Reposted by VMcClain
Aw Lizzie, thanks so much! ❤️
Here are 5 more women in SFFH well worth celebrating!
@booksbyintisar.bsky.social
@willowtalksbooks.bsky.social
@vmcclain.bsky.social
@nicovincenty.bsky.social
@writerwoodruff.bsky.social
VMcClain
@vmcclain.bsky.social
429 followers 191 following 565 posts
🏳️🌈 Author, lover of books, general outdoor enthusiast, #SPFBO5 finalist, and Supreme Overlord of @quarancon2020. She/her #ADHD bi/pan linktr.ee/vmcclain
![Thus, it is no surprise that, when presented with even
more uncontroverted evidence by the State-Plaintiffs about the
need for an injunction of the current breadth, the District Court
again found that a narrower injunction would leave unremedied
"administrative and financial harms." We therefore decline to
conclude that the District Court has abused its discretion in
fashioning relief. See Philip Morris, Inc. v. Harshbarger, 159
F. 3d 670, 680 (1st Cir. 1998) (explaining that "[als a general
rule, a disappointed litigant cannot surface an objection to a preliminary injunction for the first time in an appellate venue"
because doing so deprives the district court of the opportunity to
"consider [the objection] and correct the injunction if necessary,
without the need for appeal" (quoting Zenon, 711 F.2d at 478)).](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreiezb673t2juz5htmit7dci7dp2cxrtcljxmfqcsymgqqquoolbglq)
