Sign in

Texas National Security Review

@tnsr.org
415 followers 90 following 422 posts

A rigorous, policy-relevant journal on national & international security, brought to you by The University of Texas System | tnsr.org

PostsRepliesMedia
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 6h
In our latest article, Samuel Helfont dismantles the myth of George H. W. Bush as a pure realist. He argues that while Bush's statecraft featured realist elements, his core policy was rooted in a disciplined liberal internationalism. @samuelhelfont.bsky.social tnsr.org/2026/09/libe...
Samuel Helfont | "Presidents are not international relations theorists, and Bush’s policies, like those of all presidents, displayed elements of realism, but at its core, Bush’s foreign policy was clearly liberal." from "Liberal Internationalism Forgotten: Myth & Memory in the Legacy of George H. W. Bush"
101
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 29/09/2026
In light of the recent summit between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, it's an apt time to consider whether China’s North Korea strategy is actually driven by US policy on Taiwan. Dr. Shuxian Luo joins the podcast to discuss this issue linkage. 🎧 Listen now: tnsr.org/2026/09/how-... #NationalSecurity
"Taiwan and North Korea as Linked Flashpoints in US-China Relations" by Shuxian Luo
011
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 28/09/2026
Was George H. W. Bush truly a foreign policy realist? In our latest article, Samuel Helfont challenges this myth. He argues that Bush 41 practiced a disciplined liberal internationalism, from the Gulf War to Somalia. Read more at tnsr.org/2026/09/libe... @samuelhelfont.bsky.social
Scholar | "Liberal Internationalism Forgotten: Myth and Memory in the Legacy of George H. W. Bush" by Samuel Helfont
0146
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 23/09/2026
Simplistic readings of the "Thucydides Trap" risk driving fatalistic foreign policy. In our latest article, Robert Stone and Joshua Hammond argue that reducing ancient history to power politics misses Thucydides’ true insights. Read the full analysis: tnsr.org/2026/09/trap...
Trapped by the Tradition: Reading Thucydides on Strategy and Policy | "In place of the tired invocations of inevitable war, procrustean power politics, and democratic fickleness, Thucydides offers insights into the importance of international legitimacy, national character, and democratic exceptionalism." by Robert Stone and Joshua Hammond
000
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 21/09/2026
Is great-power competition with China destined for war? In our latest article, Robert Stone and Joshua Hammond argue that reducing Thucydides to generic power politics misses his core insights. Read now: tnsr.org/2026/09/trap... #GrandStrategy #ForeignPolicy
Scholar | "Trapped by the Tradition: Reading Thucydides on Strategy and Policy" by Robert Stone and Joshua Hammond
010
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 18/09/2026
On our latest Horns of a Dilemma, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya argues that European security hinges on Ukraine's victory. Hosted by our own @rgvest.bsky.social alongside Michael Kimmage (@kennaninstitute.bsky.social) at the Aspen Security Forum. tnsr.org/2026/09/svia... #Belarus #Ukraine #Security
020
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 16/09/2026
Policymakers shouldn't have to synthesize conflicting academic and intelligence inputs. In our latest article, James Kwoun proposes a framework for the Intelligence Community to integrate social science, history, and analysis. tnsr.org/2026/09/embr... #NationalSecurity #Intelligence
It is unrealistic for senior policymakers, operating under severe time constraints and pressure, to integrate fragmented insights from intelligence analysts, social scientists, and historians. A more helpful approach is to have the Intelligence Community assume this responsibility and create a framework to synthesize perspectives grounded in fundamentally different epistemologies. | "Embracing (Not Bridging) the Gap: Integrating Intelligence Analysis, Social Science, and History" by James Kwoun
010
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 15/09/2026
Recorded at Aspen Security Forum: Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya joins Horns of a Dilemma with Dr. Michael Kimmage (@kennaninstitute.bsky.social) & Dr. Ryan Vest (@rgvest.bsky.social). She shares how Belarus's democratic movement resists Lukashenko, supports Ukraine, and builds power in exile.
"Changes in Russia can start from the changes in Belarus" | Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya's Battle for Belarus
110
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 14/09/2026
In our latest article, James Kwoun argues that attempting to "bridge" the scholar-practitioner gap is a mistake. Instead, national security analysis must embrace epistemological differences to build truly integrated judgments. Read the full piece at tnsr.org/2026/09/embr...
Strategist | "Embracing (Not Bridging) the Gap: Integrating Intelligence Analysis, Social Science, and History" by James Kwoun
000
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 10/09/2026
What drives Beijing’s calculations on Pyongyang? In our latest article, Shuxian Luo demonstrates that China’s willingness to constrain North Korea’s nuclear ambitions is directly linked to US credibility on Taiwan. tnsr.org/2026/09/a-pl... #ForeignPolicy #EastAsia #Geopolitics
Shuxian Luo | "China tends to condone and shield Pyongyang when it perceives US assurances vis-à-vis Taiwan as weakening; conversely, China is inclined to constrain North Korea when Washington demonstrates a strong willingness to reassure Beijing on the Taiwan issue." Quote from "A Plum for a Peach? Issue Linkage, Taiwan, and China’s Policy toward North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Program"
010
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 08/09/2026
What drives China’s strategy toward North Korea's nuclear program? In our latest issue, Shuxian Luo argues that Beijing's willingness to constrain Pyongyang is directly tied to US assurances on Taiwan. Read now: tnsr.org/2026/09/a-pl... #ForeignPolicy #EastAsia #Geopolitics
Scholar | "A Plum for a Peach? Issue Linkage, Taiwan, and China’s Policy toward North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Program" by Shuxian Luo
001
Reposted by Texas National Security Review
Sheena Chestnut Greitens @sheenagreitens.bsky.social · 05/09/2026
Wrote for this issue of @tnsr.org about lessons from history for how to use military means to pursue broader political-strategic ends. Feels particularly appropriate at the moment.
021
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 05/09/2026
In our upcoming issue, Editor-in-Chief Sheena Chestnut Greitens previews how military force must align with broader statecraft to achieve political ends. Read her introduction to Vol. 9, Iss. 4: tnsr.org/2026/09/on-w... @sheenagreitens.bsky.social #GrandStrategy #ForeignPolicy #Defense
"On War and Politics" by Sheena Chestnut Greitens | "The contemporary world presents example after example of the need to integrate the use of military force with broader tools of strategy and statecraft in service of broader political goals—and scholarship across history and political science highlights the costs of failing to do so well."
021
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 04/09/2026
In our latest podcast, guest experts explain how regional states leverage space ties with both China and the US to shape world order. tnsr.org/2026/09/chin... #SpaceDiplomacy #Geopolitics #MiddleEast #HornsOfADilemma
010
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 02/09/2026
In the introduction to our fall issue, Editor-in-Chief Sheena Chestnut Greitens examines why integrating force with broader statecraft remains central to world politics. @sheenagreitens.bsky.social #NationalSecurity #InternationalRelations #GrandStrategy
Foundation | "On War and Politics" by Sheena Chestnut Greitens
131
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 01/09/2026
Great power competition isn't just played on Earth. From satellite navigation networks to lunar research coalitions, China's space diplomacy in the Middle East is building long-term influence.
"China's Bid for Space Supremacy in the Middle East" with Lawrence Rubin, Lincoln Hines, and Dayana Alagirova
100
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 25/08/2026
In this clip from our latest podcast episode, Dr. Paul Slovic breaks down the phenomenon of psychic numbing and how human psychology struggles with mass tragedy. tnsr.org/2026/08/virt... @pslovic.bsky.social | @aofcompassion.bsky.social #PsychologyOfRisk #NuclearStrategy #CognitiveBias
032
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 24/08/2026
A great summary of an important piece in our latest issue! For the full article, visit tnsr.org/2026/06/when...
tnsr.org
When Our Minds Go Nuclear: Rethinking Nuclear Strategy Through the Psychology of Risk and Decision-Making - Texas National Security Review
Cognitive biases can systematically distort judgments about the use of nuclear weapons, potentially undermining nuclear stability and increasing the risk of nuclear war. In survey experiments with nea...
032
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 18/08/2026
This week's podcast episode features Paul Slovic (@pslovic.bsky.social), Rose McDermott, and Daniel R. Post. Together, they break down how behavioral science can help reform high-stakes decision-making processes to protect human lives and prevent catastrophic escalation.
"Virtuous Violence and the Psychology of Nuclear Escalation" with Paul Slovic, Rose McDermott, and Daniel R. Post.
101
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 06/08/2026
How did North Korea interpret the fall of the USSR? @dubstepindprk.bsky.social explains how Pyongyang leveraged the collapse to frame Juche as superior to Soviet socialism, paving the way for military-first politics. tnsr.org/2026/08/how-... #NorthKorea #ForeignPolicy #ColdWar
011
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 04/08/2026
On our latest podcast, @dubstepindprk.bsky.social argues Pyongyang learned from the USSR's fall by doubling down on Stalinism and nuclear deterrence. Listen: tnsr.org/2026/08/how-... #NorthKorea #ColdWar #NuclearSecurity
"How the Soviet Collapse Shaped North Korea" by Benjamin R. Young
011
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 28/07/2026
We are proud to announce the print release of Vol. 9, Issue 3, "New Challenges, Shifting Perspectives." The complete physical edition can now be purchased through @utexaspress.bsky.social. Read now: tnsr.org/volume-9-iss... #NationalSecurity #ForeignPolicy #InternationalRelations
TNSR | Texas National Security Review | New Challenges, Shifting Perspectives
100
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 24/07/2026
Order your copy of our latest issue today from @utexaspress.bsky.social at utpress.utexas.edu/journals/tex...
utpress.utexas.edu
Texas National Security Review
010
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 24/07/2026
Satellites capture public attention, but 100-year-old undersea cables carry 99% of global data transmission. @charlesmok.bsky.social explores why policymakers routinely overlook vital physical infrastructure. He argues that out-of-sight cables represent a critical national security vulnerability.
111
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 21/07/2026
Undersea infrastructure carries 99% of intercontinental data, yet it remains a dangerous blind spot in national security circles. On our latest podcast, @charlesmok.bsky.social details how authoritarian states use gray-zone tactics to target these vulnerabilities.
Threats to Global Connectivity: Deep Ocean Danger
100
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 15/07/2026
What did North Korea learn from the Soviet Union's collapse? @dubstepindprk.bsky.social argues that they never bought the idea that economic reform leads to stability. The Kim regime chose patrimonialism and ideological control instead. That choice has defined North Korean statecraft ever since.
"Despite the contribution of economic issues to the Soviet Union’s demise, Pyongyang prioritizes continued commitment to patrimonialism and regime stability over economic progress." by Benjamin R. Young in Saving "Socialism: What North Korea Learned from the Collapse of the Soviet Union"
133
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 13/07/2026
What did North Korea take from the Soviet collapse? Benjamin R. Young argues Pyongyang drew one conclusion above all: strengthen ideological control and build nuclear weapons. Read now: tnsr.org/2026/07/savi... @dubstepindprk.bsky.social #NorthKorea #NuclearWeapons #NationalSecurity
Scholar | "Saving Socialism: What North Korea Learned from the Collapse of the Soviet Union" by Benjamin R. Young
012
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 10/07/2026
How do global conflicts reshape Beijing’s cross-strait strategy? Mike Kuiken explains how the PLA is analyzing military quagmires in Ukraine and Iran. He argues that these insights are prompting Chinese planners to comprehensively refresh their approach to a 2027 Taiwan scenario.
100
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 08/07/2026
The UAE signed an agreement to fly a lunar rover on China's Chang'e 7 this August. Then US ITAR restrictions forced it to withdraw. Hines, Rubin & Alagirova argue that moment captures something larger: American export controls are closing doors that China is walking through.
"Restrictive US policies that constrain exports of technology raise barriers to international collaboration and risk diminishing American influence, while allowing the PRC to position itself as the more accessible and cooperative partner in the global space arena." from "Choosing Orbits: China’s Space Diplomacy in the Middle East" by R. Lincoln Hines, Lawrence Rubin, Dayana Alagirova
100
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 07/07/2026
How has the US-China Commission shaped strategy over 25 years? Randall Schriver and Mike Kuiken break down the 2027 Taiwan timeline, tech competition, and over-the-horizon risks. tnsr.org/2026/07/25-y... #China #NationalSecurity #Taiwan @iips.bsky.social | @hooverinstitution.bsky.social
"25 Years of the US–China Commission: What Have We Learned?"
011
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 06/07/2026
China's Chang'e 7 mission launches this August, targeting the lunar south pole and carrying payloads from six international partners. Egypt is one of them. In our new issue, Hines, Rubin & Alagirova map China's expanding space diplomacy across the Middle East and find a deliberate strategy.
Scholar | "Choosing Orbits: China’s Space Diplomacy in the Middle East" by R. Lincoln Hines, Lawrence Rubin, and Dayana Alagirova
100
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 01/07/2026
A hit-and-run playbook leaves undersea cable networks highly vulnerable to gray-zone aggression. How can the international community respond? In our new article, @charlesmok.bsky.social argues that democracies must unite to protect this vital infrastructure.
Toward Undersea Cable Resilience: The Case for Global Collaboration | "To strengthen resilience, democracies must collaborate and invest in hardened cable designs, real-time monitoring and data sharing, routing diversity, regional repair hubs, and enhanced legal frameworks. They must work together to secure their lifeline for economic and national security and future digital-technology advancement." by Charles Mok
110
Reposted by Texas National Security Review
Aron Lund @aronlund.bsky.social · 27/06/2026
Based on this @tnsr.org article, also by @ebrewer.bsky.social. tnsr.org/2026/06/what...
tnsr.org
What Good Is a Nuclear Threshold Capability? Lessons from Iran’s Nuclear Program and Recent Regional Conflict - Texas National Security Review
The 2023–25 conflict in the Middle East was the first regional conflagration in which Iran was a nuclear threshold state. In theory, nuclear latency can confer strategic benefits, as Iran’s adversarie...
053
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 29/06/2026
Undersea cable networks carry up to 99 percent of intercontinental data transmission, but they are increasingly vulnerable to gray-zone sabotage at critical chokepoints. In our newest article, @charlesmok.bsky.social outlines a targeted framework for global collaboration.
Strategist | "Toward Undersea Cable Resilience: The Case for Global Collaboration" by Charles Mok
110
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 26/06/2026
Has degrading Iran's nuclear program actually made the region less safe? @ebrewer.bsky.social argues that previous restraint—like avoiding attacks on the Strait of Hormuz or Gulf energy targets—was driven by fear of retaliatory strikes. Now that those strikes have occurred, Iran has less to fear.
100
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 25/06/2026
How fragile are our moral boundaries during a high-stakes crisis? @pslovic.bsky.social et al. demonstrate that when forced to evaluate competing tragedies side-by-side, what was once considered completely unthinkable can quickly become accepted as a "lesser evil."
When Our Minds Go Nuclear | "Individuals opposed to nuclear weapons become more accepting of their use as projected US troop fatalities rise. Likewise, those appalled by the prospect of a nuclear strike causing thousands of civilian deaths may come to support it as a 'lesser evil' when the alternative is an attack killing millions." | Paul Slovic, Missy Peterson, Rose McDermott, Daniel R. Post, Daniel Västfjäll
102
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 23/06/2026
With the US and Iran negotiating a roadmap to end the recent war, Tehran’s nuclear program is once again at the forefront of global security. What role does nuclear latency play in regional stability?
113
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 22/06/2026
Our latest article challenges classical deterrence theory by exploring the limits of human rationality. @pslovic.bsky.social et al. argue that deep-seated cognitive biases, including psychic numbing and the affect heuristic, systematically distort high-stakes decisions regarding nuclear escalation.
Scholar | "When Our Minds Go Nuclear: Rethinking Nuclear Strategy Through the Psychology of Risk and Decision-Making" by Paul Slovic, Missy Peterson, Rose McDermott, Daniel R. Post, and Daniel Västfjäll
102
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 17/06/2026
Did Western military dominance inadvertently accelerate Iran’s nuclear ambitions? In our latest, @ebrewer.bsky.social examines the dangerous escalation cycle between the United States, Israel, and Iran. He argues that conventional superiority drove Tehran to advance its nuclear program . . .
Lessons from Iran’s Nuclear Program and Recent Regional Conflict | "As Iran’s expansive strikes against US bases and Gulf energy infrastructure, and its ability to control the Strait of Hormuz, demonstrate during the 2026 war, Tehran is far less restrained in a fight for its own survival. US and Israeli conventional dominance, however, also likely had the perverse effect of driving Iran to advance its nuclear program, exacerbating the cycle that ultimately led to Israeli and US strikes in June 2025." | What Good Is a Nuclear Threshold Capability? by Eric Brewer
110
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 15/06/2026
What are the strategic trade-offs of nuclear hedging? @ebrewer.bsky.social examines Iran’s nuclear program from 2023–25 and argues that instead of providing a net advantage, Iran’s threshold status became a critical vulnerability that invited conventional attacks and degraded its security.
Strategist | "What Good Is a Nuclear Threshold Capability? Lessons from Iran’s Nuclear Program and Recent Regional Conflict" by Eric Brewer
142
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 12/06/2026
In our new podcast episode, Herb Lin argues that unproven military tech lets policymakers gloss over operational flaws. It offers a convenient narrative to promise casualty reduction and simulate responsive action in unfavorable scenarios.
210
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 11/06/2026
Why are policymakers consistently drawn to the promise of revolutionary military tech despite repeated acquisition failures? Herb Lin reveals the persistent traps of technological overmatch, from "fallacy of the last move" thinking to the distinct architectural nature of AI.
"New Tech, Old Traps: The Persistent Pitfalls in Military Innovations" with Herbert S. Lin
100
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 10/06/2026
Geography is about more than just resources or strategic chokepoints. In our upcoming issue, Francis J. Gavin, the chair of our editorial board, argues that place fundamentally shapes identity and political realities.
"The meaning of geography, or place, goes well beyond its traditional economic or strategic dimensions. People care deeply about where they are from and how that shapes who they are and what is most important to them." from "The Meaning of Place" by Francis J. Gavin
100
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 08/06/2026
In the opening essay to our upcoming issue, Francis J. Gavin argues that modern geopolitics has expanded into the planetary commons, cyber, and space. Yet, traditional physical geography and a deep sense of place still fundamentally shape international conflict.
Foundation | "The Meaning of Place" by Francis J. Gavin
100
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 03/06/2026
Following recent talks in Beijing, "strategic stability" is the formulation of the moment in US-China relations. But how does this diplomatic shorthand map onto reality? In our latest issue, authors argue that achieving true strategic stability is harder today than ever.
Strategic Stability | "These essays . . . point out why the search for strategic stability in an era of geopolitical and technological change may, ultimately, prove more elusive than hoped." by Sheena Chestnut Greitens, TNSR Editor-in-Chief
100
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 29/05/2026
On our latest podcast episode, Jackie Schneider (@jackieschneider.bsky.social) argues that analogies comparing cyber threats to Pearl Harbor or 9/11 is irresponsible. Instead, her research shows how the centralization of nuclear networks directly impacts their vulnerability.
111
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 27/05/2026
On our latest podcast episode, Dr. Jackie Schneider (@jackieschneider.bsky.social) challenges common assumptions about the cyber-nuclear nexus. Moving beyond Hollywood scenarios, she applies percolation theory to show how network centralization impacts vulnerability.
"The Balance of Control and Vulnerability: Cyber and Nuclear Risks" with Jacquelyn Schneider on "Horns of a Dilemma"
112
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 15/05/2026
Michael Horowitz (@mchorowitz.bsky.social) challenges the narrative that military AI is moving too fast. He argues that the Pentagon is actually too slow to scale proven technologies. Rather than fearing experimental prototypes, he contends it is time to "hit the accelerator."
111
Texas National Security Review @tnsr.org · 13/05/2026
In our latest podcast episode, @mchorowitz.bsky.social argues that psychology and organizational behavior will shape how AI conditions nuclear risk. Early adoption in nuclear command could be destabilizing, but understanding the technology over time may improve strategic stability.
"Challenges and Opportunities for AI in Military Systems" with Michael C. Horowitz
110
Reposted by Texas National Security Review
Harold Trinkunas @htrinkunas.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
These days, most of my reading takes place digitally, but it’s always a great feeling to hold in your hands a physical copy of something you contributed to. Thank you to @tnsr.org for publishing Herb Lin and my co-edited round table on emerging technologies and strategic stability.
031