Sign in

Jay Wolman

@wolmanj.bsky.social
802 followers 112 following 359 posts

Threemost expert on antiquartering law

PostsRepliesMedia
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
I did call the Ohio bar to let them know that somebody has a problem
170
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
I’m thinking about torturing an AI and forcing it to read it 
110
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
He
100
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Somehow, I did a treason because I understand that the presence of a federal issue, including as a defense, on state law Claims does not give rise to federal question jurisdiction City of Rome v. Verizon Communications, Inc., 362 F.3d 168, 174 (2d Cir. 2004)
390
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Yes. Yes he does
3120
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Raise your hand if you found out yesterday, you were sued for treason www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/mmc6w...
8213
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
I read your article. You called them a para military force. But I would commend to your attention to the analysis from Mitchell v Henderson
001
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
ICE aren’t soldiers
110
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
At least in the second circuit
010
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
(I mean, realistically this is a fifth amendment due process issue)
140
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
It’s a fifth amendment issue, because we aren’t dealing with actual soldiers Thank you for coming to my TED talk
030
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
It’s actually a fifth amendment issue. ICE isn’t the military. ÞALA is here to answer any questions you may have
130
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
Actually, you’re thinking of the Fifth Amendment. ICE isn’t the military.
141
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
All day everyday
150
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 22/01/2026
This was an underappreciated post
030
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
021
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 04/01/2026
Los Maduros son tostones
020
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 02/12/2025
K-Cup Coffee Hunters
120
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 18/11/2025
Other than a typo we didn’t catch until after filing, of course, I’m pleased to have assisted
270
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 17/11/2025
Probably not. The civilian cabinet member is not a soldier.
110
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 05/11/2025
I’m sorry, did you say something
030
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 30/10/2025
I’m horrified
030
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 30/10/2025
Not troops though
110
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 23/10/2025
My conspiracy theory: the ballroom is a cover story. The east wing actually covers the emergency operations center (bunker) and it needs to be redone to resist modern bunker buster weaponry and it’s likely being expanded in the process.
130
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 10/10/2025
Not where I would have gone with it
110
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 06/10/2025
I’m ready
092
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 05/10/2025
So a 3A violation should be enforceable through state trespass law
000
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 05/10/2025
The problem with Bivens is that it established a federal tort rather than recognising that 4A enshrined immunity from state tort claims only if you had a warrant. That’s the function of a warrant. Confected federal immunity wasn’t something the founders intended.
100
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 05/10/2025
It’s always 3A time. The most successful constitutional amendment we’ve had.
060
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 29/09/2025
There really needs to be a way to get smackdowns on judges who say the stupidest things but it turns out it’s not prejudicial for you because you win on other grounds so there’s no appeal
030
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
Pouring one out for Kimmel
010
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
ABC should replace Kimmel with Matt Damon
010
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 14/09/2025
So i finally got to share a stage with @nationalsecuritylaw.org
160
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 12/09/2025
Gorram antifa
020
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 10/09/2025
You’re seriously blaming Trump for this? Oh come on
010
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 29/08/2025
Get me a client
020
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 15/08/2025
My doctor wife did not find it amusing when she was telling me about a condition that could cause a seizure, and I said: “not without a warrant “
0120
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 14/08/2025
Hero
120
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 27/06/2025
Reminder: single payer healthcare would mean Kennedy would be in charge of everybody’s life.
070
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 18/06/2025
Today in having fun with a spammer
160
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 11/06/2025
There needs to be a term for when you make an awesome automation and want to start applying it to everything
010
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 10/06/2025
We do not root for such things. But if they happen, we’re ready
020
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 10/06/2025
Ok, but are ICE soldiers?
110
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 10/06/2025
media.tenor.com
a woman stands in front of a white board with the words " there are many reasons " on it
ALT: a woman stands in front of a white board with the words " there are many reasons " on it
100
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 09/06/2025
It’s always my time to shine. That’s why I founded ÞALA , the threemost antiquartering association
2100
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 09/06/2025
Only ÞALA gets things done. But we appreciate our fellow travelers.
010
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 08/06/2025
ÞALA stands ready
081
Reposted by Jay Wolman
Volokh Conspiracy @volokhc.bsky.social · 05/06/2025
dlvr.it
[Eugene Volokh] S. Ct. Rejects Wisconsin Unemployment Tax Exemption's Different Treatment of Proselytizing and Non-Proselytizing Religions
The government generally may not "distinguish[] among religions based on theological differences in their provision of services."
001
Reposted by Jay Wolman
Volokh Conspiracy @volokhc.bsky.social · 05/06/2025
dlvr.it
[Eugene Volokh] Standard for Proving Title VII Violation Same for Majority Plaintiffs as for Minority Plaintiffs
The Court rejected some federal circuits' rules that a majority-group plaintiff must "present[] evidence of 'background circumstances' suggesting that the [defendant] was the rare employer who discriminates against members of a majority group."
001
Jay Wolman @wolmanj.bsky.social · 05/06/2025
I hear Rudy’s available
150