
We should take nothing Bhattacharya or Memoli say on good faith. The notice effectively halts foreign collaborations because there is no alternative process in place. There also is no advance warning period for investigators to plan.
000
Reposted by Anonymous Scientist
Jeremy Berg @jeremymberg.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
Facts...
0111
Anonymous Scientist @accursedhats.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
This is the most important line in this entire story. Memoli and Bhattacharya, as terrible as they are, aren't even running things. Let's not pretend they do. This is why NIH releases notices contradicting Bhattacharya's statements just hours after he says them.
130